Integrating Trust and Driver’s Safety By Robin Mitchell.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Ricardo plc 2012 Eric Chan, Ricardo UK Ltd 21 st October 2012 SARTRE Demonstration System The research leading to these results.
Advertisements

The application of real-time distraction monitoring to driver safety systems Matthew R. Smith Gerald J. Witt Debi L. Bakowski January 25, 2007.
Chapter #8 Study Guide Answers.
Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems (IVBSS): Crash Warning Integration Challenges Jim Sayer, Ph.D. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
1 National Urban Search & Rescue Response System Canine Search Specialist Training Canine Search Specialist Training Unit 3: Role of the Helper.
Collision Mitigation break system (CMS) What is CMS? How it works System Configuration Warning Devices Collision Avoidance Maneuvers Conclusions.
How does a web-service’s apparent trustworthiness affect people’s intention to adopt? a.k.a. “Seal of Approval and Multidimensionality of Perceived Trustworthiness.
Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 7-1 Chapter Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 35 (2005) 939–953 Situation awareness and workload in driving while using adaptive cruise control and a.
Distributed Reinforcement Learning for a Traffic Engineering Application Mark D. Pendrith DaimlerChrysler Research & Technology Center Presented by: Christina.
Overview of Project Lydia Eatmon ACC2 Fall Project Adaptive Cruise Control Diver aid, part cruise control, part collision avoidance Motivation for.
1 Effects of an In-Vehicle Collision Avoidance Warning System on Short and Long-Term Driving Performance Presented by: Josh Essner & Scott Lubensky.
Business Research for Decision Making Sixth Edition by Duane Davis Chapter 3 Scientific Inquiry PowerPoint Slides for the Instructor’s Resource Manual.
CRASH IMMINENT SAFETY: A TIER 1 UNIVERSITY TRANSPORTATION CENTER PROFESSOR UMIT OZGUNER TRC INC. CHAIR ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIRECTOR,
AUTOMOBILES Dimitris Milakis, Transport Institute, Delft University of Technology Envisioning Automated Vehicles within the Built Environment: 2020, 2035,
Certified Business Process Professional (CBPP®)
Coaching Workshop.
1.2 The Driving Task.
Bloom’s Cognitive and Affective Taxonomies Cognitive and Affective Taxonomies.
1 Development and Evaluation of Selected Mobility Applications for VII (a.k.a. IntelliDrive) Steven E. Shladover, Sc.D. California PATH Program Institute.
Safety All The Time Oyuki Ogawa Executive Vice President DENSO CORPORATION.
1. This seminar paper is based upon the project work being carried out by the collaboration of Delphi- Delco Electronics (DDE) and General Motors Corporation.It.
Enabling learning and assessment Unit 3 – Week 1.
Emergency Vehicle Operations Unit VIII Avoiding Accidents 1 Dave Denniston Loss Control Training Specialist.
Hans-Martin Gerhard28. April 2010 Seite 1Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche AG Pedestrian Safety - Quiet Cars Hans-Martin Gerhard Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG Quiet.
01-1-S230-EP Unit S230-EP S230-EP Unit 1 Objectives Describe the values and principles of operational leadership. Identify the qualities.
Transportation Active Safety Institute TASI: Our Focus on the Human Machine Interface 25 January 2007 Purdue School of Engineering & Technology, IUPUI.
The future of road safety Michael Meyer Robert Bosch GmbH.
TOWARDS A TRUST MODEL IN E-LEARNING: ANTECEDENTS OF A STUDENT’S TRUST W Wongse-ek, G B Wills, L Gilbert.
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
© Siemens AG, 2002 s CP RS Agenda The Role of IT for Accident-free Driving Interaction with driver’s physical condition Interaction with the roadside environment.
Artificial Intelligence Solutions Within the Automotive Industry Francisco Illanes, Iain Letourneau Nathan Hupman& Max Jackman.
Drivers’ attitudes towards driver assistance systems presented by Juliane Haupt.
VELS The Arts. VELS (3 STRANDS) Physical, Personal and Social Learning Discipline-based Learning Interdisciplinary Learning.
Attention Grounding: A New Approach to IVIS Implementation Emily Wiese Cognitive Systems Lab Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering University.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk.
Chapter 6 Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC)
IHRA-ITS UN-ECE WP.29 ITS Informal Group Geneva, March, 2011 Design Principles for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: Keeping Drivers In-the-Loop Transmitted.
Research Elements of Integrated Vehicle Based Safety Systems Jack Ference, IVBSS Technical Manager ITS America Annual Meeting May, 2005.
1 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration An Overview of NHTSAs Vehicle Safety Research Priorities Nathaniel Beuse Associate Administrator, Vehicle.
A LongROAD Study December 2015 Keeping Older Adults Driving Safely: A Research Synthesis of Advanced In- Vehicle Technologies.
Army Traffic Safety Program INTRODUCTORY COURSE 1 ATSP-1.
Competency based learning & performance Ola Badersten.
Lindsey/Patrick Emergency Vehicle Operations © 2007 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ Chapter 1 Leadership and Management.
Office of Service Quality
1 Warning Timing, Driver Distraction, and Driver Response to Imminent Rear-End Collisions review of some research literature referred to in the ITS guidelines.
Submitted To: Submitted By: Seminar On ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL.
CRUISE CONTROL DEVICES Presented by Anju.J.S. CRUISE CONTROL DEVICES.
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
Sample Workbook for Crash Avoidance Technologies Focus Groups.
WEEK 6: 2/9/15 – 2/13/15 PSYCHOLOGY 310: SPORT & INJURY PSYCHOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF MARY INSTRUCTOR: DR. THERESA MAGELKY Goals and Goal Setting in Sport Injury.
2 Overhead & channel use for multiple messages. Unused elements in common message set. Security? A new message for each new application? Where to change.
Transmitted by the Experts of TRL (EC)
VEMANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,BANGALORE
Goals and Goal Setting in Sport Injury Rehabilitation
On-board Technologies
Team members: Project Manager: Alex Crimin Facilitator: Chengzhu Jin
HISTORY FLATBED ACQUISITION
15 COMPETENCY-BASED HRM.
Informal Document: ACSF Rev.1
Trust What does trust mean to you as a manager?
The Decision to Trust Model
Overview of CV2X Requirements
John Lenkeit, Terry Smith
Trust, Justice and Ethics
On-board Technologies
Safety concept for automated driving systems
Informal Document: ACSF-10-08
How Safe Are Self-Driving Cars?
Presentation transcript:

Integrating Trust and Driver’s Safety By Robin Mitchell

Components of Focus Area Improving driving safety through the use of in vehicle warning devices Trust in automation

Automotive Warning Devices Designed to help alert the driver to potentially dangerous driving situations Currently, there are several Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) Forward Collision Warning (FCW)

Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) Uses radar and laser range sensors to detect vehicles ahead of the driver and adjusts the vehicle’s speed to maintain a minimum headway with the other vehicles Able to control the engine, power train, and/or the service breaks

Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) Maintains both set speed and headway Is able to control both these settings for the vehicle and adapt them to the current driving situation

Forward Collision Warning (FCW) Uses the same sensors as ACC to assess collision potential and warn the driver of emerging collision situations Helps the driver to avoid striking the rear end of another vehicle

Combined Use of ACC and FCW Improve ability to avoid collisions by helping the driver to maintain safe speeds and headways Conveyed through visual, auditory, and tactile cues Helps refocus driver attention when it is diverted to another place

Example of ACC and FCW If ACC detects a slower or stopped vehicle, it will create an alert If the driver does nothing, this would cause the FCW to also alert (as a forward collision would be imminent) It is up to the driver to react to the warnings

Change in Driving Tasks Changes driver tasks by taking some control from the driver Creates different tasks for the driver to perform The driver relies on the automation to determine the safety of the situation

Trust Defined Generally it is an attitude towards technology regarding expected performance Most widely used definition comes from Mayer, Davis, and Schoorman, 1995: “the willingness of a party to be vulnerable to the actions of another party based on the expectation that the other will perform a particular action important to the trustor, irrespective of the ability to monitor or control that party”

Characteristics that govern Trust Ability: the group of skills, competencies, and characteristics that enable the agent to influence the domain. – Similar to predictability Integrity: degree to which the agent follows a set of principles – Similar to dependability Benevolence: the extent to which the motivations of the agent are aligned with those of the trustor – Working towards a common goal

Trust is dependant on 3 dimensions Performance Process Purpose of Automation Definitions from “Trust in Technology: Designing for Appropriate Reliance” by John Lee and Katrina See

Performance The competency or perceived expertise of the automation as demonstrated by its ability to achieve the operator’s goals In other words, will it do what I want it to do Trust will increase when the automation performs to expectations

Process The degree to which the algorithms of the automation adhere to the operator’s understanding of how the automation works In other words, does it work like I think it should work in this situation Trust will increase if the algorithms used are appropriate for the current situation

Purpose of Automation The degree to which the automation is being used within the realm of the designers’ intent In other words, is it being used in the manner for which it was designed This is often based on if the designer’s intent has been properly communicated to the operator Trust will increase when the automation performs as intended

Trust based on Use Trust is largely based on observation If a system is not trusted, it will not be used—trust will not grow The more the automation is used, the more trust will be facilitated in the system Highly trusted automation is monitored less frequently

Trusting ACC and FCW ACC and FCW are emerging technologies with the possibility of improving driving safety Drivers need to trust these automations and use them appropriately An important concept not yet investigated

Proposed Research Investigate the degree of trust a driver places in these devices Test ACC and FCW individually Test ACC and FCW together Examine the differences in driver trust across conditions

Integrating Trust and Driver’s Safety Questions?