1 Instructional Decision Making. Iowa Department of Education2 Instructional Decision Making in Brief The Instructional Decision Making (IDM) structure.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dan Ebbert Paul Cicciarelli
Advertisements

Response to Intervention: Linking Statewide Initiatives.
Rich Formative Assessment: Critical Component of Instruction
Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Instructional Decision Making
MTSS Trainers: Janet Stephenson Melissa Long School Psychologist: Griselle Zeno.
Read the Quote Below: Why?
Gifted Education and Response to Intervention Update on Gifted Education Workshop August 2013 Toddie Adams, Marshall County Schools.
Parents as Partners in Education
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Action Plan Mr. Ahmed Zaki Uddin Mathematics O-Level.
August 6, TOO MANY UNMET LEARNING NEEDS ACCELERATING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT PILOT The GOAL/OUTCOME is to improve student achievement for all students.
North East School Division An Introduction to Response to Intervention (RTI)2009.
RtI Day 2 EXCEED Trainer of Trainers SDUSD October 2011 Linda Trousdale Michelle Crisci Several slides were adapted from: Washoe County School District,
General Universal Level Targeted Level Intensive Level Bonus
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS Statewide Collaborative Initiative.
How do we document evidence of student growth in Healthful Living?
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
Principal Performance Evaluation System
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
PRINCIPAL ORIENTATION June 18, A ccelerating S tudent A chievement P ilot WHY?
TODAY Observations Hypotheses Connection to Student Performance CSIP ASPIRING Goal(s) Objectives & Actions.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
RtI/DI Intervention Model for The Public Schools of Petoskey Building Strong, Life-long Learners.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
Response to Instruction & Intervention Training Banning High School RtI2.
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
 Implementing Best Practice Strategies New Licensed Staff Induction Program.
Progress Monitoring for All Student Adapted from the Kentucky Systems of Interventions Guidance Document.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
An Effective Elementary School and the Instructional Decision-Making Process 2 hour presentation.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention.
Unit Design for Curriculum North Scott High School Presentation by Chad Guge Social Studies Instructor.
Assessment Literacy Interim Assessment Kansas State Department of Education ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT1.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Importance of Building Family and Community Engagement for Implementing a Multi-Tiered System of Support There is great power in harmony and mutual understanding.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
An Overview March Wh y Wh at Ho w Wh ere Wh en Wh o ?
What does an effective secondary school look like and sound like?
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
Overview Check for Understanding - Activity Collaboration/Discussion WASD Oct RtII is: [Student] Reponse to Instruction and Intervention:
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
Response to Intervention SPED 461. Basic Principles of RTI Response to intervention integrates assessment and intervention within a multi-level prevention.
Assessment in education is the process of gathering, interpreting, recording, and using information about pupils’ responses to an educational task.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
U SING D ATA TO ASSESS AND INFORM SCHOOL CHANGE Data for change Presenter: Judith Marty Principal Mater Academy Charter Middle High.
Defining & Aligning Local Curriculum. What is Curriculum? Individually consider your personal definition of the term curriculum What words do you think.
Creative Curriculum and GOLD Assessment: Early Childhood Competency Based Evaluation System By Carol Bottom.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
There is great power in harmony and mutual understanding.
By: Alice Tackett and Jill Maynard
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Magothy River Middle School
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Inclusion A school district shall use the term “inclusion” to mean that a student is receiving education in a general education regular class setting,
Success for All Prairie Elementary Schools
RTI Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach to the early identification and support of students with learning and behavior needs. Struggling.
CORE Guaranteed & Viable Curriculum
There is great power in harmony and mutual understanding.
DSUSD MTSS Implementation (Multi-Tiered System of Supports)
An Overview April 2012.
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

1 Instructional Decision Making

Iowa Department of Education2 Instructional Decision Making in Brief The Instructional Decision Making (IDM) structure focuses on instruction by using data regarding students’ responses to instruction to guide future educational decisions. The Instructional Decision Making (IDM) structure focuses on instruction by using data regarding students’ responses to instruction to guide future educational decisions.

Iowa Department of Education3 Instructional Decision Making (IDM) Process that focuses on appropriate instruction for ALL students Process that focuses on appropriate instruction for ALL students  Core curriculum is the foundation  Based on formal/informal assessment data  Three fluid and flexible instructional levels  Organizes resources to meet student needs  Results in improved learning

Iowa Department of Education4 Both Struggling and Accelerated Students Accelerated students Struggling students Grade level expectation

Iowa Department of Education5 Components of IDM

Iowa Department of Education6 Core Curriculum Academic, Social, Emotional and Behavioral Academic, Social, Emotional and Behavioral  Guaranteed – all students  Viable – able to be implemented in time available  Rigorous - challenging  Relevant – useful, encouraging engagement

Iowa Department of Education7 Core Instruction   Differentiated   Provided for all students   Screening and formative evaluations occur Core Instruction

Iowa Department of Education8 Supplemental Instruction   Instruction that is available for students identified as exceeding or not meeting core- learning expectations   Provided to smaller groups of students with similar needs   Research based/evidence based strategies selected   Targeted instruction in identified area   IN ADDITION TO CORE Supplemental Instruction Supplemental Instruction

Iowa Department of Education9 Focus on the student learning needs identified through screening / formative assessment. Focus on the student learning needs identified through screening / formative assessment. May involve the use of additional resources within the classroom May involve the use of additional resources within the classroom May be changes in, intensity, consistency, and immediacy of feedback May be changes in, intensity, consistency, and immediacy of feedback May include a change in instructional strategy May include a change in instructional strategy Instruction Components of the Cycle Supplemental Instruction

Iowa Department of Education10 Intensive Instruction   Instruction that is available for students identified as significantly exceeding or not meeting core and/or supplemental learning expectations   Provided to individuals or small groups of students with similar needs   Research based/evidence based strategies selected   IN ADDITION TO CORE Supplemental Instruction Intensive Instruction Intensive Instruction

Iowa Department of Education11 Often includes different instructional strategies Intensive instruction plan prescribed for the individual Provided to individuals or small groups of students Often includes other support (AEA) personnel Instruction Components of the Cycle Intensive Instruction

Iowa Department of Education12 Assessments Screening Screening Diagnostic Diagnostic Formative Formative Summative Summative

Iowa Department of Education13 Screening Assessment Questions Answered Questions Answered How is each student responding to instruction? How is each student responding to instruction? What do students already know and are able to do?What do students already know and are able to do? What do students still need to know and be able to do?What do students still need to know and be able to do? Which students are in need of additional assessment? Which students are in need of additional assessment? Is the instruction effective? Is the instruction effective?

Iowa Department of Education14 Diagnostic Assessment Question Answered Question Answered What are the specific concerns? What are the specific concerns? What is the root of the student’s difficulty? What is the root of the student’s difficulty? What instruction does the student need? What instruction does the student need?

Iowa Department of Education15 Formative Assessment Question Answered Question Answered Is the student making progress compared to self, peers and/or standard ? Is the student making progress compared to self, peers and/or standard ? What instructional adjustments are needed? What instructional adjustments are needed?

Iowa Department of Education16 Summative Assessment Question Answered Question Answered Did each student achieve the expected outcome? Did each student achieve the expected outcome? Are the chosen curriculum and instructional practices providing the desired results? Are the chosen curriculum and instructional practices providing the desired results?

Iowa Department of Education17 Pilot Sites   Bettendorf   Paul Norton Elementary – Connecting Learning Assures Successful Outcomes (CLASS)   Armstrong Elementary - CLASS   Mark Twain Elementary – Positive Behavior Supports   Bettendorf Middle – CLASS   North Scott   Junior High – Differentiated Instruction

Iowa Department of Education18 Why consider this? “The main benefit of IDM for us has been its ability to help us organize all that we are doing. We are using our district data to work for us in determining what students need and what supports we need to provide.” - Principal, Waterloo School

Iowa Department of Education19 Pilot Opportunity Interest Form –Due March 30, 2007 Interest Form –Due March 30, 2007 Gap Analysis for Pilot Schools – April 18, 2007 Gap Analysis for Pilot Schools – April 18, 2007 Action Planning for Selected Schools – April 30, 2007 Action Planning for Selected Schools – April 30, 2007 Implementation – Fall, 2007 Implementation – Fall, 2007

Iowa Department of Education20 IDM Website for More Information