ASTM E17 Committee Mini-Seminar Dec. 5, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration 1 FAA PERSPECTIVE Airfield Pavement Roughness Presentation to: ASTM E17 Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ride Specification – IRI Update Prepared by Joe Thomas, P.E. 11/1/06 MAAPT 53 rd Annual Asphalt Conference December 6, 2006.
Advertisements

Modeling Airport Capacity
DANVILLE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AUGUST 3,
29 th Annual Airports Conference Hershey, PA Kenneth Jacobs FAA Airport Engineering Division March 1, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration Runway Safety.
FAA AAR-410 December 5, FAA Airport Pavement Roughness R&D u Gordon Hayhoe, AAR-410, FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center, Atlantic City, New Jersey,
2014 Washington Asphalt Conference “Specification Update & Initiatives” Joe DeVol Assistant State Materials Engineer State Materials Laboratory.
2013 C&MS Section 500- Structures Changes from 2010 to 2013 Construction and Materials Specifications in Structures Items.
From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG) Chapter 5 Diamond Grinding and Grooving.
FAA Eastern Region 34 th Annual Airport Conference March 2, 2011 – Hershey, PA.
Binder Characterizations for High Tire Pressure Project 04/26/2012 Injun Song Injun Song, Ph.D., P. E. SRA International, Inc. Federal Aviation Administration.
Why the United States needs NACLA Recognition of Accreditation Bodies Federal Highway Administration’s Perspective Mike Rafalowski Materials Engineer Office.
Tolerances and Price Impacts Presented by:- Er. Bhagawan Shrestha.
KOREA AIRPORTS CORPORATION & ROADTECH Advanced Non-contact Profiler Improving the Quality of Pavement Profile Measurement 1.
PRESENTATION TO 34 TH ANNUAL AIRPORTS CONFERENCE 3/02/11 By: Casimir J. Bognacki, PE, FACI Chief of Materials Engineering.
OPSG 1 JAR OPS Noise Abatement Procedures Capt. Claude Godel OST 05-4.
Presented to: FAA Airport Pavement Working Group By: Murphy Flynn Date: April 24, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration Construction Update.
Airfield Pavement Roughness -Gaps in the Industry-
FAA/Asphalt Institute Airport Pavement Workshop October 18-20, 2011 Newport Beach, California The Benefit of Runway Grooving Hector Daiutolo 1.
Presentation By: Timothy W. Neubert, MBA, A.A.E.
Lec 22, Ch.16, pp : Vertical alignment (objectives) You learned how to lay out a vertical curve, given grades, PVC, PVI, and PVT in CE113 Surveying.
Design of Highway Vertical Alignment Chapter 16
VERTICAL ALIGNMENT Spring 2015.
PERMEABLE DRAINAGE LAYERS IN AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS
Recent Lighting and Marking Design Challenges/Trends
PRACTICAL AIRPORT PAVEMENT M&R MANAGEMENT Y. Hachiya & M. Kanno Service Center of Port Engineering Tokyo, JAPAN 1 FAA Airport Pavement Working Group Meeting.
Presented to: 2008 FAA Eastern Region Airports Conference By: Donna O’Neill FAA Obstruction Evaluation Specialist Date: March 19, 2008 Federal Aviation.
Aircraft classifications Aircraft classifications are useful in airport engineering work (including terminal gate sizing, apron and taxiway planning,
Aircraft Dynamic Response
Vertical Alignment CE 2710 Spring 2009 Chris McCahill
FAA Runway Friction Program
Takeoff Performance Jet Aircraft Performance
Introduction Installation variables have a real-world effect on the fixture’s Light Beam or the Field Photometrics. Disruption to the Photometric Beam.
I. Advantages of Smooth Pavements: Longer Life Public Opinion Save Fuel Less Surface Maintenance II. Ways to Ensure Smooth Pavements Subgrade and Subbase.
Geometric design.
Airport Lighting Brett Malloy
Developing a Mixture-Based Specification for Flexible Base.
Presented to: SEARAST, NARAST, SARAST By: Glenn Michael Date: November , 2007 Federal Aviation Administration Analytical Unit Call to Action on.
COMFAA 3.0 Beta.
Review of Handbook Chapters Pat Cahill
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration National Airport Pavement Test Facility Update Airport Pavement Working Group Don Barbagallo April.
By: FAASTeam Federal Aviation Administration Land and Hold Short Operations (LAHSO)
Guidelines for Use of Highway Specifications for Airport Pavements
Presented to: Transport Airplane Metallic and Composite Structures Working Group and Airworthiness Authorities By: Walt Sippel and Mike Gruber Date: Sept.
1 Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration Runway Incursion Prevention Airport Design – AC 150/5300 Change - 17 Presented to: Eastern.
Definition: Preliminary Geometric Design of an Airport in Palestine.
Wes Timmons, Director of Runway Safety, FAA April 2009 Federal Aviation Administration Runway Safety: Sun ‘N Fun Update.
4/25/2017 9:25 AM Inertial Profiler Forum Intro to the Inertial Profiler Implementation September 28, 2015 © 2015 California Department of Transportation.
Skip Hudspeth and Gordon Hayhoe 112/20/2015. Pavement Roughness Subjective Pilot Rating Study Phase I - Develop a surface roughness model on the B
Jeffrey L. Rapol Qiang Wang Jeffrey L. Rapol, Civil Engineer Federal Aviation Administration Airport Engineering Division, AAS Independence Ave,
SESSION 9 Construction Considerations. Objectives  Describe key aspects of: Prepaving operations Paving operations Postpaving operations  Understand.
HIGH TIRE PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE EFFECTS ON HOT MIX ASPHALT CONCRETE PERMANENT DEFORMATION USING CUSTOMIZED ASPHALT PAVEMENT ANALYZER April 22, 2010.
Federal Aviation Administration Halon 1211 Stratification/ Localization in Aircraft Louise Speitel Fire Safety Branch FAA Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center.
Presented to: 2010 FAA Worldwide Airport Technology Transfer Conference By: Gordon Hayhoe, FAA AJP-6312, WJHTC Date: April 20, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration.
Federal Aviation Administration Wiring Test 0 Federal Aviation Administration Pat Cahill AJP-632; Fire Safety Team Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
Airport FAA 5010 Safety Inspections What does that mean???? Inspectors are responsible for reporting accurate information about all landing facilities.
AAR-410 February 2, Alpha Factor Determination for 6-Wheel Gears u Gordon Hayhoe, AAR-410, FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center, Atlantic City,
Presented to: By: Date: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 Federal Aviation Administration Go Around Defined Business Rules.
Presented to: 2010 FAA Worldwide Technology Transfer Conference By: James Zargan and Al Larkin Date: April 2010 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement.
NCDOT – “Final Surface Testing” CAPA / NCDOT Asphalt Training Workshop February 21-22, 2012 Raleigh, NC IRI Standard Specification Article
National Highway Institute 4-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 PROFILE INDICES BLOCK 4.
Classification of Aerodromes
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration RPD 151 (RPA S5.1) Evaluation of In-Pavement Light Fixture Designs and Performance REDAC Subcommittee.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: OSWG Presented by: Chris Hope Date: March 9, 2016 ILS Performance Classification OpSpec C061.
National Highway Institute 5-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 EQUIPMENT FACTORS AFFECTING INERTIAL PROFILER MEASUREMENTS BLOCK 5.
Quantity Calculations Module 3. Quantity Calculations  Specifications  Post Bid Quantity Calculations  Production Quantity Calculations –Checking Yield.
Airport Pavements Lexington, KY.
Chapter 7 Visual Aids for Denoting Restricted Use Areas
ALDOT Specification Updates
Chapter 10 Aerodrome Maintenance
Patented Precision 8 August 2014 US Patent 6,775,914
Presentation transcript:

ASTM E17 Committee Mini-Seminar Dec. 5, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration 1 FAA PERSPECTIVE Airfield Pavement Roughness Presentation to: ASTM E17 Committee Mini-Seminar Name: Rodney Joel - Airport Engineering Division Date: Dec. 5, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration

ASTM E17 Committee Mini-Seminar Dec. 5, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration 2 FAA Guidance - Pavement Profile NEW CONSTRUCTION AC 150/ , Airport Design Surface Gradient Maximum grade allowance Change in grade provisions AC 150/ B, Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports Construction Tolerances Acceptance Criteria

ASTM E17 Committee Mini-Seminar Dec. 5, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration 3 FAA Guidance - Pavement Profile AC 150/ , Airport Design Category C & D airports +1.5 percent - Max longitudinal grade (+0.8 percent in first and last quarter of runway) +1.5 percent - Max grade change Parabolic vertical curves 1,000 ft each 1 percent change 1,000 ft - Min distance between points of intersection Relaxed for category A & B airports

ASTM E17 Committee Mini-Seminar Dec. 5, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration 4 FAA Guidance - Pavement Profile Longitudinal Grade – Category C & D Airports 0% to 0.8% End ¼ Runway 0% to 1.5% Vert. Curve Length Grade Change Distance Between Grade Change Minimum (1000 ft) x (sum of grade change) Minimum length – 1000 ft x grade change 0% to 1.5% P.C. P.T.

ASTM E17 Committee Mini-Seminar Dec. 5, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration 5 FAA Guidance - Pavement Profile Transverse Grade – Category C & D Airports 1.0 % to 1.5 % Runway Width 1.0% to 1.5%

ASTM E17 Committee Mini-Seminar Dec. 5, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration 6 FAA Guidance - Pavement Profile AC B, Item P-401 Plant Mix Bituminous Pavements Grade – not exceed ½ inch at any point Smoothness Finished Surface < ¼ inch in 16 feet Reject if more than 15% exceed criteria Optional Profilograph

ASTM E17 Committee Mini-Seminar Dec. 5, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration 7 FAA Guidance - Pavement Profile AC B, Item P-501 Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Grade not exceed 0.4 inch (12mm) at any point Smoothness Finished Surface < ¼ inch in 16 feet Reject if more than 15% exceed criteria Optional Profilograph

ASTM E17 Committee Mini-Seminar Dec. 5, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration 8 FAA Guidance - Pavement Profile When tolerances are within the quality limits specified,experience has shown that the current FAA grade and straightedge criteria provides pavements that are safe for aircraft operations with regards to accelerated gear load, fatigue damage, pitch & roll, and cockpit g-forces. This criteria may not address isolated exceptions such as harmonic oscillations

ASTM E17 Committee Mini-Seminar Dec. 5, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration 9 FAA New Construction (6mm per 5 m) ICAO Tolerable Limit (30mm per 45 m) ICAO Slope Change Limit (1.5% between consecutive slopes) Acceptable Unacceptable Excessive ICAO Standard of Construction (3mm per 3 m) Bump Length, meters Bump Height, cm FAA Guidance - Pavement Profile BOEING BUMP (appears to address gear load issues for a single event) Meeting the FAA design and construction criteria (0.25” per 16’) or the ICAO (3mm per 3 m) criteria produces pavements which are safe for aircraft operations

ASTM E17 Committee Mini-Seminar Dec. 5, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration 10 Pavement Roughness EVALUATION OF EXISTING PAVEMENTS There are several tools and methods to measure and evaluate a pavement profile. Parameters under consideration include: Boeing Bump CG or Gear Acceleration (aircraft response) IRI Bandpass Filters Power Spectral Density ETC...

ASTM E17 Committee Mini-Seminar Dec. 5, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration 11 Pavement Roughness EVALUATION OF EXISTING PAVEMENTS There is no industry standard which clearly defines when an airport pavement has become “too rough” Problems can be aircraft specific New Construction criteria is not applied Action is initiated by pilot complaints

ASTM E17 Committee Mini-Seminar Dec. 5, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration 12 Pavement Roughness – Existing Facilities

ASTM E17 Committee Mini-Seminar Dec. 5, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration 13 Pavement Roughness – What Next? FAA Tech Center – Airport Pavement Roughness Criteria “develop practical procedures for measuring and characterizing the roughness of runways and taxiways” Simulator Study Dr. Hayhoe will discuss Industry Efforts ??