Deaton US History.   What Rights do you have as a citizen? Citizen Rights.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Lincoln-Douglas Debates: Video (2:13)

Advertisements

CHAPTER 16.3: THE DREDD SCOTT DECISION. FACTS 1.Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri. (MO) 2. Scott and his owner moved to Wisconsin for four years. 3.

The Crisis Turns Violent Why did a civil war break out in Kansas? How did the Dred Scott decision divide the nation?

Dred Scott v Sanford. Who was Dred Scott? A slave born around the 1800’s Married fellow slave: Harriet Robinson 2 children: Eliza and Lizzie Died: Sept.

Dred Scott And The case for freedom By: Nate Widitor And The case for freedom By: Nate Widitor.

The Dred Scott Decision

Continued Increase in Tension Over Slavery. Do Now: Read the brief background info below on Dred Scott. Then read Chief Justice Taney’s Court Decision.

Unit 9: Lecture 5 Significant Slavery Legislation Part II Mr. Smith 8 th grade U.S. History January 22 nd, 2012.

Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857). Background: The Missouri Compromise 1803: U.S. purchases Louisiana Territory from France 1820: Compromise allows slavery.

PRE-CIVIL WAR NOTES. Missouri Compromise (1820) 1. Missouri Compromise (1820) a. Maine enters as a Free State b. Missouri enters as a Slave State c. No.

 Dred Scott v. J. A. Sanford (1857).   Who was Dred Scott?  Events Affecting Dred Scott’s fate  Timeline of Events  The Two Sides of the Issue 

Objectives:. Bellringer: What was the Missouri Compromise?

A Nation Divided Political Divisions Chapter 15, Section 3 Pages

Causes of the Civil War and The Election of 1860 We will look at events that polarized the country, including the 1860 election. We’ll compare that election.

Causes of the Civil War. What was the Civil War  War between the Northern U.S. States and the Southern U.S. States  Lasted 4 years:  Brother.

The Court ruled that Scott's "sojourn" of two years to Illinois and the Northwest Territory did not make him free once he returned to Missouri.

Griffin Honeycutt Block 2 October 29,  Official Name- Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford  The defendant’s name was actually Sanford, but was misspelled.

By Alexander M. Barker. Born as a slave in the late 1700s Owned by the Blow family Parents are unknown Lived in Southampton County, VA Moved to Alabama;

V. Sanford Dred Scott A presentation presented by Paola Garcia.

Bell Work In your notebooks, respond to the prompt: How can differences among students affect the school? What kinds of differences could lead to problems.

Chapter 15, Section 3 Challenges to Slavery.

YOU MUST WRITE EVERYTHING DOWN, UNLESS I TELL YOU OTHERWISE.

By: Mireina Barrios. Dred Scott and Roger B. Taney Dred Scott, a slave who had his freedom at Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving.

Emerson DeLoach Elicia Bilyeu Isidro Hernandez Noah Hickman Supreme Court Cases.

 By: Kylisha Smith and Hasan Evans.  Dred is an slave who lived in the free state of Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving back.

Fill in your “Describing Historical Event” handout using the following PowerPoint presentation. If you need extra space use the back of your handout. Aim:

APUSH – Spiconardi.   In the 1830s, Dred Scott, a slave, accompanied his owner from Missouri to Illinois and later the territory of Wisconsin  Scott.

What lead to the Civil War. Missouri Compromise 1819 Missouri asks to join the United States as a slave state – South wanted it to be a slave state –

Bell Ringer  Who was Stephen Douglas?  Why was he important to the politics of slavery?  Take out your homework (#3 on page 331) to be checked in.

Objective: To examine the importance of the Lincoln – Douglas debates and the Dred Scott decision.

Chapter 15 Section 3 1.Republican Party A. Founded by Northern Whigs and others who were anti slavery B. Became strong in the North.

Supreme Court Cases Setting the Precedent. John Marshall Helped make the Supreme Court the powerful institution it is today Presided over several important.

Slavery in the 1850s: Changing National Politics Chapter 10 Section 3.

Lesson 18: The Union in Peril part 7

Dred Scott Decision (1857).

APUSH Review: Dred Scott v. Sanford Everything You Need to Know About Dred Scott v. Sanford To Succeed In APUSH

Dred Scott v. Sandford By Chloe Sturges. Overview Dred Scott, a slave in the 1800s, was taken out of Missouri, a slave state, by his owner John Emerson.

Dred Scott Decision (1857).

Ch. 15, Section 3: Challenges to Slavery pg. 445  Main Idea: Social, economic, and political differences divided the North and South.  Key Terms:  Arsenal.

By Greg Munetz. He was born a slave in 1795 in Southampton County, Virginia He was industrious and intelligent, he served as a farmhand, a stevedore,

Peyton Waters and John McArthur 2A DRED SCOTT V. SANDFORD(1857)

Dred Scott V. Sanford 1858 Julien Mercier and Kendal Kulp.

By: Mireina Barrios. Dred Scott and Roger B. Taney Dred Scott, a slave who had his freedom at Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving.

Back to the 1850’s… Law in the 1850’s. Rights of African Americans Still the Fugitive Slave Act Whether free or slave you could NOT be citizen Still segregation.

Dred Scott v. Sandford A Supreme Court Decision in 1857.

Slavery and Secession. The Birth of the Republican Party.

Slavery Divides the Nation. The Dred Scott Case Dred Scott was a slave who traveled with his master from Missouri (slave state) to Illinois & Wisconsin.

Dred Scott.  I can explain how the Dred Scott Court decision impacted African Americans during the time before the Civil War.

Ch:14 The Nation Divided :3 The Crisis Deepens.

WhoA Missouri slave What When Where Why Concept Development: Dredd Scott was a slave who argued for his freedom to the Supreme Court. Dredd Scott vs. Sanford.

The Civil War and Reconstruction 1-1:Causes of the Civil War Pro-slavery and anti- slavery settlers killing each other in Kansas.

21.6 & 21.7: The Dred Scott Case & Decision Page

On your own and on the worksheet provided: 1) Write a definition for the word property. 2) List some examples of property.

Factors Leading to Sectional Division. Compromise of 1850 Proposed by Senator Henry Clay of Kentucky California admitted to the Union as a free state.

Political Divisions Chapter 15, Section 3.

Causes of the Civil War.

Dred Scott Decision 1857.

Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)

Opener – Copy into Notebook pp. 84

Background: Who was Dred Scott?

Dred Scott v. Sanford.

Famous Abolitionists.

FOA 2/29/16 1. What did the Kansas-Nebraska Act actually do?

The Compromise Missouri Compromise (1820)

Political Divisions Chapter 18 - Section 3.

And The case for freedom

8X Tuesday Objective: Describe political developments in the US that led to Civil War. Agenda: Do Now: Explain the rise of the Republican Party.

Warm up: Review Previous Lessons

Dred Scott Decision (1857).

Presentation transcript:

Deaton US History

  What Rights do you have as a citizen? Citizen Rights

  Born as a Slave in Virginia  Bought by John Emerson and Army surgeon of Missouri - _______________ state.  Scott was taken to military bases in free states like Illinois.  In fact he was allowed to marry (Harriet)  When they came back to Missouri John died and Scott was turned over to Eliza Emerson. Background

  Scott attempted to purchase his freedom from Eliza.  She refused.  He sued and won in 1846, but Eliza appealed to a higher court and she won in  She moves to Massachusetts and transfers the representation in the case to her brother John Sanford.  In 1857 the case reaches the Supreme Court. The Case

  It was led by Robert Taney who replaced John Marshal.  A southerner who emancipated his own slaves and gave them pensions when they were too old to work.  Led the judges to a very large decision that includes overturning law. The Supreme Court

  Free slaves were not considered citizens of the U.S. and slaves were the property of their owners. Therefore:  Even free AA could not sue in Federal Court because they were not citizens.  Slaves brought into a state were the property of their owners, so had no rights as citizens.  The Missouri Compromise was determined to be unconstitutional since slaves were property.  This caused fear to the anti-slavery north b/c they thought this would lead to open slavery in the Western Territories. The Decision

  What ?’s do you have?  What are your thoughts about the case? One paragraph DOK 3 Questions and Thoughts