LIGO-G000157-00-D Global Diagnostics and Detector Characterization 9 th Marcel Grossmann Meeting Daniel Sigg, LIGO Hanford Observatory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CWG10 Control, Configuration and Monitoring Status and plans for Control, Configuration and Monitoring 16 December 2014 ALICE O 2 Asian Workshop
Advertisements

The Operating System. What is an Operating System? The software which makes it possible for you to use your computer The software which starts up when.
GWDAW-10 (December 14, 2005, University of Texas at Brownsville, U.S.A.) Data conditioning and veto for TAMA burst analysis Masaki Ando and Koji Ishidoshiro.
23/04/2008VLVnT08, Toulon, FR, April 2008, M. Stavrianakou, NESTOR-NOA 1 First thoughts for KM3Net on-shore data storage and distribution Facilities VLV.
# H0:PEM-LVEA_SEISX : 10-30Hz # H0:PEM-LVEA_SEISX : 3-10Hz # H0:PEM-LVEA_SEISX : 1-3Hz # H0:PEM-LVEA_SEISX : 0.3-1Hz # H0:PEM-LVEA_SEISX : Hz #
LIGO-G0200XX-00-M DMT Monitors: Beyond the FOM John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech LLO August 18, 2006.
LIGO-G E ITR 2003 DMT Sub-Project John G. Zweizig LIGO/Caltech Argonne, May 10, 2004.
Detector Characterization in GEO 600 by Alicia M. Sintes-Olives on behalf of the GEO-DC team Universitat de les Illes Balears
SensIT PI Meeting, January 15-17, Self-Organizing Sensor Networks: Efficient Distributed Mechanisms Alvin S. Lim Computer Science and Software Engineering.
LIGO-G Z NSF Review LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Michigan 1 LSC Participation in Initial LIGO Detector Characterization.
LIGO-G DM. Landry – Amaldi5 July 9, 2003 Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory Monitoring LIGO Data During the S2 Science Run Michael.
LIGO-G Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
A new class in PC Data Acquisition Delphin Technology AG Felix Ottofuelling V5.0.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization NeedsK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Detector Characterization Needs Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
3 May 2011 VESF DA schoolD. Verkindt 1 Didier Verkindt Virgo-LAPP CNRS - Université de Savoie VESF Data Analysis School Data Quality and vetos.
Opton 4 short presentation1 Opton 4 User friendly operating software for Symmetron’s Stylitis data loggers.
LIGO-G9900XX-00-M ITR 2003 DMT Sub-Project John G. Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL, Dec 2004 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software and calibration L3 display 200 GeV February.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting April 25, 2006 Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in Data from the.
6-10 Oct 2002GREX 2002, Pisa D. Verkindt, LAPP 1 Virgo Data Acquisition D. Verkindt, LAPP DAQ Purpose DAQ Architecture Data Acquisition examples Connection.
Analysis of nonstationarity in LIGO S5 data using the NoiseFloorMon output A proposal for a seismic Data Quality flag. R. Stone for the LSC The Center.
1 Data quality and veto studies for the S4 burst search: Where do we stand? Alessandra Di Credico Syracuse University LSC Meeting, Ann Arbor (UM) June.
Abstract: We completed the tuning of the analysis procedures of the AURIGA-LIGO joint burst search and we are in the process of verifying our results.
Online Software 8-July-98 Commissioning Working Group DØ Workshop S. Fuess Objective: Define for you, the customers of the Online system, the products.
G R LSC UL 13 Aug 011 Detector Characterization; Triggers, code infrastructure; Followup Analysis for the UL groups Nelson Christensen, Szabi.
Martin Hewitson Data access for GEO600. GEO DC workshop June Overview A variety of tools exist for on-line and off-line analyses Aux info.
LIGO-G D Status of Stochastic Search with LIGO Vuk Mandic on behalf of LIGO Scientific Collaboration Caltech GWDAW-10, 12/15/05.
11 CLUSTERING AND AVAILABILITY Chapter 11. Chapter 11: CLUSTERING AND AVAILABILITY2 OVERVIEW  Describe the clustering capabilities of Microsoft Windows.
The KLOE computing environment Nuclear Science Symposium Portland, Oregon, USA 20 October 2003 M. Moulson – INFN/Frascati for the KLOE Collaboration.
LSC Meeting, 19 March 2003 Shawhan, Leonor, MarkaLIGO-G D Introduction to Hardware Signal Injections Peter Shawhan, Isabel Leonor, Szabi Márka.
LIGO-G Z 5 June 2001L.S.Finn/LIGO Scientific Collaboration1 LDAS Camp.
Jan 12, 2009LIGO-G Z1 DMT and NDS2 John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech Ligo PAC, Caltech, Jan 12, 2009.
A real-time software backend for the GMRT : towards hybrid backends CASPER meeting Capetown 30th September 2009 Collaborators : Jayanta Roy (NCRA) Yashwant.
A Data/Detector Characterization Pipeline (What is it and why we need one) Soumya D. Mohanty AEI January 18, 2001 Outline of the talk Functions of a Pipeline.
LIGO-G D Upper Limits on the Stochastic Background of Gravitational Waves from LIGO Vuk Mandic Einstein2005 Conference Paris, July
Pertemuan 16 Materi : Buku Wajib & Sumber Materi :
Characterization of PEM Channels Chirpiness of the Test Mass motion due to “Noise” Anthony Rizzi Staff Scientist, LIGO LIGO-G D.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
May 29, 2006 GWADW, Elba, May 27 - June 21 LIGO-G0200XX-00-M Data Quality Monitoring at LIGO John Zweizig LIGO / Caltech.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Issues K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Introduction to Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Software Tools K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Introduction to Detector Characterization Sessions.
LIGO-G D Online Digital Signal Processing NSF Review, October 23, 2002 Daniel Sigg, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G Z Introd. to Detect. Charact. Sessions K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Introduction to the Detector Characterization.
ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December, Generating time domain strain data (h(t)) for the ALLEGRO resonant detector or calibration of ALLEGRO data.
Detector Characterisation and Optimisation David Robertson University of Glasgow.
Online Consumers produce histograms (from a limited sample of events) which provide information about the status of the different sub-detectors. The DQM.
HNC COMPUTING - Network Concepts 1 Network Concepts Network Concepts Network Operating Systems Network Operating Systems.
S.Klimenko, LSC meeting, March 2002 LineMonitor Sergey Klimenko University of Florida Other contributors: E.Daw (LSU), A.Sazonov(UF), J.Zweizig (Caltech)
XFEL The European X-Ray Laser Project X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Wojciech Jalmuzna, Technical University of Lodz, Department of Microelectronics and Computer.
January 2010 – GEO-ISC KickOff meeting Christian Gräf, AEI 10 m Prototype Team State-of-the-art digital control: Introducing LIGO CDS.
ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle for the US Department of Energy Status Report: Data Acquisition and Instrument Controls for the Spallation Neutron Source.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
XFEL The European X-Ray Laser Project X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Wojciech Jalmuzna, Technical University of Lodz, Department of Microelectronics and Computer.
Control Software Features  Modularity and flexibility to ensure the long-term viability and scalability of the MUST-SIM Control System  System setup.
LIGO-G05????-00-Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
Online all-sky burst searches during the joint S6/VSR2 LIGO-Virgo science run Igor Yakushin LIGO Livingston Observatory, Caltech For the LIGO Scientific.
From LSE-30: Observatory System Spec.
DELLSOFT Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Advanced Virgo Detector Monitoring and Data Quality
Methods and Milestones
The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO
Overview of E10 / S3 Hardware Injections
ITS combined test seen from DAQ and ECS F.Carena, J-C.Marin
Cover page.
Report on the S2 Run Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
Status and Plans for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Data Analysis
EPICS: Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Michigan
Overview of Computer system
Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G D Global Diagnostics and Detector Characterization 9 th Marcel Grossmann Meeting Daniel Sigg, LIGO Hanford Observatory

LIGO-G D LIGO I2 Organization  Detector Characterization Working Group  Leader: Keith Riles  Part of the LIGO Science Collaboration  Development of software algorithms  Transient analysis  Performance characterization  Data set simulation  Reduced data sets  Global Diagnostics Subsystem  John Zweizig, Daniel Sigg  Hardware and software infrastructure

LIGO-G D LIGO I3 Diagnostics Tasks  Detector Characterization  Calibration  Detector response, inter-system dependencies & cross-couplings  Machine artifacts  Maintain Performance  System identification (Feedback control)  Continuous operation monitoring  Detection Confidence  Understand the physical environment  Understand the auxiliary degrees-of-freedom  GW signal  1% of data rate (3MB/s/ifo)

LIGO-G D LIGO I4 System Overview

LIGO-G D LIGO I5 Basic Approach  Diagnostics Test Tool  Emulates a measurement instrument  Interactive graphical user interface  Stimulus-response tests  Data Monitoring Tool  Maximum flexibility  Interactive command line interface & background processing  Simultaneously look at all channels

LIGO-G D LIGO I6 Diagnostics Test Tool  Supported tests  Fourier tools: power spectra estimates, coherence, etc.  Swept sine measurements  Multiple sine response measurements  Triggered time series measurements  Supports many excitations & measurement channels  Site-wide & GPS/UTC synchronized  Interfaces digital feedback controllers  Off-line capabilities

LIGO-G D LIGO I7 Setup

LIGO-G D LIGO I8 Plot

LIGO-G D LIGO I9 Data Monitoring Tool  Multi-processor SUN workstations  Input:  High bandwidth distribution of on-line data (1000baseSX broadcast)  Alternatively: Frame files from disk  Shared memory partitions (~10 sec of data)  Output:  Triggers/veto to event database  Alarms to control room  Trend channel recording  C++ class library  Container objects for time and frequency series, etc.  Signal processing library: FFT, etc.  Interactive environment & graphics based on ROOT

LIGO-G D LIGO I10 Micro- Seismic Monitoring Report produced for seconds to June 17, :30:00 ============================= Channel Statistics Flag Channel Frames On Off Repeat Avg Sigma Minimum Maximum H0:PEM-MX_TILTT ee H0:PEM-MX_SEISZ H0:PEM-MX_SEISY H0:PEM-MX_SEISX H0:PEM-MX_TILTY f H0:PEM-MX_TILTX c H0:PEM-MY_TILTT e Channel Statistics

LIGO-G D LIGO I11 Time Frequency Analysis

LIGO-G D LIGO I12 Frequency Noise Measurement

LIGO-G D LIGO I13 Seismic Displacement

LIGO-G D LIGO I14 Alignment Fluctuations before after

LIGO-G D LIGO I15 Auto-Alignment: Step Response

LIGO-G D LIGO I16 Conclusions Combination of  High performance data acquisition system  24 hour disk cache  New software and analysis tools has enabled  Fast learning curve  Emphasis on analysis rather than data gathering  Greatly enhanced remote diagnostics