1 Departure Scenario 1 November 14, 2007. 2 Scenario Overview Entry of Flight Data into AWIM SystemEntry of Flight Data into AWIM System –Embry Riddle.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 PHARE Operational Scenarios J-P. Nicolaon, Operational Task Force Chairman EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
Advertisements

October 31, Metron Aviation, Inc. Dan Rosman Assessing System Impacts: Miles-in-Trail and Ground Delays.
- European CDM - To benefit from the animation settings contained within this presentation we suggest you view using the slide show option. To start the.
Flight Crew Activities During a Typical Flight
© DLR, Institute of Flight Guidance ASAS Thematic Network 2 nd Workshop 6-8 October 2003 – Malmö Session 1 – ATSA Application Track Bernhard Czerlitzki.
Tower ESSA User Handbook. Configuration The Tower system can be configured to model different configurations of controller and pilot positions. Controller.
Air Traffic Management
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-80/PIA-1 Improved Airport Operations through Airport-CDM SIP/ASBU/2012.
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Saulo Da Silva
MIT Lincoln Laboratory RWSL OpEval PilotTraining, page 1 Aug 2006 MPK Pilot Training for Continued Operational Evaluation of Runway Status Lights (RWSL)
Best Practices for Taxi Operations at Towered & Non-Towered Airports
1 Data Link Roadmap Overview Mike Shorthose, Helios Technology Jorge Grazina, European Commission 25 September 2002.
Understanding Role of FDP Across NAS Operational Domains
Applications from packages I to III
The Next Generation Air Transportation System “The Near Term and Beyond” Presented by Charles Leader, Director Joint Planning and Development Office.
Welcome Air Traffic Control Procedures For: SAFECON 2015 Competition.
Introduction to NextGen Relevance to Taiwan 29 May 2008 The views, opinions and/or findings contained in this report are those of The MITRE Corporation,
Vincent Chu and Peter Hwoschinsky, FAA Maria Picardi Kuffner, MIT/LL
Book: The Global Airline Industry By: Peter Belobaba Flight Crew Activities During a Typical Flight Sections – Presented by: Nahid Boustani.
1 Arrival Scenario 1 November, Scenario Overview Sharing of Flight and Status data via AWIMSharing of Flight and Status data via AWIM –Parking.
Gate-to-Gate Project: Implementing Sequencing, Merging, and Spacing Captain Bob Hilb September 11, 2006.
Date: 18 February 2008 Federal Aviation Administration Collaborative Decision Making at the FAA/ATO A look at how CDM is applied in the U.S.
Best Practices for Taxi Operations at Towered & Non-Towered Airports
Tower Enroute Control Procedures
12/01/2011 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION AIR TRAFFIC ORGANIZATION 1 Execution of Flow Strategies (XFS) (aka Go Button)
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL Presented by S.SUMESWAR PATRO Regd no:
Aeronautical information
Federal Aviation Administration 1. Presented to: By: Federal Aviation Administration Palomar Airspace 101 Plus One Flyers Kristin Grulke, Brandon Gonzales.
Houston Flight Standards District Office Manager Holly W. Geiger
Outcome: Zero fatalities resulting from runway incursions.
0 Downloaded from FAA Runway Safety Briefing Sun ‘n Fun EAA Fly-In April 2002.
CPDLC / ADS Operations 4/22/2017 2:35 PM
1 Runway Incursion Causal Analysis Section 3. 2 PILOTS and VEHICLE OPERATORS must taxi and maneuver their aircraft/vehicles on taxiways and runways in.
Data Link Communications
A Time For Change Integrated Airport … A NextGen Testbed November 14, 2007.
Introduction to Integrated Airport Demonstration November 14, 2007.
By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services November 12, 2008 Merging and Spacing Enabling Continuous Descent Arrivals.
Lecture 3: Air Traffic Control Tower
M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Interactive Electronic Flight Strips Nathan A. Doble R. John Hansman.
Airport Markings & Signs
Federal Aviation Administration Data Communications Program Operational Trials in Domestic Airspace Presented to:Data Comm Implementation Team (DCIT) By:Jerry.
RECITE A PRAYER…(15 SECONDS). ATM TOPIC 1. INTRODUCTION TO AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT,TYPE OF CONTROL AREAS & FLIGHT PLAN 2. AERODROME CONTROL 3. AREA CONTROL.
US IL Flying Club June 1 st, VERSION 4.
Harris.com Alex Murray | DCIS Benefits Lead DCIT Brief Data Comm Benefits & Metrics Alignment with DC Program, NIWG, & NAC.
What Is Multilateration Triangulation System Uses Aircraft Transponder Multiple Ground Receivers Central Computer Calculates & Displays Aircraft Position.
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL.
CY Segment 1 Phase 1 Tower Services Initial En Route Services Departure Clearances (DCL) Transfer of Communications Initial Check-In.
Air Traffic Control. There are different types of air traffic controllers who communicate with pilots from the time the pilot calls for a clearance to.
Lecture 11: Flight Management System (FMS)
Joint Planning & Development Office Evaluations & Analysis Preliminary Scenario Analyses Strategy Assessment to Provide a Basis for Prioritizing Investments.
AAL CDM Message Sending Process CDM A&D Meeting January 24-25, 2001 Presented by: Roger Beatty - Operations Coordinator American Airlines - System Operations.
Programme Status ECTL AAB February FACTS  A mature approach: 2500 contributors Release process organises the delivery cycle ATM Engineering:
1 Surface CDM Sub-team Concept of Operations Briefing Marshall Mowery (FAA CDM Lead) Dan Allen, FedEx Express (Industry CDM Lead) Carl Calcasola, ATM PBI.
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 1.
REGULATIONS FOR ARMY AIRCRAFT CW2 ROBERT GOEBEL. Administrative Please turn off all: –Cell phones –Beepers –Palm Pilots –Gameboys –Stereos –Watch alarms.
UML DESIGN By: J Kamala Ramya Y Devika
FAA NextGen Data Comm Tower Service: CPDLC DCL New Operator Introduction.
Page 1 July 28, 2003 Richmond Facility ATN 2003 IEE London Raytheon Integrated Data Link–RIDL
Sandy Lozito ATM2003 June 2003 The Impact of Voice, Data Link, and Mixed Modality Environments on Flight Deck Procedures Sandy Lozito 1, Savvy Verma 2,
Federal Aviation Administration Runway Safety For Corporate Pilot’s Corporate Seminar August 8, 2009 Back to Basics For Runway Safety.
Patuxent River Navy Flying Club Bi-Monthly Safety Briefing October 11, 2016 Dave Kirk PRNFC Safety Officer.
Procedures and radiotelephony phraseology
Data Communications Program
FPAW 2016 Summer Meeting 3 August 2016 Louis Bailey.
Air Traffic Control System
Operational Context and Use Case Focus Group
Operational Context and Use Case Focus Group
Operational Context and Use Case Focus Group
Operational Context and Use Case Focus Group
Operational Context and Use Case Focus Group
Presentation transcript:

1 Departure Scenario 1 November 14, 2007

2 Scenario Overview Entry of Flight Data into AWIM SystemEntry of Flight Data into AWIM System –Embry Riddle Instructional Flight –Delta Flight from Daytona Beach to Atlanta Pre-Pushback ActivitiesPre-Pushback Activities –Clearance Delivery –Aircraft Fueling, Pre-Flight, Start and Pushback –Departure Release Coordination Push-BackPush-Back –Immediate Push-Back for Embry Riddle Flight –Gate Hold for Just-in-Time Delivery to the Runway for Delta Flight TaxiTaxi –Digital Taxi Clearances –Surface Taxi Trajectories in Surface Automation –Taxi Conformance Monitoring Take-OffTake-Off All Flight Data Objects are Shared between Local Systems through AWIMAll Flight Data Objects are Shared between Local Systems through AWIM –And with the Rest of the NAS and Flight Operators through SWIM

3 Departure Scenario 1 STEP 1a – Entry of ERAU FlightSTEP 1a – Entry of ERAU Flight ACTION: ERAU Ops Center enters their simulated flight plan into the ERAU flight dispatch systemACTION: ERAU Ops Center enters their simulated flight plan into the ERAU flight dispatch system –Flight plan (FP) is transmitted to AWIM SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION:SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION: –ERAU display shows entry of FP –AWIM receives FP and creates a FDO which it adds to the Flight Repository and publishes to all systems connected to AWIM –ERAU FP is displayed in the proposed flight lists of applications connected to AWIM: EFS, SDSS, CARTS, FPPP and FltWindsEFS, SDSS, CARTS, FPPP and FltWinds Benefits:Benefits: –AWIM flight data distributed to all participants –Flight intent data into the NAS

4 Departure Scenario 1 STEP 1b – Entry of Commercial FlightSTEP 1b – Entry of Commercial Flight ACTION: Simulated Delta Airlines Ops Center enters their flight plan into the Flight Plan Pre-Processor (FPPP)ACTION: Simulated Delta Airlines Ops Center enters their flight plan into the Flight Plan Pre-Processor (FPPP) –Airline receives constraint feedback on 4-D trajectory Based on Special Activity AirspaceBased on Special Activity Airspace Airspace and airport congestionAirspace and airport congestion SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION:SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION: –FPPP display shows entry of Flight Plan –AWIM receives FP and creates a Flight Data Object which it adds to the Flight Repository and publishes to all systems connected to AWIM –Delta FP is displayed in the proposed flight lists of applications connected to AWIM: EFS, SDSS, CARTS, FPPP and FltWindsEFS, SDSS, CARTS, FPPP and FltWinds Benefits:Benefits: –SWIM flight data distributed to all participants –Flight intent data into the NAS –Value of constraint feedback to the airline

5 Departure Scenario 1 STEP 2 – Clearance Delivery for Delta FlightSTEP 2 – Clearance Delivery for Delta Flight ACTION: At 10 minutes prior to pushback, the ERAU and Delta pilots each receive clearance via data linkACTION: At 10 minutes prior to pushback, the ERAU and Delta pilots each receive clearance via data link –Departure clearance displayed on pilot’s cockpit display –Pilots responds by acknowledging the data link message SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION:SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION: –Flight Data Object is updated automatically –EFS shows flight in ‘Clearance Delivered’ status –Clearance Delivery Controller passes strip to Ground Controller Benefits:Benefits: –Reduced operational errors due to digital communication of clearance No chance for voice/interpretation errorsNo chance for voice/interpretation errors –Improves accuracy of Out and Off time predictions through use of cleared status for TFM use

6 Departure Scenario 1 STEP 3 – Departure ReadinessSTEP 3 – Departure Readiness ACTION: The aircraft has a planned door closed / ready to pushback (OUT) time entered in Flight Planning systemACTION: The aircraft has a planned door closed / ready to pushback (OUT) time entered in Flight Planning system SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION:SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION: –SDSS computes initial Off Time –Initial Out and Off Time updated in the Flight Data Object and shared with AWIM –Flight Ops enters updated flight status as the phases of turnaround proceed Benefits:Benefits: –ATC has awareness of flight’s turnaround status via AWIM

7 Departure Scenario 1 STEP 4 – Departure Release CoordinationSTEP 4 – Departure Release Coordination ACTION: Ramp controller sends request for release to En Route SDSSACTION: Ramp controller sends request for release to En Route SDSS –En route TMC enters the release time into SDSS SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION:SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION: –En Route SDSS shows flight that is subject to APREQ –Show entry of Release Time –SDSS recalculates OUT, OFF times as needed –EFS displays APREQ release times Benefits:Benefits: –Better information to ATC - Earlier request for departure release – possibly capture earlier slot – reduce delay –Just-in-time delivery to the runway end for departure –Reduced emissions – reduced fuel usage

