Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study Objectives and Questions for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Advertisements

Desktop Business Analytics -- Decision Intelligence l Time Series Forecasting l Risk Analysis l Optimization.
ICS 442 Software Project Management
Chapter 3 Program Management and Project Evaluation Professor Hossein Saiedian McGraw-Hill Education ISBN
6 - 1 Lecture 4 Analysis Using Spreadsheets. Five Categories of Spreadsheet Analysis Base-case analysis What-if analysis Breakeven analysis Optimization.
Exploring uncertainty in cost effectiveness analysis NICE International and HITAP copyright © 2013 Francis Ruiz NICE International (acknowledgements to:
Risk Analysis & Management. Phases Initial Risk Assessment Risk Analysis Risk Management and Mitigation.
Measuring and Monitoring Program Outcomes
Economic Analysis and Management Todd Wagner, PhD.
Recommendations for Conducting Cost Effectiveness: Elements of the Reference Case Ciaran S. Phibbs, Ph.D. February 25, 2009.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation
Risk Management and Strategy Prioritisation Intelligence Step 8 - Risk Management and Strategy Prioritisaiton Considering the risks associated with action.
1© 2013 by Nelson Education Ltd. CHAPTER TWELVE The Costs and Benefits of Training.
Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) Illustrated by the California GAIN Random Assignment Experiment.
Budget Impact Analysis and Return on Investment Usa Chaikledkaew, Ph.D.
Assignment 2 Case Study. Criteria Weightage - 60 % Due Date – 11 th October 2012 Length of Analysis – 2500 words Leverage % including appendices,
Planning for Sustainability: Framework and Process LifeSkills Training Webinar Series October 27, 2010.
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
Economic Evaluations, Briefly… CHSC 433 Module 6/Chapter 13 UIC School of Public Health L. Michele Issel, PhD, R N.
Introduction ► This slide deck provides a suggested framework for the financial evaluation of an investment project. When evaluating any such project,
1 Analytical Tools, Data & Scenarios Workshop July 29, 2004 California Water Plan Update 2004.
Cost-Effectiveness Problem l You have a $1.5 billion budget to spend on any combination of these programs:
Product Evaluation the outcome phase. Do the magic bullets work? How do you know when an innovative educational program has “worked”? How do you know.
Robustness in assessment of strategic transport projects The 21st International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making Jyväskylä June
University of Sunderland CIFM02 Unit 3 COMM02 Project Evaluation Unit 3.
1 Our Expertise and Commitment – Driving your Success An Introduction to Transformation Offering November 18, 2013 Offices in Boston, New York and Northern.
Shelter Training 08b – Belgium, 16 th –18 th November, 2008 based on content developed by p This session describes the benefits of developing a strategic.
State Smart Transportation Initiative October 9, 2014 Matthew Garrett Oregon DOT Director Erik Havig Oregon DOT Planning Section Manager.
Outcomes based approach to measuring the impact of new technology Vikas Arya HSCI 740 Spring 2004 May 22,2004.
Leapfrog Hospital Rewards Program™: Implementation Options Catherine Eikel February 6, 2006.
Shifting resources: disinvestment and re-investment Craig Mitton, PhD Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research.
GOOD INTENTIONS : USING DATA TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE 1 Prepared & Presented By: Renata Cobbs Fletcher Consultant, M.H. West & Co. Persistently Dangerous.
1 Economic Evaluation of Climate Change Adaptation Measures in the Caribbean: A Methodology Change Ms.Sophia Terrelonge.
Unit 3: Promoting Your Program CERT Program Manager.
EHR Goal Setting and Impact on Quality of Care
Copyright © 2006 by Applied Strategies Consulting. All rights reserved. Applied Strategies Consulting 400 S El Camino Real, Suite 375 San Mateo, CA
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 2006McGraw-Hill/Irwin 12 Financial and Cost- Volume-Profit Models.
1 Designing Effective Programs: –Introduction to Program Design Steps –Organizational Strategic Planning –Approaches and Models –Evaluation, scheduling,
UNDP Handbook for conducting technology needs assessments and Preliminary analysis of countries’ TNAs UNFCCC Seminar on the development and transfer on.
NCAR’s Societal Impacts Program: WIST-Related Research Efforts Julie Demuth NCAR Societal Impacts Program 3 rd National Surface Transportation Weather.
1 of 27 How to invest in Information for Development An Introduction Introduction This question is the focus of our examination of the information management.
The Development of BPR Pertemuan 6 Matakuliah: M0734-Business Process Reenginering Tahun: 2010.
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
Copyright  2005 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Australian Human Resources Management by Jeremy Seward and Tim Dein Slides prepared by Michelle.
Advice on Data Used to Measure Outcomes Friday 20 th March 2009.
Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) Illustrated by the California GAIN Random Assignment Experiment.
Covered California: Promoting Health Equity and Reducing Health Disparities Covered California Board Meeting March 21, 2013.
Flagship Program on Health Sector Reform and Sustainable Financing.
Including School Stakeholders. There are many individuals and groups associated with schools and many of these people are likely to have valuable ideas.
Program Evaluation Overview. Definitions of Program Evaluation systematic collection of information abut the activities, characteristics, and outcome.
Identifying and Analyzing Stakeholders and Their Interests
Program Evaluation Principles and Applications PAS 2010.
John N. Lavis, MD, PhD Professor and Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Transfer and Exchange McMaster University Program in Policy Decision-Making McMaster.
Benefit-Cost Analysis: ATP Experience Jeanne Powell Economic Consultant Technology Program Evaluation: Methodologies from the Advanced.
Evaluating Engagement Judging the outcome above the noise of squeaky wheels Heather Shaw, Department of Sustainability & Environment Jessica Dart, Clear.
Medium-Term Debt Management Strategy (MTDS): A Framework MDB Meeting on Debt Issues July 10, 2008.
CRJS 4466 PROGRAM & POLICY EVALUATION LECTURE #6 Evaluation projects Questions?
A Professional Development Series from the CDC’s Division of Population Health School Health Branch Professional Development 101: The Basics – Part 1.
Development of Gender Sensitive M&E: Tools and Strategies.
CONVENTION & DESTINATION MARKETING Prepared by Yooshik Yoon, Kyunghee University
Copyright 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation.
1 Edward Broughton, PhD., MPH Director of Research and Evaluation, USAID Health Care Improvement Project, University Research Co., LLC
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Joy Hsu, M.S, M.D., Medical Officer National Center for Environmental Health Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects Centers for Disease Control.
Part I Project Initiation.
Strategic Information Systems Planning
Analysis Using Spreadsheets
4.2 Identify intervention outputs
Regulatory Impact Analysis: Overview
Presentation transcript:

Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Context Context CE Sustainability RFP: 8 projects Technical assistance available o Webinar series o Individual calls Contribution to the field Other Sustainability TA underway

Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement Carla Zema, PhD Zema Consulting July 18, 2013

Outline Importance Recap of ROI from Sustainability Workshop Articulating Value – Understanding Different Methods Review of Key Elements of Analysis Determining Costs and Benefits Valuing Benefits Conclusion and Next Steps

Importance One of the great mistakes is to judge policies and programs by their intentions rather than their results -- Milton Friedman

More Effective Less Effective More Costly Less Costly ADOPT DO NOT ADOPT Tradeoff to consider Weighing Effectiveness and Cost

Use of results Justify implementation to internal and/or external stakeholders Interest potential partners, such as funders, community partners Justify use of resources Complement other evaluations

ROI Template ElementContents DescriptionScope of the activity or program Audience/point of viewStakeholders/funder(s) who will obtain ROI from participation Financial benefitsHard dollar categories, $ for each Strategic benefitsDescription with $ if possible Intangible benefitsDescription, qualitative value CostsHard dollar costs; other costs a stakeholder might want to include Additional componentse.g., time, probability of success ROICalculation and/or qualitative evaluation AF4Q Sustainability Workshop, 2013

A rose by any other name… ROI Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA)

Comparison of Methods CEACBAROI Basic calculati on Cost-effectiveness ratio = Total costs Measure of effectiveness Net benefit = Total benefit-Total costs Ratio = Total benefits/Total costs ROI = Net benefit Total cost ResultCost per measure of effectiveness (or incremental/margin al cost per unit measure of effectiveness) Net benefit valued in dollars Ratio results in number greater than or less than 1 Percentage

Comparison of Methods CEACBAROI Pros Easy to compare programs with similar outcomes Useful if outcomes are difficult to value Results are in dollars making interpretation easy Useful when considering only one program and/or when programs have different outcomes Easy interpretation “ROI” more widely known Cons Measure of effectiveness can be awkward to interpret Difficult to use if more than one benefit Can be difficult to value benefits Indirect or intangible benefits are often not included

Steps to Conduct an Analysis Define the framework for the analysis Determine the perspective of the analysis Decide on the timeframe for the analysis Define the population Identify and measure the costs and benefits Value the benefits (for a CBA) Discount (depending on timeframe) Calculate results Conduct a sensitivity analysis Use results for decision-making

Define the Framework What is the overall objective? Which options are being considered? How will effectiveness be measured? What is the status quo? (What if no action is taken?) Will the analysis be prospective, retrospective, or concurrent? Will a CEA or CBA be conducted?

Determine the Perspective of the Analysis Critical to defining the costs and benefits Must be maintained throughout the analysis May or may not be the primary audience for the results Examples: o Funders o Payers o Practice o Employers o Societal

Decide on Timeframe Must be clearly defined Considerations: o Does program have a specific timeframe for implementation? o When would results be expected? o What timeframe is meaningful to the primary audience for the results?

Define the Population Considerations: o Particular subgroup of patients or practices? o Certain geography (e.g. state, county)? o Types of practices? o Multiple systems? o Types of payers? o All practices or just those with a certain number of patients/provider?

Identify and Measure the Costs and Benefits Categories: o Direct o Indirect o Intangible Include only actual or real costs and benefits that are beyond the status quo Do not include transfers Handling missing data

Value the Benefits for a CBA or ROI For a CBA or ROI, benefits must be valued Can be “gains” or “costs avoided” Options: o Market value of benefit o Downstream financial impact of the benefit Make sure the valuations are realistic and meaningful to stakeholders

Discounting Costs and benefits should be discounted if greater than one year No consensus on standard discount rate Range of 3%-5% with 4% commonly used for social program

Calculate Results Spreadsheet software such as Microsoft Excel make calculations simple and transparent Keep each costs and benefit as well as quantities and rates as separate cells to increase transparency and make changes easier Results cells are then simply functions that calculate the results

Conduct a Sensitivity Analysis Opportunity to explore the variation in the results if inputs are modified Helpful given that some inputs have some uncertainty or a range of possible values Two types: o Partial o Extreme case

Partial Sensitivity Analysis One input variable is varied at a time while holding all other values constant Compare new results with base case results Consider varying variables: o representing assumptions that were made for the analysis o that have a range of possible values o that were estimated due to missing or unavailable data o that have uncertain values

Tornado Diagram Example Payer mix Reimbursement rate P4P incentive Increase in improvement Number of providers Number of practice staff Practice volume Cost of training Number of patient partners

Extreme Case Sensitivity Analysis Similar to partial sensitivity analysis in terms of variables to vary in the analysis Instead of one variable at a time, all variables that are selected are varying simultaneously o Once in a “best-case” scenario o Again in a “worst-case” scenario

Summary CEAs/CBAs are not a silver bullet and do not provide a definitive answer Offer important information to inform decision-making and complement other evaluation information on effectiveness Critical component of any program or project evaluation

Next Steps Webinar series will walk you through the process Homework : o Finalize framework o Begin to identify costs and benefits Individual technical assistance is available Next webinar will be opportunity to get group feedback

Contact Information Carla Zema, PhD Zema Consulting (724)