VII - 1 Presentation to NMP ST9 Workshop Washington, D.C. February 2003 VII. Aerocapture System Technology for Planetary Missions Session Facilitator:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technology Module: Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) Space Systems Engineering, version 1.0 SOURCE INFORMATION: The material contained in this lecture.
Advertisements

Concept Overview for 2 mt Case “2 mt case”: integrated payloads of no more than 2 mt can be landed on the surface of Mars; extension of current Mars EDL.
International Planetary Probe Workshop 10
Mercury Venus Earth Mars Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune Dwarf Planets Sun Eris Pluto Ceres By Michelle Stephens.
Numerical Optimal Control Methods Applied to Mars EDL Max Fagin Rapid Design of Systems Lab Purdue University 17 th Annual Mars Society Convention League.
Advances in Thermal Protection System Instrumentation for Atmospheric Entry Missions Johnny Fu Sierra Lobo, Inc. NASA Ames Research Center Presentation.
ATMOSPHERIC REENTRY TRAJECTORY MODELING AND SIMULATION: APPLICATION TO REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE MISSION (Progress Seminar Presentation - 2) K. Sivan (Roll.
VI. Descent and Terminal Guidance for Pinpoint Landing and Hazard Avoidance Session Chair: Dr. Sam W. Thurman.
1 Air Launch System Project Proposal February 11, 2008 Dan Poniatowski (Team Lead) Matt Campbell Dan Cipera Pierre Dumas Boris Kaganovich Jason LaDoucer.
Analysis of Temperature-Constrained Ballute Aerocapture for High-Mass Mars Payloads Kristin Gates Medlock (1) Alina A. Alexeenko (2) James M. Longuski.
Principles of Propulsion and its Application in Space Launchers Prof. Dr.-Ing. Uwe Apel Hochschule Bremen REVA Seminar1.
Autonomous Landing Hazard Avoidance Technology (ALHAT) Page 1 March 2008 Go for Lunar Landing Real-Time Imaging Technology for the Return to the Moon Dr.
AAE450 Senior Spacecraft Design Atul Kumar Presentation Week 3: February 1 st, 2007 Aerodynamics Team Re-Entry vehicle analysis - Lifting body 1.
Propulsion Engineering Research Center NASA Technology Roadmap: Launch Propulsion Systems Robert J. Santoro The Propulsion Engineering Research Center.
Experimental Hypersonics at the NASA Langley Research Center By John R. Micol.
Part 4: Exploration 1. Reaction Engine  An engine, such as a jet or rocket engine, that ejects gas at high velocity and develops its thrust from the.
Testing of Advanced Conformal Ablative TPS
Why Venus? The 2013 Planetary Science Decadal Survey recommends the Venus In Situ Explorer mission as highest-priority within New Frontiers class. Venus.
Traveling in Space 1.The Space Agency 2.Unmanned Space Vehicles 3.Manned Space Vehicles 4.Equipment needed in Space 5.The Future of Space Exploration NASA.
USA Fundamental Hypersonics
A.Space Probes- a vehicle that carries scientific instruments to planets or other bodies in space. 1) The soviets were first to launch a probe.
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
“ PHOBOS - SOIL ” Phobos Sample Return Mission 1. goals, methods of study A.Zakharov, Russian academy of sciences Russian aviation.
AE 1350 Lecture #14 Introduction to Astronautics.
1 Project Name Solar Sail Project Proposal February 7, 2007 Megan Williams (Team Lead) Eric Blake Jon Braam Raymond Haremza Michael Hiti Kory Jenkins Daniel.
A Simple Entry, Descent, and Floating System for Planetary Ballooning Daisuke Akita Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Titan Mariner Spacecraft Study Titan Team! IPPW-5 June 24, 2007.
Wind Tunnel / Arc Jet Re-Compete Potential Bidders Conference Aerospace Directorate Space Technology Division Thermophysics Facilities Branch.
Technology Input Formats and Background Appendix B.
Aerocapture Mission Concepts for Venus, Titan and Neptune
EXTROVERTSpace Propulsion 02 1 Thrust, Rocket Equation, Specific Impulse, Mass Ratio.
Filling Mars Human Exploration Strategic Knowledge Gaps with Next Generation Meteorological Instrumentation. S. Rafkin, Southwest Research Institute
Requirements and Operations Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
Mars 2020 Project Matt Wallace Deputy Project Manager August 3, 2015.
The Solar System Chapter 6 COPY DOWN THE LEARNING GOALS ON PG SKIP 5 LINES BETWEEN EACH!
Spacecraft Trajectories You Can Get There from Here! John F Santarius Lecture 9 Resources from Space NEEP 533/ Geology 533 / Astronomy 533 / EMA 601 University.
FP7/SPACE: Activity Strengthening of Space foundations / Research to support space science and exploration - SPA The research leading.
Guidance and Navigation
STRATEGIES FOR MARS NETWORK MISSIONS VIA AN ALTERNATIVE ENTRY, DESCENT, AND LANDING ARCHITECTURE 10 TH INTERNATIONAL PLANETARY PROBE WORKSHOP June,
FAST LOW THRUST TRAJECTORIES FOR THE EXPLORATION OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM
Minimalist Mars Mission Establishing a Human Toehold on the Red Planet Executive Summary DevelopSpace MinMars Team.
Mars Today 1 An immediate and inexpensive program for manned Mars visitation.
III - 1 III. Solar Sail Flight System Technology Session Facilitator: Gregory P. Garbe.
1 Aerothermal Ground Testing of Flexible Thermal Protection Systems for Hypersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerators Walter E. Bruce III, Nathaniel J.
Multi-Mission Earth Entry Vehicle: Aerodynamic and Aerothermal Analysis of Trajectory Environments Kerry Trumble, NASA Ames Research Center Artem Dyakonov,
 The Multi-Tier Mission Architecture and a Different Approach to Entry, Descent and Landing Jeremy Straub Department of Computer Science University of.
ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 NMP 2-1 EW M ILLENNIUM P ROGRA NNMM Program Overview Dr. Christopher Stevens Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of.
Powered Re-entry Vehicle David Lammers ASTE 527 Concept 13 December 2011.
ASEN 5050 SPACEFLIGHT DYNAMICS Interplanetary Prof. Jeffrey S. Parker University of Colorado – Boulder Lecture 29: Interplanetary 1.
A&AE 450 – Senior Design Jeremy Davis Group A – Aerodynamics Preliminary Design Analysis January 23, 2001.
Rocket Performance Principles of Space Systems Design U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND Parametric Design The Design Process Regression Analysis Level I.
Review of Past and Proposed Mars EDL Systems. Past and Proposed Mars EDL Systems MinMars Mars entry body design is derived from JPL Austere Mars entry.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration February 27, 2013 Defining Potential HEOMD Instruments for Mars 2020 A Work in Progress... NOTE ADDED BY.
06/08/2005 The 2nd Mars Expedition Planning Workshop (2005) MARTIAN MOTHS: THE USE OF SIMPLE, ROBUST, SINGLE PARAMETER SENSORS TO MAP PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS.
Pawel Swica1 Entry/Integration Hours Worked: Team Member Pawel Swica.
ST9 TPWS OSS Science Needs Overview Robert M. Nelson Lead Scientist New Millennium Program Offcie California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion.
V - 1 V. System Technology for Large Space Telescopes Session Chair: Juan A. Roman.
Pre-decisional – for Planning and Discussion Purposes Only 1 Technology Planning for Future Mars Missions Samad Hayati Manager, Mars Technology Program.
CubeSat Re-Entry Experimental System Testbed C.R.E.S.T. STK 11 This software is an orbital simulator that allows the user to examine the flight path of.
AAE 450 Spring 2010 AAE 450 2/11/2010 Kathy Brumbaugh Chris Spreen
Workshop on Science Associated with the Lunar Exploration Architecture - Earth Science Subcommittee Theme: A Lunar-Based Earth Observatory Science Observations.
Gravity Assists and the use of the Slingshot method
Session Chair: Dr. Sam W. Thurman
Lunar Trajectories.
VII. Aerocapture System Technology for Planetary Missions
NASA Hypersonic Research
Matching of Propulsion Systems for an Aircraft
Planetary Protection Category II
Rocketry Trajectory Basics
Team A Propulsion 1/16/01.
Presentation transcript:

VII - 1 Presentation to NMP ST9 Workshop Washington, D.C. February 2003 VII. Aerocapture System Technology for Planetary Missions Session Facilitator: Michelle Munk

Aerocapture System TechnologyVII - 2 Outline Executive Summary Aerocapture Capabilities to be Validated by ST9 Aerocapture Overview –Aerocapture as an Enabling Technology Technology Areas to be Addressed by ST9 –Experiment Requirements Science Capabilities Roadmap –Aerocapture Mission Summary Technology Roadmap State of the Art Figures of Merit Definitions

Aerocapture System TechnologyVII - 3 Executive Summary The Splinter Sessions Focused on the Following Technology Areas –System and Performance Modeling –Aerodynamics and Aerothermodynamics –Thermal Protection Systems/Structure –Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GN&C) Session Topics –Future space science mission needs –Desired workshop products –Technology splinter session discussions –Needs/potential capabilities assessments

Aerocapture System TechnologyVII - 4 Executive Summary (continued) Key Observations –Aerocapture is applicable to all planetary destinations with suitable atmospheres (Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Titan, Uranus, and Neptune) –The primary advantage of aerocapture is propellant mass savings. The net vehicle mass savings range from 20-80% depending on the destination and can manifest themselves in terms of smaller, cheaper launch vehicles or increased payloads. Preliminary results indicate that some missions (e.g. Neptune Orbiter) cannot be done without aerocapture because they won't fit on the largest available launch vehicle (Delta IV heavy). Aerocapture can also reduce trip time (by allowing higher arrival speeds than chemical capture can feasibly accommodate), and enable new missions with increased flexibility –Aerocapture is a systems technology in which most of the elements already exist due to development in other aeroentry applications. The critical next step is to assemble these elements into a prototype vehicle, fly it in the space environment and thereby validate the design, simulation and systems engineering tools and processes This need is very well matched to the NMP program objective that ST-9 be a systems level validation experiment –ST-9 flight experiment is key to making aerocapture technology available to science missions

Aerocapture System TechnologyVII - 5 Executive Summary (continued) Recommendations for ST-9 Flight Experiment –ST-9 should validate the most mature and immediately useful vehicle configuration, which is the blunt body aeroshell Blunt body aeroshell systems provide robust performance for aerocapture at all “small body” destinations in the solar system (Mars, Titan, Venus, Earth) The validation will be directly relevant to other aeroshell geometries (as will be needed for the gas giants) for the guidance, simulation and systems engineering disciplines –The ST-9 flight validation must demonstrate a drag delta-V of 2 km/s, in order to involve all of the essential physics of the problem and serve as an acceptable validation of aerocapture Although the ST-9 cost cap precludes a "true" aerocapture flight test involving a hyperbolic to elliptic orbit change effected by atmospheric drag, this objective can be accomplished with an elliptical-to-elliptical orbit change. –The ST-9 flight test should include an autonomous periapse raise maneuver after the atmospheric portion of the flight –The ST-9 vehicle should incorporate diagnostic instrumentation to the maximum extent possible under the cost cap The two priorities are to get information about the hypersonic flow field around the vehicle and to quantify the performance of the thermal protection material. –The ST-9 vehicle should baseline mature TPS and structural materials to minimize risk However, it is recommended (if affordable given the cost cap) that the vehicle incorporate a test coupon of one or more new TPS materials that are candidates for future aerocapture and/or aeroentry missions at other planets. These coupons should be incorporated in such a way that their failure does not compromise the overall flight test experiment

Aerocapture System TechnologyVII - 6 Aerocapture Capabilities to be Validated by ST9 Figures of Merit Required CapabilityNowST9SSE UltimateCurrent TRL TRL 5 Test Requirement Aftbody aeroheating uncertainty (%) N/A Aero/RCS interaction uncertainty (%) N/A Aerocapture GN&C validated Validated by simulationValidated by flightProvided by ST9 57 GN&C validation (# of segments flight validated) 23 Mission critical exit phase validated 3 Provided by ST9 N/A Atmospheric flight simulation validation for aerocapture Monte Carlo trajectories predicted for range of environments, uncertainties Trajectory reconstruction validates predicted trajectory, flight environment, uncertainty Provided by ST9 57 Vehicle captured into required orbit, aeromaneuvering effort indicator within 3-Sigma range predicted Success predicted by simulation, 3-sigma aeromaneuvering effort indicator predicted through Monte Carlo Success validated by flight, aeromaneuvering effort indicator within 3-sigma range predicted Provided by ST9 57 Vehicle completed autonomous periapsis raise maneuver, Delta V for periapsis raise within 3- Sigma range predicted Success predicted by simulation, 3-sigma Delta V predicted through Monte Carlo Success validated by flight, Delta V within 3-Sigma range predicted Provided by ST9 57 Aerocapture spacecraft/aeroshell integration validated Success predicted by design methods Success, design methods validated by flight Provided by ST9 and design work for SSE 56

Aerocapture System TechnologyVII - 7 What is it? Aerocapture is an orbit insertion flight maneuver executed upon arrival at a planet. Spacecraft flies through the atmosphere and uses drag to effect multi-km/s deceleration in one pass Requires minimal propellant for attitude control and a post-aerocapture periapse raise maneuver. Benefits Significant reduction in propellant load; arrival mass can be reduced by 20-80% for the same payload mass depending on the mission Achieves the required orbit faster than with aerobraking or SEP alternatives (hours vs weeks/months) Can result in reduced flight times since arrival speeds can be higher than for propulsive capture State of the Art Never been attempted before Considerable relevant experience from past aeroentry and aerobraking missions Sufficient technical maturity exists for a flight test experiment Hyperbolic approach trajectory Aerocapture maneuver Periapse raise maneuver Low L/D aeroshell Primary Technical Approach Spacecraft carried inside a protective aeroshell Aeroshell provides both thermal protection and aerodynamic surface functionality Aeroshell cutouts and feedthroughs enable full spacecraft functionality during cruise Automatic guided flight through atmosphere using specialized algorithms/software Aeroshell jettisoned after capture Aerocapture Overview

Aerocapture System TechnologyVII - 8 Aerocapture is an Enabling Technology Aerocapture can save so much propellant mass that it enables missions that cannot otherwise be done –Propulsive orbit insertion obeys the rocket equation: M fuel ~ exp(  V) –Aerocapture mass is predicted to scale almost linearly: M AC ~  V

Aerocapture System TechnologyVII - 9 Aerocapture Technology Areas to be Addressed by ST-9 Complete systems level test of a free-flying vehicle in order to validate the design, simulation, and systems engineering tools and processes. This validation will directly address flight mechanics, vehicle design, systems engineering and integration, no matter what the future planetary destination is. This validation will partially address aerothermodynamics and TPS, since the applicability to future missions is more limited because of the specialized needs of the different destinations.

Aerocapture System TechnologyVII - 10 Experiment Requirements In a single atmospheric pass, utilize bank angle modulation through an atmosphere to remove the necessary amount of delta V from the vehicle approach trajectory to achieve the target orbit. –The delta V achieved during this maneuver must be on the order of 2 km/s to validate all phases of the guidance and achieve hypersonic continuum aerodynamics Validate a mature and immediately useful vehicle configuration Perform an autonomous periapse raise maneuver after the atmospheric portion of the flight Utilize diagnostic instrumentation to the maximum extent possible, to acquire information about the hypersonic flow field and quantify the performance of the thermal protection material. –The information obtained will be the key to model validation and technology infusion

Aerocapture System TechnologyVII - 11 ST-9 Feed-Forward to Science Capabilities ST9 Space Validation SOA Time Capability Small Planets And Moons Gas Giants Ground Development/ Testing Blunt Body Aeroshells L/D .25 Slender Body Aeroshells L/D .25

Aerocapture System TechnologyVII - 12 Aerocapture Mission Summary Ref: Jeffrey L. Hall, Muriel Noca, JPL

Aerocapture System TechnologyVII - 13 LMA – Aeroshell – Aerocapture Technology Development Roadmap Competed - Cycle 1 NRA ATP 2006 Option 1Base Aerocapture Roadmap ppt Option 2 ATP Ball – Ballute – C-C Specimen Tests C-C TPS Tests “Warm” Struc Coupon Tests “Warm” Struc Component Test “Warm” Structures Prototype Titan Screening Titan TPS Downselect Titan TPS Characterization Test Solar Tower Test Arcjet Test 1 Arcjet Test 2 Neptune TPS Downselect Turbulence Model for Mid L/D Heat Flux & Recession Sensor Req’mts Detailed Drawings Sensor Fab Lab Tests Complete Sensor & Plug Designs ATP Materials Coupon Results Feasibility Assessment Baseline Concept Configuration Trades Earth Test Requirements 2002 Systems Analysis Mars Sample Return Tool Development TRL 6 ELORET – Sensors – ARC – TPS – ARA – Ablator – LaRC – Structures – Radiation Modeling Tool TPS Design Tool Guidance and Navigation Tool Engineering Atmosphere Tool Aerothermodynamic Modeling Mass Properties and Structures Ballute Design Tool Flight Simulator Tool ST-9 Earth Flight Validation Venus? Mars Science Laboratory Mars Scout Titan Neptune Cycle 2 NRA (2 awards planned) Aftbody Attached Ballute Forebody Attached Ballute Deployment Test Insulation Mat’l Test Titan Aeroshell Aerocapture Neptune Aeroshell Aerocapture Aerocapture at Other Destinations Aerocapture Feasibility Aerocapture Benefits Aerocapture Compatibility Earth Demo Applicability Aeroshell/Ballute Quicklook Concept Studies Systems Definition Studies ATP Products: 1m-2m Carbon-Carbon structural/TPS system 1m-2m ablative structural/TPS system TPS integrated heat flux sensors TPS integrated recession sensors Towed ballute prototype Aerocapture at Titan: Systems definition study complete Aerocapture at Neptune: Systems definition study complete Attached ballute(s) prototype design Aerocapture at Mars: trade studies complete Aerocapture at other SSE destinations: trade studies complete Aerocapture flight demo proposal to New Millennium complete Aerocapture Systems Analysis tools developed for Code S needs

Aerocapture System TechnologyVII - 14 State of the Art Aerocapture has never been flown in space Elements of aerocapture have been flown –Aeromaneuvering (lifting, guided and controlled) with low L/D aeroshell, lift vector modulation with low control authority Apollo, Gemini –Atmospheric exit human rated for Apollo, but never flown –Russian Zond 6 spacecraft performed loft on Lunar return, to reach U.S.S.R. in 1968 (using pre-programmed bank commands) –Aeroassist demonstrated spacecraft with similar characteristics Viking – lifting, controlled, unguided Mars Entry, Descent and Landing –Ballistic entries completed at Mars, Jupiter, Venus, Earth, Titan (Huygens Jan 05) –Shuttle Trailing ballute never flown Russians built, launched, attempted re-entry of inflatable ballistic attached ballute

Aerocapture System TechnologyVII - 15 Figure of Merit (FOM) Definitions Lift-to-Drag Ratio (L/D) - an aerodynamic term which quantifies the relative amounts force, perpendicular to the relative wind that constitutes an upward force (lift), and parallel and opposite the direction of motion (drag). In practical terms, this is a measure of the controllability of a vehicle. A ballistic vehicle has a lift-to-drag ratio of zero; a slender, winged vehicle has an L/D of greater than 1. For aerocapture, a vehicle with a higher L/D can maneuver through a more narrow flight corridor and compensate for greater uncertainties, but will be aerodynamically more complex than the high-heritage blunt body.