Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Stronge and Associates Educational Consulting, LLC  Uniform evaluation system for teachers, educational.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The SCPS Professional Growth System
Advertisements

Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
THREE HANDBOOKS TEACHER PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION SYSTEM EDUCATIONAL SPECIALISTS PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION SYSTEM SCHOOL ADMINISTRATOR PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION.
“RACE TO THE TOP” UPDATE – TKES/LKES & THE G.O.L.D. ACADEMY SEPTEMBER 4, 2013 BOE STUDY SESSION Dan Ray, Ed.S. Director – “Race to the Top” Henry County.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System 0 August 2012.
Preparing for Learning Objectives Review the TAPS component of the Cobb Keys for Teacher Effectiveness Explore the Teacher Performance Standards.
McRel’s Evaluation System Training Session 1 May 14, 2013 Herbert Hoover Middle School.
Employee Effectiveness Project. What is the Effectiveness Project? A 360° professional focused, research based process designed to deliver the highest.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
New Teacher Performance Evaluation Program
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
OverviewOverview Virginia Principal Performance Evaluation System February 2013.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
© 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Interim Evaluation Documents evidence of meeting standards
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System ASCD: ascd.org  Qualities of Principals (2008) Each leader performance standard has a set of.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
ADVANCED LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT FOR SUPERVISORS (ALDS) PROGRAM YEAR 1 IMPLEMENTATION MARCH 2010 – FEBRUARY 2011 PILOT PROGRAM.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Document Review STANDARDEVIDENCE Standard 1 - Professional KnowledgeDocumentation and Observation Standard 2 - Instructional PlanningDocumentation and.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
Requirements are now 20 hours per year. July 1 – June 30 1.School calendar changes 2.Out of district opportunities 3.Online opportunities - Safe Schools.
Stronge and Associates Educational Consulting, LLC Documenting Teacher Performance: Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits Simulation.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Val-Ed 360° Review & Alignment. Val-Ed 360° Review The VAL-ED is a paper and on-line assessment which utilizes a multi-rater, evidence-based approach.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Overview.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
E VALUATION C HANGES SB290 R EQUIREMENTS January 17, 2013.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Teacher Performance Evaluation System Data Sources.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Program Evaluation Year 5 Results Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting, LLC Cindy Walker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Primary Purposes of the Evaluation System
Connecticut PEAC meeting Today’s meeting Discussion of draft principal evaluation guidelines (1 hour) Evaluation and support system document.
Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers Virginia Department of Education Approved April 2011.
Summative Jeopardy Summing Up Summative Decision- Making.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
Teacher Evaluation 張媛甯 資料來源: Handbook on Teacher Evaluation (Chapter 1-3) (Chapter 1-3) J. H. Stronge & P. D. Tucker 著.
6 Standards: Governance, Curriculum, Diversity, Assessment, Faculty, and Clinical  Spring Self Study Completed  June Submit Report  Fall.
Principal Evaluation Code of Virginia states that: Principal evaluations be consistent with the 7 Standards set forth by the state.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Student Achievement Teacher & Leader Effectiveness Overview of Stronge & MyLearningPlan/OASYS Interim Report #1 January 27,
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Teacher Orientation Training for teachers FY15 July 28,
Breaking Ranks II: Leading and Supporting High School Reform Rosa Aronson Director, Office of Advocacy Archived Information.
Pre-Evaluation Conference Conducted August 18, 2015 STING Schedule.
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building an Effective Evaluation System May 11-13, 2016 Jackie O. Wilson, Interim Director, Professional Development.
DECEMBER 7, 2015 Educator Effectiveness: Charter School Webinar.
State Board of Education Progress Update
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Presentation transcript:

Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Stronge and Associates Educational Consulting, LLC  Uniform evaluation system for teachers, educational specialists, and principals  Camera-ready handbooks and training materials  Simplified set of research-based performance standards  Extensively field tested  Aligned with InTASC and ISLLC standards  Professional growth and accountability oriented  Multiple data sources  Includes measures of student progress  Provides diagnostic profile of evaluatee  Fully customizable to district and state requirements The Stronge Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Evaluation System Exemplary*Proficient Proficient is the expected level of performance. Developing/ Needs Improvement Unacceptable In addition to meeting the standard, the teacher consistently demonstrates extensive knowledge of the subject matter and continually enriches the curriculum. The teacher demonstrates an understanding of the curriculum, subject content, and the developmental needs of students by providing relevant learning experiences. The teacher inconsistently demonstrates understanding of the curriculum, content, and student development or lacks fluidity in using the knowledge in practice. The teacher bases instruction on material that is inaccurate or out-of-date and/or inadequately addresses the developmental needs of students. Performance Standard 1: Professional Knowledge The teacher demonstrates an understanding of the curriculum, subject content, and the developmental needs of students by providing relevant learning experiences. The teacher:. 1.1Effectively addresses appropriate curriculum standards. 1.2Integrates key content elements and facilitates students’ use of higher level thinking skills in instruction. 1.3Demonstrates an ability to link present content with past and future learning experiences, other subject areas, and real world experiences and applications. Performance Indicators Performance Standard Performance Appraisal Rubric Main Components

Standards – Data Sources – Growth/Achievement Stronge and Associates Educational Consulting, LLC In collaboration with: New Jersey Principals and Supervisors Association/ In partnership with: Foundation for Educational Administration MyLearningPlan® OASYS TM or Professional Knowledge Instructional Planning Instructional Delivery Assessment of/for Learning Learning Environment Professionalism Student Progress Instructional Leadership School Climate Human Resources Management Organizational Management Communications & Community Relations Professionalism Student Progress Principals Professional Knowledge Program Planning & Management Assessment Program/Instructional Services Communication & Collaboration Professionalism Learner/Program Progress Teachers Educational Specialists Performance Standards Multiple Data Sources Teachers Student Learning Objectives/ Goal Setting for Student Progress Observations Documentation Log Student SurveysPrincipals Goal Setting for School Improvement/ Student Progress Informal Observations/ Site Visits Documentation Log Client Surveys Student Growth/Achievement Component  Recommend that student growth/achievement account for a portion of an individual’s summative evaluation  Student progress can be measured by the selected growth measure in a state or district (e.g., student growth percentiles, value-added models)  Teachers of tested grades/subjects: Half of growth/achievement component comprised of student growth measure; other half from multiple alternative measures (e.g., student learning objectives/student achievement goal setting)  Teachers of non-tested grades/subjects: Growth/achievement component comprised of multiple alternative measures (e.g., student learning objectives/student achievement goal setting)  Principals: Half of growth/achievement component from student growth (e.g., student growth percentiles from aggregated school data, when data are available and appropriate); half from measures of student achievement (e.g., pass rates on end-of-course tests, graduation rate, SAT trend analysis, standardized test trend analysis)