NEAREST WP3 meeting Berlin 8tth October 2008, Technische Fachhochschule Berlin Seismic data from GEOSTAR Stephen Monna and Francesco Frugoni I.N.G.V. -

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Real-Time Estimation of Earthquake Location and Magnitude for Seismic Early Warning in Campania Region, southern Italy A. Zollo and RISSC-Lab Research.
Advertisements

ASL QC Procedures Status and plans. GSN ANSS Traditional Waveform Review  The “morning run” Daily summarizes problems with availability, timing,
Multi Functional Digital Fault Recorder
NEPTUNE Canada Seismograph Network (a progress report - April 2009) Garry Rogers 1,2, Bob Meldrum 1, Taimi Mulder 1, Richard Baldwin 1 & Andreas Rosenberger.
Seismic Reflection Ground Roll Filtering Ted Bertrand SAGE 2004.
March 25, 2002EarthScope CSIT Workshop Data Archiving and IT Issues for PBO Douglas Neuhauser UC Berkeley Seismological Lab Northern California Earthquake.
OBSIP Overview Instrumentation Centers: Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory A. Barclay, J. Gaherty, M. Tolstoy Scripps Institution of Oceanography J. Babcock,
Rethinking Array Seismology in Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Monitoring Steven J. Gibbons Workshop on Arrays in Global Seismology, Raleigh, North Carolina, May.
Continuous Monitoring of Crosswell Seismic Travel Time: Implications for Stress Monitoring Preliminary Results Tom Daley Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Instituto de Meteorologia, I.P. Department of Seismic and Geophysical Monitoring NEAREST 1 st Meeting, Bologna, October 2006.
Seismo-Acoustic data analysis at I34MN Mongolia - Songino Seismo-Acoustic data analysis at I34MN Mongolia - Songino RESEARCH CENTRE OF ASTRONOMY AND GEOPHYSICS.
LSC Aug ,2001G L Mark Coles 1 Livingston Seismic Environment Mark Coles LLO.
SUPERSITES COORDINATION WORKSHOP Monday 10 June 2013
Correlations 1 Surface waves and correlations  Correlation of time series  Similarity  Time shifts  Applications  Correlation of rotations/strains.
Lecture #19- Seismometers
Far Detector Data Quality Andy Blake Cambridge University.
Seismogram Relation between seismic trace and geology Wavelets
Aloha Proof Module Design Cabled Observatory Presentation School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology February 2006.
The importance of switching in communication The cost of switching is high Definition: Transfer input sample points to the correct output ports at the.
Task 3: Irpinia Fault System WP3.1 Seismic noise analysis and Green Functions Project – DPC S5 High-resolution multi-disciplinary monitoring of active.
Trends in seismic instrumentation Based on the book Instrumentation in Earthquake Seismology Jens Havskov, Institute of Solid Earth Physics University.
Industry-style combined active/passive dense array surveys: directions and issues. Dan Hollis, NodalSeismic, LLC 26 January 2014Active Source Workshop.
Seismicity around Lhasa Tsoja Wangmo 1), Norsang Gelsor 1) and Jens Havskov 2) 1) Jiangsu Road No 36 Lhasa, Tibet, PRC 2) University of Bergen, Department.
Sebastian Böser Acoustic test setup at south pole IceCube Collaboration Meeting, Berkeley, March 2005.
Workshop on Earthquakes: Ground- based and Space Observations 1 1 Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Science, Graz, Austria 2 Institute of Physics,
NEPTUNE Transforming ocean science OCEAN NETWORKS CANADA EXPLORATION∙INNOVATION∙ACTION For a Changing Planet A University of Victoria Initiative Seismic.
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 19 Digital Filtering (plus some seismology)
Work on GEOSTAR included ESONET LIDO - Demo Mission: the Cadiz node INGV activities D. Embriaco, G. Marinaro, G. Giovanetti, S. Monna, G. Cianchini, M.
Modern seismic instruments
NEAREST kick-off Meeting 9-11 October, Bologna NEARESTWP4 INGV: Leader PI: Paolo Favali.
Automatic detection and location of microseismic events
IRIS workshop on “Managing Waveform Data and Related Metadata from Seismic Networks” Hotel Windsor Suites, Bangkok, Thailand 08-13, January, 2012 Ashvin.
Mr.Santosh Kumar Scientist Web:
COMPILATION OF STRONG MOTION DATA FROM EASTERN CANADA FOR NGA-EAST PROJECT Lan Lin Postdoctoral Fellow, Geological Survey of Canada.
MICRO-SEISMICITY AND FOCAL MECHANISMS IN THE MALÉ KARPATY MTS., SLOVAKIA Lucia Fojtíková, Václav Vavryčuk, Andrej Cipciar, Ján Madarás.
Portable Broadband Seismic Stations - Checking Data Quality Cairo, Egypt November, 2009 Noel Barstow Bruce Beaudoin Marcos Alvarez.
Three BB and SM seismic stations in the Corinth Gulf jointly operated by the universities in Prague and Patras Jiri Zahradnik Charles University, Prague.
NEAREST 1st Annual Meeting October, Marralech NEARESTWP4 Leader: INGV INGV Team: Laura Beranzoli, Davide Embriaco, Paolo Favali, Francesco.
1 Environmental Coupling During S5 Robert Schofield (University of Oregon) I. PEM injection overview II.Acoustic/seismic coupling III.Seismic upconversion.
6-10 Oct 2002GREX 2002, Pisa D. Verkindt, LAPP 1 Virgo Data Acquisition D. Verkindt, LAPP DAQ Purpose DAQ Architecture Data Acquisition examples Connection.
INFO : Irpinia Near-Fault Observatory ISNet : Irpinia Seismic Network Technological issues 32 6-component strong + weak motion stations Wifi proprietary.
Project IDA (International Deployment of Accelerometers) Project IDA II GSN Calibration Procedures November 16, 2011 Peter Davis Project IDA Scripps Institution.
Noise and Sensitivity of RasClic 91
ITACA: The New Italian Strong-Motion Database Pacor* F., Paolucci^ R., and Working Groups ITACA of S4 Project *Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia.
Outline Stations design Digital telemetry The MVO seismic network SCREAM! +Earthworm SEISAN Data acquisition and processing at MVO Automatic QC procedures.
An Assessment of the High-Gain Streckheisen STS2 Seismometer for Routine Earthquake Monitoring in the US ISSUE: Is the high-gain STS2 too sensitive to.
Japan Earth-Quake November 15, 2006 Serendipitously recorded at MGL Using 5 Newly Built Pet Meters (The meters were not ready for shipment)
HACR at Virgo: implementation and results Gabriele Vajente 12 th ILIAS WG1 meeting Geneva, March 29 th -30 th 2007.
Passive seismic reflection imaging, on the earth and on the moon Kees Wapenaar Guy Drijkoningen Deyan Draganov Elmer Ruigrok Delft University of Technology.
HIGH FREQUENCY GROUND MOTION SCALING IN THE YUNNAN REGION W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD Robert.
An overview of Uganda Seismological Network and current activities
Seismograph Networks in Japan
LC Power Distribution & Pulsing Workshop, May 2011 Super-ALTRO Demonstrator Test Results LC Power Distribution & Pulsing Workshop, May nd November.
A Study on Characteristics of Seasonally Dependent Infrasound Propagation Based on the Ground-Truth Events from a Long- Term Experiment at a Quarry mine.
1 Wavefield Calibration Using Regional Network Data R. B. Herrmann Saint Louis University.
Detector Characterisation and Optimisation David Robertson University of Glasgow.
Common Stages of Digital Debug Discover Your probes will affect your ability to accurately visualize your signal. You need the right probes to maintain.
NEAREST Meeting 8-9 May, Barcelona NEARESTWP4 Leader: INGV INGV Team: Laura Beranzoli, Davide Embriaco, Paolo Favali, Francesco Frugoni, Marco Lagalante,
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Isabella Amore VLV T08, Toulon, France April 2008 International Workshop on a Very Large Volume Neutrino Telescope for the Mediterranean Sea Results.
NEAREST meeting Barcelona May 2008 NEAREST PROJECT CNRST Contribution to WP5 activities Birouk A. ING-CNRST National Center for Scientific and Technical.
Seismic instruments and seismic networks
LIDO Demonstration Mission (LIDO-DM) “LIstening to the Deep Ocean” The DM objectives are: geo-hazard and bio-acoustics LIDO-DM will operate a first nucleus.
Status of the LIDO East Sicily Station F.Bruni.
Geophones for Recording EQ’s OVERVIEW Local Events Aftershock Deployments Extend Period for Regional Events Simple Checks to Assure Sensor Works.
SCM 330 Ocean Discovery through Technology Area F GE.
Harmonics Ben Kemink.
Project progress report WP2
Power Sensors Ltd – Introducing PQube 3 Power Sensors Ltd –
Ken Creager, Wendy McClausland and Steve Malone
Presentation transcript:

NEAREST WP3 meeting Berlin 8tth October 2008, Technische Fachhochschule Berlin Seismic data from GEOSTAR Stephen Monna and Francesco Frugoni I.N.G.V. - Rome

Presentation overview Data statistics Signal quality Disturbances Possibility to “cure” disturbances Data examples Conclusions

GURALP CMG-40T 3 component broadband seismometer (30 s-50 Hz)‏ GURALP CMG-5T 3 component broadband accelerometer, strong motion (DC-100 Hz)‏ OAS E-2PD- Hydrophone 0- 5KHz 100 Hz sampling, 7 channels 24 bit + 3 mass channels 16 bit GURALP DM-24 Digitizer, 7 channels at 24 bit + 3 auxiliary OBS mass channels at 16 bit synchronization from SERCEL rubidium clock- input in GPS DM-24 channel

MCU restarted day 53 (17 October 2007)‏ Number of bytes recorded/day for OBS, ACC, HYD For OBS: 2.22*10^4 over 2.34*10^4 Mbytes = 95 % of expected bytes recorded

Number of bytes recorded/hour for OBS, ACC, HYD Hour 20:00Hour 21:00 About 325 days of recording. 25 August > 14 July 2008

21 August Port of Faro, Portugal OBS-E OBS-Z OBS-N ACC-Z ACC-N ACC-E HYD Time 200 s Recording 7 channels before deployment

First recording period after deployment 7 channels25 August 2007 OBS-E OBS-Z OBS-N ACC-Z ACC-N ACC-E HYD Time 200 s Hydrophone breakdown 145 s period disturbance

OBS-E OBS-Z OBS-N ACC-Z ACC-N ACC-E HYD 25 August 2007 First 80 s after deployment Time 10 s

Detail- hydrophone breakdown, note the corresponding step on ACC OBS-E OBS-Z OBS-N ACC-Z ACC-N ACC-E HYD Time 10 s 25 August 2007

Hydrophone- comb-style waveform starts25 August 2007 OBS-E OBS-Z OBS-N ACC-Z ACC-N ACC-E HYD OBS-E OBS-Z OBS-N ACC-Z ACC-N ACC-E HYD Time 100 s

Example 1 hour recording for all 7 channels OBS-E OBS-Z OBS-N ACC-Z ACC-N ACC-E HYD Time 500 s 06 March 2008

OBS-E OBS-Z OBS-N ACC-Z ACC-N ACC-E HYD Zoom on 145 s period disturbance Time 20 s This signal form strongly suggests leveling of the sensors is going on

Zoom on 145 period disturbance- onset OBS-Z Mass OBS-Z ACC-Z HYD Time 0.5 s

1 hour FFT, OBS-Z component Fundamental frequency 7mHz ---> 145 s period

2 time series, 1 hour long. OBS-Z component Can we “clean” the signal ?”

auto-correlation and cross-correlation on the 2 previous series 145 s amplitude Time AUTO CROSS

Example of 145 s time series which includes the disturbance, used to “clean” the signal

Effect of simple cleaning procedure, teleseismic event Mw6.9 N-mid atlantic ridge Onset first P-arrival 1 Hz, at 9:45:40 (no drift correction)‏ Arrival at Portuguese land station PFVI ( 10 0 km from GEOSTAR ), 9:45:47 7 s difference is in agreement with P traveltime tables for shallow events Clock drift for the whole mission is 184 ms in 359 days ---> ~ 0.51 ms/day time 10 s before after

time 5 s Signal cleaning example for a very local event (not present on local seismic bulletins)‏ before after Onset P arrival Bandpassed 4-20 Hz 4 poles, butterworth

11 January 2008 OBS-Z OBS-N OBS-E local event (  ~ 50 km), Ml4.4, unfiltered traces Example data recorded

Possible explanation for the disturbances (Guralp)‏ - Solve the problem before next deployment - A posteriori cleaning of the data: how to do it ? Possilbility of running trigger algorithm for automatic event detection or, in any case we can comper to trigger by nearby OBS (MAP)‏ Possibility of using nearby OBS (same sensor ?) signal to clean GEOSTAR-OBS signal

- Atalante shot oceanographic cruise (info received from Grabriela Carrara CNR-ISMAR)‏ Start End Shot Signal Annotation occurrence Frequency period (s) (Hz)‏ Date Time (GMT) Date Time (GMT)‏ 25 Aug. ‘07 01:45 28 Aug. ‘07 9: s (50 m) Aug. ‘07 03:00 09/09/ : s (75 m) Hz LON=6º 'W LAT=36º ' