Section 12.0 Guidance, Navigation & Control Samuel J. Placanica GN&C Lead Engineer ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 5 Space Technology “Tomorrow’s Technology Today”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Coasting Phase Propellant Management for Upper Stages Philipp Behruzi Hans Strauch Francesco de Rose.
Advertisements

1 Winter Launch Block Modeling and Results MMS Flight Dynamics Team MIWG 8 Feb. 20, 2014.
Attitude Determination and Control
Section 17.0 Propulsion Subsystem Michael S. Rhee Propulsion Lead 5 Space Technology “Tomorrow’s Technology Today” GSFC ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001.
Feasibility of Demonstrating PPT’s on FalconSAT-3 C1C Andrea Johnson United States Air Force Academy.
STARLight PDR 3 Oct ‘01C.1 Hansen STARLight Peter Hansen PROJECT OVERVIEW.
Page 1HMI Team Meeting – January 26, 2005 HMI Mission Operations Rock Bush HMI Stanford Program Manager Stanford University
The Pursuit for Efficient S/C Design The Stanford Small Sat Challenge: –Learn system engineering processes –Design, build, test, and fly a CubeSat project.
Integrated Orbit and Attitude Control for a Nanosatellite with Power Constraints Bo Naasz Matthew Berry Hye-Young Kim Chris Hall 13th Annual AAS/AIAA Space.
5 Space Technology “Paving the Way for Future Micro-Satellite Missions” 1 NASA’s Space Technology 5 Mission NSF workshop on Small Satellite Missions for.
1 Project Name Solar Sail Project Proposal February 7, 2007 Megan Williams (Team Lead) Eric Blake Jon Braam Raymond Haremza Michael Hiti Kory Jenkins Daniel.
Launching, Orbital Effects & Satellite Subsystems
Student Satellite Project University of Arizona Team Goals Design, Fabricate, and Analyze a Structure that will Support the Payload –Space Allocation of.
1 Formation Flying Shunsuke Hirayama Tsutomu Hasegawa Aziatun Burhan Masao Shimada Tomo Sugano Rachel Winters Matt Whitten Kyle Tholen Matt Mueller Shelby.
Space Engineering 2 © Dr. X Wu, 2012
Attitude Determination and Control System
Tielong Zhang On behalf of the CGS Team in the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Science Spacecraft System and Payload China Geomagnetism.
Attitude Determination and Control System (ADCS)
1 Introduction The TOP-modelPotential applicationsConclusion The Transient Observations-based Particle Model and its potential application in radiation.
GSFC 5 Space Technology “Tomorrow’s Technology Today” ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 Launch Vehicle Services Section 18.0 Clyde Woodall Launch Vehicle Manager.
20a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Attitude Control System (ACS) Eric Holmes, Code 591 Joe Garrick, Code 595 Jim Simpson, Code 596 NASA/GSFC August.
DINO PDR 23 October 2015 DINO Systems Team Jeff Parker Anthony Lowrey.
ORBITALS Phase A Extended Interim Meeting U of A Phase A2 Work Update ORBITALS Science Team, University of Alberta CSA HQ, St. Hubert, 2010/03/17.
Guidance and Navigation
DSL Distributed Systems Laboratory ATC 23 August Model Mission: Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) Mission Goal “To study the microphysics of three.
1 Mission Discussion & Project Reviews 祝飛鴻 10/14/93.
SPHERES Reconfigurable Control Allocation for Autonomous Assembly Swati Mohan, David W. Miller MIT Space Systems Laboratory AIAA Guidance, Navigation,
ST5 PDR June 19-20, Section 4.0 Future Status James A. Slavin Project Scientist 5 Space Technology “Tomorrow’s Technology Today” GSFC.
Magnetospheric MultiScale Mission (MMS) Overview
Goddard Space Flight Center High Earth Orbit GPS Flight Experiment AMSAT-OSCAR 40 (AO-40) Frank H. Bauer NASA Goddard Space Flight Center November 1, 2001.
