Evaluation of Astrometry Errors due to the Optical Surface Distortions in Adaptive Optics Systems and Science Instruments Brent Ellerbroek a, Glen Herriot.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TMT.OPT.PRE DRF011 Thirty Meter Telescope Secondary and Tertiary Mirror Systems International Symposium on Photoelectronic Detection and Imaging.
Advertisements

GSMT Control Workshop Tucson, September 11-12, 2001 Pointing Control for a giant segmented mirror telescope Patrick Wallace Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Error budget for the PRIMA conceptual design review Bob Tubbs, Richard Mathar, Murakawa Koji, Rudolf Le Poole, Jeff Meisner and Eric Bakker Leiden University.
Géraldine Guerri Post-doc CSL
AO4ELT3 May 28, 2013 On-Sky Tests of Sparse-Field Astrometry with GEMS and a 1-meter Telescope S. Mark Ammons Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Olivier.
Towards Creation of a JWST Astrometric Reference Field: Calibration of HST/ACS Absolute Scale and Rotation Roeland van der Marel Jay Anderson, Colin Cox,
LBT AGW units Design Review Mar.2001 General Concept Performance specifications and goals The off-axis unit The mechanical support structure The control.
Adaptive Optics and Optical Interferometry or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Atmosphere Brian Kern Observational Astronomy 10/25/00.
Keck Next Generation Adaptive Optics Team Meeting 6 1 Optical Relay and Field Rotation (WBS , ) Brian Bauman April 26, 2007.
PALM-3000 PALM-3000 Instrument Architecture Antonin Bouchez PALM-3000 Requirements Review November 12, 2007.
WFS Preliminary design phase report I V. Velur, J. Bell, A. Moore, C. Neyman Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
NGAO Alignment Plan See KAON 719 P. Wizinowich. 2 Introduction KAON 719 is intended to define & describe the alignments that will need to be performed.
TMT.AOS.PRE REL01 Ellerbroek, AO4ELT, Paris, June Brent Ellerbroek Thirty Meter Telescope Observatory Corporation Adaptive Optics for.
TMT.SEN.PRE REL01 Development and validation of vibration source requirements for TMT to ensure AO performance Hugh Thompson and Doug MacMartin.
14 Sep 1998R D Ekers - Synth Image Workshop: INTRODUCTION 1 Synthesis Imaging Workshop Introduction R. D. Ekers 14 Sep 1998.
Optical Design Work for a Laser-Fiber Scanned
Developing Performance Estimates for High Precision Astrometry with TMT Matthias Schoeck, Tuan Do, Brent Ellerbroek, Gilles Luc, Glen Herriot, Leo Meyer,
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Mechanical Design Eric James.
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Subsystem Optical Designs R.A.Buchroeder.
B.Delabre November 2003ANGRA DOS REIS - BRAZIL ESO 2 nd GENERATION INSTRUMENTATION – OPTICAL DESIGNS ESO VLT SECOND GENERATION INSTRUMENTATION Optical.
STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)
1 FRIDA Engineering Status 17/05/07 Engineering Status May 17, 2007 F.J. Fuentes InFraRed Imager and Dissector for Adaptive Optics.
MCAO System Overview Brent Ellerbroek. MCAO May 24-25, 2001MCAO Preliminary Design Review2 Presentation Outline Primary subsystems and their characteristics.
NSF Center for Adaptive Optics UCO Lick Observatory Laboratory for Adaptive Optics Tomographic algorithm for multiconjugate adaptive optics systems Donald.
The AO system for the GTC -an update Nicholas Devaney, Dolores Bello, Bruno Femenía, Alejandro Villegas, Javier Castro Grantecan, Instituto de Astrofísica.
15 October Observational Astronomy Direct imaging Photometry Kitchin pp ,
Low order modes sensing for LGS MCAO with a single NGS S. Esposito, P. M. Gori, G. Brusa Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri Italy Conf. AO4ELT June.
Tomographic reconstruction of stellar wavefronts from multiple laser guide stars C. Baranec, M. Lloyd-Hart, N. M. Milton T. Stalcup, M. Snyder, & R. Angel.
FLAO system test plan in solar tower S. Esposito, G. Brusa, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
2004 January 27Mathematical Challenges of Using Point Spread Function Analysis Algorithms in Astronomical ImagingMighell 1 Mathematical Challenges of Using.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz) Optics for AO.
IRIS OIWFS Concept Study D. Loop1, M. Fletcher1, V. Reshetov1, R
TMT.PMO.PRE REL011 Thirty Meter Telescope Background and Status.
