KT McDonald MAP Front End Meeting March 3, 2015 1 Finalizing the C- and Hg-Target Configurations for 6.75-GeV Proton Beams Present studies are for a carbon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SUPERCONDUCTING SOLENOIDS - SHIELDING STUDIES 1. N. Souchlas BNL (Oct. 5, 2010)
Advertisements

Mercury Chamber Update V. Graves NF-IDS Meeting October 4, 2011.
Magnetic Configuration of the Muon Collider/ Neutrino Factory Target System Hisham Kamal Sayed, *1 H.G Kirk, 1 K.T. McDonald 2 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory,
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Neutrino Factory Mercury Containment Concepts V.B. Graves 2 nd Oxford-Princeton High- Powered Target.
Neutrino Factory Target Cryostat Review Van Graves Cale Caldwell IDS-NF Phone Meeting August 10, 2010.
Particle Production of a Carbon/Mercury Target System for the Intensity Frontier X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Spring.
K.T. McDonald March 18, 2010 LArTPC BNL 1 Magnetizing a Large Liquid Argon Detector Kirk T. McDonald Princeton University (March 18, 2010)
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy MERIT Videoconference 11 Mar 2009 Neutrino Factory Cryostat 1 Concept V.B. Graves MERIT Videoconference.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy A Pion Production and Capture System for a 4 MW Target Station X. Ding, D.
MC/NF TARGET SHIELDING STUDIES. NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (10/29/2010)‏ 1.
1 Front End Studies and Plans David Neuffer FNAL (November 10, 2009)
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR THE MUON COLLIDER TARGET NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS BNL Nov 30, 2010 ‏ 1.
KT McDonald Muon Collider 2011 June 28, The Target System Baseline K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 28, 2011) Muon Collider 2011 Telluride, CO More.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target System Update IDS-NF Plenary Meeting Arlington, VA October 18, 2011.
KT McDonald Target Studies Meeting June 14, Mechanical Issues for the Target System K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 14, 2011) Target Studies Meeting.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Baseline IDS-NF Plenary CERN March 23-24, 2009.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy NMFCC Friday Meeting 10 Apr 2009 Neutrino Factory Nozzle Layouts V.B. Graves NFMCC Friday Meeting.
IDS-NF Target Studies H. Kirk (BNL) July 8, 2009.
Comparison of Power Deposition in SC1 Coil Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Jun. 29, 2010.
Power Deposition in SC1 Coil Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Apr. 20, 2010.
Above: Power deposition in the superconducting magnets and the tungsten-carbide + water shield inside them, according to a FLUKA simulation Approximately.
Above: On-axis field profiles of resistive, superconducting and all magnets, and bore-tube radius r = 7.5 (B/20T) −½ cm. Above: Hoop strain ε θ in resistive.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Review of NFMCC Studies 1 and 2: Target Support Facilities V.B. Graves Meeting on High Power Targets.
SUPERCONDUCTING SOLENOIDS - SHIELDING STUDIES 3. NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (10/28/2010)‏
Solid Target Options NuFACT’00 S. Childress Solid Target Options The choice of a primary beam target for the neutrino factory, with beam power of
The Front End MAP Review Fermi National Accelerator Lab August 24-26, 2010 Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Front End Technologies Harold Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory February 19, 2014.
Target and Absorbers L2 Manager: K McDonald, Princeton U March xx, 2013 Presenter’s Name | DOE Mini-Review of MAP (FNAL, March 4-6, 2013)1 Mission Target:
Target R&D Kirk T McDonald Princeton University Feb. 19, 2014 February 19, 2014 KT McDonald | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014)1 Scope of.
KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Target System Concept for a Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory K.T. McDonald Princeton University (May 28, 2014)
1 Front End – present status David Neuffer March 31, 2015.
KT McDonald MAP Winter Meeting (SLAC) December 5, Solid Target Options for an Intense Muon Source K. McDonald Princeton U. (December 5, 2014) MAP.
Review of Recent IDS120 Target Concepts Van Graves October 31, 2013.
20to2T5m100cm Images Van Graves February 13, 2014.
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR THE MUON COLLIDER TARGET. (From STUDY II to IDS120f geometries) NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (BNL)‏ ‏ 1.
Front-End Design Overview Diktys Stratakis Brookhaven National Laboratory February 19, 2014 D. Stratakis | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014)1.
KT McDonald MAP Tech Board Meeting Oct 20, The MAP Targetry Program in FY11 and FY12 K. McDonald Princeton U. (Oct 20, 2011) MAP Technical Board.
K. McDonald NFMCC Collaboration Meeting Jan 14, The Capture Solenoid as an Emittance-Reducing Element K. McDonald Princeton U. (Jan. 14, 2010)
DEPOSITED POWER STUDIES FOR THE MC/NF TARGET STATION. Nicholas Souchlas (PBL) (MAP CONFERENCE SLAC 2012) 1 DEPOSITED POWER STUDIES FOR THE MC/NF TARGET.
1 Energy Deposition of 4MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. B. Cline UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg BNL The International Design Study for the.
J. Pasternak First Ideas on the Design of the Beam Transport and the Final Focus for the NF Target J. Pasternak, Imperial College London / RAL STFC ,
-Factory Front End Phase Rotation Gas-filled rf David Neuffer Fermilab Muons, Inc.
1 Front End – present status David Neuffer March 17, 2015.
FRONTEND DESIGN & OPTIMIZATION STUDIES HISHAM KAMAL SAYED BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY June 26, 2014 Collaboration: J. S. Berg - X. Ding - V.B. Graves.
Gallium as a Possible Target Material for a Muon Collider or Neutrino Factory X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA J.S. Berg, H.G. Kirk,
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS: NEW Hg MODULE mars1510 ( DESKTOP ) vs. mars1512 ( PRINCETON CLUSTER ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (3/28/2012) 1.
K. McDonald MAP Technical Board Meeting Nov 1, FY11 Target System Budget Proposal K. McDonald Princeton U. (November 1, 2010)
Particle Production with Carbon Target and IDS120j Configuration at 3 GeV (update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Nov. 14, /14/13.
Kinetic Energy Spectra of pi +, pi -, mu +, mu - and sum of all from the 20to4T5m Configuration X. Ding Front End Meeting June 23,
Carbon Target Design and Optimization for an Intense Muon Source X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Winter Collaboration.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc W BEADS ) AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION STUDIES FOR: BP#1, SH#1, SHVS#1/LFL, SC#1+SC#2, BeWind.
KT McDonald MAP Collaboration Meeting May 19, Years of Muon Collider Target Studies 1997: Colin Johnson argued that the next step after the ACOL.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS MODIFYING Hg MODULE Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (11/1/2012) 1.
Proton Driver – Target Station Interfaces Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab Wednesday May 28, 2014 MAP 2014 Spring Meeting.
IDS120j WITH AND WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS PION AND MUON STUDIES WITHIN TAPER REGION, III ( 20 cm GAPS BETWEEN CRYOSTATS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (9/4/2012)
Meson Production at Low Proton Beam Energy (Update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies May 9, /9/113.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS SEMGENTATION STUDIES FOR BEAM PIPE BEYOND FIRST CRYOSTAT ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc W BEADS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS SEMGENTATION STUDIES FOR BP#2 WITHIN FIRST CRYOSTAT AND RIGHT FLANGE OF Hg POOL INNER VESSEL ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc.
Neutrino Factory Target Vessel Concept Update V. Graves Target Studies EVO June 12, 2012.
Neutrino Factory Target Cryostat Review (Update Aug 12) Van Graves Cale Caldwell IDS-NF Phone Meeting August 10, 2010.
Target On axis field [scale /20 T] Target Magnets Decay-Channel Triplets Taper magnets.
BNL solenoid capture workshop: magnet challenges are not trivial Summarized by Tengming Shen
KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Target System Concept for a Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory K.T. McDonald Princeton University (May 28, 2014)
ENERGY FLOW AND DEPOSITION IN A 4-MW MUON-COLLIDER TARGET SYSTEM
IDS120h: PROTON P0-P14 TRAJECTORY FOOTPRINT
X. Ding, UCLA MAP Spring 2014 Meeting May 2014 Fermilab
1 Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (11/15/2011)
1 Nicholas Souchlas (PBL) (MAP CONFERENCE SLAC 2012)
Target and Horn status report
Outline: Why now ? What ? How ?
Presentation transcript:

KT McDonald MAP Front End Meeting March 3, Finalizing the C- and Hg-Target Configurations for 6.75-GeV Proton Beams Present studies are for a carbon target in a 20-T solenoid, with a fast taper over 5 m down to 2 T. The proton beam has 6.75 GeV. 20to2T5m4PDL The last Hg target configuration was that of Oct. 31, 2013, with a 15-T solenoid and a slightly different taper. IDS120_15-1.5T7m3+4 Hg particle production studies were only performed for a 20-T solenoid, a slower taper, for 8 GeV, and with an older MARS version.

KT McDonald MAP Front End Meeting March 3, This configuration should be based on files from Bob Weggel, May 9, The field map for this should be The central proton trajectory (6.75-GeV proton energy, in 20-T peak field) for this should be The last version of this configuration (with 5-m taper) that I have from Van Graves is in A bit of a loose end is how the central proton trajectory was generated. The file seems to have been generated by Nicholas Souchlas on May 22, Later that year, we came to realize the method used by Xiaoping at that time to generate the central proton trajectory was not quite right, and we devised a better scheme, written up in I believe that this scheme is now used in Xiaoping's simulations, but I don't know if a new central proton trajectory, back to z = - 10 m, was ever generated using the new scheme. This makes it likely that the central proton trajectory in Van's CAD layout is not quite right. If so, it would be good to update this. 1. The C-Target Configuration

KT McDonald MAP Front End Meeting March 3, Field Map for a 15-T Magnet Configuration We now have a mandate to make a small effort to set up a mercury-target configuration for 6.75-GeV protons, that is a potential upgrade from the C-target scenario. For this, we want to use the 20to2T5m120cm4pD superconducting magnets, but omit the 5-T copper insert (which is not very mechanically compatible with a mercury target + collection pool). This configuration would have 15-T peak field, and would be called, perhaps, 15to2T5m120cm, following Bob Weggel’s nomenclature. We need a field map for this variant, to be generated by Bob Weggel.

KT McDonald MAP Front End Meeting March 3, Optimize the 15-T, 6.75-GeV Hg Target Once we have the field map for the 15-T case, 15to2T5m120cm, we need to optimize the Hg target and beam layout, and generate the central proton trajectory back t z = -10 m, for 6.75 GeV protons. These are tasks for Xiaoping. This optimization can be done with simplified geometry of the beampipe for the Hg target, perhaps even that recently used by Xiaoping and Scott for the 8-GeV Hg-target studies.

KT McDonald MAP Front End Meeting March 3, Finalize the 15-T, 6.75-GeV Hg-Target Station Once the central proton trajectory is available for the 15-T, 6.75-GeV configuration, Van can produce the "final" Hg-target-station layout. This needs to be a "possible" upgrade from the 20-T, 6.75-GeV C-target station. The C-target station has "inner" modules for the 5-T copper coils, the C-target vessel, and a small inner-shield vessel. Presumably, these 3 "inner" modules would be removed, and replaced by a single Hg-target/shield(?) module. It is not clear to me that Van ever developed a mercury-target scenario of quite this type. Van's last review of Hg-target concepts seems to be on Oct 31, 2013: It appears to have a "bell-shaped" mercury vessel inside a single, large "outer" shield module. So, the proposed task for Van is to generate an alternate Hg-target scenario that is better matched to the C-target scenario as a first stage. [Of, course, a possible solution is to remove the "outer" shield at z < 5 m, and replace the entire module for r < 1.2 m with a new shield + Hg target module that is more or less that given in the Oct 31, 2013 review.]

KT McDonald MAP Front End Meeting March 3, Generate Particle-Production Files for the Hg-Target Scenario Once Van has established the "final" layout for the 15-T, 6.75-GeV Hg-target scenario, we should finalize the beampipe in Xiaoping's simulations, and generate the "final" particle production files for possible use in optimizing the Buncher and Phase Rotator for this scenario, etc. If the project were to continue, we would need to make some evaluation of the effectiveness of the shielding for the revised Hg-target scenario. However, we likely won't carry the revised Hg-target scenario any farther than generating particle- production files for it.