Test-as-You Fly SpaceWire for Solar Probe Plus
START NICMOS COOLING SYSTEM ACTIVITY SUMMARY. 1/25/01Ken Pulkkinen2 START NCS ACTIVITY Applicable SMOV Requirements: J NICMOS Cooling System.
STEREO IMPACT Critical Design Review 2002 November 20,21,22 Acuña1 MAGNETOMETER (MAG) M. H. Acuña NASA/GSFC Laboratory for Extraterrestrial Physics.
March /5/2016 At A Glance STARS is a real-time, distributed, multi-spacecraft simulation system for GN&C technology research and development. It.
THEMIS FDMO Review Propellant Budget Update − 1 October 5, 2004 PROPELLANT BUDGET UPDATE Vassilis Angelopoulos Covered in this presentation: Allocations.
Final Version Kequan Luu May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Flight Software.
Dec 1, FIELDS Top Level Requirements Review S. Harris (UCB)
GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Flight Software System Checkout TRR Test Suites (Backup) Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
SWT Overview 1 UCB, Nov15/16, 2006 THEMIS SCIENCE WORKING TEAM MEETING Mission Overview Peter R. Harvey Project Manager University of California - Berkeley.
20c - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Propulsion Chuck Zakrwski NASA/GSFC Code 597 August 16-17, 2005.
ORBITAL Orbital Simulation and Telemetric Data Collection Software Developed By: Aaron M. Rosenfeld.
1 EOS Aqua Mission Status at AMSR Science Team Meeting September 16, 2015 Huntsville, Alabama Bill Guit Aqua/Aura Mission Director - Code 584 phone
Introduction: The on-board measurements available for control are a dual-slit sensor to find the elevation of the sun and a magnetometer to measure the.
Final Version Gary Davis Robert Estes Scott Glubke Propulsion May 13-17, 2002 Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF)
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 5 IOC Subsystem 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: IOC Subsystems WBS: 4.1.B.
Section 19.1 Mission Operations Steve Odendahl Honeywell Technology Solutions, Inc. 5 Space Technology “Tomorrow’s Technology Today” GSFC ST5 PDR June.
Mini Autonomous Flying Vehicle CASDE is part of the National effort to develop a Micro Air Vehicle. CASDE has chosen a Mini Vehicle, in the short term,
THEMIS MRRSystems - 1 GSFC, Jan 5, 2007 Systems Engineering.
ACE Science Workshop March 10 th, 2009 Armin T. Ellis, Deborah Vane, Mark Rokey Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1 Thermal Design Christopher Smith RBSP Thermal Engineer Space.
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 ACS Dave Auslander, Dave Pankow, Han Chen, Yao-Ting Mao, UC Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
KNU RTLAB A Real-Time Linux System For Autonomous Navigation And Flight Attitude Control Of An Uninhabited Aerial Vehicle Charles E. Hall, Jr. Mechanical.
Power Philip Luers NASA/GSFC Code 561 August 16-17, 2005.
Mark Beckman NASA/GSFC Code 595 August 16-17, 2005
GOES Data Status Mutual Benefits of NASA THEMIS and NOAA GOES
FDMO Peer Review RFA Summary
A Simple Nutation Damper Design
INSTRUMENT DATA PROCESSING UNIT (IDPU) REQUIREMENTS
CINEMA System Engineering
Technical Resource Allocations
Mini-RF Requirements Overview
Operational Description
THEMIS INSTRUMENT TRAINING
ACS UC Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory
University of California, Berkeley
Level 2 Requirements (MRD)
SDO Flight Dynamics Subsystem
Flight Dynamics Michael Mesarch Frank Vaughn Marco Concha 08/19/99
Launch and On-orbit Checkout
Attitude Determination and Control Preliminary Design Review
Presentation transcript:

Section 12.0 Guidance, Navigation & Control Samuel J. Placanica GN&C Lead Engineer ST5 PDR June 19-20, Space Technology “Tomorrow’s Technology Today” GSFC

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Agenda Requirements Documentation Components Operational Modes Mission Planning Attitude Determination Dynamic Simulator Risk Mitigation

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC General System Requirements (1 of 2)  Spin stabilized spacecraft control. (MRD ) –Utilize attitude design techniques to maintain spin stabilization control –Spin-to-transverse inertia ratio greater than 1.2  Provide ground-based attitude determination and maneuver planning capabilities. (MRD ) –Utilize sun sensor and magnetometer data in conjunction with standard sun position and geomagnetic field (IGRF-2000) reference models  Provide the capability to perform spin axis attitude maneuvers and orbit adjustment maneuvers. (MRD ) –Magnitude of attitude maneuvers calculated on the ground and based upon attitude determination results and mission planning –Initiated by either real-time or stored program commands –Uses the Cold Gas Micro Thruster System

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC General System Requirements (2 of 2)  Implement a pre-programmed autonomous Sun Acquisition Mode (SAM). (MRD ) –GN&C will provide to Flight Software an algorithm document which presents the SAM control equations  Passively control spacecraft nutation. (MRD ) –Nutation will be dissipated using a ring-like shaped damper which will be fully filled with silicone oil  A Dynamic Simulator (DS) shall be designed to simulate a realistic orbital environment on the ground and emulate the functionality and performance needed for spacecraft level GN&C and science validation requirements. (MRD ) –Based upon SMEX/Triana DS heritage –Tenth order magnetic field model –Includes science event modeling

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Specific Requirements (1 of 2)  Spin Rate Operation Range –Perform autonomous SAM following launch vehicle release; spin rate greater than 20 rpm –20 rpm ± 10% following magnetometer boom and antenna deployments  SAM Performance –Maintain the sun to within 5 degrees of the normal to the solar panels –Spin rate knowledge: ± 10% (3 sigma) –Spin axis pointing knowledge: ± 5 degree (3 sigma) –Limit thruster actuation for any single SAM activity  Nominal Spacecraft Operation Performance –Maintain spin axis to be within 5 deg (3 sigma) of the ecliptic pole –Spin rate knowledge: ± 3% (3 sigma) –Spin axis pointing knowledge: ± 1 deg (3 sigma)

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Specific Requirements (2 of 2)  Provide the capability for a full 540 deg attitude maneuver –Includes margin for worst case precession maneuver scenario  Nutation Control –Time constant less than 60 minutes –Steady-state nutation angle less than 0.5 degrees –Maximum nutation angle due to launch vehicle release is to be less than 10 degrees  Spacecraft relative separations between 100 and 1000 km at apogee  All spacecraft to have the same orbital period  No constellation station keeping is required  Comply with NASA Safety Standard regarding orbital debris

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Documentation GN&C Subsystem SpecificationST Preliminary GN&C Algorithms DocumentST Preliminary Magnetometer System SpecST Baseline Magnetometer System SOWST Baseline Magnetometer Mechanical ICDDraft Magnetometer Electrical ICDDraft Sun Sensor SpecificationST Preliminary Sun Sensor Statement of WorkST Preliminary Sun Sensor ICDDraft Attitude Determination andDraft Maneuver Planning Document Dynamic Simulator Users GuideDraft Nutation Damper Spec and ICDDraft Document Number Status

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC /8 inch Damper AssemblyGD Draft 5/8 inch TubeGD Draft Fill Adapter for 5/8 inch TubeGD Draft Tube ClampGC Draft Test StandGD Draft Configuration Damper FillGD Draft Drawings Nutation Damper DrawingsNumberStatus

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Magnetometer Science-grade device provided by UCLA Component includes sensor head, electronics and interface cable Dynamic range –0 to 64,000 nT over two range bands Resolution –1 to 2 nT in 64,000 nT field –0.1 to 0.2 nT in 1000 nT field Sample rate –16 three-axis measurements per second Data will also be used for ground-based attitude determination activities

