# 3564 Neurotoxicity with FULV versus FLOX in patients with stage II and III carcinoma of the colon: Results of NSABP Protocol C-07 S Land 1,2, J Kopec.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 536.
Advertisements

CM A pooled safety & efficacy analysis examining the effect of performance status on outcomes in 9 first line treatment trials of 6,286 patients.
MOSAIC Stage ll+lll FOLFOX4 LV5FU2 Randomize. DFS DFS (months) Hazard ratio: 0.77 [0.65 – 0.92] p < 0.01 FOLFOX (n=1123) 77.9% LV5FU2 (n=1123) 72.8% FOLFOX.
A Phase III Trial Comparing FULV to FULV + Oxaliplatin in Stage II or III Carcinoma of the Colon: Results of NSABP-C-07 Norman Wolmark, MD Colorectal Cancer.
1 N9841: A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) versus FOLFOX4 in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated.
CCEB Modeling Quality of Life Data with Missing Values Andrea B. Troxel, Sc.D. Assistant Professor of Biostatistics Center for Clinical Epidemiology and.
EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF RECOMBINANT HUMAN ACTIVATED PROTEIN C FOR SEVERE SEPSIS (PROWESS) GORDONR. BERNARD, M.D. et al. The New England Journal of Medicine.
Controversies in Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer Parag Sanghvi M.D. Tasha McDonald M.D. Department of Radiation Medicine OHSU.
NSABP PROTOCOL C-10: RESULTS A Phase II Trial of 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin and Oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) Plus Bevacizumab for Patients with Unresectable.
Pilot Experience with Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer – NCCTG Intergroup N0147 J. Huang*, D. J. Sargent*,
® Introduction Mental Health Predictors of Pain and Function in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Olivia D. Lara, K. Ashok Kumar MD FRCS Sandra Burge,
CM A Comparison of Simple Single-Item Measures and the Common Toxicity Criteria in Detecting the Onset of Oxaliplatin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.
Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of Intravenous Calcium/Magnesium to Prevent Oxaliplatin- Induced Sensory Neurotoxicity, N08CB.
Phase III study of first-line XELOX plus bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 cycles followed by XELOX plus BEV or single agent (s/a) BEV as maintenance therapy in.
Intravenous calcium and magnesium prevents oxaliplatin-induced sensory neurotoxicity in adjuvant colon cancer: Results of a phase III placebo-controlled,
Diabetes mellitus and the incidence and time to onset of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral sensory neuropathy in patients with colorectal cancer: A pooled.
Intergroup trial CALGB 80101
Taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC): investigational agents TTP = median time to disease progression OS = median overall survival.
ESMO/ECCO Presidential Session III
Phase III studies of Xeloda® in colorectal cancer (CRC)
Adjuvant Therapy of Colon Cancer 2005 Daniel G. Haller, M.D. Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA.
Intravenous Calcium and Magnesium (CaMg) Reduces Chronic, But Not Acute Neurotoxicity Associated With Oxaliplatin – Results From a Placebo- controlled.
Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Colon Cancer.
Is surgical resection of an asymptomatic primary colorectal tumor beneficial for patients with incurable Stage IV disease? A Phase II Trial of 5-Fluorouracil,
The Impact of Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin in the Preoperative Multimodality Treatment of Patients with Carcinoma of the Rectum: NSABP R-04 1 Capecitabine.
Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU/Leucovorin as Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer: X-ACT Trial Results James Cassidy, MD Colorectal Cancer Update Think Tank.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
Greg Yothers, Stephanie R. Land, Clifford Y. Ko, D. Lawrence Wickerham, Louis Fehrenbacher, Jeffrey K. Giguere, Norman Wolmark, and Patricia A. Ganz.
Generously supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, Department of Veteran Affairs, and National Institutes of Health,
This house believes that FOLFIRINOX is the best treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma Pro Marc YCHOU Montpellier.
NSABP C08 adjuvant colon cancer Best of ASCO, Beirut, July 2009 Prof Eric Van Cutsem, MD, PhD Digestive Oncology Leuven, Belgium.
EFFICACY OF A STAGE-BASED BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTION TO PROMOTE STI SCREENING IN YOUNG WOMEN: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL Chacko MR, Wiemann CM, Kozinetz.
Outcomes Following Adjuvant 5-FU based Treatment (AT) for Colon Cancer vs Impact on Recurrence Rate, Time from Recurrence to Death.
T Andre, E Quinaux, C Louvet, E Gamelin, O Bouche, E Achille, P Piedbois, N Tubiana-Mathieu, M Buyse and A de Gramont. Updated results at 6 year of the.
L Johnetta Blakely, SR Patel, PF Thall,
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.
Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Best of ASCO Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Ali Shamseddine, MD Professor of Medicine Head of Hematology/Oncology.
0 Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer NCCTG Intergroup Phase III Trial N0147 Jocelin Huang, Daniel J Sargent,
Correlation of Hand-Foot Skin Reaction (HFS) with Treatment Efficacy in Pancreatic Cancer (PC) Patients (pts) Treated with Gemcitabine/Capecitabine plus.
NSABP Overall Survival and Updated Disease-Free Survival Results of the NSABP C-08 Trial Assessing Bevacizumab in Stage II & III Colon Cancer CJ Allegra,
Quality of Life (QOL) & Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) Lori Minasian, MD Chief, Community Oncology and Prevention Trials Research Group, DCP, NCI, NIH,
CV-1 Trial 709 The ISEL Study (IRESSA ® Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer) Summary of Data as of December 16, 2004 Kevin Carroll, MSc Summary of Data.
Adjuvant Therapy of Colon Cancer: Where are we now ? Leonard Saltz, MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York, NY.
CALYPSO Trial: Carboplatin & Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) versus Carboplatin & Paclitaxel in Relapsed, Platinum- Sensitive Ovarian Cancer Pujade-Lauraine.
Age > 50 Abstract Background Limited data exists regarding outcomes and AT benefit/toxicity in Y pts with stage II and III CC. We examined overall survival.
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
P.A. Tang 1, S. J. Cohen 1, G. Bjarnason 1, C. Kollmannsberger 1, K. Virik 1, M. J. MacKenzie 1, J. Brown 1, L. Wang 1, A. Chen 2, M. J. Moore 1 1 Princess.
Lenalidomide Maintenance After Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Follow-Up Analysis of the IFM Trial Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
HERA TRIAL: 2 Years versus 1 Year of Trastuzumab After Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer at 8 Years of Median Follow-Up.
Reviewer: Dr Scott Berry Date posted: June 21, 2007 CAPEOX vs. FOLFOX4 +/- Bevacizumab: survival results from NO16966, a randomized.
Alemtuzumab BLA committee CD52 Expression Leukocytes B- lymphocytes T- lymphocytes Monocytes Macrophages Thymocytes Granulocytes (
Safety, Efficacy and Duration of Effect of RT002, a Botulinum Toxin Type A for Injection, to Treat Glabellar Lines: The Phase 2 BELMONT Study Authors:
Microsatellite Instability Predicts Improved Response to Adjuvant Therapy With Irinotecan, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin in Stage III Colon Cancer In association.
Neuropathy Is Not Associated With Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Adjuvant Taxane-Containing Therapy for Operable Breast Cancer Bryan P. Schneider,
2 years versus 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer (HERA): an open-label, randomised controlled trial Aron Goldhirsch, Richard.
Efavirenz Use Not Associated With Depressive Episodes, According to Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trial Outcomes Slideset on: Journot V, Chene G, De.
Background The occurrence of bedside teaching rounds has declined over the decades, with various barriers. One barrier sited is patient discomfort with.
Menstrual History and Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Women With Node-Positive Breast Cancer Treated With Adjuvant Therapy on the NSABP B-30 Trial Patricia.
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
Methodological challenges of studying CIPN during chemotherapy
University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Definitive Analysis of the Primary Outcomes
นายแพทย์ธราธร ตุงคะสมิต นายแพทย์ชำนาญการพิเศษ โรงพยาบาลมะเร็งอุดรธานี
ESPAC-4: Adjuvant Gemcitabine/ Capecitabine Improves 5-Yr Survival vs Gemcitabine Alone in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma CCO Independent Conference.
Dose-finding designs incorporating toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles and continuous efficacy outcome Sumithra J. Mandrekar Mayo Clinic Invited.
Jones SE et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 5082.
Short or long adjuvant treatment: can we use new trials to decide it?
First efficacy and safety results from XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomised 2x2 factorial phase III trial of XELOX vs FOLFOX4 + bevacizumab or placebo in first-line.
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
and the NSABP Investigators
Presentation transcript:

# 3564 Neurotoxicity with FULV versus FLOX in patients with stage II and III carcinoma of the colon: Results of NSABP Protocol C-07 S Land 1,2, J Kopec 3, R Cecchini 1, P A Ganz 4, HS Wieand 1,2, L Colangelo 1, S Sharif 5, JP Kuebler 6, JP Costantino 1,2, N Wolmark 5 1. NSABP Biostatistical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; 2. Department of Biostatistics, Univ of Pittsburgh; 3. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 4. Schools of Medicine and Public Health, and the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at Los Angeles, CA; 5. NSABP Operations Center, Pittsburgh, PA; 6CCOP - Columbus, OH

INTRODUCTION NSABP Phase III Protocol C-07 compared the efficacy of FULV versus FLOX in patients with stage II or III colon cancer. The definitive analysis revealed an increase in 4-year disease-free survival from 71.6% to 76.5% (HR=0.79, p=0.004) in favor of FLOX. The present study compares patient- reported neurotoxicity between the treatment groups.

METHODS Patients were randomized to FULV (5-fluorouracil, 500 mg/m2 iv bolus weekly x 6; leucovorin 500 mg/m2 iv weekly x 6, each 8-week cycle x 3) or FLOX (FULV with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 iv administered on weeks 1, 3 and 5 of each 8-week cycle x 3). N=400 were eligible for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) neurotoxicity sub-study.

Assessment of neurotoxicity 1. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) * FACT/GOG Oxaliplatin-Specific Neurotoxicity (NTX) questionnaire (Likert 0-4). Summary scale NTX-12 * Baseline through 18 months 2. Staff-reported: NCI CTC v NCI-Sanofi grade * After 12 months, Form NT was only required until resolution (no neurosensory toxicity exceeding the grade reported before treatment, no neuromotor toxicity exceeding the pre-treatment grade, and no episodes of pharyngo-laryngeal dysesthesias).

Statistical methods Form submission rates were compared across treatments with repeated measures logistic regression. Two analyses compared mean NTX-12 scores between treatment arms: a mixed effects model comparing all assessments longitudinally and a two- sample t-test using scores at 18 months (change from baseline). NTX-12 item responses were dichotomized as moderate (level “somewhat”) versus lesser severity and analyzed with logistic regression during treatment and at 18 months. All analyses of NTX-12 scores and items controlled for baseline symptoms. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods were used to compare the time to resolution of neurotoxicity based on the NCI-Sanofi criteria, including only subjects who had neurotoxicity reported at their first on-treatment assessment.

RESULTS Patients and assessments 2,492 patients enrolled in C-07 (2/ /2002); 395 patients for PROs. Form submission rates were high (90-100% for staff-reported; % for PRO). Discontinued therapy early due to toxicity: 77 (6.2%) FULV vs. 276 (22.1%) FLOX; about half of those patients remained on the other two agents.

N (%) AgeMean Range Sex Male240 (60.8) Female155 (39.2) Pos. Node s 0135 (34.2) (44.3) (21.5) Site L. Colon89 (22.5) R. Colon180 (45.6) Sigmoid124 (31.4) Multiple 2 (0.5) TABLE 1. PRO sub-study patient characteristics

Patient-reported neurotoxicity: total scores and individual items Mean NTX-12 was higher for FLOX throughout the 18-month period of study (p<0.0001) and remained higher at 18 months (p=0.009) The % who experienced a clinically important change (4 points) on NTX-12 from baseline to 6 months: 17% FULV vs. 40% FLOX (p<0.0001). At 18 months these percentages were 18% and 31% (p=0.016). During therapy, significantly more FLOX patients experienced hand/foot neuropathy and overall weakness; fewer reported trouble hearing during treatment. At 18 months, decreased hand neurotoxicity, but continued foot discomfort. Between baseline and 18 months, 10.4% of FULV vs. 20.2% FLOX had an increase of 3-4 points in at least one of the 12 items.

Mean Total NTX-12 Score (Change from Baseline)

TABLE 2.FULV (%) # FLOX (%) SYMPTOMS Cyc218moCyc 218 mo Trouble hearing Ringing ears Trouble walking Joint pain /muscle cramps Weak all over Trouble feeling shapes Trouble w/ buttons Foot discomfort Feet numb /tingling Hand/foot pain in cold Hand discomfort Hand numb/tingling Bold indicates statistically significant differences (p<.05) # % reporting “somewhat” or more severe symptoms

Observer-reported neurotoxicity Grade 3-4 toxicities were very rare (with point prevalence less than 5% in either treatment arm; Table 3). At cycle 2, grade 2-4 neurosensory toxicities were reported for 13.4% of patients assigned to FLOX. At their first on-treatment assessment, 98 (8%) of patients in the FULV group and 836 (68%) of patients in the FLOX group had neurotoxicity according to the NCI-Sanofi criteria. Time to resolution was 4.8 months FULV vs. 9.0 months FLOX (p<0.0001).

FULV (n=1245)FLOX (n=1247) Cycle months TABLE 3. NCI-Sanofi Neurosensory Grade

months Time to resolution Time to resolution among patients whose first assessment indicated neurotoxicity (n=98 of patients assigned to FULV; n=837 of FLOX). Time is measured from start of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS FLOX causes significantly more neurotoxicity than FULV. The neurotoxicity is felt primarily in the hands during therapy and in the feet during follow-up. In a minority of patients the neurotoxicity is long-lasting.