2013-14 Attainment Peter Gorrie, QIO September 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Getting started – support for reflection and engagement mathematics.
Advertisements

Assessment and Tracking Evening Foundation Stage 2 & Key Stage 1.
A Curriculum for Excellence Holyrood R. C. Sec
Transforming lives through learning Numeracy and Mathematics Seminar Primary School Leadership Conference.
Interpreting and Using ePIPS(P3,5,7) Feedback Glasgow 13 th February 2013.
Education Service Assessment and the Curriculum for Excellence (CfE) Assessment and the Curriculum for Excellence: Fife’s perspective Stuart Booker Statistician.
Introduction to: Assessing Pupil Progress (APP)
1 © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training Implementing English K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of teacher judgement.
0 Session 3 The APP Process for Reading and Writing.
Information for Parents Statutory Assessment Arrangements
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2009 Results Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner December 7, 2010.
Curriculum for Excellence Numeracy and Mathematics 18th September 2010
Performance Descriptors Consultation October 2014 Summary.
Lead ▪ learn ▪ protect ▪ engage Developing and assessing ICT capability in a the primary school Let them choose.
The Renewed Framework for Literacy Implementation through phonics Day 2 Summer 2007.
New Curriculum evening. Ne New Curriculum evening.
High School Mathematics: Where Are We Headed? W. Gary Martin Auburn University.
CHANGES EXPLAINED STIMULATING MINDS (22/10/13). In 2012 the framework was revised to make it clearer and easier to use, with a clear focus on developing.
Western Isles Mathematics & Numeracy Network Group  Formation of the group  Group Personnel  Remit.
Assessing assessment: the role of student effort in comparative studies Ray Adams Jayne Butler.
Welcome The challenges of the new National Curriculum & Life without Levels.
EYFS – and the OFSTED Framework Sue Monypenny Senior Education Standards and Effectiveness Officer.
Life After Levels. Objectives  To help you understand why the National Curriculum has changed  To inform you about the new assessment system we will.
The World Around Us and the Media Integrating ICT.
Attainment Peter Gorrie, QIO September 2014.
Using Performance Data to Improve Governor Effectiveness Julie Johnson Assistant Director of Schools (Primary) Diocese of Shrewsbury Department of Education.
Assessment without Levels September Effective  Effective Assessment Systems should;  Give reliable information to parents about how their child,
KEY STAGE 2 SATS Session Aims To understand what SATs are and why we have them. What will be different in SATs 2016? To share timetable for SATs.
PGCE Primary and a Mastery approach …the journey so far
1 CfE SecondaryHeadteache r Network Meeting Karen Prophet Senior Education Manager 11 September 2013.
Assessment meeting for parents of children in Y1 to Y6 Wednesday 9 th December 6pm & Thursday 10th December 9:15am.
Changes to end of Key Stage assessment arrangements. Monday, November 16 th 2015.
Reepham Primary School School Improvement and Development At Reepham Primary School we aspire to be confident and ambitious learners who care for.
Key Stage 2 Standard Assessment Tasks Year 6 Parent Information Evening.
RAISEonline Data Analysis for Governors and Staff Beaver Road Primary School Clive Davies OBE Beaver Road (c)
Assessment without Levels 2015 Meadow Primary School Parents as Partners.
Achievement Attainment and Progress What evidence will you need?
Curriculum for Excellence update Current developments Trialling Response to feedback Exemplification and guidance Refinement and revision Recognition.
New Curriculum and Assessment Tuesday 19 th January 2016 Mr Fairclough, Miss Gould and Ms Moyle.
Evaluation Institute Qatar Comprehensive Educational Assessment (QCEA) 2008 Summary of Results.
Helmingham Community Primary School Assessment Information Evening 10 February 2016.
Lostock Gralam CE Primary School Parent Information Meeting January 2016.
Mathematics Experiences and Outcomes Curriculum for Excellence Support for Trialling.
The Review of statutory assessment arrangements for pupils working below the standard of national curriculum tests is an independent.
OCTOBER 2014 CONSULTATION ON PERFORMANCE DESCRIPTORS INTRODUCATION Curriculum and Assessment.
RAISEonline Data Analysis St Bernadette's Catholic Primary School St Bernadette's Catholic Primary School (c)
Key Stage 2 SATs Information and Guidance on the Changes and Expectations for 2015/16 Streatley C of E Primary School Thursday 25th February 2016.
Assessment without levels. Why remove levels?  levels were used as thresholds and teaching became focused on getting pupils across the next threshold.
Key Stage 2 SATs Information and Guidance on the Changes and Expectations for 2015/16 A School Presentation to Parents.
Assessment Information Evening Over St. John’s CE Primary School.
1 ‘Assessment Without Levels’ March 2016 Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn. Benjamin Franklin.
Assessment Background September 2014 – New National Curriculum introduced into schools Years 1 and 2 (KS1), Years 3 and 4 (Lower KS2), Years 5 and 6 (Upper.
In 2014/15 a new national curriculum framework was introduced by the government for Years 1, 3, 4 and 5 However, Years 2 and 6 (due to statutory testing)
Information for Parents 3 rd May Key Stage 2 SATs Changes In 2014/15 a new national curriculum framework was introduced by the government for Years.
Good Morning and welcome. Thank you for attending this meeting to discuss assessment of learning, pupil progress and end of year school reports.
Monitoring Attainment and Progress from September 2016 John Crowley Senior Achievement Adviser.
EYFS Head Teacher Briefings Summer New EYFS Profile Handbook and Exemplification EYFSP Pilot information.
Charlton Kings Junior School INFORMATION EVENING FOR YEAR 6 PARENTS.
Key Stage 1 and 2 Tests 2016 Presentation to Parents and Carers Otterbourne Primary School April 2016.
NEW NATIONAL CURRICULUM ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK 2016.
Inspiring today’s children for tomorrow’s world Early Years Foundation Stage Assessment Procedure 2016.
The Village School Assessment Analysis
PARENTS’ INFORMATION SESSION -YEAR 6 SATS 2017
Assessment and Reporting Without Levels February 2016
EYFS and KS1 Parent Meeting November 2016
RAISEonline Data Analysis for Governors and Staff
PARENTS’ INFORMATION SESSION -YEAR 6 SATS 2017
Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2009 Results
St. Paul’s 2018 Results At St. Paul’s we are ambitious for all of our pupils and want to ensure the best possible provision in order to ensure the best.
Assessment Framework CPD
Presentation transcript:

Attainment Peter Gorrie, QIO September 2014

Title From CEC Assessment Framework, 2012

Trends Standards of Attainment over time

P4-P7 Maths Progress (10/11 to 13/14) There are less children (≈7%) scoring a mean score less than 89. The mean score has increased (≈1%). There are more children (≈6%) scoring a mean score more than 112. Stanine Band ProgressMean Score Progress These graphs shows the performance of the cohort of P4 pupils tested in 2010/11 and then the same cohort tested in P7 last session. Assessments Suffolk Reading Test, – New Group Reading Test

P7-S2 Maths Progress (10/11 to 13/14) There are less children (≈18%) scoring a mean score less than 89. The mean score has increased (≈6%). There are more children (≈9%) scoring a mean score more than 112. Stanine Band ProgressMean Score Progress These graphs shows the performance of the cohort of P7 pupils tested in 2010/11 and then the same cohort tested in S2 last session.

Maths Mean Scores P7 maths mean score has improved each year for the last four years P4 maths mean score has improved since 2010 But o P4 maths mean score has fluctuated o P4 and P7 maths mean remains below UK mean of 100. Maths Mean Score Trend

Literacy Progress There are less children (≈11%) scoring a mean score less than 89. The mean score has increased (≈3%). There are more children (≈5%) scoring a mean score more than 112. These graphs shows the performance of the cohort of P4 pupils tested in 2010/11 and then the same cohort tested in P7 last session.

CfE Levels Primary 1Primary 4Primary 7 LiteracyMathsLiteracyMathsLiteracyMaths % Pupils with Levels – at or better than expected level eg if a school enters data for 1 pupil who achieves a level they will have 100% ! % Pupils on roll - at or better than expected level

PERFORMANCE IN PRIMARY ONE

Pim5 Distribution Girls performing well at higher stanines. (and better than boys at lower stanines) BUT o The distribution of scores is lower than UK average o Mean male score is 97.0%, mean female score is 99.6%.  Overall mean standard age score is 98.3%. Better than P4 & P7.