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Magnetometer Total mass: ~ kg –Electronics unit: ~ kg –Electronics chassis: ~ kg –Sensor head: ~ kg –Interface cable: ~ kg Total power: W –Electronics unit: W –Sensor head: W Volume/Length (cm) –Electronics chassis : 10 x 10 x 12 –Sensor head: 4 x 4 x 6 –Interface cable: 100 max Thermal operating environment –Electronics unit: -20 to +40 deg C –Sensor head: -20 to +40 deg C –Interface cable: -100 to +40 deg C Thermal survival environment –Electronics unit: -40 to +50 deg C –Sensor head: -40 to +50 deg C –Interface cable: -130 to +80 deg C

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Sun Sensor Accuracy: ± 0.25 deg Resolution: ± deg Volume (estimated): 74 cm 3 Mass (estimated): 0.16 kg Power (estimated): W Thermal environment –Operating: -20 to +50 deg C –Survival: -40 to + 60 deg C Radiation –100 Krad (Si) Total dose, SEU and latch-up immune Manufactured by Adcole Corp. 4 π steradian field of view (spinning) Will provide sun elevation and sun pulse data

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Nutation Damper (1 of 2) Passive device will damp nutation induced by both launch vehicle release and thruster firings GSFC in-house design and fabrication Fully-filled with silicone oil Will be mounted inside spacecraft along a wall Performance and environmental testing will be performed

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Nutation Damper (2 of 2) Size: 18 cm x 18 cm Tubing material: Aluminum Alloy 6061-T6 –0.625 inch outer diameter –0.035 inch wall thickness Fill adapter material: Aluminum Alloy 6061-T6 Fluid: Fully filled with Dow Corning 200 Silicone –5 centistoke viscosity at 25 deg C Mass (best current estimate): kg Power: None Thermal –Operating:-20 to +50 deg C –Survival:-40 to +60 deg C

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Operational Modes (1 of 2) Standby Mode –Used during nominal spacecraft operations –No thruster activity Sun Acquisition Mode (SAM) –Can remain in mode for indefinite amount of time –Uses on-board flight software to process sun sensor data –SAM control logic will issue the appropriate commands to the cold gas thruster to orient spacecraft into a power positive attitude –Activation methods: Autonomously entered following launch vehicle release On cold CPU reset, initialization will boot spacecraft CPU into SAM Ground command

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Operational Modes (2 of 2) Maneuver Mode –Spacecraft spin axis is processed to a pre-determined orientation –Required prior to a delta V in order to orient the spacecraft spin axis along the velocity vector –Ground-based processing of sun sensor and magnetometer data results in thruster fire commands which are uploaded to the spacecraft and executed in open-loop fashion Delta V Mode –Required to maneuver the three spacecraft into a mission orbit constellation in order to demonstrate inter-spacecraft communications/crosslink capabilities –Ground command

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC System Block Diagram Sun Sensor C&DH Card Cold Gas Micro Thruster System Thruster Commands Magnetometer Sun Sensor And Mag Telemetry Ground Station Attitude/Orbit Determination Develop Thruster Cmds SAM FSW Telemetry Processing Standby Mode SAM Maneuver & Delta V Modes No Command

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Rhumb Line Precession (1 of 2)  First used thirty years ago on Early Bird and still frequently employed to reorient spinning spacecraft.  A constant heading angle   is maintained throughout the maneuver.  The heading angle is computed based on the known initial orientation and the desired final orientation.

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Rhumb Line Precession (2 of 2) Heading angle is used to compute a phase angle from the sun presence signal Phase angle is used with the estimated spin rate to compute a time delay between sun presence and the thruster pulse Orientation in the Spin Plane at Sun PresenceOrientation in the Spin Plane at Thruster Pulse

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Thruster and C&DH Interface Digital Sun Sensor Sun Elevation Sun Presence Clock Sun Presence Time Thruster Delay Time Thruster Pulse Width Thruster Enable Flight Software C&DH Sun Presence Thruster Delay Time Thruster Pulse Width Sun Presence Spacecraft Spin Period 0 1 Time Flight software sends the Delay Time, Pulse Width and Enable flag to C&DH C&DH produces the thruster commands in the form of a pulse train that repeats at the spin period in Sun Acquisition and Maneuver Modes and at 2 Hz in Delta V Mode

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Sun Acquisition Mode Block Diagram Filter Sun Elevation Threshold Comparison With Hysterisis Thruster Enable Flag If pos then   = 270° If neg then   = 90° Sun Presence Time Spin Rate Estimation Thruster Delay Calculation Thruster Delay Time Compute Variance

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Mission Planning Constellation - Formation defined as inter-spacecraft distances greater than 100 km and less than 1000 km at apogee Lifetime - 3 months, 6 month goal On-board maneuvers to final configuration Orbit Debris mitigation - NASA NSS Orbit Determination - 10 km knowledge All spacecraft in same orbit plane, identical periods Delta V required to deploy from geosynchronous transfer orbit no greater than 1.6 m/s No provision for orbit maintenance

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Orbit Characteristics Assumptions –Launch November 2003 –Nominal Orbit: from empirical survey of launch vehicle histories 200 x 38,000 km altitude (Period: 10.5 hours) 28 deg inclination perigee at descending node (typical LV injection for GTO) apogee sun side (noon) Eclipse History –30 minutes max eclipse, 143 days from launch Lifetime - nominal scenario –+2 sigma solar flux = 1.1 years, meets 6 month goal

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Lifetime Estimate for Initial 200 x 38,000 km Orbit 25 kg30 kg20 kg Preliminary

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Lifetime Estimate - Perigee Variation 200 km 215 km 225 km 250 km Preliminary

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Attitude Determination Shall accurately determine rate and attitude of the spacecraft for both the normal on-orbit mode and the orbit and attitude adjustment modes The ground-based Attitude Determination System (ADS) will reuse components from the MultiMission Spin-Axis Support System (MSASS) MSASS is a Matlab-based attitude determination system which has been used to support several GSFC missions, including FAST, Wind, and Polar ADS will utilize magnetometer and sun sensor telemetry data GN&C will provide hardware and analysis tools to support two redundant strings in the mission operation control center

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Dynamic Simulator (1 of 2) Simulator core simulates single spacecraft Simulator core code is hosted in a single PC-compatible Simulator core code is a ‘C’ program running under Linux Interface is through commercial PCI plug-in cards (via custom hardware as needed) ASCII text configuration files are used extensively to allow rapid re- configuration as needed Internal data is stored in a mnemonic-driven database Simulator core is derived from SMEX/Triana heritage code (especially Triana and FAST) One copy of simulator to be built for each of three test environments (Flight S/W, C&DH S/W, and FlatSat – no testing at spacecraft level intended)

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Dynamic Simulator (2 of 2) Simulator can be configured for “open loop” operation (i.e., sensor data is static regardless of actuators and dynamics, and interfaces can be tested in this fashion) Simulator can be configured for “mixed loop” operation (i.e., sensor data reflects the response of the dynamics to constant actuation regardless of actual commands, and interfaces can be tested in this fashion) Simulator can be configured for “closed loop” operation (i.e., sensor data reflects the response of the dynamics to the actuator commands received) Regardless of loop configuration, individual sensors and actuators can be disconnected from the simulator and actual hardware substituted (it will not then be “in the loop”) No simulation of GPS or inter-spacecraft signals intended

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Risk Mitigation Risk: Magnetometer electronics parts availability -Mitigation: GSFC will assist UCLA in parts procurement Risk: Sun sensor shock environment -Mitigation: Adcole will perform analysis and redesign to strengthen the sun sensor in the areas of recticle hold-down and recticle/solar cell separation Risk: Rapidly decaying orbit -Mitigation: Provide larger delta V capacity Acquire higher perigee altitude due to launch vehicle insertion Accommodate through system-level design