Setup and Manage PBB-based Tunnels with PWE3 Mechanism Ping Pan (Hammerhead Systems) Shane Amante (Level 3) Nasser El-Aawar (Level 3) Chicago, IETF 69.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Experiences with IEEE 802.1ah (Provider Backbone Bridges) Ronald van der Pol SARA Sep 2009NORDUnet meeting, Copenhagen.
Advertisements

MPLS Multiple Topology Support draft-zhao-mpls-ldp-multiple-topology-01 draft-zhao-mpls-rsvp-te-multiple-topology-01 IETF 80 – Prague.
John Hoffmans – Geraldine Calvignac - Raymond Zhang - Nabil Bitar -
Scalable Edge Bridge FDB For Datacenter Networks July-2012.
Internetworking II: MPLS, Security, and Traffic Engineering
All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2006, ##### Scalability of IP/MPLS networks Lieven Levrau 30 th April, 2008 France Telecom, Cisco Systems, uawei Technologies,
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Addressing the Network – IPv4 Network Fundamentals – Chapter 6.
IETF 60 draft-ooms-v6ops-bgp-tunnel-03.txt Connecting IPv6 Islands over IPv4 MPLS using IPv6 Provider Edge Routers (6PE) J. De Clerq, Alcatel D. Ooms S.
IETF 73 November aq Shortest Path Bridging Overview for IETF Don Fedyk Editor 802.1aq.
© 2001, Cisco Systems, Inc. Ethernet over Multiprotocol Label Switching.
802.1aq and 802.1Qbp Support over EVPN draft-allan-l2vpn-spb-evpn-00 Dave Allan, Jeff Tantsura, Don Fedyk, Ali Sajassi.
1 Why Carriers Like Pseudowires… Payload (IP, L2 data, voice) PseudoWires Layer-2 (Ethernet, ATM…) Physical (Optical, Wireless) User Applications Payload.
© UNIVERSITY of NEW HAMPSHIRE INTEROPERABILITY LABORATORY IEEE 802.1ad Provider Bridges Henry He UNH-IOL Bridge Functions Consortium.
Extension to LDP-VPLS for Ethernet Broadcast and Multicast draft-delord-l2vpn-ldp-vpls-broadcast-exten-03 Presenter: Zhihua Liu, China Telecom IETF79,
VPLS Extensions for Provider Backbone Bridging - draft-balus-l2vpn-vpls-802.1ah-01.txt John Hoffmans – KPN Geraldine Calvignac - France Telecom Raymond.
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 IETF 84 – Vancouver August 2012 LSP Ping Support for P2MP PWs (draft-jain-pwe3-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping-00.txt)
IETF68 CCAMP1 GMPLS Control of Ethernet Forwarding Don Fedyk Loa Andersson
1 © 2002, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. draft-nadeau-pwe3-vccv-00.txt IETF #56 San Francisco, CA USA Thomas D. Nadeau Monique.
1 Fabio Mustacchio - IPS-MOME 2005 – Warsaw, March 15th 2005 Overview of RSVP-TE Network Simulator: Design and Implementation D.Adami, C.Callegari, S.Giordano,
EVC Atahar Khan CCIE SP Cisco Systems.
Slide title In CAPITALS 50 pt Slide subtitle 32 pt PBB-TE Status Report Panagiotis Saltsidis.
PWE3 WG Document Status IETF-62 Danny McPherson Stewart Bryant
VPLS Extensions for Provider Backbone Bridging - draft-balus-l2vpn-vpls-802.1ah-02.txt John Hoffmans – Geraldine Calvignac -
©2013 Avaya Inc. All rights reservedFebruary 26-28, 2013 | Orlando, FL.
GMPLS Control of Ethernet IVL Switches draft-fedyk-gmpls-ethernet-ivl-00 GELS BOF, IETF 64 Don Fedyk, Dave Allan,
IETF 84, July 2012 Vancouver, Canada
November 2010Future TRILL Work1 Future TRILL Work 2 Donald Eastlake 3 rd 155 Beaver Street Milford, MA USA
Provider Backbone Bridges with Traffic Engineering (PBB-TE) aka PBT D. Kent Stevens Western Region Optical Architect
Slide title minimum 48 pt Slide subtitle minimum 30 pt Packet PWE3 – Efficient for IP/MPLS IeTF78 (Maastricht) – July Sriganesh Kini David sinicrope.
11/27/2015 draft-bocci-bryant-ms-pw-architecture-00.txt An Architecture for Multi-Segment Pseudo Wire Emulation Edge-to-Edge draft-bocci-bryant-pwe3-ms-pw-architecture-00.txt.
Application of PWE3 to MPLS Transport Networks
Carrier-Grade Ethernet Technology
PG 1 Multi-Segment Pseudowire Setup & Maintenance using LDP draft-balus-mh-pw-control-protocol-02.txt Authors David McDysan (MCI), Mike Duckett (Bellsouth),
DetNet Data Plane using PseudoWires Jouni Korhonen Shahram Davari Norm Finn IETF#94, Yokohama.
SOFTWARE DEFINED NETWORKING/OPENFLOW: A PATH TO PROGRAMMABLE NETWORKS April 23, 2012 © Brocade Communications Systems, Inc.
Optical + Ethernet: Converging the Transport Network An Overview.
(ed) Peter Ashwood-Smith
Omniran CF00 1 VLANs in relation to P802.1CF NRM Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max RiegelNokia Networks
IP Traffic Engineering RSP draft-shen-ip-te-rsp-01.txt Naiming Shen Albert Tian Jun Zhuang
1 Generalized EC Type 2 support EC Type 1&2 supporting bridges Maarten Vissers
IP Pseudowire Florin Balus August, PG 1Florin BalusIETF60 – San Diego Requirements - Existing topology FR/ATM VPNs ATM Network Frame Relay Access.
LSP-Ping extensions for MPLS-TP draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-lsp-ping-extensions-01 Nitin Bahadur Sami Boutros Rahul Aggarwal Eric Gray 1IETF 77 MPLS WG IETF 77,
The Role of Ethernet in Optical Networks Dave Allan, Sr. Advisor, CTO office Nortel
March th IETF - Prague1 TRILL Working Group Changes from draft-trill-rbridge-protocol-02.txt to draft-trill-rbridge-protocol-03.txt Dinesh Dutt,
Pseudo-Wire Protection Ping Pan IETF 65.
VS (Virtual Subnet) draft-xu-virtual-subnet-03 Xiaohu Xu IETF 79, Beijing.
Precision Time Protocol over MPLS draft-ronc-ptp-mpls-00.txt PWE3 WG IETF Chicago 2007 Ron Cohen
Understanding “Virtual” Networks J.J. Ekstrom Fall 2011.
Control Word Reserved bit for use in E-Tree draft-delord-pwe3-cw-bit-etree-00.txt Simon Delord, Raymond Key – Telstra Frederic Jounay - France Telecom.
1 RST _05_2001_c1 © 2001, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. SPVC Service Spanning ATM & PWE3/PSN George Swallow
Signaling Protocol for Access Service Network using LDP (draft-matsuda-l2vpn-access-service-protocol-00.txt) Tetsushi Matsuda Information Technology R&D.
End-to-End VoMPLS Header Compression (draft-ash-e2e-vompls-hdr-compress-00.txt) End-to-End VoIP Header Compression Using cRTP (draft-ash-e2e-crtp-hdr-compress-00.txt)
draft-jounay-pwe3-dynamic-pw-update-00.txt IETF 70 PWE3 Working Group
Requirements for LER Forwarding of IPv4 Option Packets
DetNet Service Model draft-varga-detnet-service-model-00
PW MUX PWE – 71st IETF 10 March 2008 Yaakov (J) Stein.
DetNet Data Plane Discussion
22.January 2007 PBB-TE Requirements
Packet PWE3 – Efficient for IP/MPLS
78th IETF Meeting - Maastricht 27th, July 2010
DetNet Data Plane Discussion
Migrating Your Network to Avaya Fabric Connect
Bala’zs, Norm, Jouni DetNet WG London, 23rd March, 2018
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS). 2 MPLS Overview A forwarding scheme designed to speed up IP packet forwarding (RFC 3031) Idea: use a fixed length.
DetNet Data Plane design team IETF 98, Chicago, 2017
PW Control Word Stitching
draft-ietf-bier-ipv6-requirements-01
Editors: Bala’zs Varga, Jouni Korhonen
Pseudo-Wire Protection
DetNet Data Plane Solutions draft-ietf-detnet-dp-sol-ip-02  draft-ietf-detnet-dp-sol-mpls-02  Bala’zs Varga, Jouni Korhonen, Janos Farkas, Lou Berger,
Presentation transcript:

Setup and Manage PBB-based Tunnels with PWE3 Mechanism Ping Pan (Hammerhead Systems) Shane Amante (Level 3) Nasser El-Aawar (Level 3) Chicago, IETF 69

2 What Problem are We Trying to Solve? Q-in-Q Network Mac-in-Mac Network Ethernet VLAN Circuits (solid red lines) PBB Tunnels (green tubes) Ethernet Circuits in Mac-in-Mac Encapsulation (dotted red lines) Conditions: A ll-Ethernet network The access/aggregation net’s are Q-in-Q The core is PBB-based How to aggregate Ethernet flows into PBB tunnels?  Aggregator

3 Observation Due to operational reasons, the carriers have a good reason in deploying MAC-in-MAC Ethernet core –Interconnecting Q-in-Q access networks with MAC-in-MAC core Due to operational reasons, MPLS LER’s may not be desirable to be used at the edge right now –Network operation may take a while to migrate… baby steps! There are ways to setup edge-to-edge tunnels –Existing practice: static configuration –Other proposals: dynamic signaling protocols etc. –Outside of the scope of our proposal The scenario is almost identical to that PWE3 has a solution for –Aggregating AC’s through PSN tunnels –Instead of PW header with label, it’s Mac-in-Mac header…

4 What does the header look like? C-SA = Customer Source MAC address C-DA = Customer Destination MAC address VID = VLAN ID C-VID = Customer VID (12 bits) S-VID = Service VID (12 bits) I-SID = Service ID (24 bits) B-VID = Backbone VID (12 bits) B-DA = Backbone DA B-SA = Backbone SA C-DA C-SA Payload B-DA B-SA B-VID I-SID C-DA C-SA Payload Ethertype 802.1Q C-DA C-SA Payload C-VID Ethertype C-DA C-SA Payload S-VID C-VID Ethertype S-VID C-VID Ethertype Customer frames 802.1ad 802.1ah Provider Bridge (PB) frame format Provider Backbone Bridge (PBB) frame format Same format and Ethertype as an S-Tag S-Tag C-Tag Mac-in-Mac Header

5 Our Proposal Q-in-Q Network Mac-in-Mac Network Ethernet VLAN Circuits PBB Tunnels Ethernet Circuits in Mac-in-Mac Encapsulation Aggregator Target LDP (RFC4447) FEC 129 Encode Mac-in-Mac data in AII and AGI

6 Operation Overview Q-in-Q Network Mac-in-Mac Network Aggregator A B IP-A MAC-A I-SID-A B-VID-A IP-B MAC-B I-SID-B B-VID-B 1.There are PSN tunnels interconnecting node A and B 2.Operators configure IP, I-SID and B-VID etc. at edge 3.From node A, send Label Mapping message to node B with SAII = {MAC-A, I-SID-A, B-VID-A} TAII = { MAC-B, I-SID-B, B-VID-B} 4.Upon reception, run the standard RFC4447 on Node B, then A… 5.Program the data path for encapsulation and aggregation 6.Ethernet flows will go through the PBB networks

7 What to be standardized? New AII Type A new AII format

8 In Conclusion… PBB is a viable option for Ethernet deployment at core Aggregating Ethernet VLAN circuits over the core is important PWE3 has defined a simple mechanism for data aggregation at network edge –“Simple” means that there is no need for extensive IP routing etc. By allocating a new AII Type (and associated format), we can achieve Ethernet circuit aggregation over PBB networks Please consider this as a WG document