2/11/2010 1 Research Review.  Geodesic Grids  Finite volume transport  Reconstruction functions  Mass Flux Calculations  Monotonic Limiting 2/11/2010.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Courant and all that Consistency, Convergence Stability Numerical Dispersion Computational grids and numerical anisotropy The goal of this lecture is to.

Advertisements

Numerical methods III (Advection: the semi-Lagrangian technique)

2ª aula Evolution Equation. The Finite Volume Method.

© Fluent Inc. 4/16/ Introductory GAMBIT Notes GAMBIT v2.0 Jan 2002 Fluent User Services Center Edge and Face Meshing.

3 Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Applications of Differentiation.

Time reversed algorithm for pure convection V.М.Goloviznin.

Algorithm Development for the Full Two-Fluid Plasma System

Numerical Integration of Functions

Improvement of the Semi-Lagrangian advection by ‘selective filling diffusion (SFD)' WG2-meeting COSMO-GM, Moscow, Michael Baldauf (FE13)

Degree and Finite Differences. How the degree translates to a function DegreeFunction 0Constant 1linear 2quadratic 3cubic.

EXAMPLE 2 Use the scale factor of similar solids Packaging

3D spherical gridding based on equidistant, constant volume cells for FV/FD methods A new method using natural neighbor Voronoi cells distributed by spiral.

Section 4: Implementation of Finite Element Analysis – Other Elements

Question 1 Integration. Question 2 Integration Question 3 Integration.

1 Internal Seminar, November 14 th Effects of non conformal mesh on LES S. Rolfo The University of Manchester, M60 1QD, UK School of Mechanical,

Steady Aeroelastic Computations to Predict the Flying Shape of Sails Sriram Antony Jameson Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics Stanford University First.

Content Subdivision First some basics (control point polygon, mesh)

Linear, Exponential, and Quadratic Functions. Write an equation for the following sequences.

Solving quadratic equations Factorisation Type 1: No constant term Solve x 2 – 6x = 0 x (x – 6) = 0 x = 0 or x – 6 = 0 Solutions: x = 0 or x = 6 Graph.

9.4 – Solving Quadratic Equations By Completing The Square

AREPO – V. Springel Adaptive, moving, unstructured hydrodynamics, locally adaptive time-steps, self-gravity + Galilean Invariance i.e. Everything you ever.

A Look at High-Order Finite- Volume Schemes for Simulating Atmospheric Flows Paul Ullrich University of Michigan.

HPC 1.4 Notes Learning Targets: - Solve equations using your calculator -Solve linear equations -Solve quadratic equations - Solve radical equations -

1 Dr. Scott Schaefer Coons Patches and Gregory Patches.

The Geometry of Biomolecular Solvation 2. Electrostatics Patrice Koehl Computer Science and Genome Center

A cell-integrated semi-Lagrangian dynamical scheme based on a step-function representation Eigil Kaas, Bennert Machenhauer and Peter Hjort Lauritzen Danish.

Lesson 11-7 Similar Solids. Two solids of the same type with equal ratios of corresponding linear measures are called similar solids.

Accuracy Based Generation of Thermodynamic Properties for Light Water in RELAP5-3D 2010 IRUG Meeting Cliff Davis.

3.3.3: Semi-Lagrangian schemes AOSC614 class Hong Li.

7. Introduction to the numerical integration of PDE. As an example, we consider the following PDE with one variable; Finite difference method is one of.

Computational fluid dynamics Authors: A. Ghavrish, Ass. Prof. of NMU, M. Packer, President of LDI inc.

Constructing Bezier Curves on the Surface of a Sphere By Reza Ali Fundamentals of Spatial Computing UCSB MAT 594CM Spring 2009.

Chapter 7: Trajectory Generation Faculty of Engineering - Mechanical Engineering Department ROBOTICS Outline: 1.

The status and development of the ECMWF forecast model M. Hortal, M. Miller, C. Temperton, A. Untch, N. Wedi ECMWF.

© Fluent Inc. 11/24/2015J1 Fluids Review TRN Overview of CFD Solution Methodologies.

Ale with Mixed Elements 10 – 14 September 2007 Ale with Mixed Elements Ale with Mixed Elements C. Aymard, J. Flament, J.P. Perlat.

Unstable-particles pair production in modified perturbation theory in NNLO M.L.Nekrasov IHEP, Protvino.

Objectives Use finite differences to determine the degree of a polynomial that will fit a given set of data. Use technology to find polynomial models for.

FALL 2015 Esra Sorgüven Öner

6.4 Solving Polynomial Equations. One of the topics in this section is finding the cube or cube root of a number. A cubed number is the solution when.

Section 7.5 Trigonometric Equations Objective: To solve linear and quadratic trigonometric equations.

Solving equations using the GDC. “WE CAN” solve linear equations using the GDC.

2.1 – Linear and Quadratic Equations Linear Equations.

1 TERMINOLOGY ISSUES. 2 The finer is the mesh the better are your results true ?false ? Geometry should be represented as accurately as possible true.

Particular Solutions to Differential Equations Unit 4 Day 2.

PreCalculus Section 1.6 Solve quadratic equations by: a. Factoring b. Completing the square c. Quadratic formula d. Programmed calculator Any equation.

IMP3 1 RITM – code Computation with stiff transport models presented by D.Kalupin 12th Meeting of the ITPA Transport Physics (TP) Topical Group 7-10 May.

Deutscher Wetterdienst Flux form semi-Lagrangian transport in ICON: construction and results of idealised test cases Daniel Reinert Deutscher Wetterdienst.

A Fully Conservative 2D Model over Evolving Geometries Ricardo Canelas Master degree student IST Teton Dam 1976.

3/25/2015PHY 752 Spring Lecture 241 PHY 752 Solid State Physics 11-11:50 AM MWF Olin 107 Plan for Lecture 23:  Transport phenomena – Chap. 17.

Transport process In molecular transport processes in general we are concerned with the transfer or movement of a given property or entire by molecular.

Computational Fluid Dynamics Lecture II Numerical Methods and Criteria for CFD Dr. Ugur GUVEN Professor of Aerospace Engineering.

The Finite Element Approach to Thermal Analysis Appendix A.

Please log on to your computers.

An accurate, efficient method for calculating hydrometeor advection in multi-moment bulk and bin microphysics schemes Hugh Morrison (NCAR*) Thanks to:

Formulas for Lengths, Areas and Volumes

Clicker Question 1 What is the interval of convergence of A. (-, )

Clicker Question 1 What is the interval of convergence of A. (-, )

9.3 Solve Using Square Roots

NUMERICAL INTEGRATION

Parent Functions.

The sequence of differences is: constant for a linear sequence,

Coons Patches and Gregory Patches

3.5 Solving Nonlinear Systems

Solving simultaneous linear and quadratic equations

Lesson Extension: Patterns and Recursion

High Accuracy Schemes for Inviscid Traffic Models

Analyze Graphs of Functions

GungHo! A new dynamical core for the Unified Model Nigel Wood, Dynamics Research, UK Met Office © Crown copyright Met Office.

Atmospheric modelling of HMs Sensitivity study

Presentation transcript:

2/11/ Research Review

 Geodesic Grids  Finite volume transport  Reconstruction functions  Mass Flux Calculations  Monotonic Limiting 2/11/ Research Review

Source: NCAR Source: Wikipedia  Geodesic grids: Tessellations of the sphere generated from platonic solids  Motivation :To avoid the POLE PROBLEM  Problem: Traditional finite difference methods are not applicable – grid lines not aligned to latitude/longitude 2/11/ Research Review

 Transport Equation  Integrating over the area  Integrating in time gives 2/11/ Research Review

Note : In three cases, Depending on V the q estimate will be different. (Trajectory Calculation) Reconstruction Function Constant Linear Quadratic 2/11/ Research Review

2/11/2010Research Review 6

Various Cases 2/11/ Research Review

Note : In three cases, Depending on V the q estimate will be different. (Trajectory Calculation) Reconstruction Function Constant Linear Quadratic 2/11/ Research Review

2/11/ Research Review

2/11/ Research Review

2/11/ Research Review

2/11/ Research Review

2/11/ Research Review

Area- Avg -Quad Area Cubic e^(x) 2/11/ Research Review

SOLUTION : MONOTONICITY CONSTRAINT 2/11/ Research Review

Zalesek Keep as much as weighing of higher order estimate as possible and at the same time preserving the monotonicity. (Details in Zalesek,1979) Vanleer : Gradients are limited for each hexagon as described in Dukowicz and Kodis(1987) Thuburn: A multidimensional flux limiter which modifies the estimated mixing ratio values at the edge itself.( details in Thuburn 1996) 2/11/ Research Review

M D T Z 2/11/ Research Review

2/11/ Research Review

 Geodesic Grids are attractive because are computationally more efficient for AGCM  Steps involved in Tracer transport are a) Compute reconstruction; b) Compute Mass flux; c) Monotonic limiting ( if needed)  Accuracy of reconstruction function determines the convergence order of scheme  Mass flux calculation are important and are responsible for overall computational cost of scheme  Monotonic limiting is important and has been successfully tested 2/11/2010 Research Review 19

2/11/2010Research Review 20