Julia Thompson Engineering Education Graduate student, Purdue University Dr. Brent Jesiek, Purdue University Contextualizing Energy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Course Design for Online Library Tutorials Carol ONeil Centre for Learning and Teaching Dalhousie University.
Advertisements

Learning through Service Community Service-Learning at the University of Guelph Cheryl Rose, CSL Specialist, Student Life Executive Director, Canadian.
Introduction to Service-Learning for Students
Information-Rich Engineering Design (I-RED)
Preparing Teachers to Enact Ambitious Teaching Practices during Secondary Preservice Teacher Education: Challenges and Successes Rebekah Elliott Ron Gray.
Using multiple technologies to promote lifelong learning to engineering students & faculty Kathryn Kennedy Engineering Outreach Librarian University of.
Connecting with Data Megan Sapp Nelson, Associate Professor of Library Sciences, Purdue University Libraries
Engineering Design: How to Introduce it in Low Level Courses? Muhammad Taher Abuelma’atti King Fahd University of Petroleum and MineralsDepartment of Electrical.
Engaging Students Using Current Topics in Chemical Research St. Lawrence University Samantha Glazier July 31 st 2006.
What Makes a Good Activity? Lessons from research and experience Cathy Manduca Science Education Resource Center Carleton College.
Teaching Science with Case Studies: A National Survey of Faculty Perceptions Mary Lundeberg Professor, Teacher Education Michigan State University Aman.
Year 10 Pathway C Mr. D. Patterson 1.  Define Kinetic Energy  Solve problems using  Define gravitational potential energy as the energy required to.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Elaborating Real-World Contexts in Urban High School Mathematics Lessons Haiwen Chu Laurie Rubel City University of New York This material is based on.
+ Assessments in Research Methods: A Literature Review (DRAFT) Dr Anesa Hosein and Dr Namrata Rao.
TRENDS CONFERENCE OCTOBER 12, 2012 Developing Quality Online Courses for Successful Learning Experiences.
Crosscutting Concepts and Disciplinary Core Ideas February24, 2012 Heidi Schweingruber Deputy Director, Board on Science Education, NRC/NAS.
South Carolina Advanced Technological Education Center of Excellence In touch with industry through Engineering Technology Education.
Assessment Seminar IMPLEMENTING ACTUAL AND PERCEIVED LEARNING ASSESSMENT TOOLS Victor Mbarika, Ph.D. Southern University.
Contributions of Contextual Teaching to Improved Student Learning Richard L. Lynch, PI University of Georgia (706)
Chemical Engineering curriculum renewal for the twenty first century: a work in progress Peter Holt, Jose Romagnoli and Ali Abbas.
Pre-college Electrical Engineering Instruction: Do Abstract or Contextualized Representations Promote Better Learning? Dr. Roxana Moreno, University of.
The Relationship Between Student Satisfaction with Learning Online and Cognitive Load 16 th Annual Sloan Consortium International Conference on Online.
The First Day of Class - Student Centered to the Extreme Dr. Cathlin Davis.
1 LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP September 29, 2011 Learning Center’s Science Objects Presented by: Flavio Mendez and Don Boonstra.
Work in Progress - Project-Based Service Learning in Engineering: Investigating Partner Relationships Julia Thompson School of Engineering Education Purdue.
EEA 2012 – Middle School STEM Day 3 Content Session.
NGSS Summit. Innovations of the NGSS Innovations in the NGSS 1.Three-Dimensional Learning 2.Students Engaging in Phenomena and Designed Solutions 3.Engineering.
1 NEST New and emerging science and technology EUROPEAN COMMISSION - 6th Framework programme : Anticipating Scientific and Technological Needs.
What Makes a Good Activity? Lessons from research and experience Cindy Shellito (U of Northern CO) and Cathy Manduca (SERC)
Chris DeWald Science Instructional Coordinator Montana Office of Public Instruction.
Instructional Leadership Team April 28, Guiding Theme for
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
Energy (chapter 5) Energy – the ability to do work Electrical, thermal, chemical, etc.
WARE RET 2014 – Understanding the Engineering Design Process within the Local Watershed Mirko I. Soko 1, Mentors 2 : Ryan C. Locicero, Dr. Maya A. Trotz.
INTEGRATING MODELING INSTRUCTION THROUGHOUT A LARGE LECTURE INTRODUCTORY BIOLOGY COURSE Lisa Limeri & Dr. Sam Donovan.
Introduction to STEM Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math.
A Model Based Reasoning by Introductory Students When Analyzing Earth Systems and Societal Challenges Lauren Holder Bruce Herbert.
Impact of NSES on Curriculum: I. Department of Geosciences, SFSU II. An Informal Survey III. What Accounts for the Change? IV. What Set the Stage? V. What.
Major Decisions A Guide to Choosing a Course of Study.
Institute for Collaborative Research in Education, Assessment, and Teaching Environments for STEM Workshop 5: How to Read the Standards.
Dr. Leslie David Burns, Associate Professor Department of Curriculum and Instruction UK College of Education
Chemistry teacher education for future Chemistry teacher education for future.
Research- and Evaluation-Informed Entrepreneurship Education: What Do the Data Tell Us? NCIIA Open Conference March 22, 2013 –Washington D.C. Grant Number:
Slide 1 ANSI Annual Conference 2002 Breaking Down Border: Business, Standards and Trade Engineering Overview presented by William E. Kelly Professor Catholic.
Virginia A. Davis, Ph.D. Alumni Professor and Graduate Program Chair Department of Chemical Engineering Auburn University, AL Keywords: 1 st Year Programs,
Engineering and Education Partnership: Preparing the Next Generation of Cross Disciplinary Trained STEM Teachers Dr. Michael de Miranda School of Education.
Board on Science Education Draft released 15 July 2011
Context “There is increasing recognition that universities must demonstrate how they prepare graduates for the employment market” (Tholen, 2014) –
Learning Mathematics Through Serious Games: An Engagement Framework
Amplify Science.
STEMify Your Classroom
Module 2: Overview of Performance Expectations
2012 Capstone Design Conference Amin Karim, DeVry University
ABET أسس ومبادئ معايير الـ
1. A 6 kg cat is running 4 m/s. What is the energy?
Potential and Kinetic Energy
Why use the Engineering Design Process?
Energy Chapter 4.
Gravitational Potential Energy
Unit 6 Forms of Energy (6.2).
Research on Geoscience Learning
Use your Journal to Name the Transformations
Pedagogy and Assessment
Engineer What education and training is required to become an engineer? Read more:
VISION AND CHANGE IN UNDERGRADUATE BIOLOGY EDUCATION: A Call to Action
Multimedia Worked Examples as an Engineering Problem-Solving Tool
Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) for Elementary Teachers
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Ch 4 Energy Kinetic Energy (KE) – the energy a moving object has because of its motion; depends on mass and speed of object KE = mv2/2 Joule – SI unit.
Presentation transcript:

Julia Thompson Engineering Education Graduate student, Purdue University Dr. Brent Jesiek, Purdue University Contextualizing Energy Balance Problems

Pop Quiz – Problem 1 An object whose mass is 400 kg is located at an elevation of 25 m above the surface of the earth. For g=9.78 m/s2, determine the gravitational potential energy of the object, in kJ, relative to the surface of the earth. Answer:

Problem 2- please see hand out Answer: a. b. c – e: Discussion

Discussion- What are the pros/cons of problem 1 when using it as an example in an engineering class Benefits: Limitations:

Discussion- What are the pros/cons of problem 1 when using it as an example in an engineering class Benefits: Tests core technical material Core ideas can be replicated in more complex systems Low cognitive load, thus more working memory can be devoted to technical material Limitations: Many students find the material not engaging/motivating Difficult to understand how material connects to real world applications

Discussion- What are the pros/cons of problem 2 when using it as an example in an engineering class Benefits: Limitations:

Discussion- What are the pros/cons of problem 2 when using it as an example in an engineering class Benefits: Clear understanding how the technical concept is used in real world application Directly connects technical material to design and societal components Limitations: Takes more time Increases cognitive load of a problem

Literature on contextualized problems Benefits: Brings opportunity to integrate social dimensions with technical content as required by ABET [1] Increases interest and motivation – especially for women [2-4] Potentially increases learning [2,5] Limitations: Can be difficult to understand the technical material in work study problems [5] Requires time [6]

Vision and next steps Ultimately, create course content that helps students develop an image of engineering that explicitly incorporates social dimensions. Current/next steps Observing a thermodynamics course Work with mechanical engineering professors to pilot content Conduct interviews with students

References [1]ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission. "Criteria For Accrediting Engineering Programs," [2]J. Holman, and G. Pilling, “Thermodynamics in Context,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 81, no. 3, pp , [3]A. Stinner, “Contextual Setting, Science Stories, and Large Contest problems: Toward a more Humanistic Science Education,” Humanistic Science Education, vol. 79, no. 3, pp , [4]D. Kilgore, C. Atman, K. Yasuhara et al., “Considering Context: A Study of First-Year Engineering Students ” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 14, [5]R. Moreno, M. Reisslein, and G. Ozogul, “Pre-college Electrical Engineering Instruction: Do Abstract or Contextualized Representations Promote Better Learning?,” in Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, [6]D. Riley, “Employing Liberative Pedagogies in Engineering ” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, vol. 9, no. 2, pp , 2003.