Department of Bioengineering Instron Uniaxial Tensile Testing and Image Analysis of Suture Performance in Chicken Skin 102B 5 Bari Dane Megan Liszewski.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Displaying data and calculations  How many trials have been performed?  Were there enough to satisfy the IB Internal Assessment criteria? FYI: IB wants.
Advertisements

Professor Joe Greene CSU, CHICO
Chapter 11 Mechanical Properties of Materials
Department of Bioengineering FRACTURE PROPERTIES OF CHICKEN BONES WITH AND WITHOUT MARROW 101A1 Edwin Akrong – Background & Hypothesis Ping-Chien (Sam)
Detection and Measurement of Pavement Cracking Bagas Prama Ananta.
The various engineering and true stress-strain properties obtainable from a tension test are summarized by the categorized listing of Table 1.1. Note that.
Department of Bioengineering A Comparison of Suture Type: Dermabond Liquid Adhesive vs. Traditional Sutures Group: TA4 Hannah Zelman – Background & Hypothesis.
EXPERIMENT # 3 Instructor: M.Yaqub
LMAF / EPFL What's new? Tested 9 specimens (3 plates, 1mm joint): 2 cameras -> local / global deformations 2 cameras -> local / global deformations variability.
Department of Bioengineering BRIEF PROJECT TITLE/TOPIC (font 32) Group 101-A2 Joseph Kimmel – Background & Hypothesis Jon Wang – Methods & Protocol George.
CTC / MTC 222 Strength of Materials
Department of Bioengineering Instron Uniaxial Tensile Testing: Mechanical Failure Properties of Suturing and Steri-Strips GROUP #5 Seungyon Kim – Background.
Aims, Objectives and Hypotheses Aims/Objectives Aims/Objectives To determine the effects of surrogate meat (rubber) thickness and loading rate on fracture.
PARTITIONING “ A de-normalization practice in which relations are split instead of merger ”
University of Pennsylvania Department of Bioengineering Aims/Objective & Hypothesis: UHMWPE Tensile Testing GROUP 2WB UHMWPE main component of THA acetabular.
Elasticity and Strength of Materials
Testing Effectiveness of Common Antacids
Mechanical Properties
Chapter 9 Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
Department of Bioengineering Modeling of Wound Closures Under Uniaxial Tensile Loading 101A3 Tefesehet Mesfin – Background & Hypothesis Ryan Stuckert –
University of Pennsylvania Department of Bioengineering Aims/Objective & Hypothesis(es): Quantifying Chicken Bone Decalcification by Mass Section 102 GROUP.
Department of Bioengineering FAILURE ENERGY: COMPARING SUTURE PERFORMANCE UNDER UNIAXIAL TENSION GROUP 101B1 Alison Agres – Background & Objective Ted.
FYI: All three types of stress are measured in newtons / meter2 but all have different effects on solids. Materials Solids are often placed under stress.
University of Pennsylvania Department of Bioengineering Aims/Objective & Hypothesis: Effect of Calcium Content on Bone Fracture Energy Group Tuesday -
Logo Introduction To investigate if white 96-well plates allow better fluorescence detection of PCR products during QPCR assays than natural 96-well plates.
Wound closure.
Thermal Degradation of Polymeric Foam Cored Sandwich Structures S.Zhang 1, J.M.Dulieu-Barton 1, R.K.Fruehmann 1, and O.T.Thomsen 2 1 Faculty of Engineering.
Module 8 Overview of processes 1. Module 82 Metal forming Principle of the process Structure Process modeling Defects Design For Manufacturing (DFM) Process.
University of Pennsylvania Department of Bioengineering Objectives & Hypotheses: Analysis of the Effect of Calcium Content on Chicken Bone Fracture Energy.
