PRECIPITATION-RUNOFF MODELING SYSTEM (PRMS) SNOW MODELING OVERVIEW.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PROCESS-BASED, DISTRIBUTED WATERSHED MODELS New generation Source waters and flowpaths Physically based.
Advertisements

C2 NWS Snow Model. C2 Snow Model Terms  SWE - Snow water equivalent  AESC - Areal extent of snow cover  Heat Deficit - Energy required to bring the.
The Color Colour of Snow and its Interpretation from Imaging Spectrometry.
Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting Model (SAC-SMA)
Modeling Rainfall Runoff and Snowmelt in the Pine Flat Watershed By Rachael Hersh-Burdick USACE Water Management Sacramento District UC Davis Civil and.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Snow hydrology ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
Hydrological Modeling FISH 513 April 10, Overview: What is wrong with simple statistical regressions of hydrologic response on impervious area?
Hydrologic/Watershed Modeling Glenn Tootle, P.E. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Nevada, Las Vegas
CNRFC Operational Flood Forecasting Pete Fickenscher Hydrologist California-Nevada River Forecast Center National Weather Service October 18, 2006.
Outline Background, climatology & variability Role of snow in the global climate system Indicators of climate change Future projections & implications.
A Macroscale Glacier Model to Evaluate Climate Change Impacts in the Columbia River Basin Joseph Hamman, Bart Nijssen, Dennis P. Lettenmaier, Bibi Naz,
ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology
Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Water Supply Forecasting Method Michelle Stokes Hydrologist in Charge Colorado Basin River Forecast Center April 28,
CRFS March 30, Virgin River NWS-SWS: 90 NWS-ESP: (+8-15% El Nino weighted) NRCS daily: 80 NRCS statistical: 78 Coordinated: 80 / 195% median.
MODELING OF COLD SEASON PROCESSES Snow Ablation and Accumulation Frozen Ground Processes.
WaterSmart, Reston, VA, August 1-2, 2011 Steve Markstrom and Lauren Hay National Research Program Denver, CO Jacob LaFontaine GA Water.
Great Valley Water Resources Science Forum
Distinct properties of snow
These notes are provided to help you pay attention IN class. If I notice poor attendance, fewer notes will begin to appear on these pages Snow Measuring.
Advances in Macroscale Hydrology Modeling for the Arctic Drainage Basin Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University.
AWRA Water Resources Conference Jacksonville, FL, November Modeling of Watershed Systems Lauren Hay Steve Markstrom Steve Regan.
Estimating Continental-Scale Water Balance through Remote Sensing Huilin Gao 1, Dennis P. Lettenmaier 1 Craig Ferguson 2, Eric F. Wood 2 1 Dept. of Civil.
Assessment of Hydrology of Bhutan What would be the impacts of changes in agriculture (including irrigation) and forestry practices on local and regional.
PRECIPITATION-RUNOFF MODELING SYSTEM (PRMS) MODELING OVERVIEW & DAILY MODE COMPONENTS.
1 Mike Smith, Victor Koren, Ziya Zhang, Brian Cosgrove, Zhengtao Cui, Naoki Mizukami OHD/HL Hydrologic Science and Modeling Branch Introduction Lecture.
NWS Calibration Workshop, LMRFC March, 2009 Slide 1 Analysis of Evaporation Basic Calibration Workshop March 10-13, 2009 LMRFC.
Coupling of Atmospheric and Hydrologic Models: A Hydrologic Modeler’s Perspective George H. Leavesley 1, Lauren E. Hay 1, Martyn P. Clark 2, William J.
Preliminary Applications of the HL-RDHM within the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Ed Clark, Hydrologist Presented July 26 th, 2007 as part of the.
LL-III physics-based distributed hydrologic model in Blue River Basin and Baron Fork Basin Li Lan (State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower.
Integration of SNODAS Data Products and the PRMS Model – An Evaluation of Streamflow Simulation and Forecasting Capabilities George Leavesley 1, Don Cline.
Reducing Canada's vulnerability to climate change - ESS J28 Earth Science for National Action on Climate Change Canada Water Accounts AET estimates for.
Estimating ET Type of method used will be determined by: 1. Type of surface (e.g. open water vs. leaf) 2. Availability of water for evaporation
MODSCAG fractional snow covered area (fSCA )for central and southern Sierra Nevada Spatial distribution of snow water equivalent across the central and.
PRECIPITATION-RUNOFF MODELING SYSTEM (PRMS) SNOW MODELING OVERVIEW.
Estimating the Spatial Distribution of Snow Water Equivalent and Snowmelt in Mountainous Watersheds of Semi-arid Regions Noah Molotch Department of Hydrology.
Hydrologic Equation Inflow = outflow +/- Changes in storage Equation is simple statement of mass conservation.
September 16, 2008 R. Edward Beighley Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering San Diego State University SWOT Hydrology Workshop The Ohio State.
Evaluating Utah Energy Balance Snowmelt Model in Operational Forecasting John A Koudelka David Tarboton Utah State University 3/26/2015.
Remote sensing for surface water hydrology RS applications for assessment of hydrometeorological states and fluxes –Soil moisture, snow cover, snow water.
Printed by Introduction: The nature of surface-atmosphere interactions are affected by the land surface conditions. Lakes (open water.
Understanding hydrologic changes: application of the VIC model Vimal Mishra Assistant Professor Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Gandhinagar
Spatial distribution of snow water equivalent across the central and southern Sierra Nevada Roger Bales, Robert Rice, Xiande Meng Sierra Nevada Research.
Additional data sources and model structure: help or hindrance? Olga Semenova State Hydrological Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia Pedro Restrepo Office.
INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS for a safer, better world Capability of passive microwave and SNODAS SWE estimates for hydrologic predictions in selected U.S. watersheds.
A Soil-water Balance and Continuous Streamflow Simulation Model that Uses Spatial Data from a Geographic Information System (GIS) Advisor: Dr. David Maidment.
1 National HIC/RH/HQ Meeting ● January 27, 2006 version: FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS.
Fine-Resolution, Regional-Scale Terrestrial Hydrologic Fluxes Simulated with the Integrated Landscape Hydrology Model (ILHM) David W Hyndman Anthony D.
1 Understanding Sources of Error and Uncertainty NOAA’S COLORADO BASIN RIVER FORECAST CENTER.
Parameterisation by combination of different levels of process-based model physical complexity John Pomeroy 1, Olga Semenova 2,3, Lyudmila Lebedeva 2,4.
PRECIPITATION-RUNOFF MODELING SYSTEM (PRMS) STORM-MODE COMPONENTS.
PRECIPITATION-RUNOFF MODELING SYSTEM (PRMS) MODELING OVERVIEW & DAILY MODE COMPONENTS.
Surface Net SW Radiation Latitude Clouds Albedo Source Reanalysis for
Performance Comparison of an Energy- Budget and the Temperature Index-Based (Snow-17) Snow Models at SNOTEL Stations Fan Lei, Victor Koren 2, Fekadu Moreda.
General Introduction. Developed by USGS Freely available via Internet
ENVI 412 Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurement Dr. Philip B. Bedient Rice University.
An advanced snow parameterization for the models of atmospheric circulation Ekaterina E. Machul’skaya¹, Vasily N. Lykosov ¹Hydrometeorological Centre of.
TOP_PRMS George Leavesley, Dave Wolock, and Rick Webb.
(Srm) model application: SRM was developed by Martinec (1975) in small European basins. With the progress of satellite remote sensing of snow cover, SRM.
Integrated measurements & modeling of Sierra Nevada water budgets UCM PI: Roger Bales LLNL Co-PI: Reed Maxwell.
Upper Rio Grande R Basin
Use of Extended Daily Hydroclimatalogical Records to Assess Hydrologic Variability in the Pacific Northwest Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
GIS in Water Resources Term Project Fall 2004 Michele L. Reba
DES 606 : Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS
Kostas Andreadis and Dennis Lettenmaier
Kostas M. Andreadis1, Dennis P. Lettenmaier1
DHSVM Distributed Hydrology Soil Vegetation Model
Challenges & opportunities: water resources information systems
Hydrology CIVL341.
Forests, water & research in the Sierra Nevada
Hydrology CIVL341 Introduction
Presentation transcript:

PRECIPITATION-RUNOFF MODELING SYSTEM (PRMS) SNOW MODELING OVERVIEW

PRMS

PRMS Parameters original version

PRMS Parameters MMS Version

SNOW PROPERTIES Porous media Undergoes metamorphosis Surface albedo changes with time Density increases with time Has a free-water holding capacity

Energy Balance Formulation Hm = Hsn + Hln + Hc + He + Hg + Hp + Hq Temperature-Index Formulation M = Cm * ( Ta - Tb) Modifications Seasonal adjustment to Cm Vary Cm for forest and open Use equation only for non rain days Account for Hg and Hq

Snowpack Energy Balance Components

Energy Balance Formulation Hm = Hsn + Hln + Hc + He + Hg + Hp + Hq Model Formulation (on each HRU) PRMS SNOW MODEL Hsn = swrad * (1. - albedo) * rad_trncf Hln = emis * sb_const * tavg 4 (   T 4) Hc + He = cecn_coef(mo) * tavg (ppt days) = 0 (dry days) Hp = tavg * net_precip Hg assumed 0 Hq is computed

Snow Surface Albedo vs Time

Solar Radiation Transmission Coefficient vs Cover Density

Net Longwave Radiation Hlw = (1. - covden_win) * [(emis * air) -snow)] emis = emis_noppt no precip = 1.0 precip air and snow = sb_const * tavg 4 [ (   T 4 )  where tavg is temp of air and temp of snow surface + covden_win * (air -snow)

Energy Balance Formulation Hm = Hsn + Hln + Hc + He + Hg + Hp + Hq Model Formulation PRMS SNOW MODEL Hsn = SWRin * (1. - ALBEDO) * TRNCF Hln =   T 4 Hc + He = Cce * Tavg (ppt days) = 0 (dry days) Hp = Tavg * PTN Hg assumed 0 Hq is computed

SNOWPACK DYNAMICS 2-layered system energy balance: 2 12-hour periods energy exchange between layers -- conduction and mass transfer Tsurface = min(tavg or 0 o C) Tpack is computed density = f(time, settlement constant) albedo decay = f(time, melt) melt volume: use depth-area depletion curve

Areal Snow Depletion Curve

MELT SEQUENCE cal_net > 0 snowmelt = cal_net / pk_temp < 0 o C refreeze to satisfy pk_def pk_temp = 0 o C satisfy free water holding capacity(freeh2o_cap) remaining snowmelt reaches the soil surface

Max Temperature-Elevation Relations

TEMPERATURE tmax(hru) = obs_tmax(hru_tsta) - tcrx(mo) tmin(hru) = obs_tmin(hru_tsta) - tcrx(mo) tcrx(mo) = [ tmax_lapse(mo) * elfac(hru)] - For each HRU where elfac(hru) = [hru_elev - tsta_elev(hru_tsta)] / tmax_adj(hru)

Precipitation-Elevation Relations

Mean Daily Precipitation Schofield Pass (10,700 ft) vs Crested Butte (9031 ft) MONTH Mean daily precip, in.

Precipitation Gage Catch Error vs Wind Speed (Larsen and Peck, 1972) Rain (shield makes little difference) Snow (shielded) Snow (unshielded)

Precipitation Gauge Intercomparison Rabbit Ears Pass, Colorado

PRECIPITATION - DEPTH hru_precip(hru) = precip(hru_psta) * pcor(mo) pcor(mo) = Rain_correction or Snow_correction For each HRU

Precipitation Distribution Methods (module) Manual (precip_prms.f) Auto Elevation Lapse Rate (precip_laps_prms.f) XYZ (xyz_dist.f) PCOR Computation

Auto Elevation Lapse Rate PCOR Computation For each HRU hru_psta = precip station used to compute hru_precip [ hru_precip = precip(hru_psta) * pcor ] hru_plaps = precip station used with hru_psta to compute precip lapse rate by month [pmo_rate(mo)] hru_psta hru_plaps

