SSC-FPB Test Requirements M. Arafin, Ph.D. Project Leader, Sour Grade Research & Development.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intellectual Property Policy and Procedures
Advertisements

When is Excipient Reduced Testing Appropriate?
1 © 2012 Ipsos © 2014 Ipsos. All rights reserved. Contains Ipsos' Confidential and Proprietary information and may not be disclosed or reproduced without.
CS479/679 Pattern Recognition Dr. George Bebis
PHMSA Perspectives Construction Process & Standards
11 What is unique about Optigal TM ? The ideal combination between a substrate and paint to ensure high formability and improved corrosion protection for.
API SC6 Winter Meeting New Business: API Spec 6A Tensile Test Specimen Requirements Tim Haeberle 8 February 2011.
REMOTE MEASUREMENT OF STRESS IN FERROMAGNETIC PIPELINES Motivation Ageing global pipeline infrastructure Non-invasive, remote, pipeline integrity assessment.
API - WI 2348 Methodology to provide Mechanical Assurance in DCB test
1 CONSTRAINT CORRECTED FRACTURE MECHANICS IN STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT Application to a failure of a steel bridge Anssi Laukkanen, Kim Wallin Safir.
The Criteria for Determining SLD When Using an RTI-based Process Part I In the previous session you were presented the main components of RtI, given a.
JAA/FAA 20th Annual JAA/FAA International Conference 1 Repair Data Acceptance Presented by W. Schulze-Marmeling.
Lecture #19 Failure & Fracture
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence January-February 2006.
WLTP-11-12e Christoph Lueginger (BMW), Céline Vallaude (UTAC), Folko Rohde (VW) on behalf of Annex 4 taskforce wind tunnel method road load.
Determination of System Equivalency – TaskForce Audi, EA-52, V4.0 WLTP-10-33e.
Source: Weight Reduction in Automotive Design and Manufacture ,
7A1 Friction & Galling Test
API WI 2385 API C110 laboratory testing for inclusion in NACE MR0175/ISO WI Leader John W Martin.
API TG for 6A718 Inclusion of Additional Alloy 718 Strength Classes Rashmi Bhavsar 27 June 2013 Washington, DC.
API Standard 6A718 Inclusion of Additional Alloy 718 Strength Classes
14 Elements of Nonparametric Statistics
Copyright © 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 22 Using Inferential Statistics to Test Hypotheses.
API 6HP Process1 API 6HP Example Analysis Project API E&P Standards Conference Applications of Standards Research, 24 June 2008.
Update on the API Work Group Activities on Pipe Markings.
Proposal Insert Subtitle Here Strictly Private and Confidential Draft December 8, 2014 Risk Management guidance box Guidance when using Smart Transaction.
API Spec 6A Tensile Test Spec Reference Requirements Tim Haeberle API SC Summer Meeting.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF FATIGUE SIMULATION DATA J R Technical Services, LLC Julian Raphael 140 Fairway Drive Abingdon, Virginia.
API Standard 6A718 Inclusion of Additional Alloy 718 Strength Classes – June Update Acceptance of alloy 718 at 140 ksi min yield strength Rashmi Bhavsar.
Retha Britz Copyright 2013 All rights reserved for this presentation 1 Other important considerations for RECs Retha Britz.
Scholarly Publication: Responsibilities for Authors and Reviewers Jean H. Shin, Ph.D. Director, Minority Affairs Program American Sociological Association.
API SC6 Winter Meeting New Business: API Standard 6A718 – Inclusion of Additional Alloy 718 Strength Classes - Inclusion of Additional Alloys Tim Haeberle.
Simpified Modelling of the PE / LENP transition Grenoble, May
Vallourec & Mannesmann Tubes OCTG Division 1 DCB performances of C125 material in various environments API Resource Group on Sour Service Products WI 2318a.
Pipeline PIG Data Recording
Research Protections Office University of Vermont Change to Procedures for Committee Review of Resubmissions of Grant Applications.
Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering West Virginia University Statistics of Brittle Fracture.
WLTP gtr Annex 9 Determination of Method Equivalency - Progress Report
Cyclic plastic deformation and damage in 304LN stainless steel --Surajit Kumar Paul et al. Reporter: Yong Wang Supervisor: Professor Xu Chen.
G. Cowan, RHUL Physics Statistics for early physics page 1 Statistics jump-start for early physics ATLAS Statistics Forum EVO/Phone, 4 May, 2010 Glen Cowan.
Pull testing procedure. F ff ѲѲ 2f sin Ѳ = F If sin Ѳ = 30° then f = F If the angle of the 1 st and 2 nd bonds is 30° then the force we measure equals.
URBDP 591 A Lecture 16: Research Validity and Replication Objectives Guidelines for Writing Final Paper Statistical Conclusion Validity Montecarlo Simulation/Randomization.
Cat Aeration Task Force Additional Prove Out Testing Proposal 1 PC-11 Statisticians Task Force July 1, 2014.
VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION SLIDE 0 New Requirements for VA ORD Investigators: Implementation of Data Management and Access Plans.
Sample Size Mahmoud Alhussami, DSc., PhD. Sample Size Determination Is the act of choosing the number of observations or replicates to include in a statistical.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Hypothesis Testing 9.
Tim Haeberle API SC Winter Meeting
WIGOS regulatory and guidance material
MANAGEMENT NOTIFICATION (MN)
Standardized baselines
Material Testing under Tension
CEA/DEN/DM2S/SEMT/LISN
Quality Assurance in Vocational Education and Training in Kosovo
Developing the Overall Audit Plan and Audit Program
Lab Report Template BY Mr. Rose. Lab Report Template BY Mr. Rose.
Inference and Tests of Hypotheses
Spain Empty Pack Survey Q4 2016
Responding to Suspected Illegal Acts
Carry Over From API SC6 Winter Meeting API Standard 6A718 Inclusion of Additional Alloy 718 Strength Classes Tim Haeberle 30 June 2011.
Design Factors Collapse Corrected
Hypothesis Testing: Hypotheses
Triggered QoS Measurements
Section 3: Sweep implementation
EPA Region 10 Alternate Test Procedures and Method Update Rule
May 26, 2014 EFFECT OF EXPLOSION CLADDING INDUCED HARDNESS ON SULFIDE STRESS CRACKING AND STRESS CORROSION CRACKING RESISTANCE OF INCONEL 625 Outline:
Significance Tests: The Basics
Revision of Error Margins Agenda point 9 (point for decision)
Interpreting Epidemiologic Results.
DISCLAIMER This document contains information that is confidential and proprietary to SC Group. It is being given to you only for the purpose of review.
Classical regression review
Presentation transcript:

SSC-FPB Test Requirements M. Arafin, Ph.D. Project Leader, Sour Grade Research & Development

© ArcelorMittal – All rights reserved for all countries Cannot be disclosed, used, or reproduced without prior written specific authorization of ArcelorMittal CONFIDENTIAL – Privileged Information - ArcelorMittal proprietary information SSC - Four Point Bending (FPB) test Acceptance Criterion API 5L Annex H acceptance criterion: 72% SMYS NACE TM0177 has not adopted the test yet – in progress However, NACE MR0175 stipulates the acceptance requirements for such test (80% AYS) FPB, however, is less conservative than the Method A test or even the actual pipe test because only the outer surface of the specimen is in tension.

© ArcelorMittal – All rights reserved for all countries Cannot be disclosed, used, or reproduced without prior written specific authorization of ArcelorMittal CONFIDENTIAL – Privileged Information - ArcelorMittal proprietary information FPB Results – 110ksi equivalent grade Sample ID Rt 0.5 (MPa) R m (MPa) Test Stress (% of Rt 0.5 ) (%) Failure (F) /No-Failure (NF) 0° NF 0 ° -2 90F 120 ° -1 80NF 120 ° -2 90F 240 ° -1 80NF 240 ° -2 90F

© ArcelorMittal – All rights reserved for all countries Cannot be disclosed, used, or reproduced without prior written specific authorization of ArcelorMittal CONFIDENTIAL – Privileged Information - ArcelorMittal proprietary information 110 ksi equivalent grade: SSC Method A Test Cell (#) Rt 0.5 (MPa) R m (MPa) Test Stress (% of Rt 0.5 ) (%) Time to Failure (h:m) : : : :23 Extremely low failure times were observed!

© ArcelorMittal – All rights reserved for all countries Cannot be disclosed, used, or reproduced without prior written specific authorization of ArcelorMittal CONFIDENTIAL – Privileged Information - ArcelorMittal proprietary information Threshold stress comparison Ikeda et al. (1987)Kobayashi et al. (1987)

© ArcelorMittal – All rights reserved for all countries Cannot be disclosed, used, or reproduced without prior written specific authorization of ArcelorMittal CONFIDENTIAL – Privileged Information - ArcelorMittal proprietary information Proposal Confidential - ArcelorMittal Global Research and Development Gent5 Specific Proposal Request approval and funding for an API research study to determine the correct equivalence of applied test load/acceptance criterion for SSC-FPB with SSC Method A Methodology Threshold stress for Method A will be determined first for a given material and process condition. The same material will then be tested using FPB with gradually increasing test loads to determine the failure stress. The same procedure will be repeated for a planned matrix of grades and process conditions in order to determine whether the threshold stress difference between the two test methods is nearly identical (e.g. always X-MPa higher in FPB) irrespective of test material or process conditions, such as the one reported by Ikeda et al. or can be expressed with other appropriate parameter.

© ArcelorMittal – All rights reserved for all countries Cannot be disclosed, used, or reproduced without prior written specific authorization of ArcelorMittal CONFIDENTIAL – Privileged Information - ArcelorMittal proprietary information Proposal contd. Confidential - ArcelorMittal Global Research and Development Gent6 The full range of API 5L grades must be considered for the study; however, higher strength grade such as X70MS will be examined first since the chance of failure is much higher compared to low strength grades like X42MS. Non- sour grades can also be used for this study since the objective of the tests is to determine the difference in threshold stress between the two test methods, and not the qualification of the materials. Anticipated outcome Provide a guideline on the test load/acceptance criterion equivalence between Method A and FPB tests. It may be inserted as a NOTE in section H as follows: “Applied test load/acceptance criterion for the FPB test should be X (appropriate equivalence parameter to be determined) higher than the agreed acceptance criterion of the Method A test”

© ArcelorMittal – All rights reserved for all countries Cannot be disclosed, used, or reproduced without prior written specific authorization of ArcelorMittal CONFIDENTIAL – Privileged Information - ArcelorMittal proprietary information THANK YOU