Black hole accretion and host galaxies of obscured quasars Vincenzo Mainieri with Angela Bongiorno, Andrea Merloni & COSMOS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
26 Maggio, 2010 AGN9 - FERRARA Poster(s) Radio quieti … + SKA Photos : Marcella Brusa.
Advertisements

AGN Eddington Ratio Distributions
AGN in hierarchical galaxy formation models Nikos Fanidakis and C.M. Baugh, R.G. Bower, S. Cole, C. Done, C. S. Frenk Accretion and ejection in AGN, Como,
Star Formation in AGN hosts Li Shao & PACS Evolutionary Probe (PEP) group Hangzhou, China April 28, 2011 Evidence from Herschel PACS.
The multiwavelength surveys of the ELAIS-S1 and GOODS fields Fabrizio Fiore & M. Brusa, A. Comastri, C. Feruglio, A. Fontana, A. Grazian, F. La Franca,
Luminous obscured quasars in the HELLAS2XMM survey: the Spitzer perspective Cristian Vignali Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universita`degli Studi di Bologna.
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS Mass determination Kauffmann et al. determined masses using SDSS spectra (Hdelta & D4000) Comparison with our determination: Relative.
The relation among black holes, their host galaxies and AGN activity INAF ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI ASTROFISICA NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ASTROPHYSICS Galaxies.
Probing the X-ray Universe: Analysis of faint sources with XMM-Newton G. Hasinger, X. Barcons, J. Bergeron, H. Brunner, A. C. Fabian, A. Finoguenov, H.
Eight billion years of galaxy evolution Eric Bell Borch, Zheng, Wolf, Papovich, Le Floc’h, & COMBO-17, MIPS, and GEMS teams Venice
Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.
Anton Koekemoer AAS 207, Washington DC, 10 January Using COSMOS to Probe the High-Redshift AGN Population Anton Koekemoer (Space Telescope Science.
SFR and COSMOS Bahram Mobasher + the COSMOS Team.
X-ray Bright, Optically Normal Galaxies - XBONGS Forman, Anderson, Hickox, Jones, Murray, Vikhlinin, Kenter and the Bootes Team Bootes Survey 9.3 sq. degrees.
Star Formation in High Redshift Submillimeter Galaxies and QSO Hosts Dieter Lutz MPE Elisabetta Valiante, Eckhard Sturm, Reinhard Genzel, Linda Tacconi,
Hubble Space Telescope Images of Post-Starburst Quasars Michael S. Brotherton, S. Cales, R. Ganguly, Z. Shang (University of Wyoming) G. Canalizo (University.
“false-color” keV X-ray image of the Bootes field A large population of mid-infrared selected, obscured AGN in the Bootes field Ryan C. Hickox Harvard-Smithsonian.
AGN in hierarchical galaxy formation models Nikos Fanidakis and C.M. Baugh, R.G. Bower, S. Cole, C. Done, C. S. Frenk Physics of Galactic Nuclei, Ringberg.
“ Testing the predictive power of semi-analytic models using the Sloan Digital Sky Survey” Juan Esteban González Birmingham, 24/06/08 Collaborators: Cedric.
Space Density of Heavily-Obscured AGN, Star Formation and Mergers Ezequiel Treister (IfA, Hawaii Ezequiel Treister (IfA, Hawaii) Meg Urry, Priya Natarajan,
Obscured AGN in the (z)COSMOS survey AGN9, Ferrara, May Angela Bongiorno Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Garching, GERMANY AND.
Renzini Ringberg The cosmic star formation rate from the FDF and the Goods-S Fields R.P. Saglia – MPE reporting work of/with R. Bender, N.
The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.
Black Hole Growth and Galaxy Evolution Meg Urry Yale University.
Modern Quasar SEDs Zhaohui Shang ( Tianjin Normal University ) Kunming, Feb
Conference “Summary” Alice Shapley (Princeton). Overview Multitude of new observational, multi-wavelength results on massive galaxies from z~0 to z>5:
ASTRONOMY BROWN BAG SEMINAR SWIRE Spitzer Wide – area Infra Red Extragalactic survey MARCH 17, 2009 DAVID CORLISS.
THE HST VIEW OF LINERS AND OTHER LOCAL AGN MARCO CHIABERGE CNR - Istituto di Radioastronomia - Bologna Alessandro Capetti (INAF-OATo) Duccio Macchetto.
KASI Galaxy Evolution Journal Club The Morphology of Passively Evolving Galaxies at z~2 from Hubble Space Telescope/WFC3 Deep Imaging in the Hubble Ultra.
Deciphering the CIB 12 Oct 2012 Banyuls MODELING COUNTS AND CIBA WITH MAIN SEQUENCE AND STARBURST GALAXIES Matthieu Béthermin CEA Saclay In collaboration.
1 On star-formation compactness & bulges: the ALMA view  IR (z~2) =  IR (z~0) x 6  IR (z~4) =  IR (z~0) x 12  IR (z) =  IR (z~0) x (1+z) 2.5 vs 
Granada, May 27thThe X-ray Universe 2008 X-ray selected Type-2 QSOs: high luminosity in heavily obscured AGN Vincenzo Mainieri ESO G. Hasinger, M. Brusa,
With: V. Smolcic, A. Karim,, B. Magnelli, A.Zirm, M. Michalowski, P. Capak, K. Sheth, K. Schawinski, S. Wuyts, D. Sanders, A. Man, D. Lutz, J. Staguhn,
The Accretion History of SMBHs in Massive Galaxies Kate Brand STScI Collaborators: M. Brown, A. Dey, B. Jannuzi, and the XBootes and Bootes MIPS teams.
University of Leicester, UK X-ray and Observational Astronomy (XROA) Group Estelle Pons - The X-ray Universe June 2014.
Quiescent and Starbursting star-forming galaxies at z=2 Giulia Rodighiero (University of Padova) On behalf of the PEP Team Trieste - The Physics of Star.
AGN9: Black Holes & Revelations 25 May 2010 Eleonora Sani Enhanced star formation in Narrow Line Seyfert 1 AGN Co-Is: D. Lutz, G. Risaliti, L. H. Gallo,
Growing black holes: from the first seeds to AGN Mar Mezcua Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics T. Miyaji, F. Civano, G. Fabbiano, M. Karouzos,
How do galaxies accrete their mass? Quiescent and star - forming massive galaxies at high z Paola Santini Roman Young Researchers Meeting 2009 July 21.
AGN feedback in action: constraints on the scaling relations between BH and galaxy at high redshift Andrea Merloni (EXC, MPE) A. Bongiorno (MPE), COSMOS.
HST Workshop Bologna Jan 31, 2008 Heavily obscured SMBH at high redshift Andrea Comastri INAF - OABologna C. Vignali, R. Gilli, K. Iwasawa, F. Civano,
USING LOW POWER RADIO GALAXIES AS BEACONS FOR CLUSTERS AT 1
Emission Line Galaxy Targeting for BigBOSS Nick Mostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab BigBOSS Science Meeting Novemenber 19, 2009.
An alternative track of Black hole – galaxy co-evolution An alternative track of Black hole – galaxy co-evolution Smita Mathur The Ohio State University.
Black hole accretion history of active galactic nuclei 曹新伍 中国科学院上海天文台.
Radio Galaxies part 4. Apart from the radio the thin accretion disk around the AGN produces optical, UV, X-ray radiation The optical spectrum emitted.
High-z AGN Candidates in COSMOS Anton Koekemoer (STScI) + F. Civano, M. Elvis, V. Mainieri, J. Trump, E. Treister, T. Murayama, T. Nagao, Y. Oyama, Y.
How do galaxies accrete their mass? Quiescent and star - forming massive galaxies at high z Paola Santini THE ORIGIN OF GALAXIES: LESSONS FROM THE DISTANT.
AGN Demographics Christine Black 3/1/12
The dependence on redshift of quasar black hole masses from the SLOAN survey R. Decarli Università dell’Insubria, Como, Italy A. Treves Università dell’Insubria,
Evolution of Accretion Disks around Massive Black Holes: Constraints from the Demography of Active Galactic Nuclei Qingjuan Yu UC Berkeley April 21, 2006.
X-ray selected Type-2 QSOs and their host galaxies Vincenzo Mainieri with A. Bongiorno, A. Merloni, M. Bolzonella, M. Brusa, M. Carollo, G. Hasinger, K.
AGN / Starbursts in the very dusty systems in Bootes Kate Brand + the Bootes team NOAO Lijiang, August 2005.
KASI Galaxy Evolution Journal Club A Massive Protocluster of Galaxies at a Redshift of z ~ P. L. Capak et al. 2011, Nature, in press (arXive: )
Warm Dust in the Most Distant Quasars Ran Wang Department of Astronomy, Peking University, China.
The M BH -  star relation at the highest redshifts Fabian Walter (MPIA)
What is EVLA? Giant steps to the SKA-high ParameterVLAEVLAFactor Point Source Sensitivity (1- , 12 hr.)10  Jy1  Jy 10 Maximum BW in each polarization0.1.
Spectral Energy Distributions of obscured AGN E. Lusso, A. Comastri, E. Treister, D. Sanders, H. Hao, M. Elvis, C. Vignali, R. Gilli, G.Zamorani, M. Brusa,
High Redshift Galaxies/Galaxy Surveys ALMA Community Day April 18, 2011 Neal A. Miller University of Maryland.
9 Gyr of massive galaxy evolution Bell (MPIA), Wolf (Oxford), Papovich (Arizona), McIntosh (UMass), and the COMBO-17, GEMS and MIPS teams Baltimore 27.
T. J. Cox Phil Hopkins Lars Hernquist + many others (the Hernquist Mafia) Feedback from AGN during Galaxy Mergers.
AGN in the VVDS (Bongiorno, Gavignaud, Zamorani et al.) 1.What has been done: main results on Type 1 AGN evolution and accretion properties of faint AGN.
The interaction-driven model for the starburst galaxies and AGNs
Understanding the near infrared spectrum of quasars
Growth of SMBH studied through X-ray surveys
Quasars: old black holes with young stars (?)
HERSCHEL and Galaxies/AGN “dust and gas”
QSO2 and their host galaxies
Borislav Nedelchev et al. 2019
Presentation transcript:

