1 E. S. Hori, Maximum Gain Rule Maximum Gain Rule for Selecting Controlled Variables Eduardo Shigueo Hori, Sigurd Skogestad Norwegian University of Science.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tuning of PID controllers
Advertisements

Ramprasad Yelchuru, Optimal controlled variable selection for Individual process units, 1 Optimal controlled variable selection for individual process.
distillation column control
1 CONTROLLED VARIABLE AND MEASUREMENT SELECTION Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
1 Effective Implementation of optimal operation using Self- optimizing control Sigurd Skogestad Institutt for kjemisk prosessteknologi NTNU, Trondheim.
1 Fremtidige trender innen prosessoptimalisering Sigurd Skogestad Institutt for kjemisk prosessteknologi NTNU, Trondheim Effective Implementation of optimal.
1 M. Panahi ’Plantwide Control for Economically Optimal Operation of Chemical Plants’ Plantwide Control for Economically Optimal Operation of Chemical.
PID Tuning and Controllability Sigurd Skogestad NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Ramprasad Yelchuru, MIQP formulations for optimal controlled variables selection in Self Optimizing Control, 1/16 MIQP formulation for optimal controlled.
GHGT-8 Self-Optimizing and Control Structure Design for a CO 2 Capturing Plant Mehdi Panahi, Mehdi Karimi, Sigurd Skogestad, Magne Hillestad, Hallvard.
1 Self-optimizing control: Simple implementation of optimal operation Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science.
1 Coordinator MPC for maximization of plant throughput Elvira Marie B. Aske* &, Stig Strand & and Sigurd Skogestad* * Department of Chemical Engineering,
PSE and PROCESS CONTROL
1 1 Economic Plantwide Control, July 2015 ECONOMIC PLANTWIDE CONTROL Sigurd Skogestad Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and.
1 1 V. Minasidis et. al. | Simple Rules for Economic Plantwide ControlSimple Rules for Economic Plantwide Control, PSE & ESCAPE 2015 SIMPLE RULES FOR ECONOMIC.
1 Structure of the process control system Benefits from MPC (Model Predictive Control) and RTO (Real Time Optimization) Sigurd Skogestad Department of.
1 Outline Skogestad procedure for control structure design I Top Down Step S1: Define operational objective (cost) and constraints Step S2: Identify degrees.
1 A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO PLANTWIDE CONTROL Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Tecnology (NTNU) Trondheim,
1 Practical Implementation of Optimal Operation using Off-Line Computations Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of.
1 AN INTRODUCTION TO PLANTWIDE CONTROL Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Tecnology (NTNU) Trondheim,
1 A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO PLANTWIDE CONTROL Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Tecnology (NTNU) Trondheim,
1 A Plantwide Control Procedure Applied to the HDA Process Antonio Araújo and Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University.
1 Outline About Trondheim and myself Control structure design (plantwide control) A procedure for control structure design I Top Down Step 1: Degrees of.
1 Feedback: The simple and best solution. Applications to self-optimizing control and stabilization of new operating regimes Sigurd Skogestad Department.
1 Self-optimizing control Theory. 2 Step S3: Implementation of optimal operation Optimal operation for given d * : min u J(u,x,d) subject to: Model equations:
1 Active constraint regions for economically optimal operation of distillation columns Sigurd Skogestad and Magnus G. Jacobsen Department of Chemical Engineering.
Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering
1/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Self-optimizing control configurations for two-product distillation columns Eduardo Shigueo Hori, Sigurd Skogestad.
1 A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO PLANTWIDE CONTROL Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Tecnology (NTNU) Trondheim,
3) OBJECTIVE FUNCTION & DISTURBANCES Objective function: Assuming product prices are the same, p D = p S = p B and (p-p F ) = p’, with F given and Q =
1 Outline Control structure design (plantwide control) A procedure for control structure design I Top Down Step 1: Degrees of freedom Step 2: Operational.
Abstract An important issue in control structure selection is plant ”stabilization”. The paper presents a way to select measurement combinations c as controlled.
1 Selv-optimaliserende regulering Anvendelser mot prosessindustrien, biologi og maratonløping Sigurd Skogestad Institutt for kjemisk prosessteknologi,
1 Decentralized control Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Tecnology (NTNU) Trondheim, Norway.
1 From process control to business control: A systematic approach for CV-selection Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University.
1 Self-optimizing control From key performance indicators to control of biological systems Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian.
1 ECONOMIC PLANTWIDE CONTROL: Control structure design for complete processing plants Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University.
1 PLANTWIDE CONTROL Identifying and switching between active constraints regions Sigurd Skogestad and Magnus G. Jacobsen Department of Chemical Engineering.
1 Feedback: The simple and best solution. Applications to self-optimizing control and stabilization of new operating regimes Sigurd Skogestad Department.
1 Outline Skogestad procedure for control structure design I Top Down Step S1: Define operational objective (cost) and constraints Step S2: Identify degrees.
1 A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO PLANTWIDE CONTROL Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Tecnology (NTNU) Trondheim,
1 Self-optimizing control: Simple implementation of optimal operation Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science.
1 Feedback: The simple and best solution. Applications to self-optimizing control and stabilization of new operating regimes Sigurd Skogestad Department.
1 Unconstrained degrees of freedom: C. Optimal measurement combination (Alstad, 2002) Basis: Want optimal value of c independent of disturbances ) – 
1 Self-optimizing control Theory. 2 Outline Skogestad procedure for control structure design I Top Down Step S1: Define operational objective (cost) and.
1 A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO PLANTWIDE CONTROL ( ) Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Tecnology.
Control Structure Design: New Developments and Future Directions Vinay Kariwala and Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering NTNU, Trondheim,
1 Outline About Trondheim and myself Control structure design (plantwide control) A procedure for control structure design I Top Down Step 1: Degrees of.
1 Effective Implementation of optimal operation using Self- optimizing control Sigurd Skogestad Institutt for kjemisk prosessteknologi NTNU, Trondheim.
1 Self-optimizing control From key performance indicators to control of biological systems Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian.
1 Combination of Measurements as Controlled Variables for Self-optimizing Control Vidar Alstad † and Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering,
1 A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO PLANTWIDE CONTROL Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Tecnology (NTNU) Trondheim,
1 A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO PLANTWIDE CONTROL ( ) Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Tecnology.
Economic Plantwide Control:
Feedback: The simple and best solution
Ramprasad Yelchuru Sigurd Skogestad Henrik Manum
Sigurd Skogestad Institutt for kjemisk prosessteknologi
Example regulatory control: Distillation
PLANTWIDE CONTROL Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering
CONTROLLED VARIABLE AND MEASUREMENT SELECTION
Example : Optimal blending of gasoline
Sigurd Skogestad Institutt for kjemisk prosessteknologi
Economic plantwide control: A systematic approach for CV-selection
Vidar Alstad† and Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering,
Example regulatory control: Distillation
Example regulatory control: Distillation
Example regulatory control: Distillation
Optimal measurement selection for controlled variables in Kaibel Distillation Column: A MIQP formulation Ramprasad Yelchuru (PhD Candidiate) Professor.
Outline Control structure design (plantwide control)
Presentation transcript:

1 E. S. Hori, Maximum Gain Rule Maximum Gain Rule for Selecting Controlled Variables Eduardo Shigueo Hori, Sigurd Skogestad Norwegian University of Science and Technology – NTNU N-7491 Trondheim, Norway

2 E. S. Hori, Maximum Gain Rule Outline 1.Introduction: What should we control? 2.Self-optimizing Control 3.Maximum Gain Rule 4.Application: Indirect control of Distillation Column 5.Combination of Measurements 6.Conclusions

3 E. S. Hori, Maximum Gain Rule Optimal operation of Sprinter (100m) Objective function J=T What should we control ? –Active constraint control: Maximum speed (”no thinking required”)

4 E. S. Hori, Maximum Gain Rule Optimal operation of Marathon runner Objective function J=T Unconstrained optimum What should we control? –Any ”self-optimizing” variable c (to control at constant setpoint)? c 1 = distance to leader of race c 2 = speed c 3 = heart rate c 4 = ”pain” (lactate in muscles)

5 E. S. Hori, Maximum Gain Rule 2. What is a good variable c to control? Self-optimizing control … is when acceptable operation can be achieved using constant set points (c s ) for the controlled variables c (without the need for re-optimizing when disturbances occur). Desirable properties for a ”self-optimizing” CV (c) : - Small optimal variation (”obvious”) - Large sensitivity (large gain from u to c) (ref. Moore, 1992) - Small implementation error (”obvious”)

6 E. S. Hori, Maximum Gain Rule How do we find ”self-optimizing” variables in a systematic manner? Assume cost J determined by steady-state behavior Effective tool for screening: MAXIMUM GAIN RULE c – candidate controlled variable (CV) u – independent variable (MV) G – steady-state gain matrix (c = G u) G’ = S 1 G S 2 - scaled gain matrix S 1 – output scaling S 2 = J uu -1/2 – input ”scaling” Maximum gain rule: Maximize This presentation: Importance of input scaling, S 2 = J uu -1/2

7 E. S. Hori, Maximum Gain Rule u cost J u opt c = G u Halvorsen, I.J., S. Skogestad, J. Morud and V. Alstad (2003). ”Optimal selection of controlled variables”. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 42(14), 3273– Maximum Gain Rule: Derivation

8 E. S. Hori, Maximum Gain Rule 3. Maximum Gain Rule: Derivation (2) Maximum Gain Rule Simplified Maximum Gain Rule

9 E. S. Hori, Maximum Gain Rule 3. Maximum Gain Rule: Output Scaling S 1 The outputs are scaled with respect to their ”span”:

10 E. S. Hori, Maximum Gain Rule 3. Maximum Gain Rule: Input Scaling S 2

11 E. S. Hori, Maximum Gain Rule 4. Application: indirect control Selection/Combination of measurements Primary variables Disturbances Measurements Noise Inputs Constant setpoints

12 E. S. Hori, Maximum Gain Rule

13 E. S. Hori, Maximum Gain Rule Column Data Column A: - Binary mixture - 50% light component -  AB = stages (total condenser) - 1% heavy in top - 1% light in bottom

14 E. S. Hori, Maximum Gain Rule Application to distillation Selection/Combination of measurements, e.g. select two temperatures Primary variables: x H top, x L btm Disturbances: F, z F, q F Measurements: All T’s + inputs (flows) Noise (meas. Error) 0.5C on T Inputs: L, V

15 E. S. Hori, Maximum Gain Rule Distillation Column: Output Scaling S 1

16 E. S. Hori, Maximum Gain Rule Distillation Column: Input Scaling S 2 =J uu -1/2

17 E. S. Hori, Maximum Gain Rule Distillation Column: Maximum Gain rule Select two temperatures (symmetrically located) This case: Input scaling (J uu -1/2 ) does not change order….

18 E. S. Hori, Maximum Gain Rule Distillation Column: Maximum Gain rule and effect of Input Scaling

19 E. S. Hori, Maximum Gain Rule 5. Linear combination of Measurements Consider temperatures only (41): Nullspace method: Possible to achive no disturbance loss : –Need as many measurements as u’s + d’s: need 4 T’s Two-step approach (”nullspace method”): 1.Select measurements (4 T’s): Maximize min. singular value of 2. Calculate H-matrix that gives no disturbance loss:

20 E. S. Hori, Maximum Gain Rule 5. Combination of Measurements 2. Same 4 T’s, but minimize for both d and n: J= Nullspace method: Composition deviation: J=0.82 (caused by meas. error n ) Alternative approaches: 3. Optimal combination of any 4 T’s: J=0.44 (branch & bound; Kariwala/Cao) 4. Optimal combination of all 41 T’s: J=0.23

21 E. S. Hori, Maximum Gain Rule 6. Conclusions Identify candidate CVs Simplified Maximum Gain Rule, - easy to apply – J uu not needed - usually good assumption Maximum Gain Rule: - results very close to exact local method (but not exact) - better for ill-conditioned plants