PCOR Computation pmn_mo padj_sn or padj_rn elv_plaps Auto Elevation Lapse Rate Parameters

adj_p = pmo_rate * Auto Elevation Lapse Rate PCOR Computation For each HRU snow_adj(mo) = 1. + (padj_sn(mo) * adj_p) if padj_sn(mo) < 0. then snow_adj(mo) = - padj_sn(mo) pmo_rate(mo) = pmn_mo(hru_plaps) - pmn_mo(hru_psta) elv_plaps(hru_plaps) - elv_plaps(hru_psta) hru_elev - elv_plaps(hru_psta) pmn_mo(hru_psta)

PRECIPITATION - FORM (rain, snow, mixture of both) For each HRU RAIN tmin(hru) > tmax_allsnow tmax(hru) > tmax_allrain(mo) SNOW tmax(hru) <= tmax_allsnow

PRECIPITATION - FORM (rain, snow, mixture of both) prmx = [(tmax(hru) - tmax_allsnow) / (tmax(hru) - tmin(hru)] * adjmix_rain(mo) For each HRU Precipitation Form Variable Snowpack Adjustment MIXTURE OTHER

PARAMETER ESTIMATION

PRMS Parameters Estimated 9 topographic (slope, aspect, area, x,y,z, …) 3 soils (texture, water holding capacity) 8 vegetation (type, density, seasonal interception, radiation transmission) 2 evapotranspiration 5 indices to spatial relations among HRUs, gw and subsurface reservoirs, channel reaches, and point measurement stations

BASIN DELINEATION AND CHARACTERIZATION Polygon Hydrologic Response Units (HRUs) (based on slope, aspect, elevation, vegetation) Grid Cell Hydrologic Response Units (HRUs) (Equal to Image Grid Mesh) Focus of operational modeling Focus of research modeling

Upper San Joaquin River, CA El Nino Year

ANIMAS RIVER, CO SURFACE GW SUBSURFACE PREDICTED MEASURED

EAST FORK CARSON RIVER, CA SURFACE GW SUBSURFACE

CLE ELUM RIVER, WA SURFACE GW SUBSURFACE

REMOTELY SENSED SNOW- COVERED AREA AND SNOWPACK WATER EQUIVALENT

Satellite Image for Snow-Covered Area Computation

NASA Regional Earth Science Applications Center Objective - Integrate remotely sensed data into operational resource management applications ~ 1 km pixel resolution of NOAA snow-covered area product on 750 km2 basin SW Center - U of AZ, U of CO, USGS, Lawrence Berkeley Labs

East Fork Carson River, CA

Observed and Simulated Basin Snow-Covered Area

SIMULATED vs SATELLITE-OBSERVED SNOW-COVERED AREA

GUNNISON RIVER BASIN LOCATION Upper Colorado River Basin Gunnison River Basin

SUBBASINS WITH CONCURRENT STREAMFLOW AND SATELLITE DATA East River Taylor River Lake Fork Cochetopa Creek Tomichi Creek

Cochetopa Creek East River Lake Fork

Taylor River Tomichi Creek

east Percent Basin in Snow Cover

east

Percent Basin in Snow Cover

coch Percent Basin in Snow Cover

lake Percent Basin in Snow Cover

STARKWEATHER COULEE, ND

DEPRESSION STORAGE ESTIMATION (BY HRU) USING THE GIS WEASEL (AREA & VOLUME)

WETLANDS HYDROLOGY DEPRESSION STORES (flowing and closed) HRU 1 HRU 2 STORAGE HRU FLOW  GW PET FLOW

Snow-covered Area 1997 April 17 March 20 April 22 May 6 SNOW NO SNOW

1997 April 12April 22 Snowpack Water Equivalent Snow-covered Area

Snow-covered Area 1999 March 25 April 1 April 8 April 13 SNOW NO SNOW

1999 April 7April 8 Snowpack Water Equivalent Snow-covered Area