Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration ADS-C CDP Climb/Descend Procedure Implementation Project Update IPACG/39 Keith Dutch, FAA 03 –

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

MINIMUM NAVIGATION PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION AIRSPACE (MNPS)

Advertisements

Federal Aviation Administration Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA Date: February 8, 2012 SOCM-2 Seminar Data Link Operations.

SOCM-2 Seminar Data Link Benefits Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA

Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Air Traffic Management (ATM) Issues 30 Nautical Mile (NM) Lateral / Longitudinal Distance-based.

Presented to: REACT Workshop By: Jay Merkle Date:25 June 2008 Federal Aviation Administration High Density Airport Time- based RNAV/RNP NextGen/JPDO Demonstrations.

Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: IPACG/39 Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA Date: February 5-6, 2014 WP02: Timing Errors in Oakland OCA.

Federal Aviation Administration FAA Labs in a Distributed and Collaborative Environment to Support V&V William J. Hughes Technical Center October 10, 2012.

Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Early Tests of Aircraft Tracking on NWRT PAR Working Group William Benner, Weather Processors Team.

FAA Controller Pilot Data Link Communications Program ATN ‘99 London, England James H. Williams September 22, 1999.

“Established on RNP” Jeff Williams – IATA

Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: Network Centric Demonstrations and Prototypes Technical Interchange By: Deborah Young Date: November 4, 2009.

Analysis of ATC Communication messages Relevant to Altitude Change Requests Electronic Navigation Research Institute IPACG/39, 5-6 February 2014, Fukuoka,

Ames Research Center 1October 2006 Aviation Software Systems Workshop FACET: Future Air Traffic Management Concepts Evaluation Tool Aviation Software Systems.

USING PBN in UPR APPLICATION, SUCCESS and LESSONS LEARNED

Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Developing a Roadmap to Success What’s Needed to Support UPRs The 9 th Pacific Project Team Meeting.

Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: IPACG/39 Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA Date: February 5-6, 2014 IP09: LOST FUEL SAVINGS DUE TO LACK OF.

JCAB and FAA Joint Paper IP/12 UPR and PACOTS Update.

1 Federal Aviation Administration Mid Term Architecture Briefing and NextGen Implementation 1 Federal Aviation Administration Mid Term Architecture Briefing.

Presented to: Teterboro User Group By: Vincent Gerry Date: 18 January 2012 Federal Aviation Administration Operations in the New York Center CTA/FIR.

Presented to: MPAR Working Group By: William Benner, Weather Processors Team Manager (AJP-1820), FAA Technical Center Date: 19 March 2007 Federal Aviation.

Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Gulf of Mexico 50 NM Lateral Separation – RNAV Routes Project Project Overview ATO Oceanic & Offshore.

Federal Aviation Administration Data Communications Implementation Team (DCIT) Departure Clearance Trials (DCL) Test Status DCIT Meeting # 22 Washington,

ASSTAR Oceanic Applications by Nico de Gelder, NLR ASSTAR User Forum #1 4 April 2006, Roma.

Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Air Traffic Management (ATM) Issues Summary of the Outcomes of the 17th Cross Polar Trans East.

Federal Aviation Administration FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (Public availability to be determined under 5USC 552) Data Communications Program DCL Benefits Modeling.

ATN Subnetwork Implementation:

Presented to: Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee By: Stan Pszczolkowski, Manager, System Analysis Division Date: March 1, 2006 Federal Aviation.

Review Continuous Descent Operations Manual Roosevelt Pena (Dom Rep)

Study Continuous Climb Operations

Presented to: Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee By: Stan Pszczolkowski, Manager, System Analysis Team Date: October 11, 2006 Federal Aviation.

A Perspective on NASA Ames Air Traffic Management Research Jeffery A. Schroeder Federal Aviation Administration* * Formerly NASA Ames.

20 FLIGHT OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY Innovations in flight FANS-1/A involvement and future Captain Joe Burns Director – Flight Operations Technology.

Presented to: Verification & Validation Summit By: Vincent Gerry Date: 12 October 2010 Federal Aviation Administration Ocean21- The Future of Oceanic ATC.

FAA NAS Enterprise Architecture – Informing Future Challenges in V&V for NextGen 2009 V&V Summit November, 2009.

Federal Aviation Administration NextGen Test Bed Capabilities and Future Plans Presented by: Vince Lasewicz Laboratory Services Group Date: 11/05/09 William.

CRISTAL ITP European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation CRISTAL ITP ASAS-TN, Paris Johan Martensson CASCADE CRISTAL ITPJohan Martensson ASAS-TN.

ADVANCED AVIATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO AVIATION CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS Prepared for: MTC Prepared By: Don Crisp ATAC February 23, 2007.

FAA System-Wide Information Management Program Overview for SWIM-SUIT Public Lauch Donald Ward Program Manager FAA SWIM Program April 2007.

Presented to: NAS-Wide Simulation Workshop By: Kimberly Noonan, FAA NextGen and Ops Planning Date: January 28, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration NextGen.

International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-84 Initial Capability for Ground-based Cooperative Surveillance SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi.

- Session 4: Interoperation José M. Roca Air/Ground Cooperative ATS Programme Eurocontrol.

