Works: Implementation strategies Megan Gonyo Office of the Vice President for Academic Affairs and Provost.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
Advertisements

Building a Strategic Management System Office for Student Affairs, Twin Cities Campus Ground Level Work Metrics Initiatives Managing Change Change Management.
Essentials of Enrolment Management and Planned Organizational Change Presentation to the National Conference of the RCCFC November 3, 2006 Victoria J.
Faculty Senate Faculty are consulted and given the opportunity for input on decisions that impact faculty members. – Faculty senate representatives.
11 The Faculty Activity Information Reporting Project.
CYPRUS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Internal Evaluation Procedures at CUT Quality Assurance Seminar Organised by the Ministry of Education and Culture and.
Representatives Jon Brickman, Chief Commercial Officer Scott Wymer, Chief Technology Officer L. K. Williams, President.
11 The Faculty Activity Information Reporting Project.
ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION Assessment, data analysis and evaluation of findings as essential components of the self study for determining if objectives.
Clinical Research Billing and Coverage Analyses CCAF 2014 Meeting San Diego, CA April 14, 2014.
Strategic Action Group 3: Collection Licensing Subgroup (CLS) Orientation Webinar June 25, 2013 University of California Libraries Systemwide Advisory.
Implementing Administrative Systems? You need an Evolution, not a Revolution! UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON Copyright [your name] [year]. This work is the intellectual.
Institutional Accreditation Review Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
Alliance for Strategic Technology (AST) SUNY Business Intelligence Initiative January 8, 2009.
New Department Chairs Orientation Nancy “Rusty” Barceló, Ph.D. Vice President and Vice Provost for Equity and Diversity Thursday, January 10, 2008.
Digital Measures Managing and Reporting on Faculty Accomplishments Steve Hare Project Manager Office of Institutional Research, Assessment, and Effectiveness.
1 MAIS & ITSS FY09 Priorities Joint UL Meeting October 27, 2008.
Institutional Accreditation Review by Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
Transforming the Enterprise Doing Business on the Web Our goals...
Luna Rajbhandari Manager, Business Intelligence Solutions Business Intelligence Solutions.
Responding to the changing landscape: The Innovative Learning Institute Jeremy Haefner, Provost September 2012.
Evaluation and Assessment Future Financial and Human Resource Administrative Systems Evaluation of options, costs, and campus readiness for transforming.
Scholarly Engagement Mission Pathway Partnership Pathway Epistemological Pathway Pedagogical Pathway Production of Knowledge Improvement of LearningConnection.
Augustana’s Five Year Goals To Create a Campus Climate that Fosters Student Learning through Effective Assessment To Articulate Learning Objectives for.
1 SHEEO Summer 2004 Financing Online Education: Building Sustainable Enterprises Laura M. King Vice Chancellor of Finance Minnesota State Colleges and.
Lori Smith Vice President Business Intelligence Universal Technical Institute Chosen by Industry. Ready to Work.™
NASPA Presentation Practical Tools for Building Division-wide Assessment Capacity Adrienne Dumpe, Graduate Assistant, VPSA Katie O’Dair, Director of Assessment.
Faculty Handbook The Faculty Handbook states that the normal full-time teaching load is 15 credits per term, including 12 credits of assigned courses and.
UCSF IT Update November 2013 Presenter: Joe Bengfort.
Institutional Implementation: The Penn State Journey Nicola Kiver Executive Assistant to the Dean College of the Liberal Arts Cheryl Seybold Director of.
Promotion and Tenure for Chairs, Heads, & Administrators: Twin Cities Arlene Carney Vice Provost for Faculty & Academic Affairs.
Planning Alignment Joseph A. Alutto Executive Vice President and Provost.
Washington State University Strategic Plan Overview and Implementation Process On web site at
Web Technologies Working Group October 25, Approval Needed Web Standards and Guidelines – Development of an online resource with the objective of.
First Tuesday Series February 2, SACS -- Quality Enhancement Plan SACS requires that universities develop a comprehensive plan to enhance student.
1 California Lutheran University Strategic Planning for
Fundraising Roles of Planning and Advancement Area.
Illinois Research Connections Researcher Information System Project Chief Communications Officers 7 April 2015 Rebecca Bryant, PhD.
Organizational Structures For Decision Support and Reporting University of Missouri Reporting Task Force March 13, 2003.
Aligning IT Investments (Plan) and the Institutional Strategic Plan Team 2 Ed Pokraka Shelley Reed Jeff Cepull Will Krause Educause Seminars On Academic.
SUBMITTED TO THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS MAY 2010 Progress Report on Outcomes Assessment.
Orientation Webinar July 10, 2013 University of California Libraries Systemwide Advisory Structure.
In a period of unprecedented change Tales of a Great University A Signature Special Presentation of OLLI’s 35th Anniversary 1.
Some Thoughts and Questions on Centralized vs. Distributed I.T. Functions 1. (mainly questions) 2.Classroom / Faculty / Desktop support 3.Governance.
A member of the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system, Bemidji State University is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer and educator.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Strategic Planning 2004: School of Health and Human Services Measuring Progress- Setting New Goals.
Activity Insight Implementation Plan Dec ‘15 – Jan ‘17 Anne Massey Associate Vice President, University Academic Affairs.
CONTEXT FOR ACADEMIC STRATEGIC PLANNING AT UM Foundation for upcoming Accreditation process Identify key issues and opportunities to address over the next.
Forward Together: UW Madison’s Framework for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence Ad Hoc Diversity Planning Committee Shared Governance (Faculty, staff,
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Reappointment, Tenure and Promotion (RTP) Processes and Procedures
Dr. Jo Alice Blondin, President, Clark State Community College
Innovation Ecosystems Fellowship Overview
University Career Services Committee
Faculty Accomplishment Systems Update
Harvard CRM Service Strategy
MidAIR Conference Kansas City, MO | November 9, 2017
Faculty Activity Information Reporting System
The Faculty Activity Information Reporting Project
The Faculty Activity Information Reporting Project
IT Governance Planning Overview
State of the University
“We don’t have enough staff assigned to making IT accessible!”
Harvard Web Publishing Web Publishing for the Harvard Community
Data Governance at UMBC: Built from the Bottom Up
Jeff Wray Research Director
Information Technology Organization Overview RFP #220-05
John Volin Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Peter Diplock
Presentation transcript:

Works: Implementation strategies Megan Gonyo Office of the Vice President for Academic Affairs and Provost

Background About 4,000 faculty, 5 campuses, large medical school Early adopters selected based on need; 30% of total estimated implementation Spent one year customizing for early adopters

Organization Works (Activity Insight) coordinated through central Provost/Faculty Affairs office –Faculty CVs, promotion and tenure guidelines, merit reviews, faculty governance Office of Information Technology: analyst, developer, and leadership support for resources

Strategic Priorities Academically driven process (not technical) Customize towards a full implementation Data integration Standardization

Why? Strategies Improve business/academic process; requires thorough understanding of the same Avoid retrofitting later Value proposition to end users; buy-in Institutional reporting Why Academically driven process (not technical) Customize towards a full implementation Data integration Standardization

Scope Tenured and tenure-track faculty; with some exceptions Annual review and accreditation First year of activities first, then backfill

Approach Steering Committee & Project Team Analyze CVs Customize screens & develop reports Pilot testing/feedback Usability lab

Usability Lab Created scenarios for volunteer faculty and administrator users Assessed intuitiveness of screens; learned expectations of users Partnered with Digital Measures to make improvements

Obstacles Data integration –Limitations in source system data (Oracle PeopleSoft) & publications  Works  output to CVs –Read-only to accommodate web service overrides –Added some new fields for reports; No good solution yet Standardization –Ex. Public engagement; discipline-specific language Historical data vs. scope –Needed for full CVs, accreditation, and some grant applications

Future goals Faculty web profiles Workflow Advanced reporting Clinical practice Extension

Disclaimer Just launched early October No data yet on actual successes/failures No guide

©2014 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.