PROCESSING STANDARDS Presentation to: Nutrition Services Directors Presented by: Sonia Jackson Date: July 7, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dispute Resolution Overview of State Performance Plan Indicators 16 – Citizen Complaints, 17 – Due Process, 18 – Resolution Settlement Agreements, and.
Advertisements

NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Integrated Approach to Title III Monitoring.
Office of Special Education & Early Intervention Services What happens after Focused Monitoring? -
DMHA Spring Provider Meeting May 2, 2012 Sue Lummus 1 Spring Provider Meeting May 2012.
Manager Performance Evaluation
U.S. Pretrial Services and Probation Office Northern District of Ohio.
Agricultural Research, Extension and Education Reform Act (AREERA) Program and Administrative Update May 25, 2011.
Oct. 1,  361 Depression  381 Oral Health Conditions  411 Inappropriate Nutrition Practices Infants  New 334 Lack of or Inadequate Prenatal Care.
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHECKLIST for 1 st year grants By Office of the Governor Criminal Justice Division (CJD) October, 2009.
Kentucky Administrative Review Training. Reinvention Goals The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 calls for a more effective and efficient review process:
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
Division of Women’s Health Quality Assurance / Quality Improvement Process February 21, 2013.
Clinical Quality Review Team (CQRT) A Guide to the Authorization Process for Alameda County Behavioral Health Plan Members.
SEPARATION OF DUTIES CONFLICT OF INTEREST POTENTIAL FRAUD 1.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Project Title Project Investigators Project Duration: (E.g., 3 years; currently in year 2, or x months if this is a better representation of project time)
WIC Information System Program
Division of Child Care STARS Interim Report. What is an interim report? Programs participating in the STARS for KIDS NOW program must demonstrate continued.
CBER Managed Review Process Sheryl A. Kochman Deputy Director, DBA, OBRR, CBER September 15, 2009.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
The mission of the Office of Migrant Education is to provide excellent leadership, technical assistance, and financial support to improve the educational.
Patient Centered Medical Home What it means for Duffy Health Center Board Presentation September 10 th 2012.
NPDES Compliance Update NCMA Workshop April 1, 2015.
Mental Health Manual GIM Revisions PY Developmental Screening In close collaboration with all parents/legal guardians, the DA/CCP must annually.
Civil Rights Compliance and Enforcement For Nutrition Programs and Activities FNS Instruction NC Department of Public Instruction.
2015 System Changes Presentation to: Nutrition Service Directors Presented by: Julianne Gaston R.D. L.D. Date: July 7 & 8, 2015.
UT-Arlington Accounting CPE Day August 13, 2014 SEFA Preparation and Subrecipient Monitoring.
WIC FL/Unit 2
Georgia WIC Program State Ordered Formula: New Special Formula Order Form Training Presentation to: WIC Staff Presented by: Laura Iberkleid and Barbara.
A Review of the Special Education Integrated Monitoring Process BIE Special Education Academy September 12-15, 2011 Tampa, Florida.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
INDIVIDUALIZED FAMILY SERVICE PLAN-IFSP. IFSP The Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) is a process of looking at the strengths of the Part C eligible.
Sarah Walters - Part C Coordinator KDHE Tiffany Smith - Part B ECSE Coordinator KSDE 1.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES A MISSOURI WIC PROJECT. PURPOSE Performance Measures is a collaboration between the State WIC office and Local WIC Providers to focus.
 Should be interactive  Strengthen nutrition education message  Provides an opportunity to check progress on goals  Provides positive support  Identifies.
CHDP DIRECTOR/DEPUTY DIRECTOR TRAINING SECTION III EPSDT: A Comprehensive Child Health Program 1 7/1/2010.
Reimbursement Statements What you need to know. Let’s Take a Closer Look… …at invoicing, cost ledgers, SB and budget revisions.
Complaints Information Santina Thibedeau March 5, 2009.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
Coordinated Review Effort (CRE) School Year Karen Franklin, SNS Distance Learning October 1, 2015.
Improvement Planning Mischele McManus Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services July 20, 2007
North Carolina Daily Meal Production Plan For Food Based Menu Planning
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.
National Center on Child Care Subsidy Innovation and Accountability NCCCSIA Webinar #2 Conducting the Error Rate Review Process using the Revised Data.
How to Get Extended School Year Services With Fairfax County Public Schools March 8, 2006 For POAC-NoVA Presented by Scott Campbell.
Completing the Commercial Kitchen Daily Meal Production Record
Completing the Commercial Kitchen Daily Meal Production Record Revised July 2014 “The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination.
Developing Strong Transition Protocols Infant Toddler Program, Head Start and Early Childhood Special Education Shannon Dunstan Idaho State Department.
January 2012 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of Special Education 1 Noncompliance.
Special Education Performance Profiles and SPP Compliance Indicator Reviews Office for Exceptional Children.
Georgia WIC Program Management Evaluation Training Nutrition Services Directors Meeting Sonia Jackson March 22, 2016.
What are the DCC-413 and DCC-414 and how do they pertain to me? The STARS Interim Report.
6/18/2016 DES / AzEIP 2011 Cycle Two Self Report Overview & Training Cycle Two Self Report Overview & Training.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
Protocol References Section Title 6.2 Entry Visit 5.1
FDPIR Management Evaluations
Protocol References Section Title 6.2 Entry Visit 5.1
Exceptional Children Division Special Programs and Data Section
Service Coordinator Training
Training Appendix for Adult Protective Services and Employment Supports June 2018.
Breastfeeding Initiation and Extension
SPR&I Regional Training
in Correcting Noncompliance
United Nations Voluntary Fund on Disability (UNVFD)
Brielle Elementary School Special Education Monitoring Summary
Performance Indicators
Indicator 11 Initial Evaluation Edit Checks (80 Day Timeline)
Contact Person: Najeebah Shine, MS,RD,LD E: P: ext 1500 What We Did
Presentation transcript:

PROCESSING STANDARDS Presentation to: Nutrition Services Directors Presented by: Sonia Jackson Date: July 7, 2015

What is Processing Standards? The definition of Processing Standards comes from the Code of Federal Regulations Part 246- Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children 246.7(f)(2)(ii) Processing Standards Processing Standards describes the amount of time permitted between the date when an applicant request WIC benefits (Initial Contact) and the date the first appointment is offered.

When Does Processing Standards Begin? Processing standards begin when an applicant requests WIC benefits: face-to-face pre-registration telephone

Processing Standards Must Be Met Within Ten (10) calendar days – Prenatal women – Breast-feeding women – Infants (0-12months) – Migrants Twenty (20) calendar days – Post-partum women – Children (1-5 years)

Processing Standards Extensions 246.7(f)(2)(iii)....State agencies may provide an extension of the notification period to a maximum of 15 days for those local agencies which make written request, including a justification of the need for an extension.

Ways To Meet Processing Standards Walk ‑ in clinics/ overbooking appointments Extended clinic hours – lunch, evenings, and Saturdays Documenting the correct initial contact dates for breaks in service Rescheduling missed appointments and documenting correct initial contact date

Processing Standards Compliance Georgia WIC Program Out of Compliance Requires Corrective Action Plan Must be in compliance to close ME Finding

How Will We Work Towards Compliance? Clinic Data

Quarterly Processing Standards Report Clinic Name and Number Met Processing Standards ? Yes or No Number of appts. scheduled Number of appts. not meeting standards Percentage of appts. meeting standards *Reason for not meeting standards

Compliance Criteria When reviewing the quarterly reports the monitoring criteria below is used: % = Satisfactory (meets minimum regulatory requirements) 95-91% = Satisfactory Needs Improvement 90%-< = Unsatisfactory (Does not meet regulatory requirements and constitutes an Improvement Plan)

Monitoring Standards Quarterly Reports will be compared to – Findings from program reviews – Compliance visits to clinics Technical assistance provided by regional advisors Revised Improvement Plan CSC Processing Standards Report (when available)

Processing Standards Compliance Critical Data Elements (DE) needed to produce an accurate report: – Date of Initial Contact (DE 110) – Initial Contact Type (DE 111) – Date Appointment Kept (DE 127) – Date Appointment Requested (DE 129)

Improvement Plan ReasonStrategies/ Activities Expected Outcomes Position Responsible Targeted Timeline Technical Assistance Requested Yes/No Next Steps What caused the deficiency and how frequent is it occurring? (for each clinic not meeting processing standards give specific reason, ex: clinic closed due to weather, staff shortages) Describe the tasks and/or steps developed to resolve the deficiency. Describe the districts expected outcomes at each interval. The position responsible for the activity (i.e., Clinic, District, Staff Person, Supervisor, etc.) The targeted task completion date for each strategy. (complete by December 2015 ) Is the District requesting assistance from the Regional Advisors? How does the district plan to monitor if the tasks/steps taken have resolved the deficiency? Continue… Begin...

Questions