P1 Pim Content Process Performing above UK average in all 4 process areas. Performing above UK average in the 2 assessed categories of number and shape. 9% better than UK average in number

YARC Distribution There is a positive distribution. CEC cohort has fewer children than UK in “Very low, Below average and average stanines”. There are more CEC pupils in the “above average and very high” stanines than UK average. The mean score across all categories is higher than UK.  Early word recognition and sound deletion were the aspects which performed least well.

P1 YARC and Maths Distribution Comparison YARC P1 2013/14Pim5 P1 2013/14 Overall performance in YARC at P1 is better than that of Maths.

PERFORMANCE IN PRIMARY 4

P4 Reading Distribution Girls at P4 performing consistently well. Mean Score – Edinburgh generally following Uk trend with the overall mean 99.1 BUT o Boys at P4 performing less well than girls across stanine distribution. o P4 male mean score is 97.6

P4 Maths Distribution % < % ≥89 and < % ≥ Mean Score P4 Maths Distribution The percentage of pupils < 89 has decreased since 10/11. The percentage of pupils ≥ 112 has increased since 10/11. BUT o The distribution of scores is lower than UK average.  Boys at lower stanines perform less well than girls, however at the upper stanines boys perform better than girls.

P4 Performance Content Process 3 Year Improvement across all process category areas and in the content area of number. BUT* o Performing below UK average in Number (21), Shape … (10) and Algebra (2) o Performing below UK average in knowing facts and procedures and using concepts * Number of marks in brackets

P4 Questions There has been an overall improvement in the number of questions which P4 are answering successfully however o there are key aspects in understanding and application of number processes that have a negative performance in relation to the UK

P4 Reading and Maths Distribution Comparison Reading P4 2013/14Mathematics P4 2013/14 Overall performance in reading at P4 is better than that of Maths.

PERFORMANCE IN PRIMARY 7

P7 Reading Distribution Girls at P7 performing consistently well. Mean Score – Positive distribution of scores compared to UK. CEC Mean P7 boys mean score is BUT o Boys at P7 performing less well than girls across stanine distribution.

P7 Maths Distribution Session % < % ≥89 and < % ≥ Mean Score The percentage of pupils < 89 has decreased by 6% since 10/11. The percentage of pupils ≥ 112 has increased by 4% since 10/11. The mean score has increased each year BUT o The distribution of scores is lower than UK average.  Boys at lower stanines perform less well than girls, however at the upper stanines boys perform better than girls. (This being the same as P4)

P7 Performance 3 Year Improvement across all process category areas and in the content area of number. Content Process BUT* o Performing below UK average in Number (22), Shape … (15), Data Handling (12) and Algebra (3) o Performing below UK average in all processes. * Number of marks in brackets

P7 Questions There has been an overall improvement in the number of questions which P7 are answering successfully However o There continues to be more questions answered wrongly than correctly relative to UK performance. o Like P4 there are key aspects in understanding and application of number processes that have a negative performance in relation to the UK

P7 Reading and Maths Distribution Comparison Reading P7 2013/14Mathematics P7 2013/14 Overall performance in reading at P7 is better than that of Maths.

Mathematics PiM11 What are the features of effective learning and teaching in mathematics? planned active learning which provides opportunities to observe, explore, investigate, experiment, play, discuss and reflect modelling and scaffolding the development of mathematical thinking skills learning collaboratively and independently opportunities for discussion, communication and explanation of thinking developing mental agility using relevant contexts and experiences, familiar to young people making links across the curriculum to show how mathematical concepts are applied in a wide range of contexts, such as those provided by science and social studies using technology in appropriate and effective ways building on the principles of Assessment is for Learning, ensuring that young people understand the purpose and relevance of what they are learning developing problem-solving capabilities and critical thinking skills CfE Principles and Practice Mathematics, Page 2

CfE Levels Primary 1Primary 4Primary 7 LiteracyMathsLiteracyMathsLiteracyMaths % Pupils on roll - at or better than expected level % Pupils with Levels – at or better than expected level