Track reconstruction and pattern recognition V.V. Ivanov Laboratory of Information Technologies Joint Institute for Nuclear Research,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Arc-length computation and arc-length parameterization
Advertisements

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Pattern Recognition in OPERA Tracking A.Chukanov, S.Dmitrievsky, Yu.Gornushkin OPERA collaboration meeting, Ankara, Turkey, 1-4 of April 2009 JINR, Dubna.
Multiple regression analysis
Mar 31, 2005Steve Kahn -- Ckov and Tof Detector Simulation 1 Ckov1, Ckov2, Tof2 MICE Pid Tele-Meeting Steve Kahn 31 March 2005.
Regression Chapter 10 Understandable Statistics Ninth Edition By Brase and Brase Prepared by Yixun Shi Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania.
1 Doing Statistics for Business Doing Statistics for Business Data, Inference, and Decision Making Marilyn K. Pelosi Theresa M. Sandifer Chapter 11 Regression.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 1 Functions and Their Graphs.
Curve Modeling Bézier Curves
Inference for regression - Simple linear regression
Correlation Scatter Plots Correlation Coefficients Significance Test.
Linear Regression and Correlation
Ch 8.1 Numerical Methods: The Euler or Tangent Line Method
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 3 Exponential and Logarithmic Functions.
Chapter 6 The Normal Probability Distribution
Vertex Reconstructing Neural Networks at the ZEUS Central Tracking Detector FermiLab, October 2000 Erez Etzion 1, Gideon Dror 2, David Horn 1, Halina Abramowicz.
Copyright © 2013, 2010 and 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter Inference on the Least-Squares Regression Model and Multiple Regression 14.
Chapter 13 Statistics © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
1 Least squares procedure Inference for least squares lines Simple Linear Regression.
Pion test beam from KEK: momentum studies Data provided by Toho group: 2512 beam tracks D. Duchesneau April 27 th 2011 Track  x Track  y Base track positions.
Measurement of through-going particle momentum by means of Multiple Scattering with the T600 TPC Talk given by Antonio Jesús Melgarejo (Universidad de.
A Reconstruction Algorithm for a RICH detector for CLAS12 Ahmed El Alaoui RICH Workchop, Jefferson Lab, newport News, VA November th 2011.
Random Sampling, Point Estimation and Maximum Likelihood.
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 1 Part 4 Curve Fitting.
Fundamentals of Data Analysis Lecture 10 Management of data sets and improving the precision of measurement pt. 2.
Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.
STS track recognition by 3D track-following method Gennady Ososkov, A.Airiyan, A.Lebedev, S.Lebedev, E.Litvinenko Laboratory of Information Technologies.
Ooo Performance simulation studies of a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon Tracking for CBM Reconstructed URQMD event: central.
Optimising Cuts for HLT George Talbot Supervisor: Stewart Martin-Haugh.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
TRD and Global tracking Andrey Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna X CBM collaboration meeting Dresden, 27 September.
V.A. Babaitsev, A.V. Brailov, V.Y. Popov On Niedermayers' algorithm of efficient frontier computing.
Status of 3D track-finding Gennady Ososkov, A.Airiyan, A.Lebedev, S.Lebedev Laboratory of Information Technologies Joint Intstitute for Nuclear Research,
The Pattern Recognition issue for the Mu2e experiment Giovanni F. Tassielli - G. Marconi University.
1 Complex Images k’k’ k”k” k0k0 -k0-k0 branch cut   k 0 pole C1C1 C0C0 from the Sommerfeld identity, the complex exponentials must be a function.
Serge Andrianov Theory of Symplectic Formalism for Spin-Orbit Tracking Institute for Nuclear Physics Forschungszentrum Juelich Saint-Petersburg State University,
Wavelet analysis applications Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna Semeon Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna.
1  The Cartesian Coordinate System  Straight Lines  Linear Functions and Mathematical Models  Intersection of Straight Lines  The Method of Least.
Top threshold Monte Carlo generator Stewart Boogert John Adams Institute Royal Holloway, University of London Filimon Gournaris (Ph.D student and majority.
A.Ayriyan 1, V.Ivanov 1, S.Lebedev 1,2, G.Ososkov 1 in collaboration with N.Chernov 3 1 st CBM Collaboration Meeting, JINR Duba,19-22 May JINR-LIT,
CBM RICH multiring recognition and fitting CBM Tracking Week, January, 2005 at GSI, Darmstadt B.Kostenko, E.Litvinenko, G.Ososkov JINR LIT
Pattern Recognition in OPERA Tracking A.Chukanov, S.Dmitrievsky, Yu.Gornushkin OPERA collaboration meeting, Mizunami, Japan, of January 2009 JINR,
Standalone FLES Package for Event Reconstruction and Selection in CBM DPG Mainz, 21 March 2012 I. Kisel 1,2, I. Kulakov 1, M. Zyzak 1 (for the CBM.
CBM RICH ring recognition G.Ososkov, B.Kostenko, A.Solovjev Laboratory of Information Technologies Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Abstract Method.
V0 analytical selection Marian Ivanov, Alexander Kalweit.
1 Data Analysis Linear Regression Data Analysis Linear Regression Ernesto A. Diaz Department of Mathematics Redwood High School.
Fast Tracking of Strip and MAPS Detectors Joachim Gläß Computer Engineering, University of Mannheim Target application is trigger  1. do it fast  2.
Geant4 Tracking Test (D. Lunesu)1 Daniela Lunesu, Stefano Magni Dario Menasce INFN Milano GEANT4 TRACING TESTs.
Track reconstruction in TRD and MUCH Andrey Lebedev Andrey Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna.
Global Tracking for CBM Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Ivan Kisel 1 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany 2 Laboratory.
Muon detection in the CBM experiment at FAIR Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Claudia Höhne 1 Ivan Kisel 1 Anna Kiseleva 3 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für.
Detector alignment Stefania and Bepo Martellotti 20/12/10.
 Measurement of  x E  (Fig. 4) Assorted correlations between a fixed high-p T trigger hadron (  p Ttrig  =4.7GeV/c) and lower p T associated hadrons.
1 DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data Plots for approval CMS- Run meeting, 26/6/09 U.Gasparini, INFN & Univ.Padova on behalf of DT community [ n.b.:
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
Chapter 9: Introduction to the t statistic. The t Statistic The t statistic allows researchers to use sample data to test hypotheses about an unknown.
09/06/06Predrag Krstonosic - CALOR061 Particle flow performance and detector optimization.
M. Ellis - MICE Collaboration Meeting - Wednesday 27th October Sci-Fi Tracker Performance Software Status –RF background simulation –Beam simulation.
The inference and accuracy We learned how to estimate the probability that the percentage of some subjects in the sample would be in a given interval by.
The Normal Approximation for Data. History The normal curve was discovered by Abraham de Moivre around Around 1870, the Belgian mathematician Adolph.
Object-Oriented Track Reconstruction in the PHENIX Detector at RHIC Outline The PHENIX Detector Tracking in PHENIX Overview Algorithms Object-Oriented.
Pattern recognition with the triplet method Fabrizio Cei INFN & University of Pisa MEG Meeting, Hakata October /10/20131 Fabrizio Cei.
LIT participation LIT participation Ivanov V.V. Laboratory of Information Technologies Meeting on proposal of the setup preparation for external beams.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Hit Reconstruction for the Luminosity Monitor March 3 rd 2009 | T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns.
Track Reconstruction in MUCH and TRD Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany 2 Laboratory of Information.
STT pattern recognition improvements since last December meeting and
Simulation results for the upgraded RICH detector in the HADES experiment. Semen Lebedev1,3, Jürgen Friese2, Claudia Höhne1, Tobias Kunz2, Jochen Markert4.
Fast Track Fitting in the SiD01 Detector
Functions and Their Graphs
Reconstruction and calibration strategies for the LHCb RICH detector
Presentation transcript:

Track reconstruction and pattern recognition V.V. Ivanov Laboratory of Information Technologies Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia CBM Collaboration Meeting GSI, Darmstadt, October 6-8, 2004

1. 3D track recognition by the track-following method. 2. Accurate momentum restoration based on orthogonal polynomial sets. 3. Application of Kalman filter for momentum restoration. 4. Polynomial approximation in a problem of accurate momenta reconstruction. 5. RICH ring guidance by the Hough transform approach. 6. Looking for the STS “secondary” tracks. 7. Fast algorithms for accurate charged particle tracing through inhomogeneous magnetic field. 8. Concluding remarks. Outline

1. STS track recognition by 3D track-following method Gennady Ososkov, A.Airiyan, A.Lebedev, S.Lebedev Laboratory of Information Technologies Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia home page:

Fast track fitting in non-uniform magnetic field Our goal : is to recognize all tracks of any STS events by hits measured on seven STS stations taking into account the magnetic field non-homogeneity 3D view of a typical STS simulated event

Stage 1. Starting from the middle of the target area, we connect this point sequentially with all points in the first station in Y-Z view, where tracks are close to straight lines. Each time we prolong the straight line driven via these two points to the plane of the second station. Then, we set aside from the crossing point an asymmetrical corridor and look for all points appeared in this corridor. Then, for each of these found points and two on sections previous we draw in X-Z projection a parabola which is prolonged to the next station. Since several prolongations can happened, we set aside corridors from each of point predicted on the third station. Then, coming to the Y-Z view, we set also a corridor aside of the corresponding prediction on the third station and look for hits in it. Prediction and search in YoZ view Prediction and search in XoZ view

The main trick, guaranteed the final track-finding efficiency on the level of % depending on the track momentum, consists of very careful preliminary calculations of the table with limits for those corridors depending on the station number and the sign of the particle charge. This table is calculated on the of many thousands simulated events. Since the conventional approach to use symmetrical 3σ corridors failed, we use the distributions of deviations between real hit positions and their predictions by prolonging straight line or parabola for all stations. Examples of those distributions for XoZ views on the 3-d and 6-th stations or for YoZ views on the 3-d and 5-th stations One can see their asymmetry and sizes growing from mkm to sm

Stage 2. Having tracks found at the first stage, we make a selection on the basis of the following criterion: each point can only belong to one track. So any track with one or more points belonging to some other track is rejected. Efficiency vs. momentum Average number of ghosts is 1.62 per event (we consider as a ghost a track that has at least one wrongly found point) Preliminary results Mean efficiency is 92.8%

As one can see from figures with corridor distributions, a corridor in the 4-th station is 25 times more narrow, then in the 5-th station and 30 times then in the 6-th station. That is due to (1) multiple scattering, (2) too simple track fitting model, (3) STS geometry is not optimal. Therefore, to decrease the corridors and improve prediction accuracy, we should apply, first, the Kalman filter technique and, then, more elaborated track model (say, Runge-Kutta solution for the real map of magnetic field). Vertex positioning improvement. Although the algorithm has shown its stability to minor vertex shifts, the option exists to estimate the vertex position after the first run on the basis of several reference tracks. Then in the second run all track-following process is recalculated with the improved vertex position. The Kalman filter applying for better vertex estimation is planned. Future plans

2. High accuracy momentum restoration applying orthogonal polynomial sets E.P.Akishina, V.V.Ivanov, E.I.Litvinenko Laboratory of Information Technologies Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna, Russia

An algorithm, which provides a high accuracy momentum restoration of a charged particle from points of the trajectory through an inhomogeneous field of the CBM dipole magnet, is developed. A set of representative trajectories is used to construct a multidimensional function which gives the momentum in terms of observable quantities.

Uniform magnetic field approximation The momentum p is calculated by a formula: - constant - deflection angle

- point in the first STS - tangents of trajectory in this point We have to construct the inverse function: In inhomogeneous magnetic field φ is function: Method of accurate momentum restoration

The procedure includes two steps: 1.A representative set of all relevant trajectories through the magnet is computed, and the corresponding set of angles is formed. 2.This set is used to construct the explicit function, which gives the momentum in terms of observables. Each trajectory is determined by five variables: 1. - coordinates of a point in the first STS 2. - tangents of a particle trajectory in this point 3. - the particle momentum.

Method of accurate momentum restoration - range of i-th variable - normalization to [-1,1] - discrete points due to Tchebysheff distribution The set of determines the collection of fixed trajectories, which are traced through the magnetic field and the set of corresponding deflections is calculated.

Method of accurate momentum restoration Let the range of φ(·) be ; φ(·) is normalized to [- 1,1]: discrete number of is chosen Applying inverse interpolation, we can calculate corresponding values of

Method of accurate momentum restoration Let be in the form The coefficients are calculated using the formula: where T(x) is orthogonal Tchebysheff polynomial

Accuracy of momentum restoration - number of “points” for which trajectories were calculated - momentum values in the range 1-10 GeV/c Total number of : 5 x 5 x 5 x 5 x 7 = 4375 Total number of coefficients can be significantly decreased without accuracy loss. The significant coefficients are selected from the whole set using Fisher test: 89 significant coefficients.

Accuracy of momentum restoration Top plots (all 4375 coefficients): left plot is the distribution (in MeV/c) and right plot RMS = 0.147% Bottom plots (89 coefficients): left plot is the distribution (in MeV/c) and right plot

Accuracy of momentum restoration In order to estimate the accuracy of the method on data close to real data, we used the GEANT data: σ = 0.263% Distribution of (in MeV/c) for GEANT data (for positively charged particles). Distribution of for GEANT data (for positively charged particles).

Accuracy of momentum restoration Distribution of (in MeV/c) for GEANT data (for all tracks). Distribution of for GEANT data (for all tracks). σ = 0.342%

Conclusion Main results of this work can be summurized as follows: The possibility to reconstruct charged particle momenta registered by coordinate STS-detectors with a high accuracy is demonstrated: The algorithm for momenta restoration is elaborated. With the help of the later the estimation was realized both the accuracy of the mathematical method (which includes inaccuracies of the magnetic field) and the accuracy the momentum determination on the basis of the GEANT data.

Our next steps are as follows 1.To increase the accuracy of the algorithm by separate restoration of momenta for paricles with different charges. 2.To increase the accuracy of the algorithm by dividing the whole interval of momenta on a few subintervals. 3.To do the estimation of the momenta determination applying the procedure of fitting particle trajectories on the basis of Kalman filter.

3. Using Kalman filter for accurate momentum restoration Baginyan, V.V.Ivanov, P.V.Zrelov Laboratory of Information Technologies Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna, Russia

Kalman filter for momentum reconstruction  The results on momentum reconstruction based on orthogonal polynomials (OP) using measurements of STS-detectors and magnetic field map and applying track fitting with Kalman filter are presented.  The accuracy of momentum restoration is estimated.

Kalman filter for momentum reconstruction (positive particles)(negative particles)

Kalman filter for momentum reconstruction (all particles)(all particles adding 456 values, hom.field)

Conclusion 1.A method of precise determination of momenta with using a Kalman filter and a method of orthogonal polynoms has been implemented. 2. Encouraging results have been obtained on determination of particle momentum with an average relative accuracy no more than 1%. 3. Use for part of tracks of approximation of a homogeneous field, when calculating the momentum, does not strongly change the results. 4. There is a difference in the accuracy of the method for positive and negative particles with a viewpoint of the accuracy of the obtained results. 5. There are ``reserves'' for improvement of the results. In particular, in the future other extrapolating procedures will be considered (excepting the parabolic model considered in this work) for obtaining coordinates and angles at the 7-th chamber.

4. Polynomial approximation in problem of accurate momenta reconstruction P.G.Akishin Laboratory of Information Technologies Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna, Russia

Procedure of momentum reconstruction includes the following steps: 1.Input data preparation using trajectory hits obtained by a track-finder. 2. Fitting trajectory hits by different approximation methods: a) polynomial, b) cubic-spline, c) B-spline. 3. Momentum reconstruction by “attaching” the motion equations to the fitted trajectory.

Accuracy of momentum reconstruction: dp/p No multiple scatteringWith multiple scattering

5. CBM RICH ring guidance by the Hough transform approach B.Kostenko, G.Ososkov, A.Solovjev Laboratory of Information Technologies Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna, Russia

CBM RICH ring recognition is complicated very much, due to low quality of the ring guidance information obtained by STS tracks extrapolation. Therefore, a preliminary search for ring centers and radii was demanded (P. Senger). A fragment of the simulated CBM RICH event with ring guidance points. They are distributed almost independently on the rings positions. Robust fitting corresponds to the blue circles. Two false circles are obtained. CBM RICH1 design

The Hough transform (HT) HT converts points from the measurement space to the parameter space and permits to find most “popular” places in it. Problem: huge number of parameters (about 1.7x10 8 possible centers for 1000 hits). Event 1, top mirror. Black points are hits, blue ones are centers. Its treatment requires sec CpuTime of 2.2 GHz computer. Many rings contain too many points necessary for their handling (excess information).

Inference: to reduce number of hits for recognition of more simple cases ( “thinning out” of data ), to take out hits corresponding these cases and to consider more difficult cases after that. Event 1, top mirror: 1/3 part of hits are taken. Its treatment requires ~ 80 sec CpuTime of 2.2 GHz computer.

Contraction mapping procedure: D(A,B)  D(A,B) / N, where N>1 “Attraction” and “merging” of centers Event 1, top mirror: distribution of ring centers after the first contraction mapping. Non-overlapping rings are recognized

Second contraction mapping: all rings are found, no false rings are present, non-overlapping rings are found with a good accuracy (compare with Robust fitting)

Further developments: - to test algorithm more thoroughly and to tune its parameters (only 7 events were considered up to now ), - to organize the interconnection between results of processing of different extractions from the data with the purpose to optimize the parameters of rings, - to mark out found circles and consider non-recognized rings.

6. Looking for the STS “secondary” tracks V.Ivanov, G.Ososkov, A.Airiyan Laboratory of Information Technologies Joint Intstitute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia

Good observation: 90% of the secondary vertexes are spread out of the 100 micron area around the vertex, so there is a hope to distinguish them from the primary tracks. The problem is to find a distinguishing criterion. Two parameters are obvious: - track momentum; - track deviation from the vertex. Secondary vertex X-Z coordinate distribution An enlarged fragment of the previous figure

Variuos measures of difference between the primary and secondary tracks Then to intensify the difference we take logarithms on both axes (b) Log(DEV) vs. Log(P). only about 40-50% of secondaries can be reliably extracted by a carefully chosen cut 1. Deviations versus momentum Since the deviations (DEV) vary from microns to meters we take its logarithm. (a) Log(DEV) vs. P. Secondaries marked in blue

An example of the secondary track search by thresholding in 3D-space of Log(divX), Log(divY), Log(divZ) The cut-off -5.4 was found of the sample of hit tracks of them are secondary tracks 300 tracks were cut off. 250 of them –secondaries Thus, a straight-forward cut-off gives the efficiency about 25% 3D distribution of Log(divX), Log(divY), Log(divZ), primaries marked by blue, secondary tracks marked by red

2. Track bending in magnetic field can be measured in XoZ plane either by the angle α between momentum directions on the 1 st and the last stations or by the shift S generated by these directions ( see figure ) Result is about the same: the bulky part of the secondary tracks is again mixed up undistinguishable with the primary tracks The angle α versus Log(DEV/P)

Track stream crossections for one event in YoX planes of the STS stations 1,2,4,7 Pay attention to the growing scales The idea was to look for narrow maximum, which could mark possible jet with the vertex lying between the previous and the current station

The same crossections for the secondary tracks only

7. Fast algorithms for accurate charged particle tracing through inhomogeneous magnetic field P.G.Akishin Laboratory of Information Technologies Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna, Russia

Charged particle tracing through inhomogeneous magnetic field The problem is to accurately prolong a charged particle trajectory from the 7-th STS to the position of the RICH detector. In work [1] there were developed fast numerical algorithms for fast solution of motion equations for a charged particle moving in inhomogeneous magnetic field. 1. P.G.Akishin: The numerical multidimensional approximation of the fast solution of equations describing a charged particle motion in non-homogeneous magnetic field, JINR preprint, P , Dubna, 2002 (in Russian).

General remarks Tracking Momentum reconstruction RICH algorithms Secondary vertices Tracing track trajectory out of the dipole magnet