IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera Compressed Sensing for Polarimetric SAR Tomography E. Aguilera, M. Nannini and A. Reigber.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BARE EARTH DEM FROM SRTM DATA CG. Objective of the project Improve Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) from SRTM mission for hydrodynamic modeling and other.
Advertisements

Wavelets Fast Multiresolution Image Querying Jacobs et.al. SIGGRAPH95.
Image acquisition using sparse (pseudo)-random matrices Piotr Indyk MIT.
Compressive Sensing IT530, Lecture Notes.
11/11/02 IDR Workshop Dealing With Location Uncertainty in Images Hasan F. Ates Princeton University 11/11/02.
Pixel Recovery via Minimization in the Wavelet Domain Ivan W. Selesnick, Richard Van Slyke, and Onur G. Guleryuz *: Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY.
Sar polarimetric data analysis for identification of ships S. Swarajya lakshmi ADRIN, Dept. of Space, Govt. of India India Geospatial Forum – 14 th International.
Multi-Task Compressive Sensing with Dirichlet Process Priors Yuting Qi 1, Dehong Liu 1, David Dunson 2, and Lawrence Carin 1 1 Department of Electrical.
Extensions of wavelets
More MR Fingerprinting
1 Easy Does It: User Parameter Free Dense and Sparse Methods for Spectral Estimation Jian Li Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University.
Folie 1 Ambiguity Suppression by Azimuth Phase Coding in Multichannel SAR Systems DLR - Institut für Hochfrequenztechnik und Radarsysteme F. Bordoni, M.
ECE Department Rice University dsp.rice.edu/cs Measurements and Bits: Compressed Sensing meets Information Theory Shriram Sarvotham Dror Baron Richard.
Signal Processing of Germanium Detector Signals
Richard Baraniuk Rice University dsp.rice.edu/cs Compressive Signal Processing.
Signal Analysis and Processing David Scraggs. Overview Introduction to Position Resolution Induced Charges Wavelet Transform Future Work Discussion.
Random Convolution in Compressive Sampling Michael Fleyer.
Introduction to Compressive Sensing
Rice University dsp.rice.edu/cs Distributed Compressive Sensing A Framework for Integrated Sensing and Processing for Signal Ensembles Marco Duarte Shriram.
Signal Processing of Germanium Detector Signals David Scraggs University of Liverpool UNTF 2006.
1 Images and Transformations Images by Pawan SinhaPawan Sinha.
Yung P. Lee (ASAP 2001, March 14, 2001) Science Applications International Corporation 1710 SAIC Drive McLean, VA Space-Time Adaptive.
Matching Compare region of image to region of image. –We talked about this for stereo. –Important for motion. Epipolar constraint unknown. But motion small.
Sparse And Low Rank Decomposition Based Batch Image Alignment for Speckle Reduction of Retinal OCT Images Ahmadreza Baghaie, Roshan M. D’Souza, Zeyun Yu.
Introduction This SAR Land Applications Tutorial has three main components: Background and theory - an overview of the principles behind SAR remote sensing,
Compressive Sampling: A Brief Overview
MULTITEMP 2005 – Biloxi, Mississippi, USA, May 16-18, 2005 Remote Sensing Laboratory Dept. of Information and Communication Technology University of Trento.
Competence Centre on Information Extraction and Image Understanding for Earth Observation Matteo Soccorsi (1) and Mihai Datcu (1,2) A Complex GMRF for.
On Estimation of Surface Soil Moisture from SAR Jiancheng Shi Institute for Computational Earth System Science University of California, Santa Barbara.
Efficient design of a C-band aperture-coupled stacked microstrip array using Nexxim and Designer Alberto Di Maria German Aerospace Centre (DLR) – Microwaves.
Mining Discriminative Components With Low-Rank and Sparsity Constraints for Face Recognition Qiang Zhang, Baoxin Li Computer Science and Engineering Arizona.
Uses of Geospatial Soils & Surface Measurement Data in DWR Delta Levee Program Joel Dudas
Compressive Sensing Based on Local Regional Data in Wireless Sensor Networks Hao Yang, Liusheng Huang, Hongli Xu, Wei Yang 2012 IEEE Wireless Communications.
DOCUMENT OVERVIEW Title: Fully Polarimetric Airborne SAR and ERS SAR Observations of Snow: Implications For Selection of ENVISAT ASAR Modes Journal: International.
Recovering low rank and sparse matrices from compressive measurements Aswin C Sankaranarayanan Rice University Richard G. Baraniuk Andrew E. Waters.
EE369C Final Project: Accelerated Flip Angle Sequences Jan 9, 2012 Jason Su.
GISMO Simulation Study Objective Key instrument and geometry parameters Surface and base DEMs Ice mass reflection and refraction modeling Algorithms used.
Learning With Structured Sparsity
IEEE IGARSS Vancouver, July 27, 2011 On the potential of TanDEM-X for the retrieval of agricultural crop parameters by single-pass PolInSAR Juan M. Lopez-Sanchez.
Range-wavenumber representation of SAR Signal
Remote Sensing Microwave Image. 1. Penetration of Radar Signal ► ► Radar signals are able to penetrate some solid features, e.g. soil surface and vegetative.
MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC RESEARCH LABORATORIES Cambridge, Massachusetts High resolution SAR imaging using random pulse timing Dehong Liu IGARSS’ 2011 Vancouver,
PARALLEL FREQUENCY RADAR VIA COMPRESSIVE SENSING
The Scaling Law of SNR-Monitoring in Dynamic Wireless Networks Soung Chang Liew Hongyi YaoXiaohang Li.
On Estimation of Soil Moisture with SAR Jiancheng Shi ICESS University of California, Santa Barbara.
Face recognition via sparse representation. Breakdown Problem Classical techniques New method based on sparsity Results.
Robust Principal Components Analysis IT530 Lecture Notes.
IGARSS-2011-Vancouver Temporal decorrelation analysis at P-band over tropical forest Sandrine Daniel, Pascale Dubois-Fernandez, Aurélien Arnaubec, Sébastien.
Jianchao Yang, John Wright, Thomas Huang, Yi Ma CVPR 2008 Image Super-Resolution as Sparse Representation of Raw Image Patches.
IGARSS’ July, Vancouver, Canada Subsidence Monitoring Using Polarimetric Persistent Scatterers Interferometry Victor D. Navarro-Sanchez and Juan.
Date of download: 6/29/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Potential imaging modes. (a) Each detector in a focal plane array measures the.
DISPLACED PHASE CENTER ANTENNA SAR IMAGING BASED ON COMPRESSED SENSING Yueguan Lin 1,2,3, Bingchen Zhang 1,2, Wen Hong 1,2 and Yirong Wu 1,2 1 National.
Date of download: 7/10/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. A graphical overview of the proposed compressed gated range sensing (CGRS) architecture.
Wavelets (Chapter 7) CS474/674 – Prof. Bebis. STFT - revisited Time - Frequency localization depends on window size. –Wide window  good frequency localization,
Active Microwave Remote Sensing
Meng Liu,Hong Zhang,Chao Wang, Bo Zhang
Compressive Coded Aperture Video Reconstruction
Hierarchical Segmentation of Polarimetric SAR Images
The general linear model and Statistical Parametric Mapping
Wavelets : Introduction and Examples
T. Chernyakova, A. Aberdam, E. Bar-Ilan, Y. C. Eldar
the University of Oklahoma
Mojtaba F. Fathi, Roshan M. D'souza
Sudocodes Fast measurement and reconstruction of sparse signals
The general linear model and Statistical Parametric Mapping
Aishwarya sreenivasan 15 December 2006.
이훈열, 조성준, 성낙훈 강원대학교 지구물리학과 한국지질자원연구원 지반안전연구부
Sudocodes Fast measurement and reconstruction of sparse signals
Outline Sparse Reconstruction RIP Condition
Introduction to SAR Imaging
Presentation transcript:

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera Compressed Sensing for Polarimetric SAR Tomography E. Aguilera, M. Nannini and A. Reigber

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera 1. Polarimetric SAR tomography 2. Compressive sensing of single signals 3. Multiple signals compressive sensing: Exploiting correlations 4. Compressive sensing for volumetric scatterers 5. Conclusions Overview

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera azimuth ground range M parallel tracks for 3D imaging Tomographic SAR data acquisition Side-looking illumination at L-Band

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera The tomographic data stack Our dataset is a stack of M two-dimensional SAR images per polarimetric channel M images azimuth range

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera The tomographic data stack Projections of the reflectivity in the elevation direction are encoded in M pixels (complex valued) azimuth range

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera The tomographic signal model: B = AX height B : measurements A : steering matrix X : unknown reflectivity

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera What’s the problem? High resolution and low ambiguity require a large number of tracks: 1. Expensive and time consuming 2. Sometimes infeasible 3. Long temporal baselines affect reconstruction

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera Where does this work fit? Beamforming (SAR tomography): 1. Beamforming (Reigber, Nannini, Frey) 2. Adaptive beamforming (Lombardini, Guillaso) 3. Covariance matrix decomposition (Tebaldini) Physical Models (SAR interferometry): 1. PolInSAR (Cloude, Papathanassiou) 2. PCT (Cloude) Compressed sensing (SAR tomography) 1. Single signal approach (Zhu, Budillon) 2. Multiple signal/channel approach

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera Elevation profile reconstruction A A MxN : steering matrix X N : unknown reflectivity B M : stack of pixels height gnd. rangeazimuth

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera The compressive sensing approach We look for the sparsest solution that matches the measurements subject to Convex optimization problem

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera How many tracks? In theory: take measurements frequencies selected at random In practice: we can use our knowledge about the signal and sample less: low frequency components seem to do the job!

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera CS for vegetation mapping ? The elevation profile can be approximated by a summation of sparse profiles Different to conventional models (non- sparse). And probably a bad one… elevation amplitude =++ … +

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera Tomographic E-SAR Campaign Testsite:Dornstetten, Germany Horizontal baselines:~ 20m Vertical baselines:~ 0m Altitude above ground:~ 3800m # of baselines:23 3,5 m 2 corner reflectors in layover and ground

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera CAPON using 23 tracks (13x13 window) = ground truth 40 m 2 corner reflectors in layover Canopy and ground Ground 40 m Single Channel Compressive Sensing CS using only 5 tracks

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera Normalized intensity – 40 m Beamforming (23 passes, 3x3) SSCS (5 passes, 3x3)

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera Multiple Signal Compressive Sensing Assumption: adjacent azimuth-range positions are likely to have targets at about the same elevation L columns azimuth range azimuth M images G HH

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera Polarimetric correlations We can further exploit correlations between polarimetric channels 3L columns G HH G HV G VV

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera Elevation profile reconstruction A MxN : steering matrix Y Nx3L : unknown reflectivities HH HV VV Mx3L : stacks of pixels

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera Y Nx3L : unknown reflectivity subject to Elevation profile reconstruction We look for a matrix with the least number of non-zero rows that matches the measurements

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera Mixed-norm minimization subject to Number of columns in Y (window size + polarizations) Probability of recovery failure (Eldar and Rauhut, 2010)

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera SSCS (saturated)MSCS (span saturated) MSCS (polar)MSCS (span) Layover recovery with CS

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera Beamforming (23 passes, 3x3) SSCS (5 passes, 3x3) MSCS (5 passes, 3x3) MSCS (pre-denoised) (5 passes, 3x3) Layover recovery with CS

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera Volumetric Imaging Single signal CS (5 tracks) Multiple signal CS (5 tracks) 40 m

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera Volumetric Imaging Single signal CS (5 tracks) Multiple signal CS (5 tracks) 40 m

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera Volumetric Imaging Polarimetric Capon beamforming (5 tracks) Multiple signal CS (5 tracks) 40 m

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera Towards a “realistic” sparse vegetation model elevation amplitude Canopy and ground component Possible sparse description in wavelet domain!

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera Sparsity in the wavelet domain Daubechies wavelet example: 4 vanishing moments 3 levels of decomposition ground canopyground canopy

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera Elevation profile reconstruction s.t. Additional regularization L1 norm of wavelet expansion (W: transform matrix) synthetic aperture

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera Volumetric Imaging in Wavelet Domain Fourier beamforming using 23 tracks (23x23 window) Wavelet-based CS (5 tracks) 40 m

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera Volumetric Imaging in Wavelet Domain Fourier beamforming using 23 tracks (23x23 window) Wavelet-based CS (5 tracks) 40 m

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera Conclusions Single signal CS: 1. High resolution with reduced number of tracks 2. Recovers complex reflectivities but polarimetry problematic 3. Model mismatch is not catastrophic (CS theory) 4. It’s time-consuming (Convex optimization) Multiple signal CS: 1. Polarimetric extension of CS 2. Higher probability of reconstruction, less noise 3. More robust for distributed targets 4. Vegetation reconstruction in the wavelet domain

IGARSS 2011 Esteban Aguilera Convex optimization solvers CVX (Disciplined Convex Programming): SEDUMI: