Announcements 1) PLEASE COMPLETE ONLINE STUDENT OPINION SURVEY 2) Graduate Resource Center on campus. The Graduate Resource Center is a space strictly.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Authorship APS Professional Skills Course:
Advertisements

Week 2: Finding and reading a paper. See StudyDirect for the names of your tutors Please remember our first names for submission of your course work Only.
Copyright 2005, Journal of Young Investigators, Inc. Writing Scientific Manuscripts a guide for undergraduates.
Ethics Prof. Toby Walsh NICTA and UNSW. Ethics  Why?  Why should you worry about ethics?  What?  What should you worry about?  How?  How do you.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT OF RESEARCH
PLAGIARISM How to stay out of trouble! Developed for use by the Department of Computer Science Midwestern State University.
REVIEW CRITERIA FOR NIH K01, K08, AND K23 (CAREER DEVELOPMENT) and K99/00 PATHWAY TO INDEPENDENCE AWARD GRANTS Liz Zelinski Former Reviewer and backup.
Ethical principles at a University Patrice Koehl Computer Science, UC Davis Sources: Phil Rogaway, UC Davis Dave Touretsky, CMU.
Ethics in Science CHEM 6691 – Science & Technology in Service to the Community George M. Strain June 27, 2003.
Publication ethics Sadeghi Ramin, MD Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.
Gail P. Taylor, Ph.D. Asst PD MBRS-RISE/MARC U*STAR 09/01/2013.
MATH How to be A Great Student. How to Use Class Time Effectively NEXT.
Ethics: An Introduction Michael Kalichman, Ph.D. Pathology Director, UCSD Research Ethics Program CSE 190 April 4, 2002.
Xingwei Wang. Lab. Notebook Hard Cover Official Lab Notebook Numbered Pages 1 st Page,Table of Contents Name & ID number Section number.
Bieber et al., NJIT © Slide 1 Excelling as a Ph.D. Student Michael Bieber Information Systems Department College of Computing Sciences New Jersey.
Applying to Ph.D. programs CBS Proseminar Topic Fall 2005.
Managing my research degree John Kirby Graduate School Faculty of Medical Sciences.
Responsible Conduct in Research
Peer Review and Responsible Conduct of Research
Writing Scientific Manuscripts. Table of Contents Introduction Part I: Publication & Peer Review –Deciding to Publish –Submitting Your Paper –After Submission.
SIAMUW.  An independent federal agency created by Congress in 1950  Mission: “to promote the progress of science; to advance the national health, prosperity,
How to Create a Research PowerPoint
Teaching RCR to undergraduate and graduate audiences: college sophomores, seniors and graduate students Julio F. Turrens, Ph.D. Associate Dean College.
Notebooks and Protocols
How to do Quality Research for Your Research Paper
Student research funding and travel support - let’s you pad your CV by listing awards - fund your own research - attend conferences: - present your research,
Making an Effective Curriculum Vitae Danielle Gordon, M.S. Senior Research Evaluator.
Let us help you navigate the Administrative Highway and submit your application on time!  Forms, memos, cover letter, signatures, etc.  Protocols  Raco.
Science, Forms, Science, Documentation, Science! It’s All about the Science!
NDLTD Prior Publications Working Group Gail McMillan, Marisa Ramirez, Joan Dalton, Ann Hanlon, Heather Smith, Chelsea Kern 15 th International ETD Symposium.
Research Misconduct Adapted with permission from Virginia Tech University Office of the Vice-President for Research.
Student-Mentor Relationships and the Politics of Graduate School.
19/9/2005 Promotion and Tenure: Suggestions for Success Kimberly W. Anderson Professor Chemical and Materials Engineering.
Ethical Issues in Journal Publication Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH Texas A&M University
Literature Search – How to Make Hard Work Easier? Prof. Haiying Huang Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University.
Scholarly Publication: Responsibilities for Authors and Reviewers Jean H. Shin, Ph.D. Director, Minority Affairs Program American Sociological Association.
AuthorAID Workshop on Research Writing Sri Lanka March 2010.
Advanced Legal Writing Seminar: Wednesdays, 10:00 p.m. EST Office Hours: Mondays from 3 – 5 p.m. EST, and by appointment AIM sign-in: cssouthall
CH 42 DEVELOPING A RESEARCH PLAN CH 43 FINDING SOURCES CH 44 EVALUATING SOURCES CH 45 SYNTHESIZING IDEAS Research!
Original Research Publication Moderator: Dr. Sai Kumar. P Members: 1.Dr.Sembulingam 2. Dr. Mathangi. D.C 3. Dr. Maruthi. K.N. 4. Dr. Priscilla Johnson.
Academic Integrity: Processes & Expectations at the College Level Andrea Goodwin Associate Director, Office of Student Conduct University of Maryland Diane.
Applying to Ph.D. programs CBS Proseminar Topic Fall 2011.
Keys to Being a Successful (and Ethical) Graduate Student Jeannette D. Hoit Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences University of Arizona.
Ethics and Scientific Writing. Ethical Considerations Ethics more important than legal considerations Your name and integrity are all that you have!
NSF policies and requirements for Implementation of the America COMPETES Act. America COMPETES Act contains a number of new requirements for all those.
Restructured NIH Applications One Year Later:
ECE 396 – Senior Design I Fall Semester 2013 Lecture 3 Documentation and the Design Process.
Scientists behaving badly Nature - 9 June issue ~~~~~ B. Martinson, M. Anderson & R. de Vries ~~~~~
1 4. Professional Ethics Most parts of this talk are borrowed from: “On being a scientist: responsible conduct in research” National Academy of Sciences.
Dr. Sundar Christopher Navigating Graduate School and Beyond: Sow Well Now To Reap Big Later Writing Papers.
Authorship, Academic Integrity, and Ethics Dr. Heather Blain Vorhies Office of Writing Initiatives The Graduate School 5 September 2013.
Science Funding (otherwise known as how to make your PI really happy and find someone to pay for you to do what you love)
Research Ethics Office of Research Compliance. Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Covers 9 content areas –Animal Subjects (IACUC) –Human Subjects (IRB)
How To Be A Constructive Reviewer Publish, Not Perish: How To Survive The Peer Review Process Experimental Biology 2010 Anaheim, CA Michael J. Ryan, Ph.D.
What Does Every Graduate Student Need to Know about RCR Jo Ann Smith, PhD, CRA Griselle Báez-Muñoz University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commericalization.
Research Integrity and Policies for Handling Misconduct Alan L. Goldin, M.D./Ph.D.
What your CV says about you
MUSC Biomedical Trainee Retreat on the Responsible Conduct of Research
Teaching Scientific Communication within an REU
MUSC College of Graduate Studies
Data Fabrication and Falsification
Publication ethics PU 7, March 15, 2017
Types of Postdocs “What Do I Want to Be When I Grow Up?”
Making an Effective Curriculum Vitae
Dr Niall Oddy Durham University
Choose one of the four topics I provided on Friday
Mrs. Anna Ward Ridge Road MS
National Institutes of Health, USA Office of Extramural Research
Ethics in scholar publishing: The journal editor's role
Presentation transcript:

Announcements 1) PLEASE COMPLETE ONLINE STUDENT OPINION SURVEY 2) Graduate Resource Center on campus. The Graduate Resource Center is a space strictly for graduate students. Students are welcomed to study, have group meetings, use the smart board, attend workshops, and make appointments with writing c ​ onsultants for writing support. See flier on website for more information about writing support 3) Assignment due next week, if you missed last class - this should take about 1 hour, the time missed from class - no credit will be issued for class if this is not completed

Keeping a lab notebook - ask your advisor what style of notebook he/she prefers - date every entry - write down EVERYTHING, whether it seems relevant or not - trouble-shooting problems is only as easy as you make it - easier to write it down now, than to try to remember 5 years from now what exactly you did - do NOT write things on stray pieces of paper; if you do, these need to get taped permanently into the notebook - print-outs can be inserted or attached to the notebook

Keeping a lab notebook - avoid using “template” sheets if this means you get lazy, and don’t make separate annotations of what you’re doing - put an index of major experiments in the front, so later students and your advisor can easily find entries after you are gone - your notebook belongs to your lab; it doesn’t leave with you. Keep it updated, organized, and clear so that anyone who comes after can use it to figure out exactly what you did - patent lawsuits, scientific fraud and misconduct hearings come down to lab notebooks, which are incredibly serious big deals - open e-notebooks: what do you think?

Research Ethics Scientific ethical conduct and ethical implications of scientific issues in society are important National Academy of Sciences broke misconduct into 3 broad categories: 1. Professional Misconduct (bad mentoring, authorship disputes) 2. General Misconduct (embezzlement, sexual harassment) 3. Research Misconduct

Research Ethics Scientific ethical conduct and ethical implications of scientific issues in society are important National Academy of Sciences broke misconduct into 3 broad categories: 1. Professional Misconduct (bad mentoring, authorship disputes) ♦ Improprieties of authorship: duplicate publication of results ♦ “Gift” or “honorary” authorship ♦ Incomplete citation of previously published work ♦ Bias in peer review of proposals or manuscripts ♦ Skewed selection of data or results to hide or disguise observations that do not fit the author’s conclusions.

Research Ethics Scientific ethical conduct and ethical implications of scientific issues in society are important National Academy of Sciences broke misconduct into 3 broad categories: 1. Professional Misconduct (bad mentoring, authorship disputes) 2. General Misconduct (embezzlement, sexual harassment) 3. Research Misconduct ♦ forged or fabricated data ♦ falsified or invented results ♦ plagiarism

Research Ethics In 1996, 170 scientists were under suspicion by the federal government for possible scientific misconduct at least 20 scientists were found to have committed scientific misconduct (Dooley and Kerch 2000). NIH had ~100 “active cases” of scientific misconduct; found 17 individuals to have committed scientific misconduct NSF had ~70 active cases, found ~6 individuals guilty 1991: American Association for Advancement of Science surveyed 1500 scientists. 25% of respondants reported they had witnessed faking, falsifying, or theft of research in the past decade (Marsa 1992:40)

Outstanding Graduate Student nominations Sally Jimmy - awarded a competitive X graduate fellowship - applied for, and was awarded, X a $3,000 research grant - won CSULA, and CSU-wide,X annual student research competition - graduated with 4.0 GPAX - admitted into Ph.D. programX at Max Planc Institute - thesis will be a stand-aloneX publication