The Third Moscow International Solar System Symposium. Moscow, 8-12 October 2012 3MS 3 -MN-11 LANDING DYNAMICS ON THE «LUNA-GLOB» PROJECT Sikharulidze.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Solar Sail Attitude Control using a Combination of a Feedforward and a Feedback Controller D. Romagnoli, T. Oehlschlägel.
Advertisements

Lunar Landing GN&C and Trajectory Design Go For Lunar Landing: From Terminal Descent to Touchdown Conference Panel 4: GN&C Ron Sostaric / NASA JSC March.
Benoit Pigneur and Kartik Ariyur School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University June 2013 Inexpensive Sensing For Full State Estimation of Spacecraft.
Solar Imaging Radio Array (SIRA) Trajectory and Formation Analysis Flight Dynamics Analysis Branch Code 595 (572) Dave Folta Bo Naasz Frank.
Golubev Yu.F., Grushevskii A.V., Koryanov V.V., Tuchin A.G. A Method of Orbits Designing Using Gravity Assist Maneuvers to the Landing.
Kinetics of Particles Impulse and Momentum.
Golubev Yu.F., Grushevskii A.V., Koryanov V.V., Tuchin A.G. A method of orbits designing using gravity assist maneuvers to the landing.
Институт прикладной математики им. М.В.Келдыша РАН Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences.
Orbital Operations – 2 Rendezvous & Proximity Operations
ATMOSPHERIC REENTRY TRAJECTORY MODELING AND SIMULATION: APPLICATION TO REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE MISSION (Progress Seminar Presentation - 2) K. Sivan (Roll.
Objects which are subject to a centripetal force undergo uniform circular motion. A centripetal force constantly accelerates the object in the direction.
Chapter 7 Rotational Motion and The Law of Gravity.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Final Presentation Draft Slides Description: Some draft slides and ideas 3/26/09 Kris Ezra Attitude 1.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Hopper Trajectory February 26, 2009 [Alex Whiteman] [Mission Ops] [Lunar Descent] Page 1.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Analysis of Trans-Lunar Spiral Trajectory [Levi Brown] [Mission Ops] February 12,
AAE450 Spring 2009 Final Sizing and Trajectory Design for 100 g/10kg Payloads [Levi Brown] [Mission Ops] March 12,
AAE450 Senior Spacecraft Design Goppert, 1 James Goppert Week 6: February 22 th, 2007 Aerodynamics: Reentry Optimization Dynamics and Control: Communication.
Taking cube roots on a simple “scientific” calculator y x or using shift x  y 27 y x = or 27 shift x  y 3 = 3.
Empirical Virtual Sliding Target Guidance law Presented by: Jonathan Hexner Itay Kroul Supervisor: Dr. Mark Moulin.
INSTITUTO DE SISTEMAS E ROBÓTICA 1/31 Optimal Trajectory Planning of Formation Flying Spacecraft Dan Dumitriu Formation Estimation Methodologies for Distributed.
-Motion of the Center of Mass -Rocket Propulsion AP Physics C Mrs. Coyle.
Samara State Aerospace University (SSAU) Samara 2015 SELECTION OF DESIGN PARAMETERS AND OPTIMIZATION TRAJECTORY OF MOTION OF ELECTRIC PROPULSION SPACECRAFT.
Sub-Optimal Solutions for Satellite Orbital Transfers 6th International Workshop and Advanced School 6th International Workshop and Advanced School "Spaceflight.
1 Samara State Aerospace University (SSAU) Modern methods of analysis of the dynamics and motion control of space tether systems Practical lessons Yuryi.
Optimal Low-Thrust Deorbiting of Passively Stabilized LEO Satellites Sergey Trofimov Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, RAS Moscow Institute of.
Physics 201: Lecture 25, Pg 1 Lecture 25 Jupiter and 4 of its moons under the influence of gravity Goal: To use Newton’s theory of gravity to analyze the.
Force, Mass and Momentum. Newton’s Second Law: F = ma 1 newton = 1 kg ∙ 1 m/s² Force: 1 pound = 4.45 newtons Your weight is the force of gravity: F =
Ryan Mayes Duarte Ho Jason Laing Bryan Giglio. Requirements  Overall: Launch 10,000 mt of cargo (including crew vehicle) per year Work with a $5M fixed.
THE LANGUAGE OF PHYSICS. ACCELERATION= a a= (v f -v i )/t v f - final velocity, v i - initial velocity UNITS ARE m/s 2 CONSTANT a NEGATIVE a POSITIVE.
Physics A First Course Energy and Systems Chapter 6.
Chapter 7 Models for Wave and Oscillations Variable Gravitational acceleration –Lunar Lander –Escape velocity Wave motion and interaction –Pendulum without.
Uniform Circular Motion (UCM) The object travels in a circular path with a constant speed. Its velocity is tangent to the circle and is changing due to.
Coming Home. De-orbit burn The craft spins itself 180 degrees so that it is facing backward with respect to its velocity The engine is fired, decelerating.
S ystems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology Automated Solution of Realistic Near-Optimal Aircraft Trajectories Using Computational Optimal.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Low Thrust Spiral Transfer Maneuvers and Analysis [Andrew Damon] [Mission Ops] February 5,
Rocket Propulsion Contents: Review Types of Rockets New concept 1 Example 1 Whiteboards 1,2,3Whiteboards123 Concept 2, Example 2Concept 2Example 2 Whiteboards:
Impulse Newton’s second law of motion, F = ma, can be rewritten by using the definition of acceleration as the change in velocity divided by the time.
Circular Motion.
TRACKING OF PHOBOS-GRUNT MISSION IN LOW EARTH ORBIT Alexander S. Samotokhin, Andrey G. Tuchin M.V. Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics of Russian.
Final Slides By: Kara Akgulian Mission Ops Locomotion Phase 1.
Speeding up and slowing down f = ma Terminal velocity.
Optimal parameters of satellite–stabilizer system in circular and elliptic orbits 2nd International Workshop Spaceflight Dynamics and Control October 9-11,
AAE450 Senior Spacecraft Design Goppert, 1 James Goppert Week 8: March 8 th, 2007 Aerodynamics: Reentry Optimization Dynamics and Control: Communication.
Rockets and Satellites. How Do Rockets Lift Off? Rockets and space shuttles lift into space using Newton’s third law of motion.
AAE 450 Spring 2008 Elizabeth Harkness Trajectory Design Group Contact Preliminary Trajectory Model: Vertical Launch.
Lunar Trajectories.
Rocket Propulsion Contents: Review Types of Rockets New concept 1
Technical Resource Allocations
Impulse Contents: Impulse/WB Area Under Force Graph Ft = mv
Plate Tectonics Reflections
Projectile Motion.
Development and Principles of Rocketry
Rotational Motion and the Law of Gravity
Attitude, Lunar Transfer Phase
Lunar Descent Slide Suggestions & Questions
Lunar Descent Trajectory
Alfred Lynam February 7, 2008 Dynamics and Control Architecture of Control System: Controller Prototypes AAE 450 Spring 2008 Dynamics and Control.
Junichi (Jun) Kanehara 03/06/2008 Trajectory The Winner of the Balloon, 5[kg] case (LB-HA-DA-DA_v125) & New Version of Trajectory 3-D Plots AAE 450 Spring.
Unit 5: Conservation of Momentum
Lunar Descent Trajectory
Speeding up and slowing down - Answers
Momentum Part 2 By: Heather Britton.
Rocketry Trajectory Basics
Speeding up and slowing down
Newtons law In this section you will
3. a. What is the force of gravity between a 2
Revision Quiz Bowl Units and Measurement
2.2 – Force and Mass Determine Acceleration
Newton’s Laws of Motion
Presentation transcript:

The Third Moscow International Solar System Symposium. Moscow, 8-12 October MS 3 -MN-11 LANDING DYNAMICS ON THE «LUNA-GLOB» PROJECT Sikharulidze Yu.G., Zhukov B.I., Tuchin A.G. (Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathemathics RAS) Zaiko Yu.K., Fedotov V.P., Likhachov V.N., Rozin P.E. (Lavochkin Design Center)

The Third Moscow International Solar System Symposium. Moscow, 8-12 October MS 3 -MN-11

The Third Moscow International Solar System Symposium. Moscow, 8-12 October MS 3 -MN Phases of Landing Trajectory

The Third Moscow International Solar System Symposium. Moscow, 8-12 October MS 3 -MN-11 Range of the initial true anomaly -10 o  o  +10 o Variation of the initial time  3 min De-orbit point shift  306 km Propellant consumption 389 kg (initial Lander mass 911 kg) The optimal pitch angle guidance and linear pitch law Engine C with thrust of 420  20 kgf (tolerance) Regulation range 400  480 kgf (+13  -33 km) 2. Main Deceleration Phase 1 with Downrange Maneuver

The Third Moscow International Solar System Symposium. Moscow, 8-12 October MS 3 -MN-11 Terminal guidance algorithm with numerical prediction of remaining trajectory (Numerical Predictor-Corrector NPC). Two-parametric guidance:  (t)=  0 + t. Three predicted trajectories. Multistep process:  t guid =1 s,  t stab =0.05 s. Linear correction of guidance parameters:  0i =  0i-1 +   0i i = i-1 +  i 3. Numerical Predictor-Corrector

