NSTX-U 5 Year Plan for Plasma Start-up and Current Ramp-up R. Raman D. Mueller, S.C. Jardin for the NSTX Research Team NSTX-U PAC-33 Meeting PPPL – B318.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Potential Upgrades to the NBI System for NSTX-Upgrade SPG, TS NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U.
Advertisements

Study of tearing mode stability in the presence of external perturbed fields Experimental validation of MARS-K/Q and RDCON codes Z.R. Wang 1, J.-K. Park.
NSTX-U T&T TSG Contributions to FY15 JRT NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U.
Summary of Presentations on Plasma Start-up and Progress on Small ST devices from STW2011 R. Raman University of Washington, Seattle, WA The Joint Meeting.
Team Meeting April 25, 2014 NSTX-U Construction Progress NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U.
Development and characterization of intermediate- δ discharge with lithium coatings XP-919 Josh Kallman Final XP Review June 5, 2009 NSTX Supported by.
Operations Notes Updates Since Last Team Meeting Stefan Gerhardt NSTX Team Meeting B318 January 3 rd, 2013 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu.
Raman, APS051 Solenoid-free Plasma Start-up in NSTX using Transient CHI R. Raman 1, T.R. Jarboe 1, B.A. Nelson 1, M.G. Bell 2, D.Mueller 2, R. Maqueda.
Particle control task force early run discussion R. Maingi, J. Canik Particle Control Task Force Meeting PPPL LSB B318 January 20, 2015 NSTX-U Supported.
Coupling Solenoid-free Coaxial Helicity Injection Started Discharges to Induction in NSTX Office of Science R. Raman University of Washington For the NSTX.
NSTX Status and Plans College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics New York.
NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans for: ORNL Boundary Physics and RF Research J.M. Canik, J.B.O. Caughman, J.-W. Ahn, S.J. Diem, T.K. Gray, D.L. Green,
Quality Assurance Readiness for Operations Review Judy Malsbury, Head of QA Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Upgrade LSB B318 December 9-11, 2014.
Sustainment and Control Chapter Status Stefan Gerhardt 12/5/12 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu.
ISTP (and other…) Update Stefan Gerhardt NSTX-U Monday Physics Meeting Feb. 20, 2015 B318 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
XP1518: RWM PID control optimization based on theory and experiment S. A. Sabbagh, J.W. Berkery, J.M Bialek Y.S. Park, (et al…) Department of Applied Physics,
EP-TSG session Meeting agenda et al. M. Podestà NSTX-U Research Forum 2015 EP-TSG session PPPL, Room B252 02/24/2015 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr.
NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans for: Charged Fusion Product Diagnostic FIU Werner U. Boeglin Ramona Perez, Alexander Netepenko, FIU D.S. Darrow PPPL.
1 Update on Run Schedule R. Raman NSTX Team Meeting PPPL, Princeton, NJ, 08 February, 2006 Work supported by DOE contract numbers DE-FG02-99ER54519 AM08,
RF Operations: Commissioning the RF systems and antenna conditioning J. Hosea et al. NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
Supported by Office of Science Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U.
NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Hebrew.
Radiative divertor with impurity seeding in NSTX V. A. Soukhanovskii (LLNL) Acknowledgements: NSTX Team NSTX Results Review Princeton, NJ Wednesday, 1.
NSTX Effects of NTSX Upgrades on DiagnosticsFebruary 8, NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL Johns.
Prototype Multi-Energy Soft X-ray Diagnostic for EAST Kevin Tritz Johns Hopkins University NSTX-U Monday Physics Meeting PPPL, Princeton, NJ June 25 th,
Direct measurement of plasma response using Nyquist Contour Z.R. Wang 1, J.-K. Park 1, M. J. Lanctot 2, J. E. Menard 1,Y.Q. Liu 3, R. Nazikian 1 1 Princeton.
NSTX-U Program Update J. Menard NSTX-U Team Meeting B318 May 7, 2013 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto.
NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Inst for Nucl.
ASC SPG NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Inst.
Absorber arc mitigation during CHI on NSTX D. Mueller, M.G. Bell, A.L. Roquemore, R. Raman, B.A. Nelson, T.R. Jarboe and the NSTX Research Team DPP09 Meeting.
ASC Five Year Plan Chapter Status Stefan Gerhardt NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu.
Summary of the SFPS XPs R. Raman, D. Mueller University of Washington Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory and the NSTX Research Team FY09 NSTX Results.
Wave Heating and Current Drive TSG: XMP for Recomissioning the HHFW System R.J. Perkins, J. C. Hosea Theory & Modeling: N. Bertelli NSTX-U Supported by.
XP817: Transient CHI – Solenoid free Plasma Startup and Coupling to Induction Office of Science R. Raman, B.A. Nelson, D. Mueller, T.R. Jarboe, M.G. Bell.
Progress and Plans for Solenoid-free Plasma Start-up and Ramp-up R. Raman D. Mueller, S.C. Jardin and the NSTX-U Research Team NSTX-U PAC-35 Meeting PPPL.
1 R Raman, B.A. Nelson, D. Mueller 1, T.R. Jarboe, M.G. Bell 1, J. Menard 1, R. Maqueda 2 et al. University of Washington, Seattle 1 Princeton Plasma Physics.
NSTX-U Construction Erik Perry Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Upgrade Readiness to Operate Review LSB B318 December 9-11, 2014 NSTX-U Supported.
M&P TSG Prioritization for FY2015 and campaign startup M.A. Jaworski, C.H. Skinner, R. Kaita NSTX-U Science and Topical Science Group organizational meeting.
Progress and Plans for Non-inductive Ramp-up/Sustainment Modeling Francesca Poli for the NSTX-U team NSTX-U PAC-35 Meeting PPPL – B318 June 11-13, 2013.
NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans for: X Science LLC Ricky Maqueda NSTX-U Collaborator Research Plan Meetings PPPL – LSB B318 April / May 2014 NSTX-U.
Safety Jerry Levine Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Upgrade Project Office of Science Review LSB B318 May 2 - 3, 2012 NSTX-U Supported by Culham.
Macroscopic Stability TSG Pre-forum Meeting #1 J.W. Berkery Department of Applied Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY NSTX-U Supported by Culham.
EP-TSG: draft plans for commissioning & first research phases of NSTX-U operation M. Podestà, D. Liu, N. Gorelenkov, N. Crocker for the NSTX-U EP-TSG Pre-Forum.
Development and characterization of intermediate- δ discharge with lithium coatings XP-919 Josh Kallman XP Review - ASC Feb 2, 2009 NSTX Supported by College.
NSTX-U Collaboration Plans for UCLA PI: Neal A. Crocker Co-PI: Prof. Troy Carter Grad. Student (planned 2 nd year onward) PPPL Research Contacts and Collaborators:
Solenoid Free Plasma Startup Progress and Plans R. Raman, D. Mueller S.C. Jardin (Theory) for the NSTX Research Team NSTX PAC-29 PPPL B318 January 26-28,
1 Plasma Start-up In NSTX Using Transient CHI R. Raman, T.R. Jarboe 1, D. Mueller 2, B.A. Nelson 1, M.G. Bell 2, M. Ono 2, T. Bigelow 3, R. Kaita 2, B.
NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans for: Local Helicity Injection - U. Wisconsin R.J. Fonck,B. T. Lewicki, A. J. Redd University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Wave Heating and Current Drive TSG: XMP/XPs for the 2015 NSXT-U Campaign RF-TSG R.J. Perkins, J. C. Hosea Theory & Modeling: N. Bertelli Univ. Rep: P.
1 Plasma Start-up In NSTX Using Transient CHI R. Raman, T.R. Jarboe 1, D. Mueller 2, B.A. Nelson 1, M.G. Bell 2, M. Ono 2, T. Bigelow 3, R. Kaita 2, B.
Effect of 3-D fields on edge power/particle fluxes between and during ELMs (XP1026) A. Loarte, J-W. Ahn, J. M. Canik, R. Maingi, and J.-K. Park and the.
NSTX-Upgrade Magnetics And Related Diagnostics SPG NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu.
First results of fast IR camera diagnostic J-W. Ahn and R. Maingi ORNL NSTX Monday Physics Meeting LSB-318, PPPL June 22, 2009 NSTX Supported by College.
Supported by Office of Science NSTX S.M. Kaye, PPPL ITPA PPPL 5-7 Oct Confinement and Transport in NSTX: Lithiumized vs non-Lithiumized Plasmas Culham.
NSTX-U Disruption PAM Working Group – Controlled Shutdown XP Discussion S. A. Sabbagh and R. Raman Department of Applied Physics, Columbia University,
Upgrades to PCS Hardware (Incomplete) KE, DAG, SPG, EK, DM, PS NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo.
Solenoid-free Plasma Start-up in NSTX using Transient CHI Office of Science 22 nd IAEA Fusion Energy Conference October 13-18, 2008, Geneva College W&M.
Presently Planned Vacuum-Side Diagnostics for the NSTX-Upgrade Center Column NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
Preliminary Results from XP1020 RFA Measurements J.W. Berkery Department of Applied Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA NSTX Monday Physics.
Raman, Dec051 Solenoid-free Plasma Start-up in NSTX using Transient CHI R. Raman 1, T.R. Jarboe 1, B.A. Nelson 1, M.G. Bell 2, D.Mueller 2, R. Maqueda.
Advanced Scenario Development on NSTX D. A. Gates, PPPL For the NSTX Research Team 50th APS-DPP meeting Dallas, TX November 17, 2008 College W&M Colorado.
NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans for: M.I.T. Plasma Science and Fusion Center Abhay K. Ram, Paul Bonoli, and John Wright NSTX-U Collaborator Research.
1 Roger Raman for the NSTX Research Team University of Washington, Seattle Update on the NSTX Run Plan PPPL, Princeton, NJ, 15 May, 2006 Supported by Office.
Research Operations Update Stefan Gerhardt NSTX-U Team Meeting B-318 December 4 th, 2014 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
NSTX-U Research Highlights and Plans Jonathan Menard, PPPL For the NSTX Research Team IAEA FEC Meeting October 2012 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr.
Comments on HC Measurements for NSTX- Upgrade SPG CS Upgrade Meeting 11/2/11 NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
J-W. Ahn 1 K.F. Gan 2, F. Scotti 3, R. Maingi 1, J.M. Canik 1, T.K. Gray 1, J.D. Lore 1, A.G. McLean 4, A.L. Roquemore 3, V.A. Soukhanovskii 4 and the.
Neutron diagnostic calibration transfer XMP D. Darrow and the NSTX Research Team XMP & XP review meeting Control Room Annex June 11, 2015 NSTX-U Supported.
Profiles Variations in NSTX-U and their Potential Impact on Equilibrium and Stability Magnetoboss 12/6/2013 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu.
Demonstration of Coupling CHI Started Discharges to Induction in NSTX R. Raman 1, B.A. Nelson 1, T.R. Jarboe 1, D. Mueller 2, M.G. Bell 2, J. Menard 2,
Presentation transcript:

NSTX-U 5 Year Plan for Plasma Start-up and Current Ramp-up R. Raman D. Mueller, S.C. Jardin for the NSTX Research Team NSTX-U PAC-33 Meeting PPPL – B318 February 19-21, 2013 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Inst for Nucl Res, Kiev Ioffe Inst TRINITI Chonbuk Natl U NFRI KAIST POSTECH Seoul Natl U ASIPP CIEMAT FOM Inst DIFFER ENEA, Frascati CEA, Cadarache IPP, Jülich IPP, Garching ASCR, Czech Rep Coll of Wm & Mary Columbia U CompX General Atomics FIU INL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Lehigh U Nova Photonics Old Dominion ORNL PPPL Princeton U Purdue U SNL Think Tank, Inc. UC Davis UC Irvine UCLA UCSD U Colorado U Illinois U Maryland U Rochester U Tennessee U Tulsa U Washington U Wisconsin X Science LLC

NSTX-U PAC-33 – NSTX-U 5 Year Plan for Plasma Start-up and Current Ramp-up NSTX-U 2 Outline Motivation & Goals Transient CHI Plasma Start-up Point Source Helicity Injection Plasma Start-up Supporting modeling work Research Thrusts Hardware preparation External collaboration activities Summary

NSTX-U PAC-33 – NSTX-U 5 Year Plan for Plasma Start-up and Current Ramp-up NSTX-U 3 Goal: Develop and understand non-inductive start-up/ramp-up to project to ST-FNSF operation with small or no solenoid Aligned with OFES program vision for FNSF requirements –Establish physics basis for ST- FNSF, and non-inductive start-up is essential in ST –Simplify the tokamak concept to reduce cost High level NSTX-U Thrusts: –Establish and extend solenoid-free plasma start-up and test NBI ramp- up –Ramp-up CHI plasma discharges using NBI and HHFW and test plasma gun start-up NSTX-U Start-up and Ramp-up strategy NSTX-U is striving for fully non- inductive operations CHI start-up and ramp-up is the front end of that objective

NSTX-U PAC-33 – NSTX-U 5 Year Plan for Plasma Start-up and Current Ramp-up NSTX-U 4 CHI is planned to be used as initial current seed for subsequent non-inductive current ramp-up in NSTX-U CHI in NSTX/NSTX-U ms1.6 ms2.7 ms R (m) Z (m) TSC (axisymmetric 2D ) simulation of CHI startup R (m) New Tools for CHI –> 2.5 x Injector Flux (proportional to I p ) –TF = 1 T (increases current multiplication) –ECH (increases T e ) –> 2kV CHI voltage (increases flux injection) –Full Li coverage (reduces low-Z imp.) –Metal divertor, Cryo pump (increases T e ) 1 MW ECH Plasma Guns Cryo pump

NSTX-U PAC-33 – NSTX-U 5 Year Plan for Plasma Start-up and Current Ramp-up NSTX-U 5 Plasma discharge ramping to 1MA requires 35% less inductive flux when coaxial helicity injection (CHI) is used High elongation Low inductance Low density CHI assisted startup in NSTX CHI produces closed flux change of ~ 50 mWb CHI generates plasmas with low n e below ECH cut-off

NSTX-U PAC-33 – NSTX-U 5 Year Plan for Plasma Start-up and Current Ramp-up NSTX-U 6 CHI start-up to ~0.4MA is projected for NSTX-U, and projects to ~20% start-up current in next-step STs Injector flux in NSTX-U is ~ 2.5 times higher than in NSTX  supports increased CHI current ParametersNSTXNSTX- U ST- FNSF ST Pilot Plant Major radius [m] Minor radius [m] B T [T] Toroidal flux [Wb] Sustained I p [MA] Injector flux (Wb) Projected Start-up current (MA) Incremental programmatic goal: FY15: Establish CHI start-up and Ramp-up a kA inductively generated plasma using RF and NBI (with Wave Particle TSG)

NSTX-U PAC-33 – NSTX-U 5 Year Plan for Plasma Start-up and Current Ramp-up NSTX-U 7 Local helicity injection being developed by PEGASUS is an alternate method for plasma start-up in NSTX-U Retractability of guns potentially advantageous in FNSF/Demo nuclear environment Plasma guns(s) & electrodes biased relative to anode or vessel –Helicity injection rate –I p ~ (I inj I TF / electrode width)^0.5: Issues being addressed by Pegasus to achieve high I p –Effective voltage scales with electrode area –Large-area electrode with uniform current density –Characterization of plasma confinement/dissipation and injector impedance –Pegasus wants to deliver MA- class (I p > 0.5 MA) to NSTX-U

NSTX-U PAC-33 – NSTX-U 5 Year Plan for Plasma Start-up and Current Ramp-up NSTX-U 8 Ramp-up strategy significantly benefits from 1-2 MW ECH to heat CHI plasma In a 500kA decaying inductive discharge, TSC simulations indicate 0.6MW of absorbed ECH power could increase T e to ~400eV in 20ms (with 50% ITER L-mode scaling) –ECH absorption and deposition profile being modeled using GENRAY –CHI discharge densities at T e = 70 eV would allow 60% first-pass absorption by 28 GHz ECH in NSTX-U GENRAY Increased T e predicted to significantly reduce I p decay rate –ECH heated plasma can be further heated with HHFW –Maximum HHFW power < 4MW, higher B T in NSTX- U would improve coupling –HHFW has demonstrated heating a 300 kA / 300 eV plasma to > 1 keV in 40ms GENRAY

NSTX-U PAC-33 – NSTX-U 5 Year Plan for Plasma Start-up and Current Ramp-up NSTX-U 9 Non-inductive ramp-up from ~0.4MA to ~1MA projected to be possible with new CS + more tangential 2 nd NBI More tangential NBI provides 3-4x higher CD at low I P : –2x higher absorption (40  80%) at low I P = 0.4MA Now modeling coupling to MA targets (TRANSP) –1.5-2x higher current drive efficiency Present NBI More tangential 2 nd NBI TSC simulation of non-inductive ramp-up from initial CHI target -Simulations now being improved to use TRANSP/NUBEAM loop within TSC -Experimental challenges: - Maximum NBI power in low inductance CHI plasma R. Raman, F. Poli, C.E. Kessel, S.C. Jardin

NSTX-U PAC-33 – NSTX-U 5 Year Plan for Plasma Start-up and Current Ramp-up NSTX-U 10 Will 3D physics in NIMROD alter our present expectations for scaling to next-step devices? -Additional physics (T e evolution, transport, ohmic heating) Ongoing simulations show promising results -Now starting to show flux closure on experimental time scales -Next step is to develop a realistic model for NSTX Simulations using Nimrod making good progress in modeling helicity injection start-up in NSTX E.B. Hooper (LLNL) F. Ebrahimi (Princeton University) J. B. O’Bryan (Univ. of Wisconsin) C. Sovinec (Univ. of Wisconsin) Simulations of an NSTX CHI discharge (E.B. Hooper) Flux closure 0.87 ms after voltage turn-off in a CHI simulation with constant coil currents (F. Ebrahimi) Point source (local) helicity injection simulations show release of a current ring following reconnection (J.B. O’ Bryan)

NSTX-U PAC-33 – NSTX-U 5 Year Plan for Plasma Start-up and Current Ramp-up NSTX-U 11 Thrust PSR-1: Establish and extend solenoid-free plasma start-up and test NBI ramp-up Re-establish transient CHI discharges utilizing: YR1 NSTX-U Ops –Graphite lower divertor tiles, increased toroidal field capability –Full Li coating of lower divertor tiles + Li conditioning of upper divertor Determine maximum toroidal currents generated with CHI: YR2 –Vary and increase the amount of injector flux, the size of the capacitor bank, and the CHI voltage (up to 2 kV). –Use upper divertor buffer coils to suppress absorber arcs –Study coupling of the CHI generated plasma to inductive drive Assess NBI coupling + current drive efficiency in kA flat- top current inductive plasmas, compare to TSC/TRANSP (YR3) –Also inject new more tangential beams into CHI targets and assess current-drive and compare to simulation Use combinations of NBI and HHFW to attempt non-inductive ramp-up of I P = MA (inductive target) to 0.8-1MA (YR2,3)

NSTX-U PAC-33 – NSTX-U 5 Year Plan for Plasma Start-up and Current Ramp-up NSTX-U 12 Thrust PSR-2: Ramp-up CHI Plasma discharges using NBI and HHFW and Test Plasma Gun Start-up Maximize the levels of CHI-produced plasma currents using: –1 MW 28GHz ECH (YR3) –Metallic divertor plates (as available) to reduce low-Z impurity radiation –2.5-3 kV CHI capability (YR4) Extend duration of high-current CHI target using ECH/HHFW and test effectiveness of NBI coupling to CHI-target (YR3) Ramp-up of CHI target + ECH/HHFW  HHFW+NBI (YR4+5) Perform detailed comparisons of CHI current drive results to 2D TSC/TRANSP and 3D NIMROD simulations (YR4) –Develop a TSC/NIMROD model of CHI for FNSF design studies. If guns ready, commission plasma guns on NSTX-U (YR4+5) –Compare point-helicity injection (plasma gun) current formation on NSTX-U to Pegasus results, assess implications for FNSF

NSTX-U PAC-33 – NSTX-U 5 Year Plan for Plasma Start-up and Current Ramp-up NSTX-U 13 FY13 Start-up and Ramp-up of CHI-started discharge Use TRANSP analysis of NSTX CHI discharges with inductive ramp to obtain electron transport model Use TSC generated CHI equilibrium to obtain ECH absorption and heat deposition profiles and extend to 1T (GENRAY) Assess requirements for electron heating by HHFW (with ECH heating Requirements for NBI ramp-up to1 MA of CHI target with ECH + HHFW With NIMROD obtain good agreement with an NSTX transient CHI discharge Requirements for voltage/injector current programming and injector flux footprint shaping Plans for start-up/ramp-up simulations (TSC-TRANSP/NUBEAM/GENRAY, NIMROD)

NSTX-U PAC-33 – NSTX-U 5 Year Plan for Plasma Start-up and Current Ramp-up NSTX-U 14 FY13-14 Extend to NSTX-U geometry Develop start-up scenarios for YR1-2 Ops. Couple TSC directly to TRANSP/NUBEAM/GENRAY codes to self-consistently calculate deposition profiles Assess impact of including additional parameters (n e and Z eff ) and impact of injector gap width in NIMROD simulations FY15-18 Support NSTX-U Ops. & Extend to FNSF/ST Demo Use experimental results to improve model & extend to FNSF Use in predictive mode to support experiments Incorporate CHI model in free-boundary predictive TRANSP Understand plasma growth rate implications for electron heating Understand 3D effects on fast flux closure as I p is increased to MA levels Requirements for establishing a start-up discharge in next step devices Plans for start-up/ramp-up simulations

NSTX-U PAC-33 – NSTX-U 5 Year Plan for Plasma Start-up and Current Ramp-up NSTX-U 15 Diagnostics [FY ] –New additional fast voltage monitors for upper divertor –Additional dedicated current monitors near injector –Special set of EMI shielded inner vessel magnetics –Additional flux loops and Mirnov coils on lower and upper divertor Langmuir probe array on lower divertor –Multipoint Thomson scattering, Filter scopes, multi chord bolometers and SXR arrays Capacitor bank power supply [FY ] – Baseline capability –Voltage increased to ~2 kV & improve voltage snubbing systems –NSTX-U to support 4kV Ops. including transients Capacitor bank power supply [YR 16-18] – Upgraded capability –Voltage increased to ~2.5-3 kV –Additional modules for improved voltage control Hardware preparations for NSTX-U Start-up

NSTX-U PAC-33 – NSTX-U 5 Year Plan for Plasma Start-up and Current Ramp-up NSTX-U 16 Preliminary design completed (January 2013) –Now working on finalizing design and pricing Electrode mounted on top of divertor plate –Insulators not part of vacuum structure –CHI operation at up to 3kV –Metallic electrodes (SS + Mo/W) Provides data for NSTX-U metal electrodes CHI design for QUEST supports NSTX-U research (Collaboration with Japan)

NSTX-U PAC-33 – NSTX-U 5 Year Plan for Plasma Start-up and Current Ramp-up NSTX-U 17 FY –Finalize CHI design for QUEST –CHI system design for FNSF –Participation with HIST device for CHI (device size scaling) –Participation with PEGASUS on plasma gun start-up – Assessment of requirements for NSTX-U –Possible installation of CHI capability on QUEST Establish Transient CHI discharges on QUEST Years –Assessment of benefits of metal electrodes on QUEST (for NSTX-U) –Test of edge current drive & steady-state CHI on QUEST Plans for external collaboration & design studies

NSTX-U PAC-33 – NSTX-U 5 Year Plan for Plasma Start-up and Current Ramp-up NSTX-U 18 CHI start-up achieves record-low flux consumption on NSTX to get to 1MA –Compatibility with H-mode operation demonstrated –Generates discharges with low internal inductance and density needed for ECH heating and non-inductive ramp-up with NBI on NSTX-U –Favorable scaling with machine size (HIT-II, NSTX) ~1MW 28 GHz ECH would greatly enhance start-up/ramp-up capabilities –Helicity injected plasmas require early heating to avoid rapid current decay MHD codes now starting to reproduce NSTX CHI discharges –TSC being used to develop initial start-up scenarios for NSTX-U –NIMROD (and possibly M3D-C1) to improve understanding of flux closure mechanisms and the early dynamic phase of CHI External collaboration aids NSTX-U, FNSF & ST Demo –Plan to test metal electrodes and new electrode design on QUEST –PEGASUS developing plasma gun start-up for implementation on NSTX-U NSTX-U is well poised to demonstrate full non-inductive start-up and ramp-up in support of next steps devices

NSTX-U PAC-33 – NSTX-U 5 Year Plan for Plasma Start-up and Current Ramp-up NSTX-U 19 Back-up slides

NSTX-U PAC-33 – NSTX-U 5 Year Plan for Plasma Start-up and Current Ramp-up NSTX-U 20 CHI start-up to ~0.4MA is projected for NSTX-U, and is projected to scale favorably to next-step STs Injector flux in NSTX-U is ~ 2.5 times higher than in NSTX  supports increased CHI current J. E. Menard et al., NF 52 (2012)