Summit in the Wasatch John Britting Wasatch Front Regional Council.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In Portland, Oregon TRB Planning Applications Conference Reno, Nevada Mark Bradley Research & Consulting.
Advertisements

Regional Bicycle Demand Model: In Use Today in Portland Bill Stein, Metro TRB Transportation Applications Conference Reno, Nevada – May 9, 2011.
April 10, 2007 Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Reno, Nevada.
1 Travel Forecasting for New Starts The FTA Perspective September 27, 2004.
Smith Myung, Cambridge Systematics Sean McAtee, Cambridge Systematics Cambridge Systematics.
October 4-5, 2010 TCRP H-37: Characteristics of Premium Transit Services that Affect Choice of Mode Prepared for: AMPO Modeling Subcommittee Prepared by:
Justifying Rail Bias Factor for Houston METRO’s Transit Model Presentation by Vijay Mahal, HDR Inc Vincent Sanders, Houston METRO May 18, 2009 TRB Applications.
USING SUMMIT FOR TRANSIT AND MODEL ANALYSIS AMPO TRAVEL MODEL WORK GROUP October 23, 2006.
MORPC Model Comparison Project Trip vs. Tour Model.
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
Status of the SEMCOG E6 Travel Model SEMCOG TMIP Peer Review Panel Meeting December 12, 2011 presented by Liyang Feng, SEMCOG Thomas Rossi, Cambridge Systematics.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
About this presentation Target audience: Prepared for Dr. Mitsuru Saito’s BYU graduate level class. Feb Please contact Mike Brown at
Agenda Overview Why TransCAD Challenges/tips Initiatives Applications.
1 Using Transit Market Analysis Tools to Evaluate Transit Service Improvements for a Regional Transportation Plan TRB Transportation Applications May 20,
Implementing a Blended Model System to Forecast Transportation and Land Use Changes at Bob Hope Airport 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Bill Davidson | PB | | Dawn McKinstry | PB | | Marie-Elsie Dowell | PB |
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
Validate - A Nationwide Dynamic Travel Demand Model for Germany Peter Vortisch, Volker Waßmuth, PTV AG, Germany.
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Innovative Approach to Transit On-board Data Collection.
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MODEL ENHANCEMENTS FOR THE RED LINE PROJECT AMPO TRAVEL MODEL WORK GROUP March 20, 2006.
Trip Generation Review and Recommendations 1 presented to MTF Model Advancement Committee presented by Ken Kaltenbach The Corradino Group November 9, 2009.
Transit Estimation and Mode Split CE 451/551 Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 7.
Calculating Transportation System User Benefits: Interface Challenges between EMME/2 and Summit Principle Author: Jennifer John Senior Transportation Planner.
 Focus Model Application to Colfax Ave  Initial Contact with FTA  Evaluation Process and Results  Next Steps.
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by Scott Seeburger, Myung Sung, Dave Schmitt & Peter Haliburton November 20, Tri-Rail On-Board Survey.
UrbanSim Model and Data Development John Britting Wasatch Front Regional Council.
COLUMBUS STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE Strategic Planning Steering Committee Session V September 7, 2012.
1 The Aggregate Rail Ridership Forecasting Model: Overview Dave Schmitt, AICP Southeast Florida Users Group November 14 th 2008.
Utilizing Advanced Practice Methods to Improve Travel Model Resolution and Address Sustainability Bhupendra Patel, Ph.D., Senior Transportation Modeler.
Modeling in the “Real World” John Britting Wasatch Front Regional Council April 19, 2005.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 18: Demand Forecasting.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Trip Distribution CE331 Transportation Engineering.
From Survey to Model Capturing Relative Perceptions of Transit Time in the Emme Strategy Transit Assignment Aaron Breakstone, Scott Higgins, Richard Walker.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
1 Predicted-versus-Actual Studies: Why/how to do them and Lessons Learned Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB Transportation Planning Applications.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Behavioral Modeling for Design, Planning, and Policy Analysis Joan Walker Behavior Measurement and Change Seminar October UC Berkeley.
February 8, 2008 SERPM65 vs. SERPM6-Corradino 1 SERPM-6.5 & SERPM-6: Differences & Future Directions Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale,
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12 th Annual TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.
Dynamic Tolling Assignment Model for Managed Lanes presented to Advanced Traffic Assignment Sub-Committee presented by Jim Hicks, Parsons Brinckerhoff.
Regional Transit Study Project Update. Four open houses held between November , 2009 Informed and engaged the public in the study process Provided.
Lecture 4 Four transport modelling stages with emphasis on public transport (hands on training) Dr. Muhammad Adnan.
Critical Issues in Estimating and Applying Nested Logit Mode Choice Models Ramachandran Balakrishna Srinivasan Sundaram Caliper Corporation 12 th TRB National.
Planning Applications Conference, Reno, NV, May Impact of Crowding on Rail Ridership: Sydney Metro Experience and Forecasting Approach William Davidson,
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference presented by Arun Kuppam, Cambridge.
FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts1March 2009FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts1March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT Bill.
1 FSUTMS-Voyager: Transit Standards within Evolving FSUTMS Summary Presentation Florida Model Task Force Tampa, Florida December 13 th, slides.
Creating a Statewide Modeling System in Virginia Presentation for the 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 7, 2007.
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by David Schmitt, AICP November 20, 2008 FSUTMS Transit Model Application.
Analytical Reporting of Travel Forecasts Using Summit Nazrul Islam Office of Planning & Environment Federal Transit Administration.
May 2009TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference 1 PATHBUILDER TESTS USING 2007 DALLAS ON-BOARD SURVEY Hua Yang, Arash Mirzaei, Kathleen.
FSUTMS Model Status and Standardization Florida Model Task Force Meeting Tampa, FL December 13, 2006 Developments and Future Directions.
Preliminary Evaluation of Cellular Origin- Destination Data as a Basis for Forecasting Non-Resident Travel 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
1 Florida’s New Transit Modeling System Huiwei Shen, Yongqiang Wu & Dave Schmitt 11 th TRB Planning Applications Conference Daytona Beach, Florida May.
Emme Modeller Applications Puget Sound Regional Council’s Model Conversion via Emme Modeller 22 nd International Emme Users’ Conference September 15-16,
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
Transit Choices BaltimoreLink Ad-hoc Committee Meeting January 12, 2016.
Walk Statistics.  The question has been asked: “Is Lomas a better BRT corridor than Central?”  The purpose of this analysis is to compare the two corridors.
May 9, th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference – Session 18 1 IMPROVING CONSISTENCY BETWEEN TRANSIT PATH- BUILDING AND MODE.
Presented to Toll Modeling Panel presented by Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics, Inc.. September 16, 2010 Time of Day in FSUTMS.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Third International Conference on Innovations in Travel Modeling presented by Thomas Rossi Cambridge.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Transportation Master Plan Randy Scherzer Mike Kelly.
Travel Modelling Group Technical Advisory Committee
NGTA Halton Planning and Public Works Committee
Integrating Mode Specific Attributes into the Transit Pathfinder in a Manner Consistent with the Multimodal Demand Model Richard Walker and Bud Reiff,
Transit Survey White Paper
Presentation transcript:

Summit in the Wasatch John Britting Wasatch Front Regional Council

Context – Fall 2001 First light rail line was very successful First light rail line was very successful Local transit priority was commuter rail Local transit priority was commuter rail Transit dedicated sales tax increase was passed Transit dedicated sales tax increase was passed Bold promises made re: CRT Bold promises made re: CRT Initial forecasts from corridor study were high (~35,000) and made FTA very uncomfortable Initial forecasts from corridor study were high (~35,000) and made FTA very uncomfortable Lawsuits over analytical methods Lawsuits over analytical methods My boss was handing over the reigns to me My boss was handing over the reigns to me

Step 1: Engage FTA Hired PB Consult to upgrade models Hired PB Consult to upgrade models Brought in FHWA/FTA for a focused peer review of models in January, 2002 Brought in FHWA/FTA for a focused peer review of models in January, 2002 Opened up the black box and welcomed feedback Opened up the black box and welcomed feedback Short-term and longer term priorities for model improvements were developed Short-term and longer term priorities for model improvements were developed Synopsis: make every step better in short-term Synopsis: make every step better in short-term

Priorities – FTA Perspective Estimate/calibrate & validate NL mode choice models using local data Estimate/calibrate & validate NL mode choice models using local data Pay close attention to path-building Pay close attention to path-building Identify CW/MD/NT markets Identify CW/MD/NT markets Incorporate segmentation into distribution Incorporate segmentation into distribution Consider handling unique markets differently (e.g. college trips and airport trips) Consider handling unique markets differently (e.g. college trips and airport trips) Thorough validation of network speeds Thorough validation of network speeds

Step 2: Progress as of 6/03 Borrow NL mode choice models and calibrate using local data (collected on-board data) Borrow NL mode choice models and calibrate using local data (collected on-board data) Little improvement to path-building Little improvement to path-building Identified CW/MD/NT markets Identified CW/MD/NT markets Did not incorporate segmentation into distribution Did not incorporate segmentation into distribution Used data on student addresses and an airport users survey to developed unique trip tables Used data on student addresses and an airport users survey to developed unique trip tables Thorough validation of network speeds Thorough validation of network speeds

Step 3: Continue Dialog Questions remained about forecasts Questions remained about forecasts High non-work benefits High non-work benefits Significant reverse commute Significant reverse commute Questions remained about validation Questions remained about validation Summarized rail trips by # transfers and attraction district for each trip purpose and auto segment (example next slide) Summarized rail trips by # transfers and attraction district for each trip purpose and auto segment (example next slide) Agreed on a range for forecasts and helped them tell the story with some confidence Agreed on a range for forecasts and helped them tell the story with some confidence CRT was given a “recommended” CRT was given a “recommended”

Step 4: Identify Illogical Benefits

Step 5: Progress as of 6/04 Estimated/calibrated & validated NL mode choice models using local data Estimated/calibrated & validated NL mode choice models using local data Transit path-building informed by on-board and model estimation (consistent weights; 95% of on-board records had access; reasonable xfer rates) Transit path-building informed by on-board and model estimation (consistent weights; 95% of on-board records had access; reasonable xfer rates) Identified CW/MD/NT markets Identified CW/MD/NT markets 0-car HBW distribution w/composite impedance 0-car HBW distribution w/composite impedance Used data on student addresses and an airport users survey to developed unique trip tables Used data on student addresses and an airport users survey to developed unique trip tables Thorough validation of auto speeds; model relating transit speeds to auto speeds Thorough validation of auto speeds; model relating transit speeds to auto speeds

Most Important Step - Validate Trips by purpose, market, period and mode Trips by purpose, market, period and mode Boardings by route and route group Boardings by route and route group District-level trip tables District-level trip tables Results from on-board assignment Results from on-board assignment % person trips with a transit path, by market % person trips with a transit path, by market % transit trips for each market by mode and transfers % transit trips for each market by mode and transfers % walk-rail that are walk-bus-rail % walk-rail that are walk-bus-rail Expressed constants/parameters in terms of IVT Expressed constants/parameters in terms of IVT

Threat 1 – naïve calibration/validation Extensive documentation Extensive documentation Asked FTA what they wanted to see Asked FTA what they wanted to see Built a calibration routine into models (in TP+) and several scripts to automate reporting of key indicators Built a calibration routine into models (in TP+) and several scripts to automate reporting of key indicators

Threat 2 – Incorrect Travel Markets Estimated, calibrated and validated a best- practice auto ownership model Estimated, calibrated and validated a best- practice auto ownership model 0-car HBW distribution 0-car HBW distribution College and Airport trip tables College and Airport trip tables

Threat 3 – Odd Properties FTA reviewed and commented on model estimation results, model functional form and implementation FTA reviewed and commented on model estimation results, model functional form and implementation Expressed all parameters and coefficients in terms of equivalent in-vehicle minutes Expressed all parameters and coefficients in terms of equivalent in-vehicle minutes

Threat 4 – Transit Path Builder Overhaul of walk/drive support link generation models Overhaul of walk/drive support link generation models Used initial estimation results to refine path- building weights Used initial estimation results to refine path- building weights Built MC estimation file 2-3 times Built MC estimation file 2-3 times Assigned transit on-board Assigned transit on-board Quality of O-D data Quality of O-D data Assure access where trips occurred Assure access where trips occurred Refine path-building parameters Refine path-building parameters

Threat 5 – Inaccurate Speeds Performed extensive auto speed data collection Performed extensive auto speed data collection Used data to calibrate and validate auto assignment Used data to calibrate and validate auto assignment Built model to forecast transit speeds from auto speeds; based on facility type and auto speed – model does a very good job Built model to forecast transit speeds from auto speeds; based on facility type and auto speed – model does a very good job

How we’ve used Summit Network quality control – does the distribution of benefits seem reasonable? Network quality control – does the distribution of benefits seem reasonable? Tell the story of who benefits Tell the story of who benefits LRP - benefits per capita analysis LRP - benefits per capita analysis Identify symptoms of quirks in the models Identify symptoms of quirks in the models

Concerns with Summit Process A lot of work for me A lot of work for me Not sure FTA has staff to go through similar process across the country Not sure FTA has staff to go through similar process across the country How do you get a baseline approved? How do you get a baseline approved? The cap has to be flexible The cap has to be flexible Old-school program Old-school program Summit proves models are not perfect, which we all should already understand Summit proves models are not perfect, which we all should already understand

Case for Higher Cap Differences in transit utility may reasonably exceed the cap of 45 minutes Differences in transit utility may reasonably exceed the cap of 45 minutes Travel time differences (IVT and OVT) Travel time differences (IVT and OVT) Transfer differences Transfer differences Unobserved attributes (i.e. constants) Unobserved attributes (i.e. constants) This assumes you minimize or eliminate This assumes you minimize or eliminate Coverage differences Coverage differences Service level differences Service level differences Access differences Access differences

Recommendations FTA should ask for specific items to be documented FTA should ask for specific items to be documented Process to justify cap increases Process to justify cap increases Process for defining range of key indicators Process for defining range of key indicators Modelers, not PM’s, need to open up to FTA early and often Modelers, not PM’s, need to open up to FTA early and often Work with Citilabs, Caliper, etc., to improve Summit Work with Citilabs, Caliper, etc., to improve Summit Recognize inherent imperfections and overcome most critical Recognize inherent imperfections and overcome most critical Start process early Start process early

Final Comment Our commuter rail forecast went down from 35,000 boardings to 26,000 and our forecast is much better.