The Third Moscow International Solar System Symposium. Moscow, 8-12 October MS 3 -MN-11 Terminal conditions for the Phase 1: V n1 =0 (stop of prediction), V r1 =-5 m/s, h 1 =1500 m (corrected values). Adaptation algorithm: m(t)=? P(t)=? Phantom acceleration: W=P/m=P/(m 0 -│dm/dt│t)=g 0 P sp /(  -t), where  =m 0 /│dm/dt│- “total burning time”. Measurements W 1 for t 1 and W 2 for t 2 → parameters of adaptation , P sp 4. Algorithm of Adaptation

The Third Moscow International Solar System Symposium. Moscow, 8-12 October MS 3 -MN-11 Numerical derivative ∂Φ/∂P= deg/kgf. Predicted angular error due to thrust variation and de-orbit point shift: ΔΦ i pred. Thrust correction: ΔP= -ΔΦ i pred /(∂Φ/∂P). Thrust is unknown. P, kgf Δ  o, deg h 1, mV r, m/sΔm prop, kg Thrust Correction

The Third Moscow International Solar System Symposium. Moscow, 8-12 October MS 3 -MN Phase 1. Trajectory with Linear Pitch Guidance

The Third Moscow International Solar System Symposium. Moscow, 8-12 October MS 3 -MN-11 Engine C with thrust of 420  20 kgf (tolerance) Regulation range 400  480 kgf Initial errors: ΔΦ 1, Δh 1, ΔV r1. Corrected values: V r2 =-5 m/s, h 2 =50 m, ΔΦ 2 =0 Parameters of control:  2 (t 2 )=  t2, t ign2 – time ignition (ignition altitude h ign2 ). Four predicted trajectories. Linear correction of guidance parameters:  0i =  0i-1 +  0i, i = i-1 +  i, t ign2(i) = t ign2(i-1) +  t ign2(i) 7. Phase 2. Precision Deceleration

The Third Moscow International Solar System Symposium. Moscow, 8-12 October MS 3 -MN-11 After engine ignition: two-parametric control & thrust regulation  0i =  0i-1 +   0i, i = i-1 +  i Numerical derivative ∂P/∂h=1.14 kgf/m. Measurements of phantom acceleration W→ , P sp. Thrust correction ΔP=- Δh/(∂P/∂h), Δh=h pred2 -h 2. Thrust is unknown. 8. Phase 2. Adaptation Algorithm

The Third Moscow International Solar System Symposium. Moscow, 8-12 October MS 3 -MN Phase 2. Parameters of Nominal Trajectory

The Third Moscow International Solar System Symposium. Moscow, 8-12 October MS 3 -MN Phase 2. Correction of Initial Downrange Error

The Third Moscow International Solar System Symposium. Moscow, 8-12 October MS 3 -MN Phase 2. Correction of Initial Velocity Error

The Third Moscow International Solar System Symposium. Moscow, 8-12 October MS 3 -MN Phase 3. Landing on the Moon Engine Thrust 2x(65±5) kgf (tolerance), without thrust regulation. Specific thrust 287.7±5 s (tolerance) Terminal conditions: altitude 0.3 m, vertical velocity -2.5±1 m/s, side velocity ≤1 m/s Single control parameter: t ign3 – time of engine ignition.

The Third Moscow International Solar System Symposium. Moscow, 8-12 October MS 3 -MN Phase 3. Single-parameter guidance

The Third Moscow International Solar System Symposium. Moscow, 8-12 October MS 3 -MN Phase 3. Two-parameter guidance

The Third Moscow International Solar System Symposium. Moscow, 8-12 October MS 3 -MN Phase 3. Simulation Results ParametersThrust, kgfComments h ign1, m43.3 The first ignition h off1, m h ign2, m The second ignition h off1, m0.3 -  m prop3, kg Propellant consumption

The Third Moscow International Solar System Symposium. Moscow, 8-12 October MS 3 -MN Results 1. The terminal guidance algorithm (NPC) with adaptation to real motion conditions was developed for landing on the Moon. 2. For the Phase 1 NPC provides compensation of initial de- orbit point error within ±0.5 o or ±15 km in downrange (±9 s). 3. For the Phase 2 NPC provides compensation of initial errors within ±40 m in downrange or ±2 m/s in side velocity by the pith angle of ±20 o from the local vertical. 4. For the Phase 3 NPC provides adaptation to the real motion conditions.