Technology Infrastructure SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PARKS IN TURKEY MUSTAFA ATİLLA CEO, Ankara Cyberpark, Turkey Knowledge Economy Forum IV March 22-24, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COMMONWEALTH YOUTH PROGRAMME AFRICA CENTRE COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT Youth Enterprise Development and Youth Employment Experiences and Lessons from Commonwealth.
Advertisements

Technology Development Zones: Tools for Enhancing University Industry Relations Prof. Dr. Canan Cilingir Vice Rector METU Turkey.
Dr. Mustafa Atilla CEO and Board Member, Cyberpark, (Bilkent University) CEO and Board Member, Mobilsoft (Meteksan Group) Turkey.
And sustainable development, the example of KFUPM.
Inno|Praxis International Ltd.. Creating world innovation centres Skolkovo Summit of Innovation Economy Creators Mervi Käki.
Entrepreneurship youth
1 Foreign Direct Investment and IP in Knowledge-based Development Ralph Heinrich UNECE Team of Specialists on Intellectual Property Minsk, 9-10 June 2010.
Turkish Research Area and European Technology Platforms Hüseyin Güler FP6 Deputy National Coordinator
The National Innovation System in Kosovo
2015. MITA. All rights reserved.````` Lithuanian Country Report Gintarė Narakienė The Agency for Science, Innovation and Technology.
Olesea BORDAN SMEs Policy Development and Internal Trade Division Government of the Republic of Moldova Ministry of Economy Budapest 2015 State Policy.
Results of the ESTER project in Slovakia Juraj Poledna Salamanca June 23, 2005.
The 4th Biennial International Business, Banking and Finance Conference June 21-24, 2011 Economic Diversification: The role of SMEs and Governments in.
Status of the implementation of the Regional R&D Strategy for Innovation for the Western Balkan Ministry of science education and sports - Croatia.
National innovation strategies and policies - Republic of Slovenia Dr. Klemen Grošelj SIPO Novi Sad,
E-w-e.com Pilot Action Plan Cluj-EWE. e-w-e.com Main objective Main objective Technology transfer unit in solar- energy field Main activities Main activitiesPrototyping.
ACTIVITIES OF SUPPORTING SMES DEVELOPMENT IN VIETNAM
Professor Song CHEN, Ph.D. Deputy Dean, School of Economics & Management Tongji University Oct. 7, 2013 The Changing National.
International Conference ON South-South Cooperation for Technology Transfer & Development of Small and Medium enterprises (SMEs) Colombo, Sri - Lanka 18-
Instruments for support to innovative and competitive SMEs in Serbia
Some aspects of National STI system in Albania & The Research at Polytechnic University of Tirana T.Korini, UPT, Tirana Tbilisi, 11 April 2012.
1 Prof. Dr. Necdet GEREN (Mech Eng.) Center Director Participant: TUBITAK-ADANA UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY JOINT RESEARCH CENTER TURKEY Participant Role: Contractor.
Main directions of innovation policy development in the Republic of Belarus State Committee for Science and Technology Prague, December 2, 2014.
NEW INNOVATION SUPPORT SERVICES, case Finland Mervi Käki, CEO, Partner
Take a look at : Thailand’s position in S&T competitiveness. Praditta Siripan Technical Information Access Center, National Science and Technology Development.
SME Finance constraints in China Lessons from Benchmark Countries Walter García-Fontes Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona – Spain) Regional Conference.
BŁAŻEJ MODER PRESIDENT LODZ REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY LODZ, OCTOBER 8, 2008 THE EU SUPPORT FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT.
Business Model for an Industrial development agency
Influence of foreign direct investment on macroeconomic stability Presenter: Governor CBBH: Kemal Kozarić.
THE MINISTRY OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION The Sixth (6 th ) Meeting of the SME and enterprise policy Subgroup for the EU-Russian Dialogue.
Technology Transfer Center of the University of Lodz High-Tech Accelerator - Innovation Center Foundation of the University of Lodz Bridging science and.
1 The Innovation Performance Review of Kazakhstan: Main Conclusions and Recommendations.
National Innovation Strategy of the Republic of Moldova. Implementation, mechanisms and measures Ghenadie CERNEI Director, Agency for Innovation.
Policy options and recommendations José Palacín Chief, Innovative Policies Development UNECE Minsk, 19 June 2014.
Support of small and medium-sized enterprises. 2 Importance of SMEs Business environment Business environment Structural changes Structural changes Stabilizing.
A new start for the Lisbon Strategy Knowledge and innovation for growth.
S&T and Innovation Policy in the Republic of Armenia Innovation Programs Division, SCS RA “Development of Coherent Innovation Policy in South Caucasian.
Key Barriers for the ICT Research Sector in Serbia, and Recommendations for Future EU- Serbia Collaboration Miodrag Ivkovic, ISS Milorad Bjeletic, BOS.
Economic Mission of Israel in Singapore מדינת ישראל The State of Israel Israel Life Science Seminar April 2005 Why Israel? Anat Katz Commercial Attaché.
JULY, 09-10, 2007 ISTANBUL KOSGEB SMALL AND MEDIUM INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION NEDRET UGUR YAVUZ KOSGEB SMALL AND MEDIUM INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION.
COORDINATION OF INNOVATION STRATEGIES/SCHEMES IN METROPOLITAN AREAS. THE ROLE OF PUBLIC POLICIES. WHY OUR INNOVATION MANAGEMENT SCHEMES ARE APPOPRIATE.
This project is financed by Ministry of European Union and the Republic of Turkey. Improving the Quality of Vocational Education and Training in Turkey.
Strengthening the Strategic Cooperation between the EU and Western Balkan Region in the field of ICT Research Key Barriers & Challenges in ICT Research:
TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT IN TURKEY Threats and Opportunities A. Mete Çakmakcı 4th Annual International Conference on Managing Intellectual Property in Universities.
Prof. Ömer ANLAĞAN Vice President 7 November 2008, İstanbul Turkey’s RTDI Profile “12th Monitoring Committee for Euro-Mediterranean Cooperation in RTD”
Financing Innovation March 25, 2004 Knowledge Economy Forum III Budapest, Hungary NATIONAL INNOVATION FUND KAZAKHSTAN.
Aid for Trade Needs Assessment Armenia: Trade and Human Development Vrej Jijyan, UNDP Armenia United Nations Development Programme.
Internationalisation in Education Adam Tyson European Commission DG Education and Culture.
Utilization of knowledge for economic growth in the Czech Republic Karel Klusacek Technology Centre AS CR Knowledge Economy Forum V.
Istanbul Forum Country Exercise: Kazakhstan. From natural resources (oil & gas) to knowledge R&D basis declining Weak links between publicly funded R&D.
R&D Supports by Ministry of Science, Industry and Technology.
1 ICT in Turkey April 2nd, 2011 CICA Business Forum Aydın Ersöz.
1 Republic of TURKEY MINISTRY OF INDUSTRY AND TRADE KOSGEB Small and Medium Industries Development Organization.
Local and National Support Schemes To Start Businesses (Start-ups) Mustafa Furkan ALBAYRAK Ministry of Customs and Trade/Turkey May 2016 Bratislava /Slovakia.
MGT601 SME MANAGEMENT. Lesson 12 Short and Medium Term Issues for SME Policy Formulation – II.
NATIONAL POLICIES FOR STEPPING-UP RESEARCH, TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION.
ENERGY MARKET REFORMS, R&D & INNOVATION, AND CHALLENGES: TURKISH EXPERIENCE Selahattin Murat ŞİRİN Expert Energy Market Regulatory Authority TURKEY.
Measuring the Innovation Potential of the Bulgarian Economy Establishing an IRC in Macedonia, Skopje, March 29, 2006 Ruslan Stefanov Economic Program Center.
Science and Technology Parks to Promote University – Industry Collaboration in Iran Mostafa K. Eghbal President of West Asia & North Africa Division International.
Innovation Development Strategy
Technology Transfer Office
Measuring the Innovation Potential of the Bulgarian Economy
Impact of EU structural funds in research and innovation: the experience of the Lithuanian 'Valleys’ April, 2016.
SUPPORTS and SERVICES Recep BİÇER President
Knowledge Economy Forum V Prague 2006
The National Innovation System in Kosovo
REGIONAL POLICY DIALOGUE SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION
COMMERCILIZATION ISSUES AND CHALLANGES
ACADEMIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP, TECHNOLOGY INCUBATORS AND R&D ENTERPRISES
Does Innovation and Technology Policy Pay-off? Evidence from Turkey
Presentation transcript:

Technology Infrastructure SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PARKS IN TURKEY MUSTAFA ATİLLA CEO, Ankara Cyberpark, Turkey Knowledge Economy Forum IV March 22-24, 2004 Istanbul, Turkey “

GERD / GDP: around %0.64 R&D expenditures by sector: %60 in universities %30 in private sector %10 in public sector Number of registered patents: around 1,200 (less than 100 of which are native patents) Number of scientific publications: more than 10,000 Number of people in R&D by Sector (SSI, 2004) TURKEY R&D CAPACITY

Source: OECD MSTI database, Nov TURKEY R&D CAPACITY

Legislation (particularly inefficient and insufficient incentive mechanisms) was the biggest barrier in front of R&D activities for many years. An important portion of R&D investment is made by governmental institutions or universities Insufficient financial resources and bureacuracy in access to existing financial resources Absence of incentive mechanisms for R&D commercialization Weak innovation culture and poor R&D infrastructure IT related products and software form an important import category. There is a big negative imbalance in IT exports/imports. The imbalance between the number of scientific publications and patents is an important indicator showing Turkey’s inability to convert the scientific research studies into applicable knowledge and technological products. SOME R&D RELATED PROBLEMS OF TURKEY

HOW STPs EMERGED IN TURKEY? Technopark concept taken in the agenda of Turkey only in the mid 90’s (40 years after establishment of Silicon Valley!) Like many developing countries, such as India, China, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand; Turkey also started to use STPs as its primary strategy for;  promoting research and development, and technology transfer,  reducing brain drain by providing employment for high- skilled IT and R&D workers  attracting foreign direct investment and generating foreign exchange from selling software and R&D products for export  generating sustainable economic growth and local know how

TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ZONES LAW (LAW NO:4691), TURKEY To promote the establishment of science and technology parks under the guidance and lead of universities some legislations were made by Ministry of Industry and Trade: Technology Development Zones (TDZ) Law (Law No:4691), which came into force on , and Application Regulation of this Law, which came into force on With this law, companies are encouraged to invest more in R&D and software development, through tax incentives. Any kind of software development activity is considered as an R&D activity according to the law. In establishing a STP, involvement of an higher education or a research institution as a founder is a mandatory requirement in the law

The aim of the law is: to increase synergy between universities, research institutes and industry, to increase international competitiveness and export potential of industry by adapting/developing high/advanced technologies, to facilitate more innovations, to increase the quality of technological products, to increase productivity, to commercialize technological knowledge, to support technology based entrepreneurship, to enable SMEs to adapt to new and advanced technologies, to create investment opportunities in technology intensive areas, to create employment opportunities for researchers and qualified persons, to help technology transfer, to provide technological infrastructure attracting foreign capital and international firms providing high/advanced technologies. TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ZONES LAW (LAW NO:4691), TURKEY

Tax Exemptions and Incentives provided with the law (till the end of 2013) : Income and corporate tax exemptions for the operating company Income and corporate tax exemptions for the incomes generated from software development and R&D activities of the companies operating in these zones Income tax exemptions for the salaries of the researchers, software development staff and R&D personnel working in these zones VAT exemptions for the sofware development activities Sponsored aid and donations for the individuals and institutions having R&D activities in the zone Right of recruitment of individuals from government research organizations or universities in the zone with the approval of their organizations. (The income obtained in the zone by academicians or research personnel are exempted from the university revolving fund deductions) Legal permission for academicians to establish firms or become a partner of existing firms in the zones to commercialize their academic works (with the approval of their university) TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ZONES LAW (LAW NO:4691), TURKEY

Similar R&D Tax Incentives in USA and Europe

TDZs in TURKEY (As of March 2005) Ankara Cyberpark (Bilkent University, Ankara) METU Technopolis (METU, Ankara) Hacettepe Technopolis (Hacettepe University, Ankara) GOSB Technopark (Sabancı University and Kocaeli University,Kocaeli) TÜBİTAK MAM (TÜBİTAK MAM, Kocaeli) İstanbul Teknik University ARI Technopolis (İTÜ, İstanbul) İzmir TDZ (İzmir YTE, 9 Eylül Univ., Ege Univ., İzmir) Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi TDZ (YTÜ, İstanbul) Kocaeli Üniversitesi TDZ (Kocaeli University, Kocaeli) Eskişehir TDZ (Anadolu Univ., Yunus Emre Univ., Eskişehir) İstanbul University TDZ (İstanbul University, İstanbul) Selçuk University TDZ (Selçuk University, Konya) Batı Akdeniz Univ. TDZ (Batı Akdeniz University, Antalya) Karadeniz Teknik Univ. TDZ (Karadeniz Tek. Univ., Trabzon) Erciyes University TDZ (Erciyes University, Kayseri) Çukurova University TDZ (Çukurova University, Adana)

Active Technoparks: 1.Cyberpark 2.METU 3.Hacettepe 4.GOSB 5.TÜBİTAK MAM 6.İTU ARI Technoparks at Initial Dev. Stage: 7. İzmir 8. Yıldız 9. Kocaeli 10. Eskişehir 11. İstanbul 12. Selçuk 13. Batı Akdeniz 14. Karadeniz Teknik 15. Erciyes 16. Çukurova 16 TDZS in TURKEY (As of March 2005)

TDZS in TURKEY Number of Companies: more than 300 Number of R&D personnel: around 2500 Number of support personnel: around 1100

HOW STPs ARE INTEGRATED WITH THE OTHER COMPONENTS OF NATIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEM OF TURKEY? R&D support infrastructure in Turkey have been comprised of some institutions providing R&D financing, while these supports are usually very limited and diffucult to obtain. After the Technology Development Zones Law providing important incentives for companies located in STPs, STPs have been important components added to our national innovation system. A new R&D loan : In 2005, more than 300 million USD R&D loan is allocated from the governmental budget, which will be distributed through TÜBİTAK.

INSTITUTIONS PROVIDING R&D FINANCING 1. TTGV - Technology Development Foundation of Turkey Technology Development Financing - Support R&D activities on marketable product and process development / improvement Venture Capital Technoparks -Innovation Centers – Start-ups Training, Tech. Assist. and other activities Sources of Fund: Treasury-World Bank funded R&D Programs UFT Undersecreteriat of Foreign Trade funded R&D Program Own resources

INSTITUTIONS PROVIDING R&D FINANCING 2. TÜBİTAK-TİDEB / Scientific and Technical Research Council Of Turkey-Technology Monitoring and Evaluation Board As of 2004, total support of around $ 160 M for 2000 R&D projects Support on grant basis From concept development to trial production stages, exclusively the costs of the research activities Sources of Fund: UFT Undersecreteriat of Foreign Trade Fund (DEFİF*-Support and Price Stabilization Fund) New R&D Loan: > 300 million USD for 2005 (support mechanisms will be determined soon)

INSTITUTIONS PROVIDING R&D FINANCING 3. KOSGEB - Ministry of Industry and Trade / Small and Medium Size Industry Development Organization Technology R&D Support Supports on Repayable Basis Supports on Grant Basis Source of Fund: State Budget 4. International Resources, like 6th Framework Program

HOW BEING LOCATED IN A STP PROVIDES AN ADVANTAGE? Some research findings (UKSPA 2003) show that STPs have a positive affect on economic development of a region / country. Accordingly, STP based companies : Have higher growth rates than similar companies at other locations in terms of employment, business potential and physical area. Have better overall commercial performance than similar firms located elsewhere. Have higher proportion of qualified scientists and engineers than off-park companies. Have easier access to finance, like venture capital and governmental grants on R&D. Believe that STPs are prestigeous places to work on. Believe that the joint facilities create a better working and living environment.

SOME PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OF STPs in TURKEY Research among different Turkish STPs showed that: Through tax incentives, companies are encouraged to invest more in R&D and software development, so R&D expenditure of the on- park companies have generally increased. IT related activities and the establishment of new companies working on software development increased Since the cost of R&D personnel have decreased, employment of qualified staff has increased among on-park companies, as well as increased employment through newly established companies Positive effects to universities: increased image, additional income, increased joint R&D projects with private sector Increased usage of university resources (academics, students, laboratories, social facilities etc.) by on-park companies

FACTORS AFFECTING THE SUCCESS OF STPs Legislation, particularly related to incentives and tax exemptions Existence of qualified human resources and scientific know-how in the region Existence of supporting research and higher education institutions Sufficient financial resources to make the necessary investment Entrepreneurship and business know-how in the region to convert the scientific studies into commercial products and services Geographical factors such as the location of the park, as well as the local community’s social, cultural and economic status Supporting governmental and non-governmental organizations Demand for high technology and technological products in the region Overall macro-economic situation of the country/region

Governmental aids through Ministry of Industry and Trade, for land acquisition, infrastructure and management building construction costs World Bank credit to STPs by Industrial Technology Project through TTGV (only to Cyberpark, ARI technopark) Other international credits and funds like World Bank InfoDev Incubator Initiative (Cyberpark Technology Incubator) KOSGEBs support for TEKMERs FINANCIAL SUPPORT MECHANISMS FOR TECHNOPARKS AND INCUBATORS IN TURKEY

INCUBATORS IN TURKEY Parallel to the poor entrepreneurial culture, incubation culture is too poor as well. Currently available incubators (12) in Turkey, called TEKMERs (Technology Development Centers), are managed by KOSGEB (SME Development Organization), a governmental agency. There is no private or PPP incubator except Cyberpark Technology Incubator which has been granted with 250,000 USD WB grant through InfoDev Incubator Initiative Program. Only two TEKMERs are located in STPs and have tax incentive advantages. Grants available for incubatees for many purposes, however access is relatively bureaucratic and limited. Services provided by KOSGEB in TEKMERs are rapidly improving, but still an effective private or PPP model incubation is required.

MAIN CHALLENGES & RECOMMENDATIONS Insufficient know-how and best practices in STP management Insufficient financial resources for land and institutional development (limited governmental support, need for international loans with favorable conditions, like from WB, EIB, etc.) Need for support mechanism for private incubators (Knowledge Economy Project may reserve some funds for supporting private incubators.) Need for effective R&D finance mechanisms like seed or venture capital funds Establishment of most of the STPs as land development projects Poor Institutionalization, insufficient technical infrastructure and support services in existing STPs (absence of technology and business support mechanisms, incubators, consultancy on IPR, access to financial resources, etc.) Need for being a Business Park before being a STP

Wrong location selection for some STPs (absence of required R&D and industrial capacity, insufficient scientific, technological, cultural and social infrastructure in the selected zone) Need of more emphasis to modify the existing education system - education of academics to have more entrepreneurial skills Requirement of an NGO to provide a platform for cooperation and best practice sharing (Turkish Science and Technology Parks Association) Too much focus on ICT, need for attracting other technologies to have crosssectoral R&D. Need for other attraction elements, other than tax advantages, providing the permanent success Need for implementing auto control mechanisms – incentives are open to abuse! MAIN CHALLENGES & RECOMMENDATIONS

Requirement for special purpose STPs by considering regional capacities and priorities (Agroparks, mediparks, etc.) Lacking synergies among different STPs and host universities (Most of the universities impose barriers for their academics to work in other universities’ science parks) Need for funding of commercialization of R&D studies Need for promotion of collaborative studies & international cooperations especially to direct funds to more relevant activities (like FP6) Requirement for additional tax incentives to some crucial support organizations like venture capital funds Importance of international recognition and attraction of FDI.

THANK YOU ! Cyberpark / Contact Information Tel: (312) Fax: (312) Address: Cyberpark Cyberplaza B Blok Kat 1 Bilkent ANKARA Web: