+ Heidi Redlich Epstein, ABA Center on Children and the Law Joyce DeBolt, National Association for Regulatory Administration Ana Beltran, Generations United.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Highlighting Parent Involvement in Education
Advertisements

Effective Casework Practice (Foster Care) Ongoing assessment of childs needs and interventions Ongoing assessment and implementation of services/supports.
Title IV-E Guardianship Assistance Program (GAP) Liliana Hernandez, Childrens Bureau Child Welfare Program Specialist September 2010.
Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.
Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.
California Department of Social Services Program Improvement Plan
Understanding Katie A and the Core Practice Model
STRENGTHENING FAMILIES National Briefing, 2012.
More About The DDD Assessment “A new way to assess and plan for supports and services for people with developmental disabilities” Aging & Disability Services.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network 1.
Emergency Safety Interventions “What Practitioners Need to Know” 1.
1 Agency/Court Collaboration in the CFSR: ENGAGING COURTS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM The National Child Welfare Resource Center For Organizational Improvement.
WELCOME!. INTRODUCTIONS Name Office Location? Program Area Just the Basics…We’ll be getting more info next.
Allianceforchildwelfare.org Adoptions.
Next Generation Child Welfare Traineeship Program September Colloquium Presentation Friday, September 11, 2009 Whitney M. Young, Jr. School of Social Work.
An introduction to for Caregivers. The Alliance for Child Welfare Excellence is Washington’s first comprehensive statewide training partnership dedicated.
+ Heidi Redlich Epstein, ABA Center on Children and the Law Ana Beltran, Generations United Donna Sabo, National Association for Regulatory Administration.
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
Pre- and Post- Placement Intervention Approach with Kinship Families: Role for Child Protection Workers Priscilla Gibson, Ph.D., Katie Haas Shweta Singh.
Pennsylvania Child Protective Services Law: Module 4: Reporting and the Role of the Child Welfare Professional Transfer of Learning The Pennsylvania Child.
Common Core 3.0 Content Overview Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
Common Core 3.0 Executive Summary Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
Chapter 10 Recruiting Children ©2013 Cengage Learning.
Different Approaches to Licensing in Child Welfare NARA 19 th Annual Licensing Seminar September 12, 2011 Tiffany Conway Perrin Senior Policy.
DSDS Quality Assurance Unit State of Alaska, Dept. of Health and Social Services Division of Senior and Disabilities Services (DSDS) Quality Assurance.
Colorado Children and Youth Information Sharing (CCYIS) Educational Stability Summit April 10, 2015.
KENTUCKY YOUTH FIRST Grant Period August July
ADOPTIONS CM 124_ADP_PPT_October 2012 PPT 1. Objectives Professional standards & values Adoption program’s legal base. Florida adoption guidelines. Legal.
+ Jennifer Miller, ChildFocus Melissa Devlin, FFTA Brian Lynch, Children’s Community Programs Sue Miklos, The Bair Foundation Child Welfare Peer Kinship.
Module 5 Successful Strategies for Promoting Collaboration and Coordinated Service Delivery.
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Updates.
Department of Human Services
+ Stefanie Sprow, Children’s Defense Fund Ana Beltran, Generations United and ChildFocus Rebecca Robuck, ChildFocus Child Welfare Peer Kinship Network.
DIAKON Lutheran Social Ministries/Family Design Resources Tools That Work Conference 11/03 Implementing Best Practice Standards in Permanency Planning.
Defending Childhood Protect Heal Thrive January 25-27, 2011 Sandra Spencer Executive Director National Federation of Families for Children’s Mental Health.
Civil Rights Training. Goals of Civil Rights Equal treatment for all applicants and participants Elimination of illegal barriers that prevent people from.
Administration for Children and Families Children’s Bureau Fostering Connections Implementation Support & Resources CAPTA 2010 – Highlights.
Child Placement Conference 11/13/03 Preserving Sibling Relationships Presented by: Melissa Dorris Georgia Supreme Court Child Placement Project.
Guidance Training CFR §483.75(i) F501 Medical Director.
ICAMA & ICPC Liz Oppenheim Summit of the States on Interstate Cooperation National Center for Interstate Compacts June 1-2, 2006.
Intersection of Fostering Connections and McKinney-Vento What is the connection? How do we connect? Susie Greenfelder, Education Planner MI Department.
Understanding Applicable Laws in Child Protection and Child Welfare Cases: Presentation at TCAP Tribal Courts Conference – Minneapolis August 20, 2015.
Illinois Department of Children & Family Service/Chicago State University STEP Program - NHSTES May THE STEP PROGRAM Supervisory Training to Enhance.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
THE LONG-TERM CARE OMBUDSMAN PROGRAM (LTCOP) Overview of the History, Role, and Responsibilities.
11/28/12 1 CALIFORNIA FOSTERING CONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS ACT Version 2.0 Assembly Bill 12.
© CDHS College Relations Group Buffalo State College/SUNY at Buffalo Research Foundation Guiding Framework for Interventions Recommendation 1.
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
Developed by: July 15,  Mission: To connect family strengthening networks across California to promote quality practice, peer learning and mutual.
1 A Multi Level Approach to Implementation of the National CLAS Standards: Theme 1 Governance, Leadership & Workforce P. Qasimah Boston, Dr.Ph Florida.
Closing the Gap for Skipped- Generation Households.
Foster Care Adoption Kathy Searle Utah Adoption Exchange.
WELCOME!. INTRODUCTIONS Name Office Location? Program Area Just the Basics…We’ll be getting more info next.
The Children’s Aid Society of Brant Preliminary Findings Crown Ward Review 2011 February 28-March 10, 2011.
Purpose Of Training: To guide Clinicians in the completion of screens and development of Alternative Community Service Plans.
Child Safe Standards How effective is your leadership team in promoting a child safe culture in your organisation? 2 June 2016.
Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act
Federal Updates on Kinship Care
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
The Grandfamilies Advocacy Network Demonstration (GrAND)
Webinar: The Kinship Diversion Debate
Panhandle Partnership for Health and Human Services
ADOPTIONS.
Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act: New Opportunities for Federal Funding for Child Welfare Key Questions and Considerations.
LINK and SPARC Webinar 2018 Overcoming Licensing Barriers for Kin
House Human Services Committee
Background checks are required by state and federal law prior to CA/DCYF staff authorizing an individual (other than a parent) to have unsupervised access.
QPI Conference Information Sharing and Normalcy
Presentation transcript:

+ Heidi Redlich Epstein, ABA Center on Children and the Law Joyce DeBolt, National Association for Regulatory Administration Ana Beltran, Generations United and ChildFocus Rebecca Robuck, ChildFocus Child Welfare Peer Kinship Network Webinar -- Model Family Foster Home Licensing Standards September 23, 2014

+ Welcome to Peer Kinship Network This is the second of 3 webinars this year. TBD date and topic from your feedback. Use listserv to ask questions of each other: Share resource materials at: lfarePeerKinshipNetwork.aspx lfarePeerKinshipNetwork.aspx 2

+ Thank you This Child Welfare Peer Kinship Network and this webinar are made possible by the Annie E. Casey Foundation. We thank them for their support. 3

+ Today’s Agenda Background and research that informed the project Model Family Foster Home Licensing Standards and accompanying documents Q & A and Sharing 4

+ Today’s Speakers Ana Beltran, Generations United and ChildFocus Heidi Redlich Epstein, American Bar Association (ABA) Center on Children and the Law Joyce DeBolt, National Association for Regulatory Administration (NARA) 5

+ Background and Research 6

+ Origins of Project Project started in 2011with the Annie E. Casey Foundation bringing together nonprofits, universities and others to look at family foster home licensing. We began knowing that many children in foster care are in the unlicensed care of their relatives. These children and their relative caregivers are part of the child welfare system and, as such, are subject to rules and restrictions, but they have limited or no support. With a license (“approval” or “certification” in some states): monthly financial assistance support services access to the federal Guardianship Assistance Program (GAP) in 31 states, DC and 4 tribes court and caseworker oversight 7

+ State Licensing Standards Anecdotally, we collectively knew that one of the biggest barriers to not being licensed was due to state licensing standards. Also knew these standards didn’t always lead to safe and appropriate placements in the best interests of the children. 8

+ Federal Licensing Requirements Federal law says little about the actual licensing of foster homes: States must designate a state authority responsible for standards. States have broad flexibility so long as those standards “are reasonably in accord with recommended standards of national organizations concerned with standards for such institutions or homes, including standards related to admission policies, safety, sanitation, and protection of civil rights…” “a waiver of any such standard may be made only on a case-by- case basis for non-safety standards (as determined by the State) in relative foster family homes for specific children in care.” 42 U.S.C. § 671(a)(10). States must periodically review their licensing standards. 42 U.S.C. § 671 (a)(11). 9

+ Federal Licensing Requirements cont. The federal Adam Walsh Act also requires states to conduct criminal background and child abuse registry checks. 42 U.S.C. § 671(a)(20)(A). Finally, Federal law prohibits a two-tiered system of licensing, one for relatives and another for non-relatives. Final rule to the Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA). 10

+ Research Generations United and the ABA Center on Children and the Law conducted 50 state and DC survey of family foster home licensing standards Purpose: identify trends, problematic standards, and barriers specific to relatives Paper summarizing findings: Improving Foster Care Licensing Standards around the United States: Using Research Findings to Effect Change Paper and research available at

+ American Bar Association (ABA) Center on Children and the Law The ABA is the largest voluntary professional association in the world with nearly 400,000 members. The ABA Center on Children and the Law improves children’s lives through advances in law, justice, knowledge, practice and public policy by focusing on child abuse and neglect, child welfare and protective services system enhancement, family preservation, adolescent health and other child protective legal issues. For more information, visit

+ Generations United (GU) National Center on Grandfamilies Generations United is a national membership organization focused solely on improving the lives of children, youth, and older people through intergenerational collaboration, public policies, and programs for the enduring benefit of all. For well over a decade, Generations United's National Center on Grandfamilies has been at the forefront of national efforts to support grandfamilies through federal and state legislative testimony and briefings, publications, training, and technical assistance. For more information, visit 13

+ Research Findings Problematic standards like requiring that applicants be no older than 65. Varying standards among the states for the same type of requirements that should not vary significantly from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Model language that was used to develop our model standards. 14

+ Problematic Standards Upper age limits Requirements to have high school diplomas and/or speak English Requirements to own a vehicle Income requirements with limitations on home businesses Potential discrimination on the basis of disability Bias against rural families 15

+ Varying Standards Standards concerning requirements that should not vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction like capacity, child abuse and neglect, and criminal background checks and raise questions: how are standards determined? what are the best standards? 16

+ Model Family Foster Home Licensing Standards 17

+ National Association for Regulatory Administration ( NARA ) In 2012, NARA joined GU, ABA and AECF to work on the model standards. NARA is an international professional organization dedicated to promoting excellence in human care regulation and licensing through leadership, education, collaboration, and services. NARA represents all human care licensing, including adult residential and assisted living, adult day care, child care, child welfare and program licensing for services related to mental illness, developmental disabilities and abuse of drugs or alcohol. For more information, see NARA has just adopted the model standards as NARA national standards. 18

+ Draft Model Standards Used model language from states Examined language from accreditation agencies like Child Welfare League of America and the Council on Accreditation Covers family foster home licensing Does not cover: licensing processes or procedures care of children after placement in a licensed home other post-licensing requirements like foster parent recordkeeping and reporting 19

+ Purpose Statement - Summary To fulfill the public policy intent behind licensing standards, which is to ensure that children in foster care have safe and appropriate placements. To fill the previous void in “national standards” by creating clear, practical, common standards that work to ensure that children, regardless of the state in which they live, will be placed in homes that have met the same safety standards. To facilitate the licensing of additional relative and non-relative homes by recognizing and respecting related and non-related foster parents as caregivers who are performing an invaluable service. To reflect community standards and be flexible so children in out of home care are placed in the best homes for them. 20

+ Principles Started work by creating 10 guiding principles. Highlight a few: Each child in state or county custody needs to be in a licensed home. The licensure of family foster homes is typically a distinct process with different standards than the placement of children. These processes must work together to ensure that children are placed in the best homes for them. Family foster home licensing standards must be distinct from licensing standards for child care and adult care settings. Family foster home licensing standards are necessary to promote safety and consistency in licensing assessments and to give licensors the tools to make good decisions. Over regulation should be avoided. 21

+ Categories Covered by Model Standards Definitions Basic Eligibility Physical and Mental Health Home Study Capacity Sleeping Other living space Fire safety/evacuation Additional health & safety Criminal history records check Abuse and neglect records check Assurances Pre-license training Emergency placement 22

+ For example – “Eligibility” All the model standards are pulled from state examples with an eye towards not excluding applicants based on socioeconomic or cultural biases – Consider “Eligibility”: Require functional literacy Ability to communicate with child in his/her language Ability to communicate with service providers and agency (can occur through translators) “income or resources to make timely payments for shelter, food, utility costs, clothing, and other household expenses prior to the addition of a child in foster care” 23

+ Another example – Criminal Background Checks Follow Adam Walsh For other crimes, we used language from Illinois: E. If an applicant was convicted for a crime other than those included in B. and C., the applicant will not be automatically rejected as a foster parent. The agency must consider the following: 1. the type of crime; 2. the number of crimes; 3. the nature of the offenses; 4. the age of the individual at the time of conviction; 5. the length of time that has elapsed since the last conviction; 6. the relationship of the crime and the capacity to care for children; 7. evidence of rehabilitation; and 8. opinions of community members concerning the individual in question. 24

+ Crosswalk Tool 25

+ Interpretative Guide This tool gives licensors guidelines to implement the standards The guide is organized as follows: The complete standard The ‘intent’ statement or purpose of the standard The guidelines, which include the assessment methods for evaluating compliance with the standards 26

+ Next Steps The Model Standards and accompanying documents will be released in October – they will be posted at and we will share them on the listserv. Attorneys at the ABA and GU will be available to provide free technical assistance to states interested in aligning their standards with the model. Contact Ana Beltran at and Heidi Redlich Epstein at We will work towards all states incorporating the Model, so that we have uniformity across states, and children needing out of home care will have safe and appropriate family foster homes. 27

+ Questions for Panelists Sharing of Other Resources Heidi Redlich Epstein, Ana Beltran, or Joyce DeBolt, 28

+ Questions about the Network Ana Beltran Rebecca Robuck 29