Freq [GHz]Q0Q0 R/Q [Ω]±Voltage [kV] 2.07224187862.340.22 2.08329155730.510.04 2.09903219379.724.04 3.0231018102114.01.43 3.27113743239.10.12 4.716412612713.00.02.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nominal and no CSR (R 56-1 = 55 mm, R 56-2 = 59 mm, R 56-3 = 0) L1 phase = 21 deg, V 3.9 = 55 MV CSR OFF BC3 OFF Elegant Tracking  z1 = mm (post.
Advertisements

Beam-based Measurements of HOMs in the HTC Adam Bartnik for ERL Team, Daniel Hall, John Dobbins, Mike Billing, Matthias Liepe, Ivan Bazarov.
Cavity BPM for Spectromety: progress and plans A. Lyapin.
Unwanted mode damping in SRF deflecting/crabbing cavities G Burt Lancaster University / Cockcroft Institute.
EMMA Cavity Update Emma Wooldridge 27/02/07. Requirements Initial Design Cavity Options & Optimisation Available Designs Future Work.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Prospects of Compact Crab Cavities for LHC Peter McIntosh LHC-CC Workshop, CERN 21 st August 2008.
S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 1 of 38 Sasha Novokhatski SLAC, Stanford University Accelerator Session April 20, 2005 Low R/Q Cavities for Super.
Slim crab cavity development Luca Ficcadenti, Joachim Tuckmantel CERN – Geneva LHC-CC11, 5th LHC Crab Cavity Workshop.
ERHIC Main Linac Design E. Pozdeyev + eRHIC team BNL.
DESIGN OF A 7-CELLS, HOM DAMPED, SUPERCONDUCTING CAVITY FOR THE STRONG RF FOCUSING EXPERIMENT AT DANE David Alesini, Caterina Biscari, Roberto Boni, Alessandro.
CLIC Drive Beam Linac Rolf Wegner. Outline Introduction: CLIC Drive Beam Concept Drive Beam Modules (modulator, klystron, accelerating structure) Optimisation.
Highly HOM-damped cavities S. Belomestnykh Brookhaven National Laboratory and Stony Brook University March Washington, DC FCC Week 2015.
Proposals for conceptual design of the CLIC DR RF system at 2 GHz 20/10/2010 A.Grudiev.
Particle dynamics in electron FFAG Shinji Machida KEK FFAG04, October 13-16, 2004.
2.1GHz cavity without cell-to-cell coupling slots – 1.875” beam pipe Binping Xiao Aug
Stephen Brooks NuFact’06, UC-Irvine, August 2006  Lower-Frequency RF Phase Rotation Techniques for Both Muon Signs.
704MHz Warm RF Cavity for LEReC Binping Xiao Collider-Accelerator Department, BNL July 8, 2015 LEReC Warm Cavity Review Meeting  July 8, 2015.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Sergey Belomestnykh SRF and RF systems.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Analysis of 2008 Beam Instability Data S. Cousineau, V. Danilov, M. Plum HB2008.
PSB C04 RF system Consolidation or upgrade? M. Paoluzzi – CERN BE-RF 11/23/20151.
1 Muon acceleration - amplitude effects in non-scaling FFAG - Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 26 April, ffag/machida_ ppt.
KEK R&D for LHC Plan of 800MHz Cavity Calculation of 400MHz Cavity 16 th September 2009, LHC-CC09 at CERN K.Nakanishi.
2.1 GHz Warm RF Cavity for LEReC Binping Xiao Collider-Accelerator Department, BNL June 15, 2015 LEReC Warm Cavity Review Meeting  June 15, 2015.
CLIC crab cavity design Praveen Ambattu 24/08/2011.
BEPCII Transverse Feedback System Yue Junhui Beam Instrumentation Group IHEP , Beijing.
Beam Dynamics in the ESS Linac Under the Influence of Monopole and Dipole HOMs A.Farricker 1, R.M.Jones 1, R.Ainsworth 2 and S.Molloy 3 1 The University.
Jean-Luc Biarrotte, SPL HOM Workshop, CERN, June 25-26, A few longitudinal BBU simulations (in the SPL case) J-Luc Biarrotte CNRS, IPN Orsay.
Aaron Farricker 107/07/2014Aaron Farricker Beam Dynamics in the ESS Linac Under the Influence of Monopole and Dipole HOMs.
1 EuroTeV High Bandwidth Wall Current Monitor Alessandro D’Elia CERN- Geneve.
Beam Test status and Plans of the ILC Main LINAC BPM
Sensitivity of HOM Frequency in the ESS Medium Beta Cavity Aaron Farricker.
THE DA  NE 3 RD HARMONIC CAVITY A. Gallo, with D. Alesini, R. Boni, S. Guiducci, F.Marcellini, M. Migliorati, L. Palumbo, M. Zobov.
704 MHz warm cavity November 4, 2015 A.Zaltsman: SRF & warm RF components for LEReC1  A single cell 704 MHz warm cavity is used to correct the beam energy.
Longitudinal HOM power estimations for pulsed beams.rev W. Weingarten 31 May 20101SPL Cavity WG Meeting.
UK-Jlab-TechX Designs for the LHC Crab Cavity Dr G Burt Lancaster University / Cockcroft Institute.
Update on LHC 800MHz Crab Cavity Conceptual Design Liling Xiao, Zenghai Li Advanced Computations Department, SLAC Presented at LARP-CM12, April 9, 2009.
Longitudinal aspects on injection and acceleration for HP-PS Antoine LACHAIZE On behalf of the HP-PS design team.
Crab Cavity Study with GDFIDL Narong Chanlek and Roger Jones 20/12/06.
Group Meeting October 15 th 2012 Lee Carver. Outline Multi-Harmonic Cavity (MHC) Design Project - Cavity Designs, Couplers, HOM analysis Electron Two.
HG 2016 Workshop Design of Metallic Subwavelength Structures for Wakefield Acceleration Xueying Lu, Michael Shapiro, Richard Temkin Plasma Science and.
MEW Meeting 05/06/14 Aaron Farricker 1. Effect Of HOMs Near Machine lines HOMs on or near machine lines get resonantly excited. Modes in real cavities.
RF manipulations in SIS 18 and SIS 100 O. Chorniy.
Longitudinal impedance of the SPS
Results from single unit-cell simulations
CLIC Main Linac Cavity BPM Snapshot of the work in progress
RF Power Generation and PETS Design
LHC Crab Cavity Conceptual Design at SLAC
Wideband, solid-state driven RF systems for PSB and PS longitudinal damper.
HOM power in FCC-ee cavities
Cavity-beam interaction and Longitudinal beam dynamics for CEPC DR&APDR 宫殿君
Electron cloud and collective effects in the FCC-ee Interaction Region
Update on PS Longitudinal Impedance Model
PSB rf manipulations PSB cavities
800 MHz 2-Cavity module simulations
High Efficiency X-band Klystron Design Study
News on the TMCI and SPS transverse impedance
Review of the European XFEL Linac System
Transition Wakes in the 3.9 GHz Cryomodule
Recent studies on BEPCII longitudinal impedance
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
Implications of HOMs on Beam Dynamics at ESS
Simulation of trapped modes in LHC collimator
CEPC Main Ring Cavity Design with HOM Couplers
Beam Position Measurements in TTF Cavities
SPS-DQW HOM Measurements
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Passive harmonic cavities for bunch shortening
Accelerator Physics Particle Acceleration
Parameters Changed in New MEIC Design
Fast kicker beam dynamics simulations
Presentation transcript:

Freq [GHz]Q0Q0 R/Q [Ω]±Voltage [kV] Sum6.46 Freq [GHz]Q0Q0 R/Q [Ω]±Voltage [kV] Total ” beam pipe Longitudinal cut-off: 4.697GHz (TM01) 1.875” beam pipe Longitudinal cut-off: 4.822GHz (TM01) Sum with fine structure: 5.84 Without beating: 0.57 Sum with fine structure: 5.14 Without beating: 0.55 Reference: Requirement: ±7e-4 peak to peak dp/p: ±2.57e-3 dp/p: ±2.92e-3

To suppress the SOMs, we further reduce the end cell length to λ/2. (beam pipe 1.925”) Freq [GHz]Q0Q0 R/Q [Ω]Voltage [kV] Total1.64 Sum with fine structure: 1.57 Without beating: 0.24 SOMs Freq [GHz]Q0Q0 R/Q [Ω] dp/p: ±7.9e-4 Shift the GHz mode 0.5 MHz away from the harmonic of the 9.14 MHz gives 0.57 kV total fluctuation, corresponding to ±2.9e-4 dp/p. Modelwith slot 1.875” λ/ ” λ/ ” λ/2+10 k // [V/pc] k // 2.11G [V/pc] k // SHOM [V/pc]

If we use 30 bunches instead of 31 bunches, the voltage from GHz mode changes to 0.47 kV, and the sum with fine structure changes to 0.55 kV, without beating it changes to 0.16kV. If we use 30 bunches and 31 bunches alternatively in the train, the voltage fluctuation will be ( )/2=1.06kV. If we shift the GHz mode 0.5 MHz away from the harmonic of the 9.14 MHz, the 30-bunch configuration gives 0.32 kV fluctuation, and the alternating configuration gives 0.45 kV fluctuation. They are both less than the 31-bunch configuration.

GHz HOM E H Why 30-bunch configuration and 31-bunch configuration are different?

Voltage with n bunches

Voltage with n bunches

Voltage with n bunches

The reason is that GHz is times of the 704 MHz. If we consider a mode 0.67 times of the fundamental. A single bunch gives Cos[τ] voltage fluctuation: Two bunches give Cos[τ]+Cos[τ-0.67*2π]*UnitStep[τ-0.67*2π] And three bunches give Cos[τ]+Cos[τ-0.67*2π]*UnitStep[τ-0.67*2π] +Cos[τ-0.67*2*2π]*UnitStep[τ-0.67*2*2π] The voltage fluctuation from this mode will get cancelled every three bunches. Due to the times slip, It will not fully get cancelled every three bunches.

Backup slides

To suppress the SOMs, we further reduce the end cell length to λ/2. Freq [GHz]Q0Q0 R/Q [Ω]Voltage [kV] Total1.64 Sum with fine structure: 1.57 Without beating: 0.24 Slightly change the end cell length to λ/2+2. SOMs Freq [GHz]Q0Q0 R/Q [Ω] Freq [GHz]Q0Q0 R/Q [Ω]Voltage [kV] Total0.81 Sum with fine structure: 0.73 Without beating: 0.08 dp/p: ±7.9e-4 dp/p: ±3.7e-4 Shifting this mode 0.5MHz away changes the voltage to 0.41 kV dp/p: ±2.1e-4 (31 bunches, beam pipe 1.925” for all models) Slightly change the end cell length to λ/2-2. Freq [GHz]Q0R/Q [Ω]Voltage [kV] Total1.57 Sum with fine structure: 1.40 Without beating: 0.25 dp/p: ±7.0e-4

Modelwith slot 1.875” λ/ ” λ/ ” λ/ ” λ/ ” λ/ ” λ/ ” λ/2+12 k // [V/pc] k // 2.11G [V/pc] k // SHOM [V/pc] ModelFreq [GHz]Q0Q0 R/Q [Ω]Voltage [kV] λ/ λ/ λ/