Oceans Topic: Disadvantages Chris Carey
Politics Agenda DA’s Dead until November, probably later than that Depends on the tournament Immigration Reform? Trade Promotion Authority Debt Ceiling
Midterms Structure X Party will win both houses of Congress Plan causes Y party (who is not winning now), to win Y party winning is bad, X party winning is good All about the Senate; the GOP is going to win seats, the question is how many Demographics History
Midterms Resources Nate Silver and fivethirtyeight.com New York Times and ‘the Upshot’ Larry Sabato’s ‘Crystal Ball’ ‘Election Lab’ by the Washington Post and John Sides Sean Trende on Real Clear Politics
GOP Good/Dems Bad Structure GOP wins both houses now Plan increases Dems base turnout b/c it is popular with certain groups, this means the Dems would win instead of the GOP Dems winning is bad because… GOP passes immigration reform GOP cements the Asia Pivot Dems are weak on Iran/GOP would strike them
GOP Bad/Dems Good Structure Dems will hold the Senate Plan makes the GOP win the Senate GOP winning is bad because Global warming/EPA regulations Other things
Oil DAs High oil prices are good and the plan decreases oil prices Renewables affs Oil drilling affs Russia
Sphere of Influence DAs Relations China Russia Trade-off Links
Trade Off DAs Plan forces a trade-off within X’s budget E.g. – NOAA Satellite DA NOAA has a tight budget, don’t have a lot of money, etc Plan forces a direct trade-off within the budget between two projects The thing the aff trades off with/decreases funding for is good Weather satellites used by the military
Environment DAs Many affs will read environment advantages, so these might be case turns Biodiversity DAs Keystone species need to be protected, the aff does something to kill ocean biodiversity, that is bad Warming Das Plan increases C02 emissions
Military DAs Plan hurts the military That is bad Hegemony is good