Federal Aviation Administration NextGen Integration & Evaluation Capability (NIEC) Presented by: Vince Lasewicz Laboratory Services Group Date: 01/07/10.

Federal Aviation Administration Newark Project Overview January 2009.

Federal Aviation Administration 2011 V&V Summit: Verification & Validation Overview Presented by: John Frederick Date:10/19/11.

Aircraft Manufacturer Plans - Airbus Stéphane Marché – Airbus ASAS TN Glasgow, September 2006.

© 2015 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. Friends and Partners of Aviation Weather Claudia McKnight ATM-Weather Integration Gap Analysis CAASD.

Malmö 5 September. 27 th 2005 NUP ITP TT Reykjavik “NUP -- ITP”

Federal Aviation Administration Data Communications Implementation Team (DCIT) DCIT En Route Services Survey Results A Review 5/8/2013.

Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration NextGen Network Enabled Weather Capability Evaluations Demonstration and Prototyping Information.

Federal Aviation Administration What’s New In Instrument Flight Procedures Jerry Lebar, Eastern Flight Procedures Office March 3, 2010 Hershey Airports.

Federal Aviation Administration APEC Seminar on Practical Measures to Manage Aviation Emissions Collaboration on Aviation Emissions Reduction Partnerships.

Avinor update CPWG/16 Ottawa 4-6 December 2013 Bodo ACC Bodo Oceanic FIR.

Presented to:GMU System-Wide Modeling Workshop By: Joseph Post, ATO NextGen & Ops Planning Date: 10 December 2008 Federal Aviation Administration FAA System-Wide.

Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration CFCG ICAO Communication Failure Coordinating Group IPACG/40 Keith Dutch, AJV September.

Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 5 “The Collaborative Environment”

Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: IPACG/39 Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA Date: February 5-6, 2014 IP06: ADS-B In-trail- Procedure (ITP)

NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace Redesign Record of Decision (ROD) Announcement Congressional Briefing Name: Steve Kelley Date: September 5, 2007 Federal.

Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration New York Center System Operations Traffic Flow Management Operations Weather Users Workshop Tom.

Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: IPACG/40 Date: September 8-12, 2014 IP8: Lost Fuel Savings due to lack of RNP4/FANS Equipage.

Federal Aviation Administration Integrated Arrival/Departure Flow Service “ Big Airspace” Presented to: TFM Research Board Presented by: Cynthia Morris.

Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology

Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology

Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology

Rome November 2008 Johan Martensson, CASCADE

FANS 1/A over Iridium (FOI)

Data Link Advanced Operations

Oceanic and International Operations

ATN Subnetwork Implementation:

New Entrants, Commercial Space and Changing Airspace Management

Presentation transcript:

Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration ADS-C CDP Climb/Descend Procedure Implementation Project Update IPACG/39 Keith Dutch, FAA 03 – 06 February 2014

Federal Aviation Administration ADS-C CDP Climb/Descend an aircraft through the altitude of a blocking aircraft using reduced 15NM separation CDP developed in response to operator requests to utilize the FANS equipment they invested in for NextGen for which they were receiving no benefit return

Federal Aviation Administration ADS-C CDP Operational Trials ADS-C CDP was demonstrated in operational trials by manually applying ADS-C CDP without changes to FAA ATOP automation system –Operational trials began on 15 Feb 2011 in the Oakland Oceanic CTA and ended 15 Feb 2013 –During the two-year timeframe of the trials, the ADS-C CDP was successfully utilized eight times There are no plans to extend the manual trial Fast-time simulations are currently being conducted at the FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center (WJHTC) –These model the use of ADS-C CDP in a more densely populated environment –Increases opportunity for use and further validates the procedure 3

Federal Aviation Administration ADS-C Operational Requirements CPDLC maintained Distance between aircraft determined from near simultaneous ADS-C demand reports which contain position accuracy of 0.25 NM or better (Figure of Merit 6 or higher) Distance between aircraft is not less than –15NM when same speed/faster aircraft in front –25NM when faster aircraft in back (not more than M0.02) Altitude difference between aircraft not more than 2000 ft Clearance assures vertical separation within 15 minutes from first ADS-C report request 4

Federal Aviation Administration Automated ADS-C CDP FL360 FL340 FL350 Desired Altitude Standard Separation RNP-4, FANS-1/A ADS-C CPDLC RNP-4, FANS-1/A ADS-C CDPLC No capabilities required CDP Separation Standard Automation requirements –ATOP conflict probe decision support tool determines when CDP can be applied for climbing/descending aircraft by determining eligibility –ATOP will account for maneuvering aircraft, blocking aircraft, and all other traffic –ATOP will be able to handle multiple maneuvers in one or multiple sectors –Controller either issues the clearance for the climb/descend or UNABLE

Federal Aviation Administration Manual Controller Actions From a systems efficiency perspective, ADS-C CDP system will allow for increased efficiency and improved flow for properly equipped aircraft. 6

Federal Aviation Administration Automated Procedure 7

Federal Aviation Administration Current Working Schedule ADS-C CDP automation, when ready as an operational capability, will be installed and employed in Anchorage, Oakland and New York oceanic airspace. 8