METHODS. Physical Methods Steam Profile Discharge Air Temperature Water Temperature Relative Humidity.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
- Environment - Climate - Landscape - Land use - Local Population (animals and humans) Depends on…
Advertisements

2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
Nicholas Notaro,Patrick Robbins, Jordyn Reese, Caroline Marr Caleb Riley.
Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,
Surface Water Geochemistry of Deckers Creek Basin Geology 399 Qingyun Sun.
Watershed Assessment Analysis of Data. Q Values Raw data values are NOT Q values. We need to convert the raw data/observations into “grades” (Q values)
Shell Creek Watershed Research Group Advisors: Mark Seier and Karen Malmkar Researchers: Audrey Wondercheck, Mark O’Brien, Alisha Dunlap, Caitlin.
Nick Herdeg Winter Ecology: Spring 2014 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder.
1 Water Quality: Temperature How is water quality affected by temperature?
Indicators of Water Quality
Dry Run Creek: Urban vs. Rural Surficial Water Quality Variability Nick Bosshart and Austin Cox.
Water Quality.
Marilyn Murphy, David Plavcan, William Shepard, Donna Suevo, Jeff Thomas, Karen Trozzo, Timothy Woods and David Yezuita West Chester University July 2002.
Water Quality in CUHK Data Analysis Skill Virtual laboratory: investigating water qualities of local lake in CU campus Environmental Science Module of.
Temperature of Stream Site (upstream to downstream) Temperature ( °C )Average ( °C ) °C °C °C °C °C °C According to.
Water Quality Trends across 319 Monitoring Sites Brian E. Haggard Director, Arkansas Water Resources Center Funding provided by ANRC.
Hydrosapiens GIV eSAT of Vermont: Water Group 2013 Ben DeJong, Nina Brundage, Caitlin Beaudet, Julie Rickner, Mariah Ollive, Hannah VanGuilder, Heather.
Turbidity and Water. Turbidity is a measure of water clarity, how much the material suspended in water decreases the passage of light through the water.
 DO level: 9.8 ppm  Hardness: 110ppm CaCo 3 (this is high due to limestone aquifers, not a bad thing)  Alkalinity: ppm (also high due to limestone.
Topic 8: Water and Climate. The Water Cycle Climate – the conditions of the atmosphere over long periods of time Water cycle – the movement and phase.
Name of presenter Date of presentation.  To help preserve and protect Wisconsin’s over 15,000 lakes and 86,000 miles of rivers.
Figure 3. (lower panel) The cumulative flow excess or deficiency – how much each water year’s flow at Atascadero (measured in inches of runoff at Patterson)
Water Quality ESI Stream Water Mass after collecting by filtration Evaporate water after filtering, determine mass of residue TDS by conductivity since.
Bellwork: 09/05/2012 1)Change 10 to 25% of the water within your tank. 2)If you are not helping your group change water, you need to be finishing the fish.
Water Chemistry Project In order to evaluate water changes, we need access to reliable information on current and past conditions. If changes are already.
The Urban Watershed Unit 1, Topic 1. 1 Urban vs. Suburban vs. Rural.
Shipwrecks, Corrosion and Conservation Summary Slides PART 4 – Jack Dengate.
Shell Creek Watershed Study Advisors – Mark Seier, Suzy Goedeken, & Karen Malmkar Researchers –Katie O’Brien, Jake Kaufman, Mark O’Brien, Aubrey.
112.3 Jessica L. Feeser, M. Elise Lauterbur & Jennifer L. Soong Research Project for Systems Ecology (ENVS 316), Fall ’06 Oberlin College, Oberlin OH BackgroundFindings.
Running Water and Ground Water
Testing for Water Quality
Water quality and indicators are measurements of the substances in water beside water molecules that determine the healthiness of the water or its level.
OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31, UPSTATE FRESHWATER INSTITUTE.
Chemical Assessment Most complicated, but easiest to do. Extreme natural variations What is normal?
An assessment of water quality in tropical streams located in primary and secondary rainforest By Emily Schultz Supervisor: Cheryl Baduini.
If there is pollution in the Chesapeake Bay then the Blue Crabs will decrease.
What’s in Your Creek? Results of the 2009 Clackamas Basin Volunteer Monitoring Effort.
Kuskokwim Watershed Council Key Parameters for Baseline Water Quality Assessment © David Griso.
Kakanui Rachel Ozanne, Water Quality Scientist. Long-term (SOE) monitoring Water quality ~78 sites Monthly sampling.
Water Quality Natural & Controlled Environments. Monitoring natural environments Photo courtesy of Melissa Gutierrez.
Figure 2. (upper) The cumulative flow excess or deficiency – how much each water year’s flow (measured in inches of runoff at Foster Park) varied from.
Our Case Study. Rationale for study The TMDL model assumes that there is no decrease in seepage during low flow conditions, basing its calculations on.
Snapshot Event Monitoring Results for the Clackamas River Watershed Presented by PSU SWRP Summer Capstone August
North Creek Water Quality Prepared by Jon Rogers and Carie McCoy.
Water Quality Indicators.
Water Quality Testing. Testing of water is used to determine if water needs to be cleaned up.
Water Quality Is it safe and healthy?. ● Certain substances can affect the taste or color of water, but are harmless unless present at very high levels.
Watershed Assessment Tables and Graphs June 2012.
SOS Water Project. Research Question: Is the quality of water in the Ishim River suitable for the needs of Astana city, and does it meet the standards.
Rush Creek 2012 EmmaBeccaCassidy Feat. Guido Temperature The purpose of the temperature test was to check the temperature of the river to make sure the.
Monitoring Water Quality for ecosystem health. Why Monitor? Under the Clean Water Act, EPA asks VA to enforce laws improving the quality of our streams,
 Water Quality Variability in a Bioswell and Concrete Drainage Pipe, Southwest Lincoln, Nebraska Jessica Shortino, B.S. University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Turbidity Definition: The measure of the degree to which water loses its transparency due to the presence of suspended particulates. Levels: Ideal Level:
Land Use Influences on Water, Sediment and Nutrients in the Napa Valley Watershed: Conceptual Models and Examples Lester McKee (PhD) Watershed Program.
Foldable You will create a foldable or brochure You will include information for each You will include a picture of each You will include an example.
Water Measurements In EcoMUVE you can measure seven abiotic factors of the pond: temperature, dissolved oxygen, phosphates, nitrates, turbidity, pH, and.
Watershed Management Plan Summary of 2014 Activities/Progress Presented by: Matthew Bennett, MS December 2014.
Warm up: Describe the features of a river basin.
WATER QUALITY.
Annual Membership Meeting Water Quality Report 2010
Water Quality Rice Creek Watershed.
Watersheds Review Science 8 SOL.
Chemicals Around us Water Near You Percents and Stuff 5 pt 5 pt 5 pt
Shirley Birosik Environmental Specialist
Which Way to the Sea?.
_________: the measure of how _________ water is due to _______________ ____________________. Turbidity cloudy suspended particles Definition:
Water & Solute Movement
Indicators of Water Quality
Indicators of Water Quality
Question: Why should we monitor the quality of our rivers, lakes and streams? Water Quality A measure of the physical, chemical and biological factors.
Presentation transcript:

METHODS

Physical Methods Steam Profile Discharge Air Temperature Water Temperature Relative Humidity

Chemical Methods Dissolved Oxygen pH Conductivity Nitrate-Nitrogen Phosphate Image Source: Colemanpalmer.com

Bacterial Methods E. coli

USDA Tree Risk Assessment Defect Codes Probability of Failure Risk Rating

Watershed Assessment

Tree Coverage NAIP Imagery Digitized QA/QC Photo Source: news.uga.edu

Results

Location 2A/2B counted TNTC on 5/22 and 5/29 Location 4A also counted TNTC on 5/29

Long Island Creek Phosphate Sample SitesAverage (mg/L) 1A0 1B0 2A0 2B0.03 3A0 3B0 4A0 4B0 5A0.08 5B0 6A0 6B0

Marsh Creek Phosphate Sample SitesAverage (mg/L) 1A0 1B0 2A0.25 2B1.21 3A0 3B0 4A0 4B0 5A0 5B0 6A0 6B0.33

Tree Canopy Coverage Trees have higher albedo than urban landscape Prevent ‘heat island’ effect Evaluate rate of urban expansion

Long Island Creek Coverage: % Marsh Creek Coverage: 48.97% Average Coverage: 55.28%

Long Island Creek Conclusion E. Coli Levels coliform have increased since Most locations had consistent coliform levels that exceeded state standard of 1000 (cfu/100ml)

Long Island Creek Conclusion Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved Oxygen levels were consistently above the state minimum of 4 mg/L Overall dissolved oxygen levels were up from Previous years except for site 1b There water temperature is not the only factor that influences dissolved oxygen

Long Island Creek Conclusion pH pH was consistently within the state standard range of 6.8 – 8.5 In 2014 Long Island Creek continued the trend from 2013 of becoming less acidic Headwaters were more acidic

Long Island Creek Conclusion Nitrates Nitrates levels were below the state standards of 10mg/L Nitrates are reasonably lower than the 2013 results Drastic decrease in nitrate levels at site 2B

Long Island Creek Conclusion Phosphates Phosphates levels were all below the state standard Phosphate levels were too low to be cause for concern over the past three years.

Marsh Creek Conclusion E. coli E. coli levels were high enough to require serious concern Overall coliform levels are less than 2013 but still much higher than 2012 and also exceed the state standard of 1000 cfu/100ml

Marsh Creek Conclusion Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved Oxygen levels were consistently above the state minimum of 4 mg/L Overall Dissolved oxygen has increased with the exception of site 4a Factors other than temperature are affected dissolved oxygen levels

Marsh Creek Conclusion pH pH was consistently within the state standard range of 6.8 – 8.5 Marsh Creek continued to become less acidic 2014.

Marsh Creek Conclusion Nitrate-Nitrogen Nitrates levels were below the state standards of 10mg/L Most of the test results showed a positive change from 2013 High test results were shown for site 6a and 6b as well as site 1a on one test date

Marsh Creek Conclusion Phosphates 3 separate sites were above the the state standard of 0.1mg/L Phosphate have levels have been to low to be cause for concern between 2012 and 2014

Stream Bank Restoration Avondale Estates, Decatur 1 st order tributary of Cobbs Creek Under the supervision of Jack White, and Harold Harbert of GA Dept. of Natural Resources

Issues & Concerns Water channel created due to storm water run-off pipe located at the headwaters of the tributary. Extreme undercutting, leaving what was once relatively healthy trees with exposed roots.

Goals & Methods Goal: to slow the movement of water within the channel while diverting the direction of flow Logs were placed in a zig-zag formation within the water channel. Coconut netting staked in place near eroded hillsides to slow down water flowing into the scour pit

Stream Restoration

Results Stream Restoration: Results

A B A B Marsh Creek Outliers Highest E.coli : 4B, 5A & 5B, 6A & 6B Out of Range Dissolved Oxygen: 4A Phosphates: 2A & 2B, 6B

A B B B A Long Island Creek Outliers Highest E.coli : 3B & 5A Out of Range Dissolved Oxygen: 1B Phosphates: 2B, 5A

Condition of Watersheds Conclusion E.Coli levels are above the state standard and are increasing annually Nitrogen Levels are declining Dissolved oxygen levels are increasing The overall condition of the watershed is mixed

Questions

APPENDIX Trends for the years to follow