OCTE Fall Update November 1, 2012 Elizabeth Collins (517) 335-3149.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results.
Advertisements

NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Integrated Approach to Title III Monitoring.
Michigan Electronic Grants System Plus
Office of Special Education & Early Intervention Services What happens after Focused Monitoring? -
INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx October 18, 2011 DESK AUDIT.
ESEA Program Review Russ Sweet Preparing for ESEA Program Reviews of Titles I-A, II-A, VI-B (REAP), and X Summer 2014.
Consolidated Application Workshop. Handouts
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHECKLIST for 1 st year grants By Office of the Governor Criminal Justice Division (CJD) October, 2009.
NASFAA 2003: Reconnecting With Students!. 2 eZ-Audit – Electronic Submissions of Financial Statements and Compliance Audits Session #105.
Performing Subrecipient Functions 1. Part 1 2 The Michigan Department of Education (MDE) is required by law to monitor implementation of Federal and.
PRESENTER: W. C. Wiseley, Ed.D Acknowledgements: Lucia Robles and Sharon Wong as co-creators Perkins Title I-C Online Final Report Tutorial.
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY14) February 24, 2015 Office of Educator Effectiveness Aviva Baff Isadora Choute Cynthia Mompoint Deborah.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
NASFAA 2003: Reconnecting With Students! 2 FSA Assessments: A Key to Compliance & Improvement Session #: S106.
SPF SIG State-Level Evaluation PARTICIPANT LEVEL INSTRUMENT (PLI)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
MEGS+ Michigan Electronic Grants System Plus Office of Special Education May 2012.
April 1, Welcome! The 2015 B-13 Data Collection webinar will begin in a few moments. –Event number: –Event password: 2015B13 To hear.
VGLA/VSEP Implementation For Program Administrators
1 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Reporting Requirements Presented by: Darryl Grant Procurement Analyst Division of Acquisition Policy &
Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 September 2009 Federal Programs Update FASFEPA Presented by: Dr. Jan Morphew, Director.
Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ETA Grant Management and Monitoring – Discretionary Grantees Pacific Northwest Workforce Development.
1 Economic Directorate’s Quality Audit Program Steven S. Klement Office of Statistical Methods and Research for Economic Programs.
Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research 1 Update on PHS New Rule on Financial Conflicts of Interest (FCOI) Presentation to Business Managers January.
Post Award Grantee Technical Assistance Call: FY 2012 Supplemental Funding for Quality Improvement in Health Centers U.S. Department of Health and Human.
Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ETA Grant Management and Monitoring – Discretionary Grantees Southern California Training and.
CIITS: Scheduling and Administering Online Common Assessments Copyright © 2011 Schoolnet, Inc. All rights reserved.
1 DRAFT Monitoring/Evaluation Overview September 20, 2010 Title III Director’s Fall Meeting.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education Self Review (SESR) Activity Three: Corrective.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Bureau of Federal Educational Programs Updates _________________________________.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
Updated: 08/10/07 Web Grades Overview MAIS The Office of the Registrar and Michigan Administrative Information Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results Reviewed & Revised with COP April 2011.
Grant Electronic Monitoring System (GEMS) Priority & Focus School Quarterly Progress Reports Getting Access 1.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Web Center Training ©2003 Optimum Technology, Inc.
GEtServices Purchasing Units & Materials Training For Suppliers Request.
1 Monitoring/Evaluation Program Overview December 3, 2008 Title III Director’s Meeting.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
Federal Program Monitoring Overview and Organization.
On Site Review Process. 2 Overview of On Site Review Materials and Process.
CIITS: Scheduling and Administering Online Common Assessments Copyright © 2011 Schoolnet, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ver. 02/13/  Registration  New Studies  Continuing Reviews  Amendments  Reportable Events  Tips & Tricks  Questions 2.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY14 Oklahoma State Department of Education Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III, VI and X.
Put the EZ in eZ-Audit Ti Baker Session What is eZ-Audit? eZ-Audit is a web-based application that allows you to submit your financial statements.
Doc.: IEEE /0828r0 Submission May 2007 Harry Worstell, AT&TSlide 1 Procedural Clarification Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Focus Schools Grant Monitoring and Support Consolidated Planning and Monitoring September 2015.
Sponsored Project Administration Fall 2012 CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Sponsored Project Lifecycle Introduction Overview Creating a Project Budget Compliance.
GMAP Grant Management, Application, and Planning Consolidate Application Training.
SDA Formulas Online Webinar Please use the mute button or press #6 on your phones to mute the teleconference line If you have questions or technical problems.
Virginia Administrative Training Module 1: Processing, Online, Scoring and Reporting Training Presentation Training Presentation Working Within PearsonAccess.
How to Complete B-13 Checklists in CIMS How to Complete B-13 Checklists in CIMS A Presentation for Transition Coordinators (TCs) and Transition Coordinator.
How to Complete B-13 Checklists in CIMS How to Complete B-13 Checklists in CIMS A Presentation for Transition Coordinators (TCs) and Transition Coordinator.
Post-Award Grant Administration Presented by: Sponsored Program Accounting Updated: Fiscal Year 2014.
Michigan Electronic Grants System Plus
Welcome! The 2015 B-13 Data Collection webinar will begin in a few moments. Event number: Event password: 2015B13 To hear the presentation.
Implementation of concur for pcard reconciliation and approval
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
Rogers Sourcing Supplier Login Process For Returning Users
Perkins Monitoring Orientation
Post-Award Grant Administration
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15)
Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Title I, Part D, Subpart 1
Monitoring & Managing Your WIF Grant
Post-Award Grant Administration
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013
WHERE TO FIND IT – Accessing the Inventory
Presentation transcript:

OCTE Fall Update November 1, 2012 Elizabeth Collins (517)

GEMS OVERVIEW 2 The Michigan Department of Education (MDE) is required by law to monitor subrecipients’ use of funds to ensure compliance with all applicable federal and state requirements and achieve the goals of the funded programs. GEMS is the Grant Electronic Monitoring System and supports this monitoring process.

GEMS OVERVIEW GEMS goals include an easy to use, automated method for: Scheduling monitoring reviews Improved collection and storage of documents (online file cabinet) Less paper collected and printed/copied Creation of monitoring reports Submitting Compliance Plans 3

GEMS OVERVIEW Quick summary of MDE/OCTE user features Pre-selection Scheduling Review (Desk Audit and Onsite) Creation of monitoring report Approval of Compliance Plan and evidence Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Best Practices 4

GEMS OVERVIEW Quick summary of Subrecipient User features Submission of documents Submission of questions Creation of Compliance Plan Submission of evidence supporting Compliance Plan Access to best practices 5

GEMS OVERVIEW Quick summary of other features Calendar at MDE, MDE Program Office (OCTE) and Subrecipient level Common documents sharable across offices/programs so they will only be collected once 6

GEMS OVERVIEW This illustrates in summary who does what: 7

Key Features for MDE/OCTE

GEMS OVERVIEW – MDE FEATURES GEMS has 2 Application Administrators (Grants Office) Application Administrators will Setup other MDE Program Administrators and Sub-recipient Administrators as needed Manage items that are “system wide” regardless of Program or Subrecipient Example: MDE Calendar, Content of error messages 9

GEMS OVERVIEW – OCTE FEATURES Every Program Office will identify 2 Administrators Program Administrators will: Setup other OCTE Users Assign them to one or more programs 10

GEMS OVERVIEW – OCTE FEATURES Program Administrators will: Manage items that are program specific, such as: Office/Program Calendar Program Setup This must be completed before pre-selection, scheduling, reviews, etc. This includes items such as Document List, Checklists, Citations/Findings and ARC (actions, recommendations and commendations) 11

GEMS OVERVIEW – OCTE FEATURES OCTE users will Pre-select So every Subrecipient is assigned to a year within the five year cycle 12

OCTE users will Schedule: Regions and programs to be reviewed Adapt the document list (add or subtract) from the program master document list Identify contacts Identify review team Select dates Notify Subrecipients 13 GEMS OVERVIEW – OCTE FEATURES

OCTE users will conduct the review TRAC – Includes Data, Finance, Grants, LTCS/Capstone and Programs Once Subrecipient submits documents Review and comment If multiple reviewers, consolidate comments Then assign findings with associated ARC Review and approve monitoring report Send findings to the region 14

GEMS OVERVIEW – OCTE FEATURES Once Subrecipient submits Compliance Plan Review each item for corrective action, implementation date, and for proposed evidences Approve or return for revision 15

GEMS OVERVIEW – OCTE FEATURES Once Subrecipient submits evidence: Review of evidence Items approved are closed Once all items approved the review is completed 16

GEMS OVERVIEW – OCTE FEATURES OCTE Users will: Respond to questions from Subrecipients If OCTE believes this is a common question, it will be added to the FAQ 17

GEMS OVERVIEW – OCTE FEATURES OCTE Users may proactively answer likely questions through FAQ FAQ can be common or Program FAQ can be further categorized (e.g. general, fiscal, data) 18

GEMS OVERVIEW – OCTE FEATURES OCTE Users may post exemplary documents as “best practice” to help Subrecipients Documents can have expiration date or be “good until replaced.” 19

Key Features for Subrecipients

GEMS OVERVIEW – SUBRECIPIENT FEATURES Every Subrecipient will identify 2 Administrators Subrecipient management will approve and MDE Application Administrators will setup (Grants Office) Subrecipient Administrators will Setup other Subrecipient Users as needed Assign them to one or more programs 21

GEMS OVERVIEW – SUBRECIPIENT FEATURES Every Subrecipient will have their own calendar Provides insight to MDE/OCTE when scheduling reviews to avoid conflicts 22

Subrecipients will, upon receipt of the scheduling notification: Review list of documents required by MDE/OCTE for the specific program Submit documents online prior to the review Assign contacts who will answer questions and provide additional information as required during the review GEMS OVERVIEW – SUBRECIPIENT FEATURES 23

GEMS OVERVIEW – SUBRECIPIENT FEATURES Subrecipients will, upon receipt of the monitoring report: Complete the Compliance Plan Define how they plan to resolve items Not In Compliance Identify who will be the contact person for each item Identify the target completion date Identify the proposed evidences 24

GEMS OVERVIEW – SUBRECIPIENT FEATURES Subrecipients will: Provide evidence to indicate the approved Compliance Plan was executed and findings are now In Compliance 25

GEMS OVERVIEW – SUBRECIPIENT FEATURES Subrecipients may view the Best Practices area to: View and download examples that MDE/OCTE believes represent the “best” 26

QUESTIONS?