Www.smcoe.org Using Technology to Extend and Enhance Learning Bruce Duncan, Instructional Technology Coordinator Rebecca Vyduna, Director, STEM Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations

Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Kati Pearson, Director Tammy Demps, Program Specialist Hana Insanally, Program Specialist Kima Spratley, Program Specialist.
A DAY IN PRE-K CLARKE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT. Clarke County School District’s Vision Our vision is for all students to graduate as life-long learners.
Examining Student Work. Ensuring Teacher Quality Leader's Resource Guide: Examining Student Work 2 Examining Student Work Explore looking at student work.
Collaborative Evaluation Communities in Urban Schools.
Curriculum & Instruction Webinar October 18, 2013.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Geography Subject leaders Training Exploring the content of the new National Curriculum.
EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP IN TECHNOLOGY: PREPARING SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS FOR A DIGITAL AGE BY VIRGINIA E. GARLAND AND CHESTER TADEJA Chapter 1: Technology.
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
Learning Centered Conferencing Using the Marzano Framework Beth McGibbon and Brent Perdue Part 1: The Preconference.
Integrating the Life Sciences from Molecule to Organism The American Physiological Society Transform a Cookbook Lab Moving Toward More Student-Centered.
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
1 Confidential to Shelby County Schools and Memphis City Schools Reflective Practice Theory of Action.
Key Leaders Network “Making Connections” October, 2012 Alabama Best Practices Center.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Professional Performance Process Principal Level Meetings October 19 & 22, 2009.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
“Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.” - Henry Ford -
Technology Leadership
Chapter 13 Program Evaluation and Technology Integration Strategies.
Project Learning Tree Project Learning Tree is an award-winning environmental education program designed for teachers and other educators, parents, and.
District Workforce Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Workforce Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 62 slides.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
WestEd.org Formative Assessment in Context Panelist: Peter L. Mangione, Ph.D. WestEd CEELO RoundTAble Using Assessment to Improve Teaching & Learning for.
ELA: Focus on Collaborative Conversations & Writing FCUSD Instructional Focus Meeting Sara Parenzin September 20, 2012 Welcome! Please sign in and start.
System Implementation and Monitoring Regional Session Spring, 2014 Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca.
Technology Use Plan Presented by: Bob Santi. Rationale A technology plan is a current guideline for the appropriate and effective use of technology a.
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Professional Learning and Development: Best Evidence Synthesis Helen Timperley, Aaron Wilson and Heather Barrar Learning Languages March 2008.
Tim Brower Professor & Chair Manufacturing & Mechanical Engr. Oregon Institute of Technology MSP Regional Meeting, San Francisco, February 14 & 15, 2008.
PRIJ, 3030 January the 22nd Assessment. Guiding questions… What are the implications for your general practices around planning and assessment? How will.
Educator Effectiveness Academy Day 2, Session 1. Find Someone Who…. The purpose of this activity is to review concepts presented during day 1.
Roles and Responsibilites of the Mentor Teacher Thank you for participating in our Mentor/Mentee Program! Parkway School District Summer 2010.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
Professional Development Opportunities for the New Math Standards.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Introduction to the Framework: Unit 1, Getting Readyhttp://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
1. What can effective planning with technology look like? 2. How do we support our teachers in their planning in this digital age? 3. How might TPACK.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Positive School Climate Dr. Shanda C. Crowder Clinical Assistant Professor and Director The Positive Schools Center University of Maryland, School of Social.
Evidence-based Research. Think Innovation…. The Day 8:30 am Introductions – Orientation for the Day – Expectation: Scenarios Three things about you,
Sustaining Your Gains.  Up to 70% of change initiatives fail, impacting: › Best possible care › Staff and provider frustration › Reluctance to engage.
SAS What is a coach to do? Classrooms for the Future/21st Century Teaching and Learning with Technology, Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Office of Service Quality
PBL Instructional Design. PBL Instructional Design Name: Name of PBL: Grade Level: Content Area:
Office of Service Quality
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
CAPS: COACHING TEACHERS Facilitator: Dr. Lynne Paradis BELIZE LITERACY PROGRAM June 2011.
207 : Developing Family Leadership: Using Data to Help Develop Practice The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program 207: Developing Family Leadership:
Strategies to Get the New Standards for Professional Learning Into Practice LF KS Annual Leadership Conference April 23, 2013 Sandee Crowther & Sheri Thomas.
AVID Leading College & Career Readiness Districtwide - Transforming Student Outcomes AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students.
Benchmark Task Cards Teaching and Learning Tammy Demps & Rehana Insanally August 9, 2012.
[School Name]’s Student Perception Survey Results This presentation is a template and should be customized to reflect the needs and context of your school.
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
Using Community Asset Maps and Oral Histories in Your Teaching Felice Atesoglu Russell, KSU Amanda Richey, KSU Jan Anglade, Dekalb International Student.
Description of a Process for Enhancing Pre-service Programs to Better Prepare General Education Teachers to Teach Students with Disabilities 2016 CEEDAR.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Mastery-Based Learning:
Collaborative Leadership
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Examining Student Work
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System
Presentation transcript:

Using Technology to Extend and Enhance Learning Bruce Duncan, Instructional Technology Coordinator Rebecca Vyduna, Director, STEM Center

Context Setting Students using technology for learning Teachers using technology to support and enhance their own professional learning Teachers integrating technology into learning experiences Learning leaders and communities developing systemic uses of technology, including to facilitate, extend and enhance professional learning

Today’s Learning Flow Exploring ISTE Essential Conditions for Technology- Mediated Learning Exploring ISTE Standards Family by and across “roles” to guide systemic change Exploring learningforward Exemplar Standards for Professional Learning Engaging the SAMR Model for Technology Integration Assessing Levels of Technology Integration Practices Implications for Professional Learning Across All Contexts

Positive Presupposition #1: Technology does and will continue to provide a range of options and opportunities for extending and enhancing student learning.

Key Question: What are the necessary conditions to effectively leverage technology for learning?

Activity: ISTE Essential Conditions 1.Read ISTE’s list of essential conditions and their descriptions 2.Share your general impression of these conditions and their interrelationships 3.We’ll return to these in a little bit…

Positive Presupposition #2: By developing their own understanding and knowledge of technology for learning, as well as their skills and proficiency using and integrating it effectively into learning experiences, teachers (learning facilitators) can help optimize the use of technology for improved student learning.

Key Question: What’s important for students to learn, understand, know, and be able to do related to the productive use of technology for learning?

Activity: ISTE Standards Family - Students 1.Form a group of 3 2.Divvy up the 6 ISTES standards (2 each) and read 3.Reflect (internally) to identify a specific improving practice in your district where technology is being used to support students achieving all or part of your selected standards 4.Share the above with your group members and discuss 5.Optional: Discuss the correlation of ISTES with other frameworks for students and technology

Key Question: What’s important for educators to learn, understand, know, and be able to do related to the productive use of technology for learning? (And by whom [by which roles] within our learning systems?)

Activity: ISTE Standards Family - Adults 1.In the same group of 3, divvy up the adult “members” of the ISTE Standards family, one each (don’t worry about the Computer Science Educators for now…) 2.Read (vertically) the standards for the role you’ve selected ( 3.Share and discuss highlights of each role with your group 4.Using the ISTE Standards by Role Matrix, compare (horizontally) common themes/content across the standards and how each role orients to a particular theme (e.g., digital age learning)

Positive Presupposition #3: A supportive context for effective professional learning is critical for teachers to be able to develop their own understanding and knowledge of technology for learning, as well as their skills and proficiency using and integrating it effectively into learning experiences, all so that they can optimize the use of technology for improved student learning.

Key Question: How do we as educators and members of learning organizations/communities contribute to and participate in shaping and sustaining professional learning? What standards, frameworks, processes, designs do we, or might we access and effectively utilize in support of such learning?

Activity: learningforward Standards for PL 1.On your own, read each of the 7 standard descriptors (standard title and bold type standard) 2.At your table, discuss your initial impressions and insights about these standards 3.Juxtapose the ISTE Essential Conditions and learningforward Standards for Professional Learning; what relationships do you observe? 4.Juxtapose the ISTE Standards and learningforward Standards for Professional Learning; what parallels do you observe between educator roles in these two sets of standards?

learningforward Innovation Configuration Maps How does this sample “IC” Map describe the uses, the roles of technology for professional learning?

The SAMR Model for Technology Integration SAMR Model by Dr. Ruben Puentedura, Ph.D. ( is licensed under CC BY 2.0

The SAMR Model in 120 Seconds… SAMR Model in 120 Seconds by Candace M. on YouTube at

Activity: What Makes this a S, an A, a M, a R? 1.Read the “framing slide” for a particular content area or topic 2.First pass: As each slide in a 4-slide SAMR progression group is shown, talk with table mates to identify the technology being shown and its (possible) use 3.Second pass: As possible, identify what about the technology and its use links it to that SAMR level 4.Debrief as a room

SAMR Model Resources ORIGINAL SOURCE: Developed by Dr. Ruben Puentadura Helpful SAMR resources by Kathy Schrock at Padagogy Wheel by Allan Carrington at

Assessing Levels of Technology Integration Practices

Assessing Levels of Technology Integration Practices What connections to SAMR did you perceive in this survey? How might your teachers score? Based on those scores, how might these results guide the design for PL? What, if any, other such assessments* have you used in your districts? How have they worked to guide PL? (*What other assessments exist?)

Implications and Opportunities for PL Across all Contexts What are some implications of today’s learning for your own and/or district PL? What opportunities do you perceive to incorporate some of today’s resources in your district? How might the use of exemplar standards for PL assist you and your district in its PL efforts? What next action focused on improving your own and/or your district’s approach to PL are you ready to commit to?

Thank you! Bruce Duncan Instructional Technology Coordinator San Mateo County Office of Education Thank you! Rebecca Vyduna Director, STEM Center San Mateo County Office of Education