When to Select Observational Studies Interactive Case Study Quiz: Dan Jonas, MD, MPH Meera Viswanathan, PhD Karen Crotty, PhD, MPH RTI-UNC Evidence-based.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quantitative Synthesis II: Interactive Quiz Thomas Trikalinos, MD, PhD Joseph Lau, MD Tufts EPC.
Advertisements

Evidence-based Dental Practice Developing guidelines or clinical recommendations Slide #1 This lecture follows the previous online lecture on evidence.
Synthesizing the evidence on the relationship between education, health and social capital Dan Sherman, PhD American Institutes for Research 25 February,
What do you think? Put your answers in your books.
When To Select Observational Studies as Evidence for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
A systematic review of interventions for children with cerebral palsy: state of the evidence Rohini R Rattihalli
Reading the Dental Literature
RTI-UNC EPC Issues Exploration Forum (IEF):. Serious Mental Illness Dan Jonas, MD, MPH.
Subject Selection and Recruitment David Wendler Department of Clinical Bioethics NIH, USA.
Guidelines for Making Decisions about IEP Services IEP Services 6 of 8 Some Students with IEPs May Need Related Services.
Clinical Trials Hanyan Yang
Systematic Reviews and the American Academy of Pediatrics Virginia A. Moyer, MD, MPH Professor of Pediatrics Baylor College of Medicine.
Chapter 7. Getting Closer: Grading the Literature and Evaluating the Strength of the Evidence.
Practicing Evidence Based Medicine
By Dr. Ahmed Mostafa Assist. Prof. of anesthesia & I.C.U. Evidence-based medicine.
Assessing Quality of Individual Studies Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic.
Introduction to Evidence-Based Athletic Training Practice MATA 2015 Mark Weber, PhD, ATC, PT, SCS.
Research Design: The Progression of Study Designs that Address a Clinical Question.
EBD for Dental Staff Seminar 2: Core Critical Appraisal Dominic Hurst evidenced.qm.
Published in Circulation 2005 Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Conservative Therapy in Nonacute Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis Demosthenes.
Slide 1 D2.TCS.CL5.04. Subject Elements This unit comprises five Elements: 1.Define the need for tourism product research 2.Develop the research to be.
Evidence Based Practice
Dr.F Eslamipour DDS.MS Orthodontist Associated professor Department of Oral Public Health Isfahan University of Medical Science.
Searching for Relevant Studies Interactive Case Study Quiz: C. Michael White, Pharm.D., FCP, FCCP Professor and Director University of Connecticut / Hartford.
Evidence-Based Public Health Nancy Allee, MLS, MPH University of Michigan November 6, 2004.
Systematic Review Module 7: Rating the Quality of Individual Studies Meera Viswanathan, PhD RTI-UNC EPC.
Downloading and Installing Autodesk Revit 2016
VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Katherine E. Hartmann, MD, PhD Lucius E. Burch Chair, Obstetrics and Gynecology Deputy Director, Institute for.
Evidence-Based Medicine Presentation [Insert your name here] [Insert your designation here] [Insert your institutional affiliation here] Department of.
Refining Key Questions: Interactive Case Study Quiz C. Michael White, PharmD, FCP, FCCP Professor and Director University of Connecticut / Hartford Hospital.
Dr Jamal Roudaki Faculty of Commerce Lincoln University New Zealand.
Systematic Review Module 11: Grading Strength of Evidence Interactive Quiz Kathleen N. Lohr, PhD Distinguished Fellow RTI International.
R-7 Health Navigator Initiative Megan O’Brien, PhD, MPH Dot Nary, PhD Sasha Li.
Historical perspective It all started with Aspirin….
Systematic Review Module 3: Study Eligibility Criteria Melissa McPheeters, PhD, MPH Associate Director Vanderbilt University Evidence-based Practice Center.
Study Eligibility Criteria: Interactive Quiz Melissa McPheeters, PhD, MPH Associate Director, Vanderbilt University Evidence-based Practice Center.
Conducting a Sound Systematic Review: Balancing Resources with Quality Control Eric B. Bass, MD, MPH Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center.
Executive Series 1 Shared Decision-making: An Essential Resource for Patient-Centered Care Based on Science Alliance for Health Reform February 14, 2010.
Understanding Medical Articles and Reports Linda Vincent, MPH UCSF Breast SPORE Advocate September 24,
Wipanee Phupakdi, MD September 15, Overview  Define EBM  Learn steps in EBM process  Identify parts of a well-built clinical question  Discuss.
Analytic Frameworks: Interactive Quiz Melissa McPheeters, PhD, MPH Associate Director for Methods, Vanderbilt University EPC Assistant Professor, Institute.
Quiz Title DIRECTIONS: Read each question and click on the correct answer. If you get it wrong use the arrow button to go back to the question and try.
When To Select Observational Studies Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic.
Systematic Reviews and American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guidelines Amir Qaseem, MD, PhD, MHA, FACP Director, Clinical Policy American College.
Presentation of Findings: Interactive Quiz Melissa McPheeters, PhD, MPH Jeff Seroogy, BS Vanderbilt University Evidence-based Practice Center Joseph Lau,
Selecting Evidence for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews: When to use Observational Studies Dan Jonas, MD, MPH Meera Viswanathan, PhD Karen Crotty, PhD,
EBM --- Journal Reading Presenter :呂宥達 Date : 2005/10/27.
Start Quiz. Instructions: 1.There is only 1 possible answer on every question. 2.When you are completing the Quiz make sure you are in a quiet environment.
Finding, Evaluating, and Presenting Evidence Sharon E. Lock, PhD, ARNP NUR 603 Spring, 2001.
EVALUATING u After retrieving the literature, you have to evaluate or critically appraise the evidence for its validity and applicability to your patient.
Guidelines Recommandations. Role Ideal mediator for bridging between research findings and actual clinical practice Ideal tool for professionals, managers,
Research Design Evidence Based Medicine Concepts and Glossary.
The US Preventive Services Task Force: Potential Impact on Medicare Coverage Ned Calonge, MD, MPH Chair, USPSTF.
EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE AND PHARMACY 1. Evidence-based medicine 2. Evidence-based pharmacy.
EBM --- Journal Reading Presenter :蕭皓天 Date : 2005/10/17.
Quiz About Your Topic Question 1 A question about your topic: A. [Insert incorrect answer] C. [Insert incorrect answer] B. [Insert incorrect answer]
Clinical Trials for Comparative Effectiveness Research Mark Hlatky MD Mark Hlatky MD Stanford University January 10, 2012.
Special Triangles Review
Critically Appraising a Medical Journal Article
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
Jeopardy [Column 1] [Column 2] [Column 3] [Column 4]
Critical Reading of Clinical Study Results
Choice 1 Choice 2 Choice 3 Choice 4
Quiz About [Your topic]
FIND THE CORRECT ORDER Click Here to begin FIND THE CORRECT ORDER.
Using the Correct Order Template
Study Eligibility Criteria Interactive Quiz
Quiz Name Here Click to start.
FIND THE CORRECT ORDER.
FIND THE CORRECT ORDER.
Presentation transcript:

When to Select Observational Studies Interactive Case Study Quiz: Dan Jonas, MD, MPH Meera Viswanathan, PhD Karen Crotty, PhD, MPH RTI-UNC Evidence-based Practice Center Authors have no actual or potential conflicts of interest in relation to this activity

Interactive Case Quiz: Instructions Open this presentation as a slideshow. This will activate the hyperlinks. When you come to a decision slide, choose the red box corresponding to the correct choice. If you are correct, you will be directed forward in the case. If you are incorrect, you will be directed back to the decision slide to choose again. – – Click on forward hyperlinks (Red Boxes) to follow through cases based on your responses – – Click on home hyperlink (Blue House Icon) to go back to the last correct step in the series

Participation Quiz: Question 1 When should observational studies be considered for inclusion in a CER? Observational studies should never be considered for inclusion. Observational studies should always be considered for inclusion as the “default strategy.” There are no observational studies in CERs.

Never This is incorrect. Observational studies should always be considered for inclusion as the “default strategy.” [Click on Blue Box to Go Back]

Default Strategy You are correct! CERs should always consider observational studies as the “default strategy.” [SELECT RED BOX]

No Observational Studies in CERs This is incorrect. Observational studies regularly form part of the evidence for CERs. [Click on Blue Box to Go Back]

Participation Quiz: Question 2 Which of the following is the first question to consider when deciding whether to include observational studies to assess benefits in CERs? Will trials provide valid and useful information to address key questions? Are there gaps in the available observational evidence? Are there gaps in trial evidence for the review questions under consideration?

Valid and Useful Information This is incorrect. Trials generally provide valid and useful information and are the first source of evidence when selecting data for inclusion in a CER. The second question to consider when deciding whether to include observational studies in CERs is whether observational studies provide valid and useful information to address key questions. [Click on Blue Box to Go Back]

Gaps in Observational Evidence This is incorrect. Whether there are gaps in the observational evidence is not the first consideration when selecting evidence. [Click on Blue Box to Go Back]

Gaps in Trial Evidence This is correct. The first of two steps when considering whether to include observational studies is to determine if there are gaps in the trial evidence under review. [SELECT RED BOX]

Participation Quiz: Question 3 A CER comparing PCI vs. CABG for coronary disease identified 23 RCTs. Experts (TEP) raised concerns that the studies enrolled patients with a relatively narrow spectrum of disease relative to those having the procedures in current practice. Should you: Change your key questions to focus on the types of patients for whom research is available? Complete your review including only the 23 trials that were identified? Expand the review to include observational studies?

Change Key Questions This is incorrect. The lack of trial data is not a reason to change prespecified key questions that were developed to answer an important question. [Click on Blue Box to Go Back]

Include Only the 23 Trials This is incorrect. You should consider the advice from your TEP suggesting that the evidence to date poorly represents clinical practice and will result in poor applicability of the results of your CER. [Click on Blue Box to Go Back]

Include Observational Studies This is correct! Expanding your review to include suitable observational studies will improve the applicability of your CER. [SELECT RED BOX]

Participation Quiz: Question 4 Once gaps in the trial evidence to assess benefits have been established and you have decided to include observational studies, should you: Include all suitable observational studies found to answer the initial key questions? Exclude trial data that can be answered by the selected observational studies? Refocus the study question on the gaps in trial evidence?

Include All Suitable OS This is incorrect. You should include observational studies that address the gaps in trial evidence. [Click on Blue Box to Go Back]

Exclude Trial Data This is incorrect. You should not exclude suitable trial data. [Click on Blue Box to Go Back]

Refocus on Gaps This is correct! Observational studies should seek to answer the questions that trial data were unavailable to answer by refocusing the key questions. [SELECT RED BOX]

Participation Quiz: Question 5 In the absence of sufficient trial data, which types of observational studies should CERs routinely search for and include evidence of harms? Case reports Cross-sectional studies Cohort and case-control studies

Case Reports This is incorrect. [Click on Blue Box to Go Back]

Cross-sectional This is incorrect. [Click on Blue Box to Go Back]

Cohort and Case-control This is correct! [SELECT RED BOX]

Congratulations! You have selected the correct evidence and are now equipped with the skills necessary to sift confidently through the scientific literature, selecting the evidence most suited to answering your CER questions.