Setting the Context: impacts of migration between Antoine Paccoud LSE Geography What we have learned from the last decade
OUTLINE Limitations The situation in 2011 Identifying trends: Zooming in: South London Causes/implications
LIMITATIONS Focus on Country of Birth Data for 2001 and 2011 Not on date of arrival Not on ethnicity/nationality Focus on Greater London Not on extended London region Focus on spatial patterns Not on socio-economic characteristics
London’s super-diversity in the UK context The UK-born in the wider London region The settlement patterns of different migrant groups THE SITUATION IN 2011
London’s super-diversity in the UK context The UK-born in the wider London region The settlement patterns of different migrant groups THE SITUATION IN 2011
London’s super-diversity in the UK context The UK-born in the wider London region The settlement patterns of different migrant groups THE SITUATION IN 2011
Differentiating between ‘diversities’ A return to the centre of the UK born? Summarising changes IDENTIFYING TRENDS:
1. USA, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Australia, China, HK 3.6% in 2001; 5.5% in India, Kenya, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Romania 5% in 2001; 7.9% in Jamaica, Nigeria, Portugal, Turkey, Somalia 3.3% in 2001; 5% in 2011 UK: 73.1% in 2001; 71.7% in 2011 Poland: 0.3% in 2001; 2.2% in 2011 DIFFERENT DIVERSITIES 2001: 85.4% 2011: 92.3%
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Differentiating between ‘diversities’ A return to the centre of the UK born? Summarising changes IDENTIFYING TRENDS:
Location Quotient 2001 – United Kingdom UK 2001
Location Quotient 2011 – United Kingdom UK 2011
Differentiating between ‘diversities’ A return to the centre of the UK born? Summarising changes IDENTIFYING TRENDS:
SOUTHWARK, LAMBETH, LEWISHAM Summary All residents UK Group 1: Germany, USA Group 2: India, Pakistan Group 3: Jamaica, Nigeria Poland ZOOMING IN
SOUTHWARK, LAMBETH, LEWISHAM Summary All residents UK Group 1: Germany, USA Group 2: India, Pakistan Group 3: Jamaica, Nigeria Poland ZOOMING IN
All Residents 2001
All Residents 2011
SOUTHWARK, LAMBETH, LEWISHAM Summary All residents UK Group 1: Germany, USA Group 2: India, Pakistan Group 3: Jamaica, Nigeria Poland ZOOMING IN
UK 2001
UK 2011
UK
SOUTHWARK, LAMBETH, LEWISHAM Summary All residents UK Group 1: Germany, USA Group 2: India, Pakistan Group 3: Jamaica, Nigeria Poland ZOOMING IN
Germany 2001
Germany 2011
Germany
USA 2001
USA 2011
USA
SOUTHWARK, LAMBETH, LEWISHAM Summary All residents UK Group 1: Germany, USA Group 2: India, Pakistan Group 3: Jamaica, Nigeria Poland ZOOMING IN
India 2001
India 2011
India
Pakistan 2001
Pakistan 2011
Pakistan
SOUTHWARK, LAMBETH, LEWISHAM Summary All residents UK Group 1: Germany, USA Group 2: India, Pakistan Group 3: Jamaica, Nigeria Poland ZOOMING IN
Jamaica 2001
Jamaica 2011
Jamaica
Nigeria 2001
Nigeria 2011
Nigeria
SOUTHWARK, LAMBETH, LEWISHAM Summary All residents UK Group 1: Germany, USA Group 2: India, Pakistan Group 3: Jamaica, Nigeria Poland ZOOMING IN
Poland 2001
Poland 2011
Poland
SOUTHWARK, LAMBETH, LEWISHAM Summary All residents UK Group 1: Germany, USA Group 2: India, Pakistan Group 3: Jamaica, Nigeria Poland ZOOMING IN
Change in the spatial distribution of benefit claimants Change in the spatial distribution of social renting households Current threats to London’s diversity CAUSES/IMPLICATIONS
Benefits 2001
Benefits 2010
Change in the spatial distribution of benefit claimants Change in the spatial distribution of social renting households Current threats to London’s diversity CAUSES/IMPLICATIONS
Social Rented 2001
Social Rented 2011
Change in the spatial distribution of benefit claimants Change in the spatial distribution of socially rented housing Current threats to London’s diversity CAUSES/IMPLICATIONS
Re-commodification of labour Local Government cuts (social housing) Welfare Reforms (‘Bedroom Tax’, housing benefits, benefit cap, etc.) Housing market Increasing house prices (Help to Buy) Proposed immigration checks (racial profiling) CURRENT THREATS