2007 YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR SURVEY DATA: DURHAM COUNTY AND COMPARISON LOCATIONS Youth Violence.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2009 MPS Youth Risk Behavior Survey The Youth Risk Behavior Survey is conducted in public schools nationwide every two years. It is a critical measure.
Advertisements

2010 Healthy Youth Survey Data... Listening to Our Students Dixie Grunenfelder Learning and Teaching Support Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Youth in Alternative Learning Settings School Context and Climate: Perceptions, Behaviors and Experiences.
Dating & Sexual Violence in NYC Public High School Students Cari Olson, MPH Division of Epidemiology NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene With Catherine.
What is Take Two?. Take Two is a developmental therapeutic service for Child Protection clients who have suffered trauma and disrupted attachment due.
University of Wisconsin POPULATION HEALTH INSTITUTE Translating Research into Policy and Practice Evaluating Wisconsin’s Safe and Supportive Schools Program.
Mat-Su Substance Abuse Prevention Coalition Community Assessment and Data Project Trends in Youth Substance Use.
2007 Youth Risk Behavior Survey Results Alaska High School Survey Grades 9-12 Alaska Division of Public Health Weighted Data Injuries and Violence.
McCreary Centre Society Adolescent Health Survey III: 2003 results in preparation for 2008 AHS IV A Brief Summary of Results for the Richmond Region.
Lori Grassgreen Director of Prevention Projects Alaska Network On Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault
SAFE & DRUG FREE SCHOOLS Smarttrack Results Presented by: Brandy Gardner Safe & Drug Free Schools Coordinator Dr. Peggy J. Rogers, Assistant.
The 2005 Youth Risk Behavior Survey Vermont Department of Health Agency of Human Services September 27, 2005.
Data and Policy Consultant – DPI – Healthy Schools Hope E. White, Ph.D Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) Results: North Carolina.
Purposes of the YRBSS  Focus the nation on behaviors among youth causing the most important health problems Violence Alcohol and other drug use Behaviors.
Adolescent Sexual Risk Behaviors From the 2011 SC YRBS Delores Pluto, PhD SC Healthy Schools The SC Youth.
Andrew Owusu Ph.D. Research Workshop in Water Supply, Sanitation and health related to schools and local communities in West Africa September 18 th – 20.
Unifying science, education and service to transform lives Module 11 Clinical Issues with Youth A Provider’s Introduction to Substance Abuse for Lesbian,
Dr Simon Denny Adolescent Health Research Group Auckland HPE Symposium December 2011.
FCD CWI Kenneth C. Land, Vicki L. Lamb and Qiang Fu Duke University Presentation to the Foundation for Child Development April 26,
Virginia Youth Survey 2011 Results Summary Office of Family Health Services Virginia Department of Health June 2012.
Overview of the 2007 Ohio Youth Risk Behavior Survey Health Educators Institute October 13, 2010 Angie Norton, MA Ohio Department of Health School and.
WCSD Student Climate Survey: What do students have to say about our schools?
2009 YRBSS Results and Implications Gabriel Garcia, PhD, MA, MPH Department of Health Sciences University of Alaska Anchorage.
Alleghany County Public Schools 2006 Youth Risk Behavior Survey Kerry J. Redican, MPH, Ph.D. David S. Sallee, Ph.D. Professor, School of Education Assistant.
Manitowoc County 2015 Youth Risk Behavioral Survey An Overview Based on Grades 9-12.
EXPERIENCES OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE AMONG ADOLESCENTS IN BOTH URBAN AND RURAL KENYA The 8th Pan-African PCAF Psychotrauma Conference Victoria Mutiso, PhD, Senior.
YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR SURVEY Saugus Public Schools.
Lexington High School Youth Risk Behavior Survey Results Ten Year Trends.
2011 WHITE MOUNTAINS COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=339.
2007 CT School Health Survey Results Diane Aye, MPH, PhD Connecticut Department of Public Health (860)
© Marvin Krank, Kelowna BC, 2004 November 8, 2004 Youth at risk What they are doing What is happening to them Why ? What we can do about it Marvin Krank.
McCreary Centre Society Adolescent Health Survey III: 2003 results in preparation for 2008 AHS IV A Brief Summary of Results for The Central Vancouver.
McCreary Centre Society Adolescent Health Survey III: 2003 results in preparation for 2008 AHS IV A Brief Summary of Results for the Vancouver Region.