Black hole accretion and host galaxies of obscured quasars Vincenzo Mainieri with Angela Bongiorno, Andrea Merloni & COSMOS

Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO)QSO-2 and their host galaxiesThe X-ray Universe 2011 Introduction AGN-galaxies co-evolution M-  relation: AGN and galaxies co-evolve (Magorrian et al. 1998; Gebhardt et al. 2000; Ferrarese & Merrit 2000; Tremaine et al. 2002) Hickox+09Hopkins+08

Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO)QSO-2 and their host galaxiesThe X-ray Universe 2011 Introduction AGN-galaxies co-evolution Where the “food” is coming from? Secular processesMajor mergers

Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO)QSO-2 and their host galaxies The X-ray Universe 2011 QSO-2 sampleSample selection Selection criteria: L X >10 44 erg s -1 N H >10 22 cm QSO-2 The galaxy to AGN contrast ratio is maximized: “easier” to study the morphology of the host as well as its stellar mass and SFR. Caveat: UV light can be contaminated from scattered AGN light, SFR diagnostics (e.g. H , [OII]) excited by accretion power rather than young stars, etc..

Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO)QSO-2 and their host galaxiesThe X-ray Universe 2011 X-ray propertiesStacking Stacked X-ray spectrum N H =( )10 22 cm -2 EW(FeK  )~104 eV For the 34 QSO-2 with spectroscopic redshifts, only the rest-frame 2-10 keV band was used for each spectrum. Spectral binning was designed to match a fixed rest-frame 200eV intervals. The total accumulated counts are 4763 See Poster G41 (Salvato+11)

Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO)QSO-2 and their host galaxiesThe X-ray Universe 2011 QSO-2 sampleRedshifts Redshift distribution 34 spectroscopic redshifts from zCOSMOS (Lilly+09) and IMACS (Trump+08) 112 photometric redshifts using gal+AGN templates (  z =0.015, Salvato+09)

Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO)QSO-2 and their host galaxiesThe X-ray Universe 2011 QSO-2 sampleRedshifts Optical spectroscopy D n (4000) = 1.19±0.02 (Balogh+99) Hδ A = 4.7±0.4 (Worthey&Ottaviani97)

Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO)QSO-2 and their host galaxiesThe X-ray Universe 2011 SED SED fitting : galaxy + AGN 14 Bands Used 6 SUBARU bands (U-z) I + K band (CFHT) 4 Spitzer/IRAC 24μm Spitzer/MIPS Galaxy templates: - 14 phenomenological: Polletta (2007) - Libr. of synthetic sp. (B&C) a) 10 declining SFH SFR µe-t/t t=[0.1-30] Gyr tage=[50Myr-5 Gyr] tage<tuniv(z) 0 < E(B-V) <0.5 b) 1 constant SF AGN template: -Richards et al. (2006): mean QSO SED from 259 IR- selected QSOs from the SDSS with Spitzer photometry 1 ~5x10 22 cm -2 (assuming 1/3 of Galactic dust-to-gas) - > E(B-V)~3

Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO)QSO-2 and their host galaxiesThe X-ray Universe 2011 SED SED fitting : MIR/X-ray correlation Gandhi+09 VISIR/VLT high resolution imaging of a sample of local Seyferts: the least contaminated core fluxes ~70 pc at z=0.01 <40% contaminating star- formation in the unresolved flux log L 12.3  m =(-4.37±3.08)+(1.106±0.071) log L 2-10 keV A strong MIR (12.3  m) / X-ray (2-10 keV) correlation :

Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO)QSO-2 and their host galaxiesThe X-ray Universe 2011 SED SED fitting : galaxy + AGN Chabrier IMF  2 minimization comparing observed and template fluxes at the redshift of the QSO-2 PRIORS The maximum allowed age is the age of the Universe at the redshift of the source The AGN SED should fit the 12.3  m flux predicted using the Gandhi+09 correlation

Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO)QSO-2 and their host galaxiesThe X-ray Universe 2011 Host galaxy propertiesStellar Mass Chabrier IMF Ilbert+10: parent sample of ~70,000 galaxies selected in the redshift range , where there is a good completeness for M * > 5x10 9 M sun We folded the parent sample with the X-ray sensitivity map 80% of the hosts have M * >10 10 M sun the fraction increases with M * 80% of the hosts have M * >10 10 M sun the fraction increases with M *

Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO)QSO-2 and their host galaxiesThe X-ray Universe 2011 Host galaxy propertiesRest frame colors Host galaxies classification Photometric classification Separating red and blue galaxies (Wilmer+06): “Blue” QSO-2 : 42% “Red” QSO-2 : 58% Star formation activity classification Active: log(sSFR/Gyr -1 ) > -1 (62%) Quiescent: log(sSFR/Gyr -1 ) < -1 (38%) ~20% “red” hosts are dusty star-forming galaxies (see also Cardamone+10, Lusso+11) ~20% “red” hosts are dusty star-forming galaxies (see also Cardamone+10, Lusso+11)

Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO)QSO-2 and their host galaxiesThe X-ray Universe 2011 Host galaxy propertiesRest frame colors Host galaxies classification Photometric classification Separating red and blue galaxies (Wilmer+06): “Blue” QSO-2 : 42% “Red” QSO-2 : 58% Star formation activity classification Active: log(sSFR/Gyr -1 ) > -1 (62%) Quiescent: log(sSFR/Gyr -1 ) < -1 (38%) Mass selected sample ~20% “red” hosts are dusty star-forming galaxies (see also Cardamone+10, Lusso+11) ~20% “red” hosts are dusty star-forming galaxies (see also Cardamone+10, Lusso+11)

Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO)QSO-2 and their host galaxiesThe X-ray Universe 2011 Host galaxy propertiesStar formation SFR-M * correlation Goal: compare the star formation in the QSO2 hosts with the tight correlation between SFR and M * of blue star-forming galaxies (e.g. Noeske+07; Daddi+07; Elbaz+07; Pannella+09; z~1 : 62% of the hosts are star- forming and their rates are comparable to the main-sequence “Noeske” relation Similar evolution of the

Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO)QSO-2 and their host galaxiesThe X-ray Universe 2011 Host galaxy propertiesStar formation SFR-M * correlation Lutz,VM+10 Mullaney+11 z~1 : 62% of the hosts are star- forming and their rates are comparable to the main-sequence “Noeske” relation Similar evolution of the

Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO)QSO-2 and their host galaxiesThe X-ray Universe 2011 Host galaxy propertiesMorphology Merging? Greene et al (SDSS QSO-2): nearly one-quarter have highly disturbed morphologies Liu et al (SDSS QSO- 2): high fraction of double cores and physically associated companions from long-slit spectroscopy. Cisternas+11: a) no difference in the distortion fractions between inactive and active galaxies; b) ~65% of the AGN hosts are disk dominated.

Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO)QSO-2 and their host galaxiesThe X-ray Universe 2011 Host galaxy propertiesMorphology 35 QSO-2 with z<1.2 & I AB <24 ZEST+ (Scarlata+07; Carollo+11): Five non-parametric diagnostics (asymmetry A, concentration C, Gini coefficient G, 2nd order moment of the brightest 20% of galaxy pixels M20, ellipticity e) + Sersic index n Bulge-dominatedDisksMergers Lack of evidence is not necessarily evidence of lack: e.g. quasar phase at the end of the merging process (Di Matteo +05; Conselice03)? 23% 20% 57% F775W (i) F160W (H) Credits to the CANDELS team

Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO)QSO-2 and their host galaxiesThe X-ray Universe 2011 QSO-2 sample BH masses and bolometric luminosities Bolometric luminosities L bol =f(L[2-10 keV) from Hopkins+07 k 2-10keV =[25,120] ~8x10 45 erg s -1 caveat: intrinsic spread in AGN SED (e.g. Vasudevan&Fabian07; Lusso+10) M dot =L bol /ε rad c 2 ~ 1 M sun /yr with ε rad =0.1 BH masses M BH -M * from Häring&Rix04 Δlog(M BH /M * )(z)=0.68log(1+z) (Merloni+10) ~90% with logM BH =[7.5,9.5] M sun Eddington ratios λ Edd =L bol /L edd, L edd =1.38x10 38 M BH /M sun ~50% have λ Edd >0.1

Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO)QSO-2 and their host galaxiesThe X-ray Universe 2011 QSO-2 sample Morphology and accretion rate bulge dominated galaxies tend to host low Edd ratios BHs disks and mergers host high Edd ratios BHs bulge dominated galaxies tend to host low Edd ratios BHs disks and mergers host high Edd ratios BHs lowest mass BHs are the fastest accretors (e.g McLure & Dunlop 2002; Netzer & Trakhtenbrot 2007) ~1x10 8 M sun ~4x10 8 M sun

Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO)QSO-2 and their host galaxiesThe X-ray Universe 2011 Host galaxy propertiesCo-evolution Co-evolution of QSO-2 and their hosts L(FIR) from the SFR using the Kennicutt+98 relation: SFR(M sun yr -1 )=L(FIR)/(5.8x10 43 erg s -1 ) (Rowan-Robinson 1995; Netzer 2007 & 2009) SMGs Shao+10

Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO)QSO-2 and their host galaxiesThe X-ray Universe 2011 Radiation pressure and absorption OUTFLOWS ? Effective Eddington limit: the dust component of the gas surrounding the AGN greatly enhances the effect of radiation pressure above that for Thomson scattering so that an AGN which is sub-Eddington for ionized gas can appear super-Eddington for cold dusty gas (e.g. Laor & Draine 1993; Scoville & Norman 1995). Long-lived stable clouds are not expected to survive in a regime where the effective Eddington limit is exceeded (Fabian+08,+09). M BH = (M K +24) Graham+07 L bol from L 2-10keV using Marconi+04 (or Hopkins+07) z<1

Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO)QSO-2 and their host galaxiesThe X-ray Universe 2011 Conclusions Type-2 QSOs reside almost exclusively in massive galaxies, 80% have M * >10 10 M SUN and the fraction of galaxies hosting them monotonically increases with M * The majority of the hosts (>60%) are actively forming stars The SSFR of QSO-2 hosts is similar to what observed for star-forming (“Noeske”) galaxies at z~1. The evolution of SSFR of QSO-2 hosts is similar to the one of SFGs. Morphological analysis suggests that the majority of the hosts are bulge dominated. We do not find clear signature of merger activity for the majority of the hosts but it could be a time issue: QSO phase at the end of a major merger event. Difficult to test the quasar fueling models by studying the morphology.