Comparison of Arithmetic Mean Stage vs. Weighted Mean Stage in Refuge Compliance Calculations Cheol Mo, PhD Lead Environmental Scientist South Florida.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Line Efficiency     Percentage Month Today’s Date
Advertisements

Settlement Agreement April - September 2008 Prepared for the Technical Oversight Committee January 29, 2009.
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT REPORT October - December 2009 Technical Oversight Committee March 2, 2010 Pam Lehr Section Leader Restoration Sciences Department.
Unit Number Oct 2011 Nov 2011 Dec 2011 Jan 2012 Feb 2012 Mar 2012 Apr 2012 May 2012 Jun 2012 Jul 2012 Aug 2012 Sep (3/4 Unit) 7 8 Units.
HOW TO MAKE A CLIMATE GRAPH CLIMATE GRAPHING ASSIGNMENT PT.2.
Interim Update: Preliminary Analyses of Excursions in the A.R.M. Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge August 18, 2009 Prepared by SFWMD and FDEP as part.
Spatial Pattern of PM2.5 over the US PM2.5 FRM Network Analysis for the First Year: July 1999-June 2000 Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf.
San Gabriel Valley Water Forum August 28, Delta LA Aqueduct Colorado River Aqueduct Supplies State Water Project Supplies Sierra Mtns Local Groundwater.
Non Leap YearLeap Year DateDay NumberMod 7Day NumberMod 7 13-Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
Everglades Protection Area Tributary Basins Long-Term Plan for Achieving Water Quality Goals Everglades Protection Area Tributary Basins Long-Term Plan.
This is an example text TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING DecOctSepAugJulyJuneAprilMarchFebJanMayNov 12 Months Example text Go ahead and replace it with your own.
ProjectImpactResourcesDeadlineResourcesDeadline Forecast Plan Time Resources Risk 001xx 002xx 003xx 004xx 005xx 006xx 007xx TotalXX Example 1: Portfolio.
Using the Trapezoidal Model to Derate NW Hydro Capacity Resource Adequacy Technical Committee July 25, 2007 Portland, Oregon.
AUG SEPChange % Cong. Travel18.0%14.5%3.5% Travel Time Index Buffer Index PORTLAND CONGESTION REPORT September 2005 Month vs.
Jan 2016 Solar Lunar Data.
Olathe South ACT Timeline
Baltimore.
COSMO Priority Project ”Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts”
Q1 Jan Feb Mar ENTER TEXT HERE Notes
Average Monthly Temperature and Rainfall
ABT & Frequency.
Broward County Consolidated Communication Committee Update

I.E.S. Universidad Laboral
Nuffield Free-Standing Mathematics Activities Music Festival
Mammoth Caves National Park, Kentucky
2017 Jan Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Study 4 – Business Income Forms: Sum Insured; Loss Settlement
Gantt Chart Enter Year Here Activities Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
CORPUS CHRISTI CATHOLIC COLLEGE – GEOGRAPHY DEPARTMENT
FAY Dates School Year Traditional Fall 4x4 Spring 4x
FY 2019 Close Schedule Bi-Weekly Payroll governs close schedule
Calendar Year 2009 Insure Oklahoma Total & Projected Enrollment
MONTH CYCLE BEGINS CYCLE ENDS DUE TO FINANCE JUL /2/2015
Jan Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
2009 TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING 12 Months Example text Jan Feb March
HOW TO DRAW CLIMATE GRAPHS
©G Dear 2008 – Not to be sold/Free to use
FAY Dates School Year Traditional Fall 4x4 Spring 4x
Electricity Cost and Use – FY 2016 and FY 2017
A Climate Study of Daily Temperature Change From the Previous Day
ENTANGLEMENTS REPORTED
Safety Group Program Timeline
Independent Variables
©G Dear 2010 – Not to be sold/Free to use
2014 Advantage Program Timeline Guide *** Progress Visits ***

Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Operations Management Dr. Ron Lembke
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Births as per Civil Registration System,
Linear Transformations
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Objective - To make a line graph.
Belem Climate Data Table
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Value in Health Regional Issues
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3

TIMELINE NAME OF PROJECT Today 2016 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Safety Group Program Timeline
2009 TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING 12 Months Example text Jan Feb March
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Presentation transcript:

Comparison of Arithmetic Mean Stage vs. Weighted Mean Stage in Refuge Compliance Calculations Cheol Mo, PhD Lead Environmental Scientist South Florida Water Management District May 20, 2008

Calculation Methods for Average Stage in Refuge Current Method - Arithmetic Mean 1. Compute daily mean of 3 stages 2. Calculate arithmetic mean of daily mean stages Alternative Method – Weighted Mean 1. Compute daily mean of 3 stages 2. Weight daily mean by number of stations sampled 3. Divide sum of weighted daily stages by total number of stations sampled

Calculation of Mean Stage in Refuge ScenarioArithmetic vs. Weighted Mean Stage Number of Months* 1) All samples on same daySame15 2) Same number of samples on 2 days Same25 3a) Different number of samples on 2-3 days Same54 3b) Different number of samples on 2-3 days Slight Difference (<0.1 feet) 16 Total110 *Period of record: February 1999 – March 2008 (110 months)

Potential Compliance Impacts for Arithmetic vs. Weighted Mean Stage Month Year* Mean Stage Difference (feet) Interim Level Difference (ppb) Long-Term Level Difference (ppb) Compliance Affected? Jun noneNo Dec No Feb No Mar noneNo Apr none0.1No May No Jun noneNo Nov noneNo Apr none0.1No Apr No Sep none-0.1No May No Dec none0.1No Sep N/A0.2No *Mean stage differences in July 2000 and April 2002 did not impact interim or long-term levels.

Comparison of Arithmetic and Weighted Mean Stage No difference in mean stage in 94 of 110 months (85%) Very small difference in mean stage (<0.1 feet) resulted in  0.1 ppb change in interim or long- term levels in 16 of 110 months (15%) Differences in interim levels and long-term levels caused by rounding No difference in compliance status

Recommendations Sample all 14 compliance stations within 3 days Continue using an arithmetic mean to calculate the mean stage

Questions?