Dr. Abednego Musau. School violence is widely held to have become a serious problem in recent decades in many countries. It includes violence between.
The Burden of Youth Violence in RI September 16, 2005 SAFE RI: Violence and Injury Prevention Program.
Presented to: The Cambridge Prevention Coalition Presented by: Social Science Research and Evaluation, Inc. 21-C Cambridge Street Burlington, MA
Strategies to Close the Educational Achievement Gap  Standards and accountability  Revising school financing  Teacher preparation  Rigorous curricula.
School Safety Update Guilford County Schools 712 North Eugene Street Greensboro, NC Presentation to the Board of Education July 28,
World Health Organization Gender and Women’s Health Challenges of a short module in surveys on other topics vs a specialized survey Henrica A.F.M. Jansen.
Factors Affecting Youth Awareness of Anti-Tobacco Media Messages Komal Kochhar, M.B.B.S., M.H.A. Terrell W. Zollinger, Dr.P.H. Robert M. Saywell, Jr.,
McCreary Centre Society Adolescent Health Survey III: 2003 results in preparation for 2008 AHS IV A brief summary of results for the Northern Interior.
The YRBS 2010 Changes in Key Risk Behaviors and Developmental Assets.
Margot E. Ackermann, Ph.D. and Erika Jones-Haskins, MSW Homeward  1125 Commerce Rd.  Richmond, VA Acknowledgements The Richmond.
How many is too many? Alcohol use and associated harms.
Youth Risk Behavior Survey October Number of K-12 health office visits for social-emotional reasons September 2013-November 2014: 287 Mental Health.
McCreary Centre Society Adolescent Health Survey III: 2003 results in preparation for 2008 AHS IV A Brief Summary of Results for The North Vancouver Island.
Suicide in Columbia County: A Preliminary Report April 25, 2013.
May 2016 Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol and Marijuana: Beliefs and Behaviors, United States,
California Healthy Kids Survey King City Joint Union High School District 2007/08 Results grades 9 & 11.
Lexington High School Youth Risk Behavior Survey 2015 Results.
Fighting Behavior among early adolescent African Americans: What are the personal and environmental factors? Vanya Jones, PhD, MPH APHA Session ,
138 th American Public Health Association Annual Meeting Denver, Colorado November 8, 2010 Determinants of HIV Testing Among High School Students with.
1.  Since 1999, the County of Chester has conducted a biannual survey of our youth on their behavior, attitudes and knowledge concerning alcohol, tobacco,
Behaviors that Contribute to Unintentional Injuries.
Compared to Injury and Violence Imperial County - CA Healthy Kids Survey 2005 Results Compared to National Youth Risk Behavior System 2005 Results Injury.
Bullying Bullying Based on a 2020 survey of 5,083 8 th and 9 th grade students in our district: Percent responded that “students know and understand.
Nation’s First Collaborative School of Public Health
Delaware State Epidemiological Outcomes Workgroup December 16, 2016 Trauma and Substance Use among Delaware Youth Prepared by the University of Delaware.
Percentage of High School Students Who Rarely or Never Wore a Seat Belt,* by Sex, Grade, and Race/Ethnicity, 2016 Data for this slide are from the 2016.
2015 Youth Risk Behavior Survey Results
School Violence in Rural Areas: Prevalence, Explanation and Prevention
Percentage of High School Students Who Rarely or Never Wore a Seat Belt,* by Sex,† Grade, and Race/Ethnicity, 2017 Data for this slide are from the 2017.
Percentage of High School Students Who Rarely or Never Wore a Bicycle Helmet,* by Sex,† Grade, and Race/Ethnicity,† 2015 Data for this slide are from the.
Percentage of High School Students Who Rarely or Never Wore a Seat Belt,* by Sex,† Grade, and Race/Ethnicity,† 2017 Data for this slide are from the 2017.
Percentage of High School Students Who Rarely or Never Wore a Bicycle Helmet,* by Sex, Grade, and Race/Ethnicity, 2015 Data for this slide are from the.
Youth Risk Behavior Survey
National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)
Unintentional Injury & Violence-Related Behaviors
Percentage of High School Students Who Rarely or Never Wore a Bicycle Helmet,* by Sex,† Grade, and Race/Ethnicity,† 2015 Data for this slide are from the.
Presentation transcript:

2007 YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR SURVEY DATA: DURHAM COUNTY AND COMPARISON LOCATIONS Youth Violence

Durham County YRBS YRBS Background Durham County specifics YRBS limitations YRBS benefits Middle School Risks High School Risks Summary

Durham County YRBS: Background National school-based survey Developed by CDC Administered every other year Monitors health risk behaviors affecting the adolescent population  Behaviors contributing to unintentional and intentional injuries  Substance use  Sexual behaviors  Dietary habits, physical activity

Durham County YRBS: County Specific 2007: first year YRBS administered in Durham County 876 students participated  484 middle school respondents (6 th,7 th,8 th grades)  392 high school students (9 th, 10 th, 11 th, 12 th grades) (Note: convenience sampling was used in high schools - 85% were 9 th graders) Participation was voluntary for all  Administered during one school day  Alternate activities provided for students who did not participate

Durham County YRBS: Limitations First year: no comparison for trending of risk behaviors Data are self-reported, not from direct observation  Potential for under-or over-reporting of behaviors Data do not reflect entirety of adolescent youth sub- population (i.e. students in private schools, alternative education programs, and drop-outs) Survey does not address how or why students engage in risky behaviors ( only who, what, where, when)

Durham County YRBS: Benefits Survey is standardized We now have county-level baseline data for risky behavior engagement and exposure for adolescents.  Data can be compared to regional, state, and national data. Data are useful for:  Creating awareness about youth violence  Informing program/ intervention planning to address or reduce risky behaviors Re-assessment in the future will allow for trending changes in risky behaviors, evaluation of interventions.

DATA PRESENTATION TERMINOLOGY YRBS

Durham County YRBS: Data Presentation Data for the Durham YRBS are reported in frequency (raw number) and percent of students with similar categorized responses (used as average response rate for comparison) Types of responses:  Yes/no  Categorization of attitudes or beliefs (strongly agree/ agree/unsure/disagree/ strongly disagree)  Numerical (i.e., number of times participated in “x” behavior 0,1,2…)  Demographic categories Data are presented for three sub-populations : Durham County, State of NC, Central Region of NC Data for Middle School reported separately from High School NOTE: For the purposes of the following data presentation, samples are not separated by race, gender, or specific grade.

Durham County YRBS: Data Presentation Percent Variance The relationship between the Durham student sample response and that from each of the comparison sites (regional or state) is presented in the measure “percent variance”. Using this measure, we are trying to determine the similarity (or difference) between the Durham County (DC) student response for YRBS question and that of the state and regional comparison group.  A larger value for % variance indicates less similarity.  A smaller value for % variance indicates more similarity.  A % variance of less that 10% means no significant difference between the DC and comparison sample response.

Durham County YRBS: Data Presentation Percent Variance NC/Regional response DC response: lower % variance DC response: Medium % variance Durham response: High % variance

Durham County YRBS: Data Presentation Percent Variance What does this all mean?  With a higher value for percent variance for any YRBS question, there is “something different” about the sample of Durham County students that they are participating in or are exposed to risky behaviors with a greater (or lesser) occurrence than the whole of students in the comparison group(s). We do not know what that “something different” is necessarily, we just know that it is a factor in the DC students’ lives.  Examples highlighted in following slides

Durham County YRBS: Data Presentation Chart Overview Data are presented in charts, each with the following components:  A paraphrased version of the YRBS question  Average response from each sample of students, measured as a percent. Samples are labeled: Durham County, State (NC), Regional (Central Region of NC). Highest value for average bolded  Percent Variance comparing Durham County sample average with each comparison sample (State or Regional) Significant variance measures, with Durham County students being at a higher risk for a violent occurrence are in bold. Variance measures that are negative (Durham County students have a lesser risk than a comparison) are in parentheses.

NUMBERS OF STUDENT PARTICIPANTS DURHAM COUNTY:484 CENTRAL REGION:993 STATE:3256 Data from Middle School Students

Durham County YRBS: Middle School Violence-Related Behaviors QuestionDurha m (%) NC (%) Region (%) Durham- NC (%variance) Durham - Region (%variance) 13. Required medical treatment for an injury sustained in a fight %67.2% 15. Had something stolen/ damaged on school property in past 12 months %18.9% 11. Threatened or injured with a weapon on school property in past 12 months % (4.5%) 14. Did not go to school 1+ days because student did not feel safe there or traveling % (1.6%) 12. Has ever been in a physical fight %(1.2%) 10. Has ever carried a weapon such as a gun, knife or club (22.8%)(16.8%)

Durham County YRBS: Middle School Violence –related behaviors Risks more prevalent reported by Durham County students as compared to both state and regional data:  More likely to require medical treatment for injury sustained in fight  More likely to have something stolen/damaged on school pr0perty Risks more prevalent reported by DC Students as compared to state only:  More likely to be threatened or injured on school property in past 12 months

Durham County YRBS: Middle School Violence –related behaviors Risks less prevalent as reported by Durham County Students as compared to both state as regional data:  Less likely to have carried a weapons such as a gun, knife, or club

NUMBER OF STUDENT PARTICIPANTS DURHAM COUNTY:392 CENTRAL REGION:1260 STATE: 3500 Data from High School Students

Durham County YRBS: High School Violence-Related Behaviors (1) QuestionDurham (%) NC (%) Region (%) Durham- NC (%variance) Durham- Region ( % variance) 22. Was in a physical fight school property in past 12 mo %143.8% 2 1. Required medical treatment for an injury sustained in a fight in past 12 months %127.8% 18. Threatened or injured with a weapon on school property in past 12 months %98.4% 17. Did not go to school 1+ days because student did not feel safe there or traveling to and from %61.2% 20. Was in a physical fight during past 12 months %54.8%

Durham County YRBS: High School Violence-Related Behaviors (2) QuestionDurham (%) NC (%) Region (%) Durham- NC (%variance) Durham- Region (% variance) 24. Victim of forced sexual intercourse %23.3% 15. Carried a weapon 1+ days in past 30 days %24.5% 19. Had something stolen/damaged on school property in past 12 mo %9.7% 16. Carried a weapon on school property 1+ days in past 30 days % 15.9% 23. Victim of physical abuse by boyfriend or girlfriend in past 12 mo % 13.9%

Durham County YRBS: High School Violence –related behaviors Durham County High School students reported a greater incidence of participation in or exposure to numerous violent risk behaviors including:  Physical fighting both on and off school property  Most significant difference is fighting on school property  Severity of fights- measured as respondent requiring medical attention for fight-related injuries  Being threatened or injured with a weapon  Being fearful of safety at or in transit to school  Carrying weapons

Durham County YRBS: Middle School and High School Bullying–related behavior  28.8% of middle school and 30.1% of high school students reported having been harassed or bullied 1+ times on scho0l property in last year.  51.6% of middle school students and 45.9% of high school students indicate they believe harassment/bullying is a problem in schools.  These numbers do not vary significantly from estimates from either state or central subpopulations.

SUMMARY Durham County YRBS

Durham County YRBS: Summary Durham County versus NC and Regional  Durham County high school students reported significantly greater rates of exposure to many violent behaviors than students in the state and regional comparison populations.  Durham County students are at a higher risk of being victimized, or engaging in victimizing actions than students in the broader comparison populations. Some examples:  Involvement in physical fights  Injuries from fight requiring medical attention  Carrying weapons,  Victimization in schools: damaged property, threatened with weapon, bullying, fearful of safety in school, sexual assault

Durham County YRBS: Summary Middle School versus High School  Comparing the Durham middle school and high school samples  The reported incidence of exposure risky violence-related behaviors increases with the high school sample  the % variance of the Durham County sample response from the comparison samples (NC and central NC) increases with the high school sample.  Our middle school students are more similar to the comparison groups for many of the violence indicators.

Durham County YRBS: Summary  The sample of students from Durham County report higher exposures to many violence-related behaviors, as compared to the comparison groups of NC and Central Region  These data support anecdotal reports of the pervasiveness of youth-violence in Durham County, and corroborate data collected in other arenas on exposure of the Durham County student population to violence-related activities.  We still are without an understanding of why Durham County students are reporting such higher rates of exposure to violence and violent behaviors.

Durham County YRBS: Summary Next Steps Find out the why?  Closer analysis of the data may offer some information  Population profiles, socioeconomic status, comparison with the violent crime indicators for all of Durham County and comparison sites.  Middle School students seem to not have as high of an exposure to violent crime, nor as great of a deviation in exposure from the two comparison populations as do the Durham County High School sample population.  What is happening in the interim contributing to the dramatic increase in violence-related behaviors exposures as the student move to high school?  How do the contributing factors differ among the Durham County student population an the regional and/or state comparison groups?

YRBS: Resources Durham County YRBS report:  North Carolina and Central Region Data and Reports 