EGU 2015 Dr. Ingo Simonis Open Geospatial Consortium Europe Citizen Observatories: A Standards Based Architecture.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fall VoN 2000 SIP for IP Communications Jonathan Rosenberg Chief Scientist.
Advertisements

Sensor Web Standards and the Internet of Things May 24 th, 2011 Scott Fairgrieve Geospatial Research and Development COM.Geo 2011 Workshop Expanding GeoWeb.
George Percivall, OGC and Ingo Simonis, OGC-E
© Geospatial Research & Consulting Ingo Simonis Ingo Simonis Freelancer.
Sensor Web Enablement and GEOSS Presented by: Terence van Zyl.
Ubiquitous GIS - Part IV Standards for UBGIS: ISO/TC211 WG 10 UPA (Ubiquitous Public Access) Fall 2007 Ki-Joune Li Pusan.
Geneva, Switzerland, 18 February 2014 OGC Where the Internet of Things touches Location/Space Bart De Lathouwer, OGC, ITU.
Mike Botts – Summer Open Geospatial Consortium Sensor Web Enablement (SWE) GEOINT Huntsville August 14, 2013 Dr. Mike Botts
FOSS4G 2009 Building Human Sensor Webs with 52° North SWE Implementations Building Human Sensor Webs with 52° North SWE Implementations Eike Hinderk Jürrens,
UNCERTML - DESCRIBING AND COMMUNICATING UNCERTAINTY Matthew Williams
W3C Video on the Web Workshop December 2007, San Jose, California Video on the Semantic Sensor Web Amit Sheth Amit Sheth with Cory Henson, Prateek.
Pacific Island Countries GIS/RS User Conference 2010, Suva, November 2010 Sensor Web Enablement for the Pacific Vulnerability and adaptation of coastal.
Services Javi Carrasco Miguel Montesinos Carlos Sánchez Fran Peñarrubia Alain Tamayo SWE.
® Sponsored by OGC/WMO Hydrology Domain Working Group 95th OGC Technical Committee Boulder, Colorado USA David Arctur 13:00-14:45 Wednesday 3 June 2015.
Copyright © 2006, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc., All Rights Reserved. The OGC and Emergency Services: GML for Location Transport & Formats & Mapping.
1 NOAA/National Weather Service John Halquist. 2 Why Standards? Accessibility Versatility Consistency Ensure correct use Remove ambiguity Leverage toolkits.
OGC Liaison Report WGISS-20 Allan Doyle, EOGEO
Metadata (for the data users downstream) RFC GIS Workshop July 2007 NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC Documentation.
Interoperability ERRA System.
Luis Bermudez Southeastern Universities Research Association Carlos Rueda Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute Moving Beyond the 10,000 Ways That Don't.
WPS Application Patterns at the Workshop “Models For Scientific Exploitation Of EO Data” ESRIN, October 2012 Albert Remke & Daniel Nüst 52°North Initiative.
Presented by ORNL SensorNet: Wide-Area Sensor Networks for Protection and Assurance Presenter’s name Affiliation.
® Sponsored by In Location Alliance Coordination: architecture and use cases 95th OGC Technical Committee Andreas Wachter, ILA/Qualcomm George Percivall.
Mapping between SOS standard specifications and INSPIRE legislation. Relationship between SOS and D2.9 Matthes Rieke, Dr. Albert Remke (m.rieke,
Achieving Interoperability using the ArcGIS Platform
CEOS WGISS, Hanoi May OSCAR Prototyping the sensor web Wyn Cudlip BNSC/QinetiQ Presentation to WGISS Hanoi May 2007 (Slides.
THEME[ENV ]: Inter-operable integration of shared Earth Observation in the Global Context Duration: Sept. 1, 2011 – Aug. 31, 2014 Total EC.
Planning RETF Meeting1 Planning RETF Presentation Problem Statement Problem Statement Solution Solution Proposal Proposal Next Steps Next Steps.
Geneva, Switzerland, 18 February 2014 OGC Where the Internet of Things touches Location/Space Bart De Lathouwer, OGC, bdelathouwer [at] opengeospatial.orgbdelathouwer.
UNCERTML - DESCRIBING AND COMMUNICATING UNCERTAINTY WITHIN THE (SEMANTIC) WEB Matthew Williams
® OGC Extensions to Traditional Spatial Data Infrastructures: Integration of Social Media, Synchronization of Datasets, and Data on the Go in GeoPackages.
SensorGrid Galip Aydin June SensorGrid A flexible computing environment for coupling real-time data sources to High Performance Geographic Information.
© 2006, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. The OGC Sensor Web Enablement framework Simon CoxMike Botts CSIRO Exploration & MiningNational Space Science &
Open Geospatial Consortium Overview and why we are adopting the standards.
WPS 2.0 developments and proposed features Umweltwissenschaften, FR Geowissenschaften, Professur f. Geoinformationssysteme Matthias Müller Castellón, June.
Data Assimilation Decision Making Using Sensor Web Enablement M. Goodman, G. Berthiau, H. Conover, X. Li, Y. Lu, M. Maskey, K. Regner, B. Zavodsky, R.
© 2005, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. CrisisGrid: Critical Infrastructure and Informatics for Emergency Response 4 May 2005 Mark Reichardt President.
COMPASS09 Annual Conference of Compass Informatics.
Presented by ORNL SensorNet: Wide-Area Sensor Networks for Protection and Assurance Budhendra Bhaduri Geographic Information Science and Technology Computational.
® ® Geospatial Information Standards for Human Geography at: Human Geography Summit by: Raj Singh, PhD Director, Interoperability Programs Open Geospatial.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use INSPIRE Orthoimagery TWG Status Report Antonio Romeo ESRIN 15/02/2012.
SDI 4.0 Crowd-sourcing, Gov-sourcing Geographic Data via Open Geosynchronization Raj R. Singh Director, Interoperability Programs Open Geospatial Consortium.
® Capacity Development & Knowledge Frameworks Denise McKenzie Open Geospatial Consortium 22 April 2016 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
® OGC perspective on CyberGIS for Collaborative Problem Solving AAG Annual Meeting panel, April 2015 George Percivall Chief Engineer and CTO
® Sponsored by SOS 2.0 Profile For Hydrology 90th OGC Technical Committee Washington, DC Michael Utech 26 March 2014 Copyright © 2014 Open Geospatial Consortium.
SWE Profile for Citizen Science Ingo Simonis Bart De Lathouwer Mexico-City, 9 November 2015 AIP Results.
Page 1Overview of the HMA Project, 8 March 2010 Overview of the HMA Project OGC TC Opening Plenary Pier Giorgio Marchetti European Space Agency.
. A Standardized Encoding to Exchange Citizen Science Data January 2016 Dr. Ingo Simonis Open Geospatial Consortium Europe
. A Standardized Encoding to Exchange Citizen Science Data EO Science 2.0 – Oct 2015 Dr. Ingo Simonis Open Geospatial Consortium Europe
1 O PEN S ENSOR H UB FOR S ENSOR W EBS AND I O T FOSS4G-NA May 2016 Mike Botts Botts Innovative Research, Inc Alex Robin Sensia Software.
Intro text for this chapter OGC standards power next-gen emergency response apps Frank Suykens Research & Development.
Copyright, Open Geospatial Consortium Making Location Count Peer-to-Peer File Sharing An Answer to the SDI blues North Carolina GIS Conference February,
® Sponsored by Architecture DWG 98th OGC Technical Committee Washington, DC USA Carl Reed, Joan Maso 10 March 2016 Copyright © 2016 Open Geospatial Consortium.
® Standards for Disaster Mitigation and Response Scott Simmons Executive Director, Standards Program Open Geospatial Consortium Copyright © 2016 Open Geospatial.
Botts – August 2004 Sensor Web Enablement Sensor Web Enablement WG (SWE-WG)
Python Driven Sensor Observation Service Benjamin Welton NASA USRP.
Program / Interoperability Update CDB
Task 2.6 Eric Delory PLOCAN
Sensor Web Enablement (SWE) and Sensor Modeling Language (SensorML)
OGC Standards Overview
HMA Follow On Task 1 Standards evolutions
Earth Observation topics in OGC
Sensor Services & Processing Services
OGC Where the Internet of Things touches Location/Space
Sensor Web technologies in support of monitoring climate change
SWE 2.0 – Current Status of Standards
and perspectives for AIXM
QoS Metadata Status 106th OGC Technical Committee Orléans, France
Location Presentation
Presentation transcript:

EGU 2015 Dr. Ingo Simonis Open Geospatial Consortium Europe Citizen Observatories: A Standards Based Architecture

Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) © 2014 Open Geospatial Consortium 2

Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) © 2014 Open Geospatial Consortium 3 Not for profit 35+ Standards 500+ Members 1994 Consensus driven 3

© 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium 4 slide based on work by Alex Robin © 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium Citizens Observatories

OGC Sensor Web Enablement Quickly discover sensors and sensor data (secure or public) that can meet my needs – location, observables, quality, ability to task Obtain sensor information in a standard encoding that is understandable by me and my software Readily access sensor observations in a common manner, and in a form specific to my needs Task sensors, when possible, to meet my specific needs Subscribe to and receive alerts when a sensor measures a particular phenomenon © 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium 5

describe sensors describe citizens describe observations discover & access data task citizens & sensors common formats

Sensors and Actuators Copyright © 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium

SensorML Profile for Citizen Science SensorML is generic Profile required to ensure interoperability –minimum set of SensorML elements –structure on how to provide this minimum set of elements who device connected sensors

SensorML Profile for Citizen Science SensorML is generic Profile required to ensure interoperability –minimum set of SensorML elements –structure on how to provide this minimum set of elements Formal definition with Schematron? Best practices without formal testing? Simplify even more and go with JSON-LD contexts? who device connected sensors

10 O&M Design patterns

O&M Profile for Citizens Science O&M Result is generic Most devices are used in default settings Profile required to enhance interoperability Formal definition with Schematron? Best practices without formal testing? Simplify even more and go with JSON-LD contexts? who observation connected sensors

How Much Profile is Enough? Often, results are first class citizens!... but metadata matters! How much observation specific information do we need? Avoid redundant information (observation centric vs. sensor centric)

GeoSynchronization Service (GSS) Replicati on Channel Change Channel Resolutio n Channel Alternative Solution Collector Submits Change Request Collector notified of disposition of proposed change(s) 2 2 Reviewer is notified of pending Change proposals 3 3 Reviewer Approves or Rejects the proposed changes 4 4 Approved changes are applied to features via OGC WFS-T OGC WFS- T Geographic features accessible via WFS OGC WFS- T 6 6 GSS notifies Subscribers of changes to features (i.e. Transactions) Collector Reviewe r Subscrib er Also known as a “Data Publisher” or “The Crowd” Collector reads features from a WFS and proposes changes to those features. This may include proposing creation of new features. 13 slide by Peter Vretanos

WFS WMTS GeoPackage Service GSS A GeoPackage service (GPS) exists that creates geopackages (WPS?). Client makes request to service to get a geopackage. GeoPackage service accesses WFS’s and WMTS’s to create the GeoPackage. Package is created and sent to client. The client makes modifications to the features in the geopackage A “geopackage enabled” GSS exists to mediate Tx to the WFS’s. Client posts the geopackage with modified features to the GSS. The GSS processes modified features in the geopackage as it would any feature. Changes that are accepted after validation are posted to their source WFS. GeoPackage can be refreshed from GPS to get latest accepted revisions. slide by Peter Vretanos

Sensors Everywhere (Things or Devices) 50 billions Internet-connected things by 2020 OGC SWE-IoT Focus

16

© 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium 17 slide based on work by Alex Robin © 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium

Next Steps Geopackage & GSS SWE, SWE4IoT and SWE solutions closer to programming code JSON-LD & GeoJSON © 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium 18 ReportExperimentProduce

© 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium 19 Ingo Simonis opengeospatial.org