Minimum Sign Retroreflectivity Requirements Updated August 2012 with compliance date revisions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2003 MUTCD Chapter 2B Regulatory Signs
Advertisements

Part 7 Traffic Controls For School Areas. Section 7A.01 STANDARD statement changed to GUIDANCE statement TCDs in school areas should be related to: Volume,
P RACTICES TO M ANAGE T RAFFIC S IGN R ETROREFLECTIVITY NCHRP Project Synthesis Topic Paul Carlson June 21, 2011.
September 2011 Webinar 2009 MUTCD NPAs on Compliance Dates & Standard Definition 2009 MUTCD – NPAs on Compliance Dates & Standard Definition MUTCD Proposed.
Elements of Effective Sign Maintenance
The MMUTCD New Compliance Dates Sign Retroreflectivity
D11 - ENGINEERING DIVISION. VISIBILTY DURABILITY COST.
CURVE SPEED ADVANCED WARNING SIGNS
Revisions to Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates.
2009 MUTCD (Final Rule) Revisions Incorporated into the 2009 MUTCD Revisions to Part 7 – Traffic Control for School Areas.
2008 Mid-States Highway–Rail Grade Crossing Safety Conference May 20, 2008 David Peterson.
FHWA Report on MUTCD Activities Chung Eng, FHWA Office of Transportation Operations NCUTCD Meeting – June 26, 2014.
Created by: Victor Lund, PEKen Johnson, PE, PTOE St. Louis CountyMnDOT.
Most-to-Least Legible Color Combinations for Viewing on Slide Shows Color and contrast are very important tools in communication. They can be used to enhance.
Conducting Sign Retroreflectivity Inspections Training for Conducting Visual Sign Retroreflectivity Inspections and Measuring Retroreflectivity of Traffic.
2009 MUTCD Revisions Part 4 – Traffic Signals Revisions to the 2009 MUTCD.
Overview of 2009 MUTCD. Tom McDonald, PE Safety Circuit Rider Iowa LTAP.
Welcome to Inspecting Maintenance of Traffic Items on Projects
2009 MUTCD (Final Rule) Revisions Incorporated into the 2009 MUTCD Revisions to Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates.
2009 MUTCD (Final Rule) Revisions Incorporated into the 2009 MUTCD Revisions to Chapter 2D – Guide Signs for Conventional Roads.
RETROREFLECTIVITY - UPDATE CLIFF REUER SD LTAP WESTERN SATELLITE – SDSM&T
© red ©
Traffic Engineering Traffic Control Devices. Traffic Control Traffic engineers do not have any control over individual drivers need to develop devices.
June 2011 Statewide Traffic Engineers Meeting Interstate Guide Sign Upgrade Projects.
SIGN MANAGEMENT UPDATE Tracy Nowaczyk Pavement Management and Operations Section Engineer Meeting Fall 2013.
Matheu J. Carter, P.E. T 2 Engineer Delaware T 2 Center October 15, 2009.
Section Engineers Meeting Lake Cumberland March 2010.
MUTCD and Traffic Sign Requirements This information is confidential and may include proprietary and/or trade secret information. It is intended for this.
Minimum Retroreflectivity Levels for Traffic Signs New MUTCD Criteria.
Signs. Most Frequently Cited (1999) (g)(1) Traffic signs at point of hazard (a)(4) Flag person-warning garments (a)(1) Flag person/traffic.
What's New In The 2009 MUTCD? Richard C. Moeur, PE 2010 Roads & Streets Conference.
Sign Retroreflectivity Requirements in the MUTCD Eric Green, PE, GISP University of Kentucky Kentucky Transportation Center.
Revisions to Chapter 2C – Warning Signs and Object Markers.
Safety Solutions for the FHWA Minimum Levels of Retroreflectivity
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Chapter 2 Signing Overview Traffic Signs 101 November 20, 2014.
New MUTCD Requirements for Sign Retroreflectivity Matheu J. Carter, P.E. Delaware T 2 Center.
Wisconsin Contractor-Engineer Conference January 22, 2009 Safety Apparel, FHWA Work Zone Safety Subpart K Rule & Permanent Concrete Barriers Bill Bremer,
2009 MUTCD (Final Rule) Revisions incorporated into the 2009 MUTCD 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
Mid-States Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Safety Conference Guan Xu, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety Design.
MUTCD Adoption Delays/Status. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) KRS requires the Cabinet to adopt a manual of standards and specifications.
MUTCD Website: Nighttime Visibility Website:
October 25, 2015 Funding Your Program October 20, 2008 ATSSA Sign Maintenance and Management Workshop Addison, Texas.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE Nutrition Labeling of Single- Ingredient Products and Ground or Chopped Meat.
A summary of the new rule and methods to be in compliance Sign Reflectivity Maintenance Standards.
Low Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study Advanced Street Name Signs Dr. James Jenness, Westat.
Road Signs & Signals. RED= DO NOT ENTER YELLOW= RIGHT OF WAY IS EXPIRING GREEN= YOU MAY ENTER THE INTERSECTION Flashing Red: Stop, Yield to traffic and.
Revisions to Chapter 2C – Warning Signs and Object Markers
2009 MUTCD -- Compliance Dates NPA Notice of Proposed Amendments to MUTCD: Changes in Compliance Dates Table I-2.
MUTCD KEY Concepts for Traffic Control Applications.
Presented by Keenline Innovation Technology & Training Inc.
General Revisions to Part 2 – Signs
2003 MUTCD Chapter 2A Signs General. 2A.06 Design of Signs  Add to the support statement “General appearance” of sign legends, colors, and sizes shown.
Donald E. Howe, P.E. Division of Traffic Operations California Department of Transportation Minimum Sign Retroreflectivity Requirements New.
2012 Work Zone Inspection For LTF Nancy Avery, LTF Project Supervisor December 6, 2012.
REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED SIGNIFICENT REVISIONS TO THE 2011 VIRGINIA WORK AREA PROTECTION MANUAL Fall 2014 Virginia ATSSA Chapter Meeting October 1, 2014.
Jason J. Siwula, PE – Safety Engineer HSIP HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT SIGNING.
MUTCD Sign Retroreflectivity Requirements Peter Allain June
MUTCD for Elected Officials Moderator: Dave Boruff, Indiana Department of Transportation Speakers: Karen Stippich, Federal Highway Administration 1 Purdue.
What's in the 2009 MUTCD For Bicyclists?
New MUTCD Requirements for Operations
Safety Colors Quiz.
Traffic Control Devices
Revisions to Part 7 – Traffic Control for School Areas
Review of Revised SP 150 – Traffic Control Dated February 01, 2017
Safety Colors Quiz.
What Color is it?.
BSI Symbols for Graphic Communication
Example of cones and signs as traffic control at a roadway incident.
Minimum Sign Retroreflectivity Requirements Updated August 2012 with compliance date revisions New Retroreflectivity standards were added to the MUTCD.
Presentation transcript:

Minimum Sign Retroreflectivity Requirements Updated August 2012 with compliance date revisions

Why Do We Install Signs? Required by MUTCD? To help drivers (including older) Most are not Engineering Decision? YES! Why?

Night Travel and Crashes

But, Retroreflectivity Degrades Over Time Retroreflectivity When Do We ReplaceSigns? Signs Provide Critical Information to Drivers

Final Rule to Establish Min Reto Published on Dec 21, 2007 –Vol 72, No. 245 Revision #2 of the 2003 Edition of the MUTCD Effective Jan 22, 2008

MUTCD Language Section 2A.08 Maintaining Minimum Retroreflectivity “Standard: Public agencies or officials having jurisdiction shall use an assessment or management method that is designed to maintain sign retroreflectivity at or above the minimum levels in Table 2A-3”

Sign Color Sheeting Type (ASTM D )  Additional Criteria Beaded SheetingPrismatic Sheeting IIIIIIIII, IV, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X White on Green W* G ≥ 7 W* G ≥ 15 W* G ≥ 25 W ≥ 250; G ≥ 25Overhead W* G ≥ 7 W ≥ 120; G ≥ 15 Ground- mounted Black on Yellow or Black on Orange Y*; O*Y ≥ 50; O ≥ 50  Y*; O*Y ≥ 75; O ≥ 75  White on RedW ≥ 35; R ≥ 7  Black on WhiteW ≥ 50   The minimum maintained retroreflectivity levels shown in this table are in units of cd/lx/m 2 measured at an observation angle of 0.2  and an entrance angle of -4.0 .  For text and fine symbol signs measuring at least 1200 mm (48 in) and for all sizes of bold symbol signs  For text and fine symbol signs measuring less than 1200 mm (48 in)  Minimum Sign Contrast Ratio ≥ 3:1 (white retroreflectivity ÷ red retroreflectivity) * This sheeting type shall not be used for this color for this application. MUTCD Table 2A.3 Minimum Maintained Retroreflectivity Levels

Methods to Maintain Retro Visual Nighttime Inspection Calibration Signs Comparison Panels Consistent Parameters Measured Sign Retro Expected Sign Life Blanket Replacement Control Signs Future Method Based On Engineering Study Combination Of Any

MUTCD Language Section 2A.08 Maintaining Minimum Retroreflectivity “Support: Compliance… is achieved by having a method in place and using the method to maintain the minimum levels established in Table 2A-3. Provided that… a method is being used, an agency would be in compliance… even if there are some individual signs that do not meet the… levels at a particular point in time.

Exempt Signs Parking/Standing/Stopping Walking/Hitchhiking Adopt-A-Highway Blue or Brown Backgrounds Exclusive Use of Bikes or Peds Note: Must still meet other requirements in MUTCD (inspections, retroreflective, etc,)

Compliance Date Final Rule May 14, 2012 Eliminated 46 items Revised 4 others items Safety related compliance dates maintained (8) Revision #2 of the 2009 MUTCD

Updated Sign Retroreflectivity Compliance Dates January 2012 June 2014 – Implementation and continued use of an assessment or management method that is designed to maintain traffic regulatory and warning sign retroreflectivity at or above the established minimum levels January Replace identified regulatory, warning, ground-mounted guide signs (except street-name) January Replace identified street name & overhead guide signs

Why were guide signs removed from compliance dates ? Regulatory and warning signs constitute the highest priority for assessing retro of existing signs Including guide signs would increase the economic burden Section 2A.08 still requires a method for all signs, including guide signs

When do I have to replace my worn out signs? Agencies are expected to prioritize replacement of these signs based on engineering considerations, similar to other traffic control devices. It is expected that the use of the assessment or management method would serve to identify and program the replacement of signs that are found to or expected to be below the minimum retroreflectivity levels.

Do guide signs and street name signs still have to meet the minimums? Yes. The standards for minimum retroreflectivity requirements still apply to guide signs. The compliance date for guide signs (including street name signs) have been eliminated. However, agencies are expected to add these signs to their method as resources allow.

More Information MUTCD Website: Nighttime Visibility Website: Regulations/Standards Technical Guidance Implementation Tools Frequently Asked Questions Research