8 Departure Scenario 1 STEP 6 – ERAU Power Up and Taxi StartSTEP 6 – ERAU Power Up and Taxi Start ACTION:ACTION: –ERAU ramp clears flight for push-back –Aircraft starts taxiing SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION:SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION: –Aircraft starts generating ADS-B reports –Movement of aircraft is displayed on SDSS, LCSS and CARTS –FDO updated to state ‘Ramp Taxi Out’

9 Departure Scenario 1 STEP 7 – ERAU Approaches SpotSTEP 7 – ERAU Approaches Spot ACTION: Tower Ground Controller evaluates taxi route on EFSACTION: Tower Ground Controller evaluates taxi route on EFS –Ground Controller modifies taxi route from SDSS which is shown on EFS SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION:SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION: –Taxi Route Change initiates full taxi trajectory update in SDSS –Updated taxi route displayed on EFS –Taxi route changes can be datalinked to the pilot or sent by voice Benefits:Benefits: –Automation assistance in generation of taxi routes –Allows for electronic version of taxi route for conformance monitoring

10 Departure Scenario 1 STEP 7 – ERAU Approaches Spot (cont.)STEP 7 – ERAU Approaches Spot (cont.) ACTION: Aircraft taxis in ramp to spotACTION: Aircraft taxis in ramp to spot –Ground Control provides clearance and instructs aircraft to follow SDSS generated surface taxi trajectory SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION:SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION: –Aircraft continues generating ADS-B reports –Movement of aircraft is displayed on SDSS, CAMS and CARTS Benefits:Benefits: –Operator (Flt Ops) can now be aware of aircraft status “in the ATC realm” via AWIM –Reduced controller workload due to less frequency interaction

11 Departure Scenario 1 STEP 8 – Delta Aircraft power upSTEP 8 – Delta Aircraft power up ACTION: Aircraft powers up based upon SDSS generated OUT timeACTION: Aircraft powers up based upon SDSS generated OUT time SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION:SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION: –Aircraft begins generating/broadcasting ADS-B position reports –ADS-B surveillance data is displayed on SDSS, CAMS and CARTS Benefit:Benefit: –Just in time power-up – reduced fuel usage and emissions

12 Departure Scenario 1 STEP 10 – Delta Push BackSTEP 10 – Delta Push Back ACTION: Aircraft pushes backACTION: Aircraft pushes back SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION:SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION: –Aircraft continues generating ADS-B reports –Movement of aircraft is displayed on SDSS, CAMS and CARTS –FDO updated to state ‘Ramp Taxi Out’ BenefitsBenefits –Just-in-time delivery to the runway end for departure –Reduced emissions – reduced fuel usage

13 Departure Scenario 1 STEP 11 – Delta Hand Off to Tower Ground ControlSTEP 11 – Delta Hand Off to Tower Ground Control ACTION: Tower Ground Controller evaluates taxi route on EFSACTION: Tower Ground Controller evaluates taxi route on EFS –Ground Controller approves the taxi route from SDSS which is shown on EFS SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION:SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION: –Taxi route displayed on EFS –Taxi route changes can be datalinked to the pilot or sent by voice Benefits:Benefits: –Automation assistance in generation of taxi routes –Allows for electronic version of taxi route for conformance monitoring

14 Departure Scenario 1 STEP 12 – Delta Approaches SpotSTEP 12 – Delta Approaches Spot ACTION: Aircraft taxis in ramp to spotACTION: Aircraft taxis in ramp to spot –Ground Control provides clearance and instructs aircraft to follow SDSS generated surface taxi trajectory SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION:SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION: –Aircraft continues generating ADS-B reports –Movement of aircraft is displayed on SDSS, LCSS and CARTS Benefits:Benefits: –Operator (Flt Ops) can now be aware of aircraft status “in the ATC realm” via AWIM –Reduced controller workload due to less frequency interaction

15 Departure Scenario 1 STEP 13 – Both Flights Follow Surface Taxi TrajectorySTEP 13 – Both Flights Follow Surface Taxi Trajectory ACTION: Aircraft taxies per SDSS generated surface taxi trajectoryACTION: Aircraft taxies per SDSS generated surface taxi trajectory –EFIS/CDTI/MFD displays taxi clearance SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION:SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION: –Aircraft movement is displayed on SDSS, CAMS and CARTS –SDSS is performing conformance monitoring of aircraft actual position with respect to the assigned surface trajectory Benefits:Benefits: –Redundancy of taxi conformance monitoring (ground system and aircraft)

16 Departure Scenario 1 STEP 14 – ERAU Flight Taxi DeviationSTEP 14 – ERAU Flight Taxi Deviation ACTION:ACTION: –ERAU Flight taxis to wrong intersection off of taxiway N SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION:SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION: –Aircraft movement is displayed on SDSS, CAMS and CARTS –SDSS performs conformance monitoring of aircraft position Taxi conformance alert will be shown on SDSS and CARTSTaxi conformance alert will be shown on SDSS and CARTS Benefits:Benefits: –Alerting of taxi deviation immediately upon missing taxi turn – rather than waiting to be approaching runway

17 Departure Scenario 1 STEP 15STEP 15 ACTION: Aircraft approaching departure queue / run-up areaACTION: Aircraft approaching departure queue / run-up area –Flight strip handed off from ground to local on EFS SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION:SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION: –Aircraft movement continues to be displayed on SDSS, CAMS and CARTS –SDSS continued performing conformance monitoring of aircraft actual position versus the surface trajectory

18 Departure Scenario 1 STEP 16 – Both ERAU and Delta Line Up for Take Off in SequenceSTEP 16 – Both ERAU and Delta Line Up for Take Off in Sequence ACTION: CLEAR TAKEOFF issued by voice by Local ControllerACTION: CLEAR TAKEOFF issued by voice by Local Controller –Flight enters runway according to local controller clearance SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION:SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION: –EFS Status Indicates Take-Off Clearance Issued

19 Departure Scenario 1 STEP 17 – Flights Take-off in SequenceSTEP 17 – Flights Take-off in Sequence ACTION: Aircraft enters runway and takes offACTION: Aircraft enters runway and takes off SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION:SYSTEM RESPONSE / VISUALIZATION: –ADS-B and MWS position reporting –OFF status identified automatically by SDSS and CAMS –As aircraft passes a parameter height or time after ‘OFF’ runway is deallocated –CARTS will “auto acquire” aircraft on departure and generate a Departure Message that is used by the enroute system to initiate its processing –CARTS will show aircraft on departure route Benefits:Benefits: –Taxi trajectory and airborne trajectory are consistent – taxi trajectory delivers the flight to the runway for departure to meet the airborne trajectory

20 Scenario Summary Entry of Flight Data into AWIM SystemEntry of Flight Data into AWIM System –AWIM flight data distributed to all participants –Flight intent data into the NAS Pre-Pushback ActivitiesPre-Pushback Activities –TFM has awareness of flight’s turnaround status via AWIM –Better information to ATC - Earlier request for departure release – possibly capture earlier slot – reduce delay Push-BackPush-Back –Just-in-time delivery to the runway end for departure –Reduced emissions – reduced fuel usage TaxiTaxi –Automation assistance in generation of taxi routes –Assigned taxi route available in surface automation for conformance monitoring –Alerting of taxi deviation immediately upon missing taxi turn – rather than waiting to be approaching runway Take-OffTake-Off –Taxi trajectory and airborne trajectory are consistent – taxi trajectory delivers the flight to the runway for departure to meet the airborne trajectory