READING FIRST MISSION Less Than 5 Percent of Students Referred to Special Education in 2004-05 Alice Furry Marvi Hagopian.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RtI Response to Intervention
Advertisements

Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Teacher In-Service August, Abraham Lincoln.
Parent and Educator Information Dyslexia
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
November 2009 Oregon RTI Project Cadre 5.  Participants will understand both general IDEA evaluation requirements and evaluation requirements for Specific.
Reading Intervention “Today a reader, tomorrow a leader.” -Margaret Fuller-
NJ Regulations on Dyslexia. CHAPTER 105 AN ACT concerning professional development for public school employees and supplementing chapter 6 of Title 18A.
Margaret D. Anderson SUNY Cortland, April, Federal legislation provides the guidelines that schools must follow when identifying children for special.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION An overview of RtI by Sandy Asmussen, Kathi Shepardson, Kerry Duersteler Revised Fall 2008.
K-3 ELA Common Core State Standards Job Alike #3 – Foundational Skills 3:00 – 4:30 & 3:45 – 5:15 Grades K - 3.
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education.
Response to Intervention: The new Road to Ensuring Student Success January, 2011 PISD.
RtI Response to Intervention April 2, 2008 Board Presentation.
Today’s Objectives What is RtI and why it is here – Consensus-building Preparation for 2010 Implementation: – Three Tiers of Services – Data Analysis.
 Specific learning disability is defined as a disorder in one or more of the basic psychological processes involved in understanding or in using language,
Iowa Department of Education Early Literacy Implementation & Support Summer / Fall 2014.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Malissa Patrick and Kim Thorndycraft February 25, 2010.
Tools for Classroom Teachers Scaffolding Vocabulary activities Graphic organizers Phonics games Comprehension activities Literature circles.
Fremont Unified School District An Informational Session for Families August 2015 Standards-Based Report Cards.
Report of the National Reading Panel TEACHING CHILDREN TO READ: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its.
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Pennsylvania Reading First Leadership Meeting A Pathway For Success Eastern Regional Reading First Technical Assistance Center Florida Center for Reading.
Wisconsin’s New Kindergarten Screener A training for the administration and scoring of the Phonological Awareness Literacy Screener.
Oregon Reading First Orientation Holiday Inn Portland Airport November 12, 2002 Oregon Department of Education.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program Parent Guide
Response to Intervention. Background Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 Changes to align with No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Allows districts.
KEDC Special Education Regional Training Sheila Anderson, Psy.S
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.
R esponse t o I ntervention E arly I ntervening S ervices and.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Parent Leadership Team Meeting Intro to RtI.  RtI Overview  Problem Solving Process  What papers do I fill out?  A3 documenting the story.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Dr. Sarah McPherson New York Institute of Technology Adapted from Lora Parks-Recore CEWW Special Education Training and Resource Center SETRC 1 Response.
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
Read to Achieve Parent Presentation What is Read to Achieve? Read to Achieve was created in legislation and approved by the North Carolina.
Response to Instruction: Creating a Systematic Response.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
Learning Disabilities A general term describing a group of learning problems Largest single disability area 4.0% of all school-age children are classified.
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
WISCONSIN’S NEW RULE FOR SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES Effective December 1, 2010.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
Plan for Response to Intervention (RTI). What is Response to Intervention? Response to Intervention (RTI) is a practice of providing high-quality instruction.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
MTSS MULTI-TIERED SYSTEMS OF SUPPORT A LOOK AT THE SYSTEMS TODAY IN CALIFORNIA GAIL LANCASTER –ASSOCIATE FACULTY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY/FRESNO CAMPUS RESOURCE.
WORKING TOGETHER TO HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED
American Institutes for Research
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Parent and Educator Information Dyslexia
Chapel Hill ISD Reading First Initiative
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Writing the Response to Intervention (RtI) District Plan
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Parent and Educator Information Dyslexia
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Presentation transcript:

READING FIRST MISSION Less Than 5 Percent of Students Referred to Special Education in Alice Furry Marvi Hagopian

In the United States, 44 percent of fourth grade students are at “below basic” levels; only 2 to 5 percent of total number of students should legitimately be classified as having severe, intrinsically-based learning disorders.

Sixty to 80 percent of students in special education are likely to be suffering from consequences of inappropriate teaching, low standards, and/or disadvantageous environmental consequences.

THE CHALLENGE FOR READING FIRST Reduce the Number of Referrals to Special Education

What Research Tells Us: Reading disabilities affect at least 10 million children in the US Most reading disabilities reflect a persistent deficit rather than a developmental lag Approximately 74 percent of the children who are reading disabled in the third grade will remain disabled in the ninth grade

Distinguishing between disabled readers with and without an IQ achievement discrepancy is an invalid measurement Children with and without reading discrepancies show similar information processing, genetic, and neurophysiologic profiles

What Research Says About Students with Reading Delays: 80 percent of students who fall behind in reading by the end of first grade are still significantly behind in fourth grade, despite current conventional intervention practices Of the students with reading delays, 80 percent have primary weakness in phonological/phonemic awareness, phonics and work study, and oral fluency Based on research published in multiple sources and conducted by the National Institute for Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), the US Department of Education, and the US Department of Special Education.

The primary message of the No Child Left Behind is URGENCY - Leave No Child Behind! Teachers must determine at the earliest possible moment when a student is beginning to fall behind, and at the same time, know how to intervene to prevent that student from falling further behind.

It is now known that students do not outgrow reading problems!

Assessment and systematic, explicit, accelerated, and focused intervention efforts early in the school career of a child/student can make a huge difference. Be it Resolved:

Definition of a Student At-Risk of Falling Behind A student who the classroom teacher identifies as behind his or her peers as indicated by observations and progress monitoring assessments A student who has problems with: Spoken language Separating phonemes Matching sounds to letters and spellings Spelling Decoding Word substitution when reading, etc. See Overcoming Dyslexia by Sally Shaywitz, M.D.

Evidence Gathering and Confirming a Student At-Risk Initial Evidence Kindergarten Monitoring Log and Assessments Grades 1-3, 6-8 Week Skills Assessments in the range of 0-3 scores in repeated succession [especially for oral fluency and comprehension subtests] Confirmed Evidence Results from State Approved Screening/Diagnostic Assessments

Screening Assessments have predictive validity and are used to determine which students are likely to experience reading difficulty and need additional prevention/intervention instruction.

Diagnostic Assessments offer reliable, stable, and consistent evidence as to which beginning reading technical skills are mastered or not mastered and how much instructional prevention/intervention is most likely needed.

State-approved Supplemental Intervention Materials and Comprehensive Stand-alone Intervention Programs State Board approved list release dates: November 10, 2004 January 13, 2005 March 10, 2005 May 12, 2005

The State Board list will be based upon recommendations of the Department of Education and the Reading First, California Technical Assistance Center. Criteria will include ratings on: if it is research-based if it is aligned to adopted reading/language arts program if it is aligned to California English/Language Arts Content Standards

List of eligible intervention materials and programs must have been previously evaluated by either the Western or Eastern Reading First Technical Assistance Centers. See web sites: WRFTAC ERFTAC

Special Education Referral Reduction Program Application Guidance (see Application -- Sample)

1. Program Goals and Intents: Our district is committed to the Special Education Referral Reduction goal of the Reading First (RF) program and intends to implement a plan of early identification and accelerated and focused prevention/intervention instruction.

2. Program Assignments and Responsibilities: The plan allocates the necessary time and staff to oversee the implementation of this program at each of our RF schools.

3. RF Site Participation: All participating RF school sites are included in this program.

4. Screening and Assessment: Our district will select approved screening and diagnostic assessments to identify students for participation in this program.

5. Monitoring Responsibilities: Our district has designated and approved the monitoring responsibilities of all staff involved in the program.

6. Reporting: At the end of the year our district will submit required reports to the California Department of Education (CDE): : the number of special education referrals by grade level : the number of referrals placed in special education

7. Full Core Program Implementation: Our district will fully implement the state and district adopted reading/language arts instructional program as designed and analyze its effectiveness for each student prior to placement in a multi- tiered program that includes a supplemental prevention/intervention program.

8. Research-Based Supplemental Programs: Our district will only use research-based supplemental prevention/intervention programs after all efforts of full implementation of the adopted program have been exhausted.

9. Supplemental Materials: All supplemental materials used in our intervention program will be research- based and selected from the approved list provided by the State.

10. Budget = Difference between grant rate of $6,500 and $8,000 per RF teacher The LEA will be asked to submit a revised program budget no later than three months after receiving the grant award amendment for this program.

Application should be: Single-spaced At least 11-point font size One-inch margins all around

For Assistance: Check with your Reading First Regional Technical Assistance Center Director

Questions