Negligence. Homework 20.1 and 20.2 – read Chapter 20 20.1 and 20.2 – read Chapter 20.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Torts.
Advertisements

CHAPTER 6 REVIEW Let the Games Begin
Q3 LAW NOTES 1 TORTS.
What You’ll Learn How to define negligence (p. 88)
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Negligence and Strict Liability Section 4.2.
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Litigation and Procedure Negligence and Strict Liability Litigation and Procedure Negligence.
{ Chapter 10 TORTS: Negligence and Strict Liability.
Negligence.
Chapter 18: Torts A Civil Wrong
Tort Law Part 2 Negligence and Liability. Negligence Most common tort Accidental or Unintentional Tort Failure to show a degree of care that a “reasonable”
Chapter 18 Torts.
Chapter 3 Tort Law.
NEGLIGENCE Law 12 – MUNDY Negligence  Tort law is based on mostly case precedents and certain provincial and federal legislation;  Hence, our.
Private Wrongs: Torts Negligence and Strict Liability Chapter 14.
Tort Law – Unintentional torts
Tort Law – Unintentional Torts. Negligence Action was unintentional Action was unintentional It is planned It is planned Injury occurs Injury occurs anyone.
 A body of rights, obligations, and remedies that is applied by courts in civil proceedings to provide relief for persons who have suffered harm from.
Copyright © 2008 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 9 Torts Twomey Jennings Anderson’s Business Law and the Legal.
 1. Duty-The accused wrongdoer owed a duty of care to the injured person  2. Breach of Duty- the defendant’s conduct breached that duty  3. Causation-defendant’s.
1 Ins301 Chp12 Tort Law Background on the law Basic tort liability rules Liability from negligence Economic objectives of the tort liability system.
Chapter 4 Section 2 Negligence and Strict Liability.
Part 2 – The Law of Torts Chapter 5 – Negligence and Unintentional Torts Prepared by Michael Bozzo, Mohawk College © 2015 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 5-1.
Unit 6 – Civil Law.
Products Liability “Liability for Defective Products”
Torts in a Health care setting. What is a Tort? A tort is an infringement of a person’s rights that constitutes grounds for a lawsuit. This may be in.
Tort Law Summary. Entitles you to sue for damages in a civil court of law Entitles you to sue for damages in a civil court of law It is a “wrong” which.
3.2 Negligence and Liability
PE 254. Negligence The legal claim that a person failed to act as a reasonable and prudent person should, thereby resulting in injury to another person.
Chapter 19 Objective At the Conclusion of this lesson students will be able to: Define negligence and its elements Use these elements to analyze cases.
Chapter 20 Negligence. The failure to exercise a reasonable amount of care in either doing or not doing something resulting in harm or injury.
Torts A.K.A. civil law. What’s a Tort? Torts more or less means “wrongs” Refers to civil laws Based on both common law (decisions made by judges) and.
Chapter 09 Negligence and Strict Liability Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
 Understand the four elements of the tort of negligence  Understand the reasonable person standard  Understand how foreseeability (ability to anticipate.
 Crime – _______________________________ _______________________________________  Elements of a Crime: › A duty to do or not to do a certain thing ›
Negligence by Snježana Husinec. Negligence  failure to exercise the care toward others which a reasonable or prudent person would do in the circumstances,
LAW for Business and Personal Use © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible.
The Role of the Courts.
Chapter 5 Negligence Damages Civil Procedure. Negligence Duty Owed Breach of that Duty Proximate Cause of Injury or Damage.
Unit 2 Chapter 5 Legal Environments of Business (LEB)
By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts
Tort Law Summary. Entitles you to sue for damages in a civil court of law Entitles you to sue for damages in a civil court of law It is a “wrong” which.
CHAPTER 12: NEGLIGENCE THE BASICS Emond Montgomery Publications 1.
The Law of Torts Chapter 4. Intentional Torts Crime: –Harm to specific individuals and also to the general welfare Tort: –Private wrong committed by one.
Law for Business and Personal Use © Thomson South-Western CHAPTER 5 Civil Law and Procedure 5-1Private Injuries vs. Public Offenses 5-2Intentional Torts,
Chapter 9 Negligence and Strict Liability Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior.
Chapter 20. Conduct that falls below the standard established by law for protecting others against unreasonable risks of harm Surgeon forgets to remove.
CHAPTER 18 PART I Torts: A Civil Wrong. A Civil Wrong In criminal law, when someone commits a wrong, we call it a crime. In civil law, when someone commits.
Negligence. Definition Negligence in an unintentional Tort This occurs when a person fails to use reasonable care and it causes harm to another person.
 In some circumstances, responsibility lies not only with the person undertaking (or failing to undertake) an action, but also with an individual responsible.
Understanding Business and Personal Law Negligence and Strict Liability Section 4.2 The Law of Torts A person can commit an unintentional tort, when he.
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Negligence and Strict Liability Section 4.2.
Negligence Tort law establishes standards for the care that people must show to one another. Negligence is the conduct that falls below this standard.
Certain professionals, such as doctors, pilots, and plumbers, are held to the standards of reasonably skilled professionals in their field. Even minors.
Law-Related Ch Notes I. Torts: 1. A tort is a civil wrong.
Neglect Torts Chapter 20.
The Law of Torts I’m going to sue you!.
Negligence Mr. Lugo.
THE CASE OF THE MISSING SHOES
Negligence Damages Civil Procedure
2.03 Civil Law.
Introduction to Torts: Civil Law
Defenses to Negligence
Introduction to Civil Law
Negligence.
Section Outline Unintentional Torts Negligence Strict Liability
Negligence Ms. Weigl.
Lesson 6-1 Civil Law (Tort Law).
Tort Law Summary.
Civil Law 3.5 Defenses to Torts
Civil Law 3.4 negligence.
Presentation transcript:

Negligence

Homework 20.1 and 20.2 – read Chapter and 20.2 – read Chapter 20

Negligence: a tort, is a civil wrong consisting of five criteria: Negligence: a tort, is a civil wrong consisting of five criteria: Duty or reasonable standard of care (as decided by judge as a matter of law), Duty or reasonable standard of care (as decided by judge as a matter of law), Breach (or "negligence" in laymen's terms, decided as a matter of fact), Breach (or "negligence" in laymen's terms, decided as a matter of fact), Injury (the fact that the plaintiff suffered an injury, and is determined at a matter of fact), Injury (the fact that the plaintiff suffered an injury, and is determined at a matter of fact), Cause in Fact or conduct of defendant that causes plaintiff's injury(s)(decided as a matter of fact), Cause in Fact or conduct of defendant that causes plaintiff's injury(s)(decided as a matter of fact), Legal Cause (now perceived as the foreseeability of the type of injury caused but not the specific injury or extent of injury, determined as a matter of fact). Legal Cause (now perceived as the foreseeability of the type of injury caused but not the specific injury or extent of injury, determined as a matter of fact). Matters of law are decided by a judge, matters of fact are decided by a jury. Matters of law are decided by a judge, matters of fact are decided by a jury.

In order to prove negligence, it is not necessary to prove harm, but in order for a cause of action to rest in tort, harm must be proven In order to prove negligence, it is not necessary to prove harm, but in order for a cause of action to rest in tort, harm must be proven In order for the harm to be compensable in a negligence lawsuit, the defendant must be shown to have been negligent, and it must be demonstrated that his negligence was the proximate cause of the harm sustained by the plaintiff. In order for the harm to be compensable in a negligence lawsuit, the defendant must be shown to have been negligent, and it must be demonstrated that his negligence was the proximate cause of the harm sustained by the plaintiff. Damages are awarded in proportion to the scope of the harm done Damages are awarded in proportion to the scope of the harm done The courts also consider the idea if a “reasonable person” would commit or dismiss the act The courts also consider the idea if a “reasonable person” would commit or dismiss the act

When considering a negligence cause of action there are six primary elements which need to be viewed and covered thoroughly: When considering a negligence cause of action there are six primary elements which need to be viewed and covered thoroughly: (1) duty, (1) duty, (2) breach of duty, (2) breach of duty, (3) causation, (3) causation, 4) damage, 4) damage, (5) remoteness and (5) remoteness and (6) defences. (6) defences. Once this has been done an appropriate award of damages may be considered Once this has been done an appropriate award of damages may be considered

Coase theorem the Coase theorem, attributed to Ronald Coase, relates to the economic efficiency of a government's allocation of property rights the Coase theorem, attributed to Ronald Coase, relates to the economic efficiency of a government's allocation of property rights B < PL B < PL where B is the cost (burden) of taking precautions, and P is the probability of loss (L). where B is the cost (burden) of taking precautions, and P is the probability of loss (L). rather than spending money on safety, the individual will simply allow harm to occur and pay for the costs of that harm, because that will be more cost-efficient than taking precautions rather than spending money on safety, the individual will simply allow harm to occur and pay for the costs of that harm, because that will be more cost-efficient than taking precautions leads to an optimal allocation of resources; where harm can be cheaply avoided, the legal system requires precautions. Where precautions are prohibitively expensive, it does not leads to an optimal allocation of resources; where harm can be cheaply avoided, the legal system requires precautions. Where precautions are prohibitively expensive, it does not

In many states, damages in negligence lawsuits can include (but are not limited to) compensation for: In many states, damages in negligence lawsuits can include (but are not limited to) compensation for: the injury suffered the injury suffered damaged or destroyed personal property damaged or destroyed personal property medical and hospital bills medical and hospital bills harm to marital relations (called "loss of consortium") harm to marital relations (called "loss of consortium") lost past and future earnings lost past and future earnings and physical and emotional "pain and suffering" and physical and emotional "pain and suffering"

Defenses to suits Contributory negligence: cannot recover remedies for your own negligence Contributory negligence: cannot recover remedies for your own negligence Comparative negligence: dividing the damages in accordance to the degree in which each was at fault Comparative negligence: dividing the damages in accordance to the degree in which each was at fault Scenario: Business Law question Scenario: Business Law question P sues D in negligence. At trial, it is determined that P's negligence was 40% responsible for P's injury, and D's negligence was 60% responsible. P's losses total $10,000. Under a pure comparative negligence system, P will recover: a) Nothing. b) $4000. c) $6000. d) $10,00 0. P sues D in negligence. At trial, it is determined that P's negligence was 40% responsible for P's injury, and D's negligence was 60% responsible. P's losses total $10,000. Under a pure comparative negligence system, P will recover: a) Nothing. b) $4000. c) $6000. d) $10,00 0. Assumption of Risk: voluntary encountering a known danger Assumption of Risk: voluntary encountering a known danger