1 MCAO at CfAO meeting M. Le Louarn CfAO - UC Santa Cruz Nov. 22 2000.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RASC, Victoria, 1/08/06 The Future of Adaptive Optics Instrumentation David Andersen HIA.
Advertisements

Adaptive Optics1 John O’Byrne School of Physics University of Sydney.
Page 1 Lecture 12 Part 1: Laser Guide Stars, continued Part 2: Control Systems Intro Claire Max Astro 289, UC Santa Cruz February 14, 2013.
March 30, 2000SPIE conference, Munich1 LGS AO photon return simulations and laser requirements for the Gemini LGS AO program Céline d’Orgeville, François.
Why do astronomers need AO? Lick Observatory, 1 m telescope Long exposure image Short exposure image: “speckles” With adaptive optics Three images of a.
Laser Guide Stars by Roberto Ragazzoni INAF – Astronomical Observatory of Padova (Italy)
NGAO Companion Sensitivity Performance Budget (WBS ) Rich Dekany, Ralf Flicker, Mike Liu, Chris Neyman, Bruce Macintosh NGAO meeting #6, 4/25/2007.
Aug-Nov, 2008 IAG/USP (Keith Taylor) ‏ Instrumentation Concepts Ground-based Optical Telescopes Keith Taylor (IAG/USP) Aug-Nov, 2008 Aug-Sep, 2008 IAG-USP.
Low order wavefront sensor trade study Richard Clare NGAO meeting #4 January
NGAO Trade Study : LOWFS type and architecture Stephan Kellner, Ralf Flicker NGAO Team meeting #4, WMKO Kamuela HI, 1/22/2007 Status report.
Widening the Scope of Adaptive Optics Matthew Britton.
California Association for Research in Astronomy W. M. Keck Observatory KPAO Keck Precision Adaptive Optics Keck Precision AO (KPAO) SSC Presentation January.
WFS Preliminary design phase report I V. Velur, J. Bell, A. Moore, C. Neyman Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
NGAO Photometric Accuracy Budget Strategy Richard Dekany.
LGS-AO Performance Characterization Plan AOWG meeting Dec. 5, 2003 A. Bouchez, D. Le Mignant, M. van Dam for the Keck AO team.
NGAO Status R. Dekany January 31, Next Generation AO at Keck Nearing completion of 18 months System Design phase –Science requirements and initial.
Don Gavel: Keck NGAO meeting April 25, LAO Activities Relevant To Keck NGAO Donald Gavel NGAO Team Meeting 6 April 26, 2007.
Telescope Errors for NGAO Christopher Neyman & Ralf Flicker W. M. Keck Observatory Keck NGAO Team Meeting #4 January 22, 2007 Hualalai Conference Room,
What Requirements Drive NGAO Cost? Richard Dekany NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
MCAO A Pot Pourri: AO vs HST, the Gemini MCAO and AO for ELTs Francois Rigaut, Gemini GSMT SWG, IfA, 12/04/2002.
1 On-sky validation of LIFT on GeMS C. Plantet 1, S. Meimon 1, J.-M. Conan 1, B. Neichel 2, T. Fusco 1 1: ONERA, the French Aerospace Lab, Chatillon, France.
Adaptive Optics Nicholas Devaney GTC project, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias 1. Principles 2. Multi-conjugate 3. Performance & challenges.
Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Beyond Basic AO
Adaptive Optics with Adaptive Filtering and Control Steve Gibson Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University of California, Los Angeles
Laboratory prototype for the demonstration of sodium laser guide star wavefront sensing on the E-ELT Sexten Primary School July 2015 THE OUTCOME.
A visible-light AO system for the 4.2 m SOAR telescope A. Tokovinin, B. Gregory, H. E. Schwarz, V. Terebizh, S. Thomas.
GLAO simulations at ESO European Southern Observatory
Telescopes & recent observational techniques ASTR 3010 Lecture 4 Chapters 3 & 6.
1 Manal Chebbo, Alastair Basden, Richard Myers, Nazim Bharmal, Tim Morris, Thierry Fusco, Jean-Francois Sauvage Fast E2E simulation tools and calibration.
Adaptive Optics1 John O’Byrne School of Physics University of Sydney.
NSF Center for Adaptive Optics UCO Lick Observatory Laboratory for Adaptive Optics Tomographic algorithm for multiconjugate adaptive optics systems Donald.
AO for ELT – Paris, June 2009 MAORY Multi conjugate Adaptive Optics RelaY for the E-ELT Emiliano Diolaiti (INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna)
Update to End to End LSST Science Simulation Garrett Jernigan and John Peterson December, 2004 Status of the Science End-to-End Simulator: 1. Sky Models.
Viewing the Universe through distorted lenses: Adaptive optics in astronomy Steven Beckwith Space Telescope Science Institute & JHU.
Low order modes sensing for LGS MCAO with a single NGS S. Esposito, P. M. Gori, G. Brusa Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri Italy Conf. AO4ELT June.
Tomographic reconstruction of stellar wavefronts from multiple laser guide stars C. Baranec, M. Lloyd-Hart, N. M. Milton T. Stalcup, M. Snyder, & R. Angel.
OC, June 3, SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.
Fundamentals of closed loop wave-front control
Future Plan of Subaru Adaptive Optics
MCAO System Modeling Brent Ellerbroek. MCAO May 24-25, 2001MCAO Preliminary Design Review2 Presentation Outline Modeling objectives and approach Updated.
ATLAS The LTAO module for the E-ELT Thierry Fusco ONERA / DOTA On behalf of the ATLAS consortium Advanced Tomography with Laser for AO systems.
Improved Tilt Sensing in an LGS-based Tomographic AO System Based on Instantaneous PSF Estimation Jean-Pierre Véran AO4ELT3, May 2013.
Vancouver, June Models of the ground layer and free atmosphere at some sites A. Tokovinin, CTIO Need for OTP “models”: Adaptive Optics!
AO4ELT, June Wide Field AO simulation for ELT: Fourier and E2E approaches C. Petit*, T. Fusco*, B. Neichel**, J.-F. Sauvage*, J.-M. Conan* * ONERA/PHASE.
Shack-Hartmann tomographic wavefront reconstruction using LGS: Analysis of spot elongation and fratricide effect Clélia Robert 1, Jean-Marc Conan 1, Damien.
Experimental results of tomographic reconstruction on ONERA laboratory WFAO bench A. Costille*, C. Petit*, J.-M. Conan*, T. Fusco*, C. Kulcsár**, H.-F.
California Association for Research in Astronomy W. M. Keck Observatory KPAO Keck Precision Adaptive Optics 1 Keck Precision AO (KPAO) Notes for AOWG telecom.
Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 1 Adaptive Optics Requirements, Concepts, and Performance.
March 31, 2000SPIE CONFERENCE 4007, MUNICH1 Principles, Performance and Limitations of Multi-conjugate Adaptive Optics F.Rigaut 1, B.Ellerbroek 1 and R.Flicker.
Na Laser Guide Stars for CELT CfAO Workshop on Laser Guide Stars 99/12/07 Rich Dekany.
Atmospheric Turbulence: r 0,  0,  0 François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz) Adaptive Optics in the.
Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova A study of Pyramid WFS behavior under imperfect illumination Valentina Viotto Demetrio Magrin Maria Bergomi Marco Dima.
VLT Laser Guide Star Facility Recovery DBO - ESO Status Overview – CfAO meeting 26 March 2007 ESO: E. Allaert, C. Araujo, G.Avila, D.Bonaccini Calia, E.Brunetto,
Comète axe 2 - TC1 : RSA n°2 - SPART/S t Cloud Workshop Leiden 2005 Performance of wave-front measurement concepts for GLAO M. NICOLLE 1, T. FUSCO.
AO4ELT, Paris A Split LGS/NGS Atmospheric Tomography for MCAO and MOAO on ELTs Luc Gilles and Brent Ellerbroek Thirty Meter Telescope Observatory.
Keck Precision Adaptive Optics Authors: Christopher Neyman 1, Richard Dekany 2, Mitchell Troy 3 and Peter Wizinowich 1. 1 W.M. Keck Observatory, 2 California.
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes Center for Adaptive Optics.
François Rigaut, Gemini Observatory GSMT SWG Meeting, LAX, 2003/03/06 François Rigaut, Gemini Observatory GSMT SWG Meeting, LAX, 2003/03/06 GSMT AO Simulations.
Parameters characterizing the Atmospheric Turbulence: r0, 0, 0
Introduction of RAVEN Subaru Future Instrument Workshop Shin Oya (Subaru Telescope) Mitaka Adaptive Optics Lab Subaru Telescope Astronomical.
Gemini AO Program March 31, 2000Ellerbroek/Rigaut [ ]1 Scaling Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics Performance Estimates to Extremely Large Telescopes.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz) Basics of AO.
The MAORY Simulation Tool C. Arcidiacono, L. Schreiber, G. Bregoli, E. Diolaiti, Mauro Patti, M. Lombini OA BOLOGNA.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Beyond Basic AO François Wildi Observatoire de Genève.
Page 1 Lecture 13: Basic Concepts of Wavefront Reconstruction Astro 289 Claire Max February 25, 2016 Based on slides by Marcos van Dam and Lisa Poyneer.
Pyramid sensors for AO and co-phasing
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
NGAO Trade Study GLAO for non-NGAO instruments
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Presentation transcript:

1 MCAO at CfAO meeting M. Le Louarn CfAO - UC Santa Cruz Nov

Goal of MCAO modeling Can one use 1 NGS measuring 5 modes instead of 3 NGS measuring TT ? –Limiting magnitude with NGS ? –Sky coverage ? Astrophysical implications of MCAO ELTs: Is it possible to use N LGS and only 1DM (closed loop problem ?) for correction in the visible ? Effect of spot elongation on MCAO […] AO engineering modelling (engineering tolerences) Lasers ? NGS - MCAO ? Probably not because of low SC, but can use a lot of faint stars (?) Effect of the NGS star distribution (no perfect triangles) MCAO: smaller SC than with single NGS AO. –JPV: MCAO SC on HST targets -> MCAO CoDR

MCAO Modeling Full numerical Monte Carlo Simulation –3 DMs, 5 LGS, 7 atmospheric layers (~ Gemini) –13x13 SH for each LGS (with SH spot speckles) –3x3 SH for 1 NGS (instead of 3 TT Gemini) –Least-squares inversion of IM (SVD) –Closed loop, obtain PSF anywhere in the FOV Analytic covariance code (Tokovinin et al.) –Covariances of Zernikes computed for measurements & reconstructions –Knowledge of C n 2 profile –Optimal estimation of the correction –Open loop –Obtain residual WF error anywhere in the FOV

Analytic vs. Numerical Black: Analytic & Numerical isoplanatism, Red: Numerical MCAO, Blue: Analytical MCAO

H Band

J Band

What could go wrong in simulations ? Atmosphere is not as simulated: –There are many turbulent layers, almost continuous profile, outer scale L0 -> effect on high altitude DM density ? –Strong turbulence profile variations in closed loop –Propagation effects –Non-Kolmogorov turbulence, Non-Taylor turbulence Na layer / LGS properties –Height variations: difficult to put in but can get an estimate –Spot elongation (  ELTs): can be simulated for 8m tel. –Lasers for MCAO Hardware issues: AO simulation validity ??? –High order aberrations in mirrors, DM mis-registration... –MCAO waffle modes on real DMs –DM hysteresis effects –edge effects –laser launch telescope jitter -> total least squares

C n 2 profiles

Lab/sky tests Atmosphere: –Continuous turbulence (not repeatable ?) + thin layers (?) Turbulence generator Phase screens –Propagation effects Phase screens –Non-Kolmogorov screens Na Layer: –Studies on LGS AO systems ? –Site monitoring (Na profile measurements) Lab MCAO system: –control algorithm testing, system tolerances –DM hysteresis AO Systems: DO NGS AO system work as modelled ? (Lick AO, Keck, Pueo…)

Why lab / sky tests ? Lab test = acceptance test of the MCAO system: saves money Have you thought of everything ? 1DM LGS AO system: –Na Layer saturation checked –Engineering for Keck, VLT,... Sky testing / site monitoring -> Do we have the right parameters ? Ragazzoni test on the sky did it bring anything good ?