Improved Tilt Sensing in an LGS-based Tomographic AO System Based on Instantaneous PSF Estimation Jean-Pierre Véran AO4ELT3, May 2013.
Zero field The 25 ‑ m f /0.7 primary mirror for the Giant Magellan Telescope (GMT) is made of seven 8.4 ‑ m segments in a close packed array. Each of the.
The Active Optics System S. Thomas and the AO team.
FELT 1 Study of the capability and configuration of a fixed mirror Extremely Large Telescope (FELT) Low cost path to large telescope Primary concern is.
SNAP Calibration Program Steps to Spectrophotometric Calibration The SNAP (Supernova / Acceleration Probe) mission’s primary science.
Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 1 Adaptive Optics Requirements, Concepts, and Performance.
March 31, 2000SPIE CONFERENCE 4007, MUNICH1 Principles, Performance and Limitations of Multi-conjugate Adaptive Optics F.Rigaut 1, B.Ellerbroek 1 and R.Flicker.
Na Laser Guide Stars for CELT CfAO Workshop on Laser Guide Stars 99/12/07 Rich Dekany.
Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova A study of Pyramid WFS behavior under imperfect illumination Valentina Viotto Demetrio Magrin Maria Bergomi Marco Dima.
Prof. Charles A. DiMarzio Northeastern University Fall 2003 July 2003
On the Evaluation of Optical Performace of Observing Instruments Y. Suematsu (National Astronomical Observatory of Japan) ABSTRACT: It is useful to represent.
System Performance Metrics and Current Performance Status George Angeli.
Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Optics for AO
AO4ELT, Paris A Split LGS/NGS Atmospheric Tomography for MCAO and MOAO on ELTs Luc Gilles and Brent Ellerbroek Thirty Meter Telescope Observatory.
Robo-AO Overview: System, capabilities, performance Christoph Baranec (PI)
Charts for TPF-C workshop SNR for Nulling Coronagraph and Post Coron WFS M. Shao 9/28/06.
The High Altitude Observatory (HAO) at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by.
Keck Precision Adaptive Optics Authors: Christopher Neyman 1, Richard Dekany 2, Mitchell Troy 3 and Peter Wizinowich 1. 1 W.M. Keck Observatory, 2 California.
François Rigaut, Gemini Observatory GSMT SWG Meeting, LAX, 2003/03/06 François Rigaut, Gemini Observatory GSMT SWG Meeting, LAX, 2003/03/06 GSMT AO Simulations.
J. H. Burgea,b, W. Davisona, H. M. Martina, C. Zhaob
Parameters characterizing the Atmospheric Turbulence: r0, 0, 0
Introduction of RAVEN Subaru Future Instrument Workshop Shin Oya (Subaru Telescope) Mitaka Adaptive Optics Lab Subaru Telescope Astronomical.
Gemini AO Program March 31, 2000Ellerbroek/Rigaut [ ]1 Scaling Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics Performance Estimates to Extremely Large Telescopes.
January 6, 2005 URSI Nation Radio Science Meeting, Boulder, CO. Pointing and Focusing the GBT K. T. Constantikes NRAO Green Bank.
Computationally Efficient Wavefront Reconstruction for Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics (MCAO) Brent Ellerbroek AURA New Initiatives Office IPAM Workshop.
Astronomical Spectroscopic Techniques. Contents 1.Optics (1): Stops, Pupils, Field Optics and Cameras 2.Basic Electromagnetics –Math –Maxwell's equations.
WFC3 SMOV UVIS and IR Geometric Distortion Calibration and Multidrizzle Vera Kozhurina-Platais and WFC3 team.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz) Basics of AO.
July © Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University ECEG105/ECEU646 Optics for Engineers Course Notes Part 4: Apertures, Aberrations Prof.
June 21, 2016, Robert Karban Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
SSA Module Assembly ANNEX 0 - Assembly sequence
Astronomical Spectroscopic Techniques
Design of the NFIRAOS PWFS module
GPI Astrometric Calibration
He Sun Advisor: N. Jeremy Kasdin Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Modern Observational/Instrumentation Techniques Astronomy 500
Optics Alan Title, HMI-LMSAL Lead,
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation of Astrometry Errors due to the Optical Surface Distortions in Adaptive Optics Systems and Science Instruments Brent Ellerbroek a, Glen Herriot b, Ryuji Suzuki c, and Matthias Schoeck a a TMT Observatory Corporation, b NRC Herzberg, c National Astronomical Observatory of Japan Adaptive Optics for Extremely Large Telescopes 3 Florence, Italy May 28, 2013 TMT.AOS.PRE REL01 AO4ELT3, Florence, 05/28/13 1

Presentation Outline Current astrometry requirements and error budget for TMT Objectives of this exercise Simplified model for astrometric observations Simplified modeling assumptions Summary of analytical results Application to NFIRAOS+IRIS for TMT Summary and future plans TMT.AOS.PRE REL01 AO4ELT3, Florence, 05/28/13 2

Astrometry Requirements for TMT [REQ-1-ORD-3650] NFIRAOS shall enable precise differential astrometry measurements, –where one-dimensional time-dependent rms astrometric positional uncertainties, after fitting distortion measured with field stars, and over a 30 arcsecond field of view –shall be no larger than 50 µ-arcseconds in the H band for a 100s integration time. –Errors should fall as t -1/2. –Systematic one-dimensional rms position uncertainties shall be no more than 10 µas. [REQ-1-ORD-3652] The AO system should provide sufficient calibration information to not degrade the astrometric capabilities beyond the limits set by the atmosphere. TMT.AOS.PRE REL01 AO4ELT3, Florence, 05/28/13 3

Astrometry Error Budget Organization for TMT Reference catalogue errors Atmospheric refraction correction Other atmospheric effects Opto-mechanical errors: –Telescope optics calibration –Guide probe position –Imager calibration –Optical surface calibration –Rotator calibration –Quasi-static errors –Stuck actuators, diffraction spikes –Vibrations –Coupling with other effects Focal plane errors More than 30 (currently 34) terms grouped in 5 categories –Organization derived in part from MICADO budget –Values of many terms are scenario- dependent –Many terms remain work in progress 4 Driven by optical surface errors in IRIS and NFIRAOS TMT.AOS.PRE REL01 AO4ELT3, Florence, 05/28/13

Objectives of this Exercise Develop engineering formulas for estimating astrometry errors due to optical surface errors in instruments and AO systems –Intended as a practical tool to support development of error budgets and optical surface specifications Apply to current optical designs and surface specifications for IRIS + NFIRAOS to confirm that TMT astrometry requirements can be met Begin to iterate designs and surface specifications as necessary… 5TMT.AOS.PRE REL01 AO4ELT3, Florence, 05/28/13

Observing Sequence Model 6 Distortion Calibration w/ Ref. Grid Distortion Calibration w/ Stars Distortion map, post- focal optics Science Exposure #2 Science Exposure #1 Distortion map, pre- focal optics Position Measurement #1 Differential Position Measurement Position Measurement #2 Quasi-static error #1 Boresight error #1 Quasi-static error #2 Boresight error #2 Field rotation or dither     Calibration by Field Stars TMT.AOS.PRE REL01 AO4ELT3, Florence, 05/28/13

Modeling assumptions 7 Optical surface errorsRandom, with shift-invariant statistics  Defined by PSDs Induced wavefront errorsLinear sum of contributions from “phase screens” at each surface Resulting image distortionRMS best-fit tilt to exit pupil wavefront Random boresight errorsNormally distributed in 2 dimensions Intentional field-of-view offset or rotation Linear displacement of optical path through some or all optical surfaces Distortion calibration by reference sources/stars Measures image distortion map up to the Nyquist rate defined by reference source spacing Distortion calibration by field stars Removes low-order (polynomial) modes of image distortion map Other simplifying assumptions Circular, unobscured aperture Circular field-of-view Circularly symmetric error PSDs TMT.AOS.PRE REL01 AO4ELT3, Florence, 05/28/13

Formulation of Results Mean-square error a sum of contributions from each surface: For quasi-static errors For dither/rotation errors (random boresight errors similar) For calibration errors 8 Domain of aliasing Translation filter Error PSD Tip/Tilt filter Low-order Mode removal filter TMT.AOS.PRE REL01 AO4ELT3, Florence, 05/28/13

Optical Train Schematic for NFIRAOS (Facility AO System) + IRIS (Near IR Imager/Spectrograph) 9 TMT NFIRAOS Windows (Reference Source Grid) NFIRAOS Optics IRIS Window IRIS Optics Focal Plane (Rotation Bearing) Rotates in IRIS Coordinate System Distortion Calibration via Stars Distortion Calibration via Reference Sources TMT.AOS.PRE REL01 AO4ELT3, Florence, 05/28/13

TMT+NFIRAOS Optical Layout : Input windows 1,16: Input/output focus 7,9,10,14: OAPs 8,11: DMs 12: Science beamsplitter 15: Instrument selection fold TMT.AOS.PRE REL01 AO4ELT3, Florence, 05/28/13

(Initial) NFIRAOS Optical Surface Specifications Developed based upon overall NFIRAOS wavefront error budgets –Science field –Off-axis guidestars –Compensation by NFIRAOS deformable mirrors permitted Values specify transmitted wavefront errors over surface clear aperture with tip/tilt/focus removed Power law error PSD specified –p=-2.5 Total76.5 nm RMS Win 1 ( km)30.9 Win 2 ( km)31.0 OAP1 (49.2 km)25.1 OAP2 (-36.6 km)24.6 OAP3 (35.2 km)24.9 Sci B/S (-9.7 km)27.5 OAP4 (-43.6 km)24.3 Inst. Fold (-85.2 k m)27.1 TMT.AOS.PRE REL01 AO4ELT, Victoria, September Uniform tolerance of 25 nm RMS assumed for initial astrometry budgeting Input window specifications tightened as needed to achieve astrometry budget

NFIRAOS focal plane Entrance window Collimator lens Fold mirror Collimator lenses Pupil ADC Filter Camera TMA Detector IRIS Imaging Channel (ApT Collimator + TMA Camera) TMT.AOS.PRE REL01 AO4ELT3, Florence, 05/28/13

IRIS Optical Surface Specifications #Surf. Name DA,mDA,m h, km PSD pwr , nm #Surf. Name DA,mDA,m h, km PSD pwr , nm 1Win f ADC 1f Win b ADC 1c Col 1f ADC 1b Col 1b ADC 2f Fold ADC 2c Fold ADC 2b Col 2f Filt. F Col 2b Filt. B Col 3f Cam Col 3b Cam Col 4f Cam Col 4b TMT.AOS.PRE REL01 AO4ELT3, Florence, 05/28/13

Distortion Calibration Errors vs. Reference Source Spacing All optics except NFIRAOS Windows Spacing of 0.7 arc sec yields 5  arc sec error NFIRAOS windows, original specs Errors too large! NFIRAOS windows, revised specs Spacing of 5 arc sec yields 6  arc sec error 14 Source Spacing arc sec Calibration Error,  arc sec TMT.AOS.PRE REL01 AO4ELT3, Florence, 05/28/13

Distortion Calibration Error Contribution by Surface 15 Surface number in optical train Calibration Error,  arc sec Camera mirrors 2 and 3 NFIRAOS windows, original specs NFIRAOS windows, revised specs IRIS input window Collimator lens 1 Fold mirror 1 TMT.AOS.PRE REL01 AO4ELT3, Florence, 05/28/13

Differential Image Distortion Due to Iris/NFIRAOS Rotation Fourier model approximates field rotation by a global translation: 16 Line-of-sight shift in NFIRAOS, arc sec Field-averaged differential distortion,  arc sec Red: Original window tolerances Blue: Revised tolerances Solid: Global tip/tilt calibration using reference stars Dashed: Plate scale calibration TMT.AOS.PRE REL01 AO4ELT3, Florence, 05/28/13

Sensitivities for Quasi-Static DM Figure Errors on DM11.2 in NFIRAOS D=30m 30” FoV 11.2 km DM conjugate range 0.5m actuator pitch Max. sensitivity of ~2.5  as/nm with global tip/tilt calibration ~0.15 with plate scale calibration 17 Spatial frequency, cycles/m Sensitivity,  as/nm TMT.AOS.PRE REL01 AO4ELT3, Florence, 05/28/13

Summary A Fourier model for evaluating the magnitude of image distortions due to optical surface errors has been applied to develop astrometry error budget terms for observations with IRIS+NFIRAOS on TMT Results are preliminary, but confirm intuition and are encouraging: –Calibration of static distortions to 5-7  arc sec is feasible, but… Tolerances on surfaces near focal planes are tight Even so, many references sources are needed IRIS optical design may be iterated to adjust surface conjugates –As with K-mirrors, a consistent image rotator angle must be used for repeated observations of the same field –Image distortion due to quasi-static errors on DM11.2 are small, provided that overall plate scale changes can be calibrated using reference stars Further modeling/simulation is planned to using more realistic models of static errors, calibration procedures, quasistatic errors, etc. 18 TMT.AOS.PRE REL01 AO4ELT3, Florence, 05/28/13

Acknowledgements The TMT Project gratefully acknowledges the support of the TMT partner institutions. They are –the Association of Canadian Universities for Research in Astronomy (ACURA), –the California Institute of Technology –the University of California –the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan –the National Astronomical Observatories and their consortium partners –And the Department of Science and Technology of India and their supported institutes. This work was supported as well by –the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation –the Canada Foundation for Innovation –the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation –the National Research Council of Canada –the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada –the British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund –the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA) –and the U.S. National Science Foundation. 19 TMT.AOS.PRE REL01 AO4ELT3, Florence, 05/28/13