1 Review of OAS Mandates Status Report 1 SECRETARIAT FOR ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE December 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
Advertisements

Guidance Note on Joint Programming
Secretariat for Multidimensional Security
The intersectoral approach within the OAS Inter-American Council for Integral Development (CIDI) First Meeting of Ministers and High Authorities of Social.
Special Multilateral Fund of the Inter-American Council for Integral Development – FEMCIDI Inter-American Committee of Education - CIE.
Mandates Management Module August 18, 2009Secretariat for Administration and Finance.
Financing of OAS Activities Sources of cooperation Cooperation modalities Cooperation actors Specific Funds management models and resources mobilization.
Moving to a Results Based-Management Environment Progress Report April
Organizational Chart Detail of the Areas Under the Assistant Secretary General Assistant Secretary General Chief of Staff of the Assistant Secretary General.
Special Multilateral Fund of the Inter-American Council for Integral Development - FEMCIDI.
Report of the Inter-American Program for the Promotion and Protection of the Human Rights of Migrants, Including Migrant Workers and Thier Families Committee.
1 OAS Financial Management Challenges and Program- Budget Implications 1 SECRETARIAT FOR ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE October 2008.
Special Multilateral Fund of the Inter-American Council for Integral Development - FEMCIDI.
Ninth Replenishment of IFAD’s Resources Draft Resolution: Revisions made since the 2 nd Session of Consultation October 2011.
SYSTEM OF EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT CONTROL RESULTS-BASED BUDGETING THE CHILEAN EXPERIENCE Heidi Berner H Head of Management Control Division Budget Office,
Australia’s Experience in Utilising Performance Information in Budget and Management Processes Mathew Fox Assistant Secretary, Budget Coordination Branch.
ZHRC/HTI Financial Management Training
TEMPLATE PRESENTATION BY THE CHAIR OF THE WORKING GROUP TO CONDUCT THE TECHNICAL REVIEW OF THE BUDGET FEBRUARY, 2015 QMPR.
April 2, 2013 Longitudinal Data system Governance: Status Report Alan Phillips Deputy Director, Fiscal Affairs, Budgeting and IT Illinois Board of Higher.
Achievements in the incorporation of OHS in Declarations and Plans of Action of the main hemispheric fora Maria Claudia Camacho Department of Social Development.
Integration Development Programme in the Field of Statistics of the Eurasian Economic Union for EEC THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC COMMISSION.
SAF Mandates Review Background 1,582 mandates Total OAS mandates, (Determination of the size of the sample for establishing the.
STRATEGIC PLANS, BUDGETS AND ANNUAL REPORTS Presentation to Portfolio Committee on Arts and Culture 11 March 2008.
March 2015 Inter-American Network for the Prevention of Violence and Crime.
1 JUSTICE LAW AND ORDER SECTOR SWAP DEVELOPMENT & IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS.
Multidimensional Security in the Americas. INTRODUCTION 1.Where are we today? 2.Achievements (How and where?) 3.Our future 4.Realities.
OAS Review Process: New resolution templates A presentation by Pierre Giroux Permanent Mission of Canada to the OAS March 2010 Prepared by Sophie Leduc,
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF THE ACTIVITIES OF THE REMJA WORKING GROUP ON MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND EXTRADITION.
Contributions from Permanent Observer Countries to the OAS 2012.
Analysis of operative paragraphs of the draft resolution “Program-budget of he Organization for ” (CAAP/GT/RPP-52/14)
THE FINAL ACTS OF THE ITU PLENIPOTENTIARY CONFERENCE, MARRAKESH, MOROCCO 2002 PRESENTATION TO SELECT COMMITTEE ON LABOUR AND PUBLIC ENTERPRISES.
Definition of objectives, guidelines, and thematic areas of the Secretariats Ad Hoc Working Group on the Strategic Vision of the OAS October 2015.
Moving to a Results Based-Management Environment Progress Report April
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Source: OEA/Ser.W /XIII.2.3 CIDI/CIDS/doc. 6/02 The Inter-American Program on Sustainable Development establishes the priorities and policy guidelines.
1 Inter-American Committee on Ports Secretariat Executive Secretariat for Integral Development October 5, 2012.
2009 Proposed Program-Budget 1 SECRETARIAT FOR ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE March 2008 (Portions updated July 22, 2008)
Analysis of the Proposed Program- Budget of the Organization for 2016 Working Group to Conduct the Technical Review of the Program-Budget October 28, 2015.
Continued Analysis of the Program-Budget for 2016 Working Group to Conduct the Technical Review of the Program-Budget November 2, 2015.
Definition of objectives, guidelines, and thematic areas of the Secretariats Ad Hoc Working Group on the Strategic Vision of the OAS November 2015.
Public health, innovation and intellectual property 1 |1 | The Global Strategy on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property Technical Briefing.
WORK PLAN OF THE MANAGEMENT BOARD OF THE INTER-AMERICAN AGENCY FOR COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (MB/IACD) ENRIQUE MARURI LONDOÑO Chair of the.
The MESICIC Experience & Civil Society Participation.
Analysis of Mandates 2007–2011 Working method approved by the Working Group for the Review of OAS Programs.
Business Modernization Pursuant to AG/RES (XLIII-O/13 “Omnibus Resolution of 2013”
Contributions from Permanent Observer Countries to the OAS 2011 Presentation delivered by Ambassador Alfonso Quiñonez, Secretary for External Relations,
October 22, 2014 Activities carried out to facilitate the participation of civil society organizations in the OAS October 1, 2013 – October 22, 2014 Department.
Project Management December 2008 Department of Planning and Follow-up (DPF) Secretary of Administration and Finance (SAF)
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 32 – Financial Control Bilateral screening:
Contributions from Permanent Observer Countries to the OAS 2012 Presentation delivered by Ambassador Alfonso Quiñónez, Secretary for External Relations,
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 31 – Common Foreign and Security Policy.
Moving to a Results Based-Management Environment Progress Report January
GTFORCIDI Summary of mandates and proposal for streamlining sectoral ministerial processes.
Determining the Overarching Factor
Audit of predetermined objectives
STRATEGIC COUNSEL FOR ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT FOR RESULTS October 4, 2016.
Migration Secretariat for Access to Rights and Equity Department of Social Inclusion Continuous Reporting System on International Migration in the.
Parliament and the National Budget Process
GOOD PRACTICES AND REFORM OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
INTER-AMERICAN CHILDREN’S INSTITUTE
Seminar on Evaluation of Internal Control Systems
Presentation of Draft Resolution: Program-budget of the organization for 2016 Insert date here.
Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) in the Republic of Uzbekistan Geneva, April 12, 2017.
PEFA 2016 Slides selected from the training materials of the PEFA secretariat.
Current Status OAS Country Offices staff:-74
Managing the General Secretariat’s Personnel Policy
12/5/2018 ANNUAL performance PLAN (2018/19) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY Select COMMITTEE – 19 June 2018.
PEFA 2016 Slides selected from the training materials of the PEFA secretariat.
United Nations Voluntary Fund on Disability (UNVFD)
Audit of Contracting Arrangements of Public Services
Presentation transcript:

1 Review of OAS Mandates Status Report 1 SECRETARIAT FOR ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE December 2008

2 What is covered in this presentation? I.Background II.Mandates in the OAS Context III.Narrowing the Scope IV.Where is the GS/OAS in the process? V.Next Steps VI.Annexes

3 I Background

4 General Standards Article 88a: ■ “Maintain a database with the current mandates, which contains, among other things, the following information: the beginning and end of the mandate, origin of the mandate, program area, organ responsible for its execution, etc. This information must be used as a basis for determining actions to be undertaken by the General Secretariat during the budget year and should be made available to the Member States”. (CP/RES. 703 (1122/97) dated May 27, Article 88b: ■ “Prepare, as far as possible, a classification of the mandates in each area, according to the level of priority the General Secretariat believes they should have”. (CP/RES. 703 (1122/97)) dated May 27, Background OAS Regulations – What is the OAS mandate for this exercise?

5 ■ General Assembly: AG/RES (XXXVIII-O/08) rev. 1 (Jun. 3, 2008) General Provision: II.A.1.c “ To request the General Secretariat to provide the following reports on an annual basis: a comprehensive report regarding the resources allocated for compliance with the mandates of the member states of the Organization, listed by effective date, object of expenditure (e.g., travel, contracts), and responsible area of the Secretariat, taking into account the four pillars of the Organization” ■ General Assembly: AG/RES. 1 (XXXVI-E/08) rev. 1 (Sep. 30, 2008) General Provision: III.2.d “To instruct the Permanent Council to conduct, beginning in October 2008, a thorough review of all resources and expenditures of the Organization in the context of existing mandates, in order to prioritize and optimize the use of resources for future program- budgets…” Background OAS Regulations – What is the OAS mandate for this exercise? (cont.)

6 ■ Like the OAS, the UN is addressing the issue of mandate reform and is three years into the project. ■ UN document “Mandating and Delivering: analysis and recommendations to facilitate the review of mandates” (A/60/733). Distributed to CAAP on October 31,2008 at the request of the member states. ■ That UN experience includes development of a web-based repository of mandates. ■ The UN is also re-examining the “Mandate Generation Cycle”: ▪ who can create a mandate, ▪ how are they funded and implemented, ▪ who follows up and evaluates the progress; continuation, change or elimination. Background UN Experience

7 II Mandates in the OAS Context

8 ■ Challenges identified by the UN: ▪ Burdensome reporting requirements ▪ Overlap between and within organs ▪ Duplicative architecture for implementation (proliferation leads to overlapping; what to do with older mandates? who’s responsible for implementing or eliminating them?) ▪ Gap between mandates and resources ■ UN identified tools required: ▪ Searchable database ▪ Better reporting ▪ Monitoring and evaluation (e.g. better information on effectiveness) ▪ Phraseology used in resolutions – they should provide strategic direction, set objectives, establish measures of accountability. Mandates in the OAS Context Key challenges

9 ■ Sources: ▪ Multiple sources of mandates. Policy bodies other than the General Assembly issue mandates for the OAS. ▪ Many resolutions and mandates are directed at multiple technical areas, resulting in overlap. ■ Timeline: ▪ Fiscal year and mandate-generation cycle (GA, Summits etc) are out of sync. ▪ Specific Funds do not reflect the Fiscal Year. ■ Funding: ▪ Mandates generally do not specify source of funding. ▪ The structure of the Regular Fund budget is not mandate-based. ▪ The OAS often resorts to multiple funding sources (Regular, Voluntary and Specific) to finance activities required to meet the mandate. ■ Definitions/Results: ▪ Need to define what is to be considered an OAS mandate. ▪ Articulate within the mandate the desired result. ■ Communication: ▪ How we inform member states in a coherent and decision-oriented format the work of the GS/OAS and the results obtained. Mandates in the OAS Context Key challenges (cont.) Building on the UN experience, five key challenges for the OAS have been identified :

10 Mandates in the OAS Context Key challenges (cont.) ■ Like at the UN and other Multilateral Organizations, there are many sources of mandates: a) Internal Legislation: ▪ Charter of the Organization ▪ Democratic Charter ▪ General Standards b) Organs of the Inter-American System: ▪ General Assembly (In 2008, 87 Resolutions with 767 operative paragraphs were issued) ▪ Meetings of Consultation of Ministers of Foreign Affairs (e.g. Colombia-Ecuador) ▪ Permanent Council ▪ CIDI: Integral Development ▪Summits of the Americas ▪Ministerial Meetings: ▪ Education ▪ Public Security ▪ Social Development ▪ Labor ▪ Culture ▪ Science & Technology ▪ Sustainable Development ▪ Tourism ▪ Justice ▪ Defense

11 ▪ I-A Commission of Human Rights (IACHR) ▪ I-A Drug Abuse Control Commission (CICAD) ▪ I-A Committee against Terrorism (CICTE) ▪ I-A Telecommunications Commission (CITEL) ▪ I-A Committee on Ports (CIP) ▪ I-A Children’s Institute (IIN) ▪ I-A Commission on Women (CIM) Mandates in the OAS Context Key challenges (cont.)

12 Mandates in the OAS Context Key challenges (cont.) Current OAS Policy-Making Framework Summit of the Americas General Assembly Permanent Council Specialized Commissions & Committees Ministerial & Sectoral Meetings Sectoral Commissions CIDI CEPCIDI

13 Mandates in the OAS Context Example of the challenge General Assembly: AG/RES (XXXVIII-O/08) ERADICATION OF HUNGER: INTERNATIONAL YEAR OF THE POTATO [THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY] RESOLVES: 1.To welcome with satisfaction the declaration of 2008 as the “International Year of the Potato.” 2.To request the organs, agencies, and entities of the inter-American system to contribute, within their areas of competence, to the efforts of the member states to reduce rates of malnutrition in the Hemisphere by providing support for food crops, inter alia, the potato. 3.To request that the Inter-American Council for Integral Development (CIDI), with the support of the General Secretariat, report to the General Assembly at its thirty-ninth regular session on the implementation of this resolution, the execution of which shall be subject to the availability of financial resources in the program-budget of the Organization and other resources.

14 ■ Scope: ▪ Paragraphs 2 and 3 contain two instructions (i.e., “mandates”) given to the General Secretariat as an entity of the Inter-American System, namely: ▪ To contribute to the efforts of member states to reduce rates of malnutrition by supporting a specific indigenous crop. ▪ To request CIDI’s Secretariat to present a report at the XXXIX session of the General Assembly ■ Timeline: ▪ Under paragraph 2, efforts (which are unspecified) may be assumed to commence immediately, but no specific timeline has been set for completion. ▪ Paragraph 3 identifies a deliverable to be presented in June ■ Funding: ▪ Paragraph 3 specifies that the source of funding for the activities required by the resolution shall be the Regular Fund, funds are contingent upon their availability (it may be assumed that funds should be secured in FY 2009, but there is no express authorization to do so). ▪ No specific amounts have been either estimated, nor earmarked in the Regular Fund to support the activities. Using AG/RES (XXXVIII-O/08) to further illustrate the challenge: Mandates in the OAS Context Example of the challenge (cont.)

15 Mandates in the OAS Context Example of the challenge (cont.) Member States themselves, other Policy Bodies, the General Secretariat to lend support to the Member States, the policy bodies and others organs directing the General Secretariat to take specific actions. It can be determined from a review of the GA resolutions that there are mandates directed to:

16 Mandates in the OAS Context Bottom Line Over the years, mandates from multiple sources have proliferated without reference to the limitation of the OAS Regular Fund budget and often with unclear measures of results intended. Further, the current Regular Fund budget is not mandate-based.

17 III Narrowing the Scope

18 ■ Restricting the scope of the initial phase to the mandates contained in the resolutions of the General Assembly in 2006 and ■ Mandates from other sources (e. g. Summits of the Americas Process) incorporate later. ■ Definition of an OAS Mandate: ▪ For purposes of this exercise, consider defining an OAS mandate as an operative paragraph of the General Assembly resolutions, which contains a request, directive or action by the General Secretariat or other implementing entities in the OAS. ▪ General Assembly resolutions which not contain a direct reference to the source of funding, will be considered “declarations” and excluded from this exercise. Narrowing the Scope For the purpose of this study, the Permanent Council through CAAP may consider:

19 1.Define what constitutes an OAS mandate and the corresponding reporting format required. 2.Define timeline. OAS mandates should contain or define a time frame for start and completion aligned with the fiscal cycle of the Organization. 3.Define funding. OAS mandates should specify funding required. The goal is to pave the way towards a mandate-based budget. 4.Define results. OAS mandates should explicitly define the expected results of the activities. 5.Communicate results. OAS mandates should define a mechanism by which results are communicated to the member states. Narrowing the Scope Agreement is needed on the following principles:

20 Narrowing the Scope Reporting Format Sample Annual Report to Permanent Council (through CAAP)

21 Narrowing the Scope Reporting Format (cont.)

22 Narrowing the Scope Reporting Format (cont.)

23 Narrowing the Scope Reporting Format (cont.)

24 IV Where is the GS/OAS in the process?

25 Where is the GS/OAS in the process? Repository - Basic Data Like the UN, the OAS started with an inventory/database, which includes: ▪ The resolution number, year (session), section or paragraph (mandate), and title. ▪ Policy Body (e.g. Permanent Council or any of its committees). ▪ Technical area within the General Secretariat responsible for carrying out the activities. ▪ The start and end dates of the mandate. ▪ The current status of the mandate, i.e. completed, in process, postponed. ▪ A listing of activities engaged by the technical areas in response to the mandate.

26 Where is the GS/OAS in the process? Repository - Basic Data (cont.) ▪ The expected result (s) of those activities. ▪ An explanation of why and how those activities were carried out in response to the mandate. ▪ A field indicating whether or not resources were identified (budgeted) in the Regular Fund. ▪ The estimated cost of the activities and source of funding.

27 V Next Steps

28 Next Steps ■ Validate sample report and approach to mandate review. ■ Define, in operational terms, what is a mandate. ■ Agree on the sources of mandates. ■ Develop a methodology to cost and fund mandates before they are approved. ■ Articulate mandates with a result in mind. ■ Communicate results to the member states. To honor the objectives of the mandate given by the member states, there are a few things that we need to do:

29 Next Steps ■ Once the technical areas have defined the results of the mandate-driven activities, the Member States will have an analytical tool at their disposal to begin the process of establishing its priorities. ■ Emphasis will be on funding outcomes, less on inputs (travel, CPR’s, etc.). ■ Mandates should articulate expected results. ■ Focus on performance measurement. ■ The Organization is gradually moving from an input-driven budget to a mandate-driven (results-driven) budget.

30 VI ANNEXES

31 Annexes 1. Database - Sample Screen Shots List of Mandates for the Department of Legal Cooperation in 2006

32 Annexes 1. Database - Sample Screen Shots Mandate Status, Activities, Results and Budgetary Information Reported by Department

33 Annexes 1. Database - Sample Screen Shots

34 Annexes 1. Database - Sample Screen Shots

35 Annexes 1. Database - Sample Screen Shots Resolution Mandates

36 Annexes 1. Database - Sample Screen Shots

37 Annexes 1. Database - Sample Screen Shots General Report

38 Annexes 1. Database - Sample Screen Shots Statistical Report