University of Pennsylvania Department of Bioengineering Aims/Objective & Hypothesis(es): MATERIAL TESTING: ROCKWELL HARDNESS & IMPACT ENERGY Group 101B5.
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Counting Statistics and Error Prediction Poisson Distribution ( p.
Department of Bioengineering Effect of Decalcification on Fracture Strength in Chicken Bones Group 102A5 Tim Bakke Vincent Cina Jonathan Lee Wee Siong.
Sounds of Old Technology IB Assessment Statements Topic 14.2., Data Capture and Digital Imaging Using Charge-Coupled Devices (CCDs) Define capacitance.
Department of Bioengineering Tendon Stiffness and Strain Distribution GROUP 4B Dipal Patel – Background & Hypothesis Joe Frey – Methods & Protocol Chrysta.
University of Pennsylvania Department of Bioengineering Aims/Objective & Hypothesis: SPECTROANALYSIS OF ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID CONTENT IN ASPIRIN - TB4 The.
Department of Bioengineering Buffering Capabilities of Guinea Pig Blood GROUP MB3 Kim Coughlan, Barry Huang, Laura Michelis, Le Truong.
Department of Bioengineering Bone Repair Techniques: Fracture Testing of Chicken Bones 102-1B Ted Lee – Background & Hypothesis Nikhil Deshmukh – Methods.
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, 1st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Radioactive decay is a random process. Fluctuations. Characterization.
Mechanical Properties of Materials
Department of Bioengineering Brandon Chen Stephen Cifelli Robert Metter Ek Kia Tan Uniaxial Suture Strength Testing Group TB2.
This section of work is also known as Hookes Law.
Engineering I – Statics. Test the Strength of Structural Members To design a structure, an engineer must be able to determine the strengths of the structural.
Department of Bioengineering Tensile Properties of Chicken Skin Treated with Trypsin-EDTA Group 3A Sakil Chundydyal – Background & Hypothesis Arnav Mukherjee.
Department of Bioengineering SUTURE PERFORMANCE 102 A Gyong Min Bak – Background & Hypothesis Heather Forquer – Methods & Protocol Kelvin Leung – Deliverables.
Department of Bioengineering Suture Performance Under Uniaxial Tensile Testing Group: 101A5 Ilan Epstein – Background & Hypothesis Neha Jha – Methods &
Module 8 Overview of processes 1. Module 82 Metal forming Principle of the process Structure and configurtion Process modeling Defects Design For Manufacturing.
Department of Bioengineering Suture Performance of Stitches and Medical Adhesives 102 A2 Valerie Meausoone David Solomon Indraneel Gowdar Sarah Casey.
University of Pennsylvania Department of Bioengineering Objective To even force distribution over all stitches and thus increase force needed for system.
Haseeb Ullah Khan Jatoi Department of Chemical Engineering UET Lahore.
Department of Bioengineering Structural Properties of Glued-Wood Surrogates 102B_4 Yang Zhang – Background & Hypothesis Kevin Clark – Methods & Protocol.
University of Pennsylvania Department of Bioengineering Aims/Objective & Hypotheses: Instron Uniaxial Tensile Testing of Suture Performance Group: TA2.
Department of Bioengineering Instron Uniaxial Tensile Testing: Structural & Material Properties of Sutures Group 102 3B Leia Harbour Julianne Huegel Will.
ISE 311 Tensile Testing Lab in conjunction with Section 3.1 in the text book “Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing” Third Edition Mikell P. Groover 4/25/2008.

The various engineering and true stress-strain properties obtainable from a tension test are summarized by the categorized listing of Table 1.1. Note that.
Material Testing under Tension
André Lubeck; Dr. Gihad Mohamad; Dr. Fonseca, Fernando Soares; PhD.
Fracture Energy of Chicken Bones:
How Are Wounds Stitched?
Poisons Ratio Poisons ratio = . w0 w Usually poisons ratio ranges from
Impact of Stitch Density on Suture Performance
David Harwin Adviser: Petros Faloutsos
Eng. Ahmed Al-Afeefy Eng. Ibrahim Aljaish
Alejandra M. Ruiz-Zapata, Andrew J
Physical Properties of Rocks
Mechanical Properties: 1
Applied Technology High School (ATHS)
Mechanical Properties Of Metals - I
Tutorial.
Edge Lights Tutorial Designing the Panels.
Presentation transcript:

Department of Bioengineering Instron Uniaxial Tensile Testing and Image Analysis of Suture Performance in Chicken Skin 102B 5 Bari Dane Megan Liszewski Anthony So

Department of Bioengineering Background: This experiment combines the properties of chicken skin and image analysis labs. In these experiments, the optimal Instron sampling occurred with a cross head speed of 50mm/min and maximum sampling rate of 20pts/sec. This will be used to apply force to a cut sutured with interrupted stitches separated by 1/8in. A video camera that takes 20 fps is needed. Hypothesis(es) & Aim(s) or Objective(s): The non-biodegradable suture, silk, in chicken skin under tensile load will more tightly seal a cut at a greater ultimate load than a biodegradable suture, catgut, will under the same conditions. The load is applied when the Instron cross head moves at a rate of 50mm/min. A video camera that takes 20 fps will be used in conjunction with the Instron to correlate the load and deformation experienced by the chicken skin and stitches with the precise location of deformation on the sample. 102B_5

Department of Bioengineering Methods & Protocol: 1.Cut 10 chicken skin specimens measuring 2.54cm x 5.08cm (1in x2in). 2.Cut one sample in half so that both new halves measure 2.54cm x2.54cm. 3.Suture the two halves together using 3 interrupted stitches of catgut spaced.32cm (1/8in) apart. 4.Place sample in Instron so that the cut is perpendicular to the direction of loading. 5.Load sample at a rate of 50mm/min with a sampling rate of 20pts/sec while recording the test with a video camera that takes 20fps. Make sure to begin recording and loading simultaneously. 6.Repeat steps 2-5 for four more samples. 7.Repeat steps 2-6 using silk suture instead of catgut. 8.Create force-displacement and stress-strain curves for each Instron loaded specimen and compare with the video to determine which suture type more successfully sealed the cut and sustained a greater ultimate load. 102B_5

Department of Bioengineering Proposed Deliverables/Findings: The advantage of biodegradable sutures is that a patient does not have to revisit the doctor to have stitches removed. However, in substituting biodegradable sutures for non-biodegradable sutures, it is possible that performance is being sacrificed for convenience. To determine if this is the case, measurements of ultimate strength and deformation at this strength can be determined from the Instron. Deformation will be distributed throughout the chicken skin as either a change in cut width or as a stretch in the suture hole. Since suture success is defined based on changes in cut width and ultimate strength, the deformation of the cut width should be measured from the image at the time of ultimate strength. These measurements can be compared between trials to determine the substitutability of biodegradable and non-biodegradable sutures using unpaired t- tests. 102B_5

Department of Bioengineering Potential Pitfalls: A possible difficulty in this experiment is that greater ultimate strength and smaller cut width might occur in different suture types, offering no conclusion about suture success using the definition of success provided. It is known that deformation in the chicken skin is also expressed by stretching out the suture hole. If all deformation is in the form of stretching the suture hole, the definition of suture success used would yield no significant result. An alternate definition, perhaps involving total deformation of the chicken skin at ultimate strength would need to be used. Also, due to the inconsistent thickness of the chicken skin, it is possible that different areas sustain more load and deform less than others, thus skewing results. It is known that biodegradable sutures are absorbed over time. This experiment tests these sutures before any degradation can occur, which could be a central issue to assess the performance of the suture. Finally, it may be difficult to successfully implement the stitches, due to lack of suturing experience. 102B_5

Department of Bioengineering Equipment/Materials and Budget & Justification: 102B_5 Sutures from Harrell Medical, Inc. 3-0 Plain Catgut CP Medical Sutures 27 inch, FS-2 (needle) Product ID: 822PG Cost: $ $9.00 (shipping) 3-0 Black Silk CP Medical Sutures 18 inch, FS-2 Product ID: Cost: $ $9.00 (shipping) Video Camera Equipment MV320 Digital Video Camera from Microtek 20fps with 640 x 480 resolution Cost: $ $9.50 (shipping) Win DVD Creator 2 Platinum Cost: $69.95 (download) Catgut is a natural biodegradable suture and silk is a natural non- biodegradable suture. These sutures are the same size, are both natural, and are still commonly used today, allowing for a practical comparison between suture materials. This particular camera is needed to visualize the deformation of chicken skin and sutures during testing at 20 fps. WinDVD Creator is needed to view each frame corresponding to each data point from the Instron.