 I can examine the benefits of peer observation.  I can demonstrate understanding of the PGES protocols for the peer observation process.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Training for Teachers and Specialists
Advertisements

Year 2 Formative Progress Review
Day 2: Learning and Teaching Session 3: Effective Feedback NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
Overview of the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System KY Council of Administrators of Special Education Summer Conference July 9th, 2013.
Teacher Evaluation Model
Round Table Discussion- Evaluating Arts Teachers William Kohut, Principal- Denver School of the Arts Dr. Mark Hudson- Director of Arts- Denver Public Schools.
PGES SUMMER ADMINISTRATOR’S TRAINING 2014 Mark & Debbie.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
Using Data as a Catalyst for Collegial Conversations Changing Instruction and Reflecting on Practice through Peer Observation CCSSO Educational Leaders.
Pause for Discussion Multiple pauses are included for discussion opportunities.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System
Differentiated Supervision
© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. TEACHER PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM What the year holds.
Your Mentoring Program: Step by Step including the Danielson Framework North Palos #117 Presenters: Marilyn Marino, NBCT – Mentor Coordinator David Creagan.
Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Literacy Coaches in Action: Strategies for Crafting Building- Level Support.
© 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.
Peer Observation Grades 6-12 Presentation by Kimberly Fitch and Joseph Harris June 26, 2014.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Building Teacher Effectiveness A Lab School Protocol.
World Languages Portfolio. Student Growth Portfolio with Peer Review 2  THE GOAL: A holistic and meaningful picture of the value a teacher adds to students,
Kazakhstan Centres of Excellence Teacher Education Programme Assessment of teachers at Level Two.
Coaching Mentoring and Reflecting Effectively: Creating a Culture of Excellence Through Colleague Collaboration and Reflective Practice Helene Chan, Norman.
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES/OPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.
Kathy Mears National Catholic Educational Association Teacher Performance Development Process.
Certified Evaluation Plan Training Module Products of Practice, Student Voice Surveys December 2014.
LESSON STUDY INSTRUCTIONAL LEARNING TEAMS – LIVING WITHIN A PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY By Nancy J. Larsen, Ph.D.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Maine Teacher Effectiveness Status.  Maine approved a teacher evaluation law during in the 2012 Legislative sessions.  The rules were determined in.
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Student Voice and Peer Observation in the Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System.
Introduction to Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System and Framework for Teaching.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Professional Performance Process OPD 864 – Writing the Mid-Year and Summative Evaluation Report Our Journey Continues! 21 st Century Supervision and Evaluation.
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Introduction to Peer Observations.
Authentically Integrating Student Voice Into Your Classroom
Framework In Action: Theory into Practice
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process Tyson Carter Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
Barren County Schools CERTIFIED EVALUATION PLAN
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Welcome to todays session!  Please take a moment to check your connection and audio settings.  If this is your first time using LYNC please see the resources.
Online Lync session Nov. 23, 2015
EVAL Introduction RIG 2 – Cohort 1 October 29, 2012 Cathey Frederick ESD 189 eVAL Specialist.
PEER COACHING INTRODUCTION Lisa Bruno Tanza Shuy.
Benefits of Being Observed: How To Make Collaborative Observations Really Work John L. Tenny, Ph.D.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
 Pre-Observation Conference  Priority component: 1e (Designing Coherent Instruction)  Observation  Priority components: 3c, 3d (Engaging Students in.
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES.
Getting Ready for the Professional Growth & Effectiveness System AISD Getting Ready for the Professional Growth & Effectiveness System AISD.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for
Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Pulaski County Schools June
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Avon Grove School District October 2009
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Self-Advocacy in the Observation Cycle
Peer Observation Grades 6-12
Presentation transcript:

 I can examine the benefits of peer observation.  I can demonstrate understanding of the PGES protocols for the peer observation process.

 The purpose of Peer Observation is for teachers to receive formative feedback from a peer to help improve their practice.  The Peer Observation is only shared between the teacher and the peer and is an opportunity for teachers to engage in collegial conversations concerning pedagogical practice.

 Teachers should guide the observation process. Empowering teachers to share with peers their expectations from this partnership will allow peers to more effectively tailor their feedback.  Teachers collaborate with one another to establish observation specifics.

 Observing others to identify areas of growth in the Kentucky Framework for Teaching or other standards.  Observing others with one focus in mind, such as looking for areas of growth in student engagement.  Observing others to see what new ideas we can walk away with such as formative assessment and differentiation.

 704 KAR 3:370 requires every teacher to have one Peer Observation during his or her summative cycle; this is a minimum requirement and should not dictate the frequency of peer-teacher contacts.

 will observe, collect, share evidence, and provide feedback for formative purposes only  will NOT score a teacher’s practice, nor will peer observation data be shared with anyone other than the observee unless permission is granted.

 peer observer is trained certified school personnel  Peer Observers participating during the summative year observations will complete the state developed training once every three years.

 All required peer observations must be documented in CIITS (time, date, evidence).  All peer observations documentation will be accessed only by the evaluatee  All peer observation scripting must be evidence based, not biased or interpretative statement. All teachers will receive a peer observation in their summative yea r.

Screenshot of CIITS

 Initial Contact  Pre-Conference › The pre-observation conference begins the collaboration process. Use this meeting to learn about the context of the class, the focus/and or goals of the particular session to be observed and the student outcomes the teacher aims for in the session. › Questions to Consider

 During the observation you should be as unobtrusive as possible. Students will know you are there, but try not to call attention to yourself.  Feel free to take a clock or timer and a copy of the framework if necessary. Your ultimate goal is to script evidence.  Length of observation can vary between districts

 After leaving the classroom, work through the evidence collected, check for bias or interpretation, and connect the evidence to each domain.  You will want to complete this within two days of the observation while the lesson is fresh on your mind.  After finalizing the evidence, you may want to share it with your peer to allow her or him time to look through it before the post conference.

 The post observation conference is the opportunity for the peer observer and teacher to review the evidence and facilitate teacher reflection.  As peer observer, you are not evaluating the teacher, your task is to share the evidence and facilitate the discussion. “How do you think the lesson went?” is a good conference starter that allows the teacher to reflect and start the conversation.  Use the framework as a guide for your discussion.

PEER OBSERVERS will observe, collect, share evidence, and provide feedback for formative purposes only will NOT score a teacher’s practice, nor will peer observation data be shared with anyone other than the observee unless permission is granted. QUALIFICATIONS peer observer is trained certified school personnel Peer Observers participating during the summative year observations will complete the state developed training once every three years. PROTOCALS All required peer observations must be documented in CIITS (time, date, evidence). All peer observations documentation will be accessed only by the evaluatee All peer observation scripting must be evidence based, not biased or interpretative statement. All teachers will receive a peer observation in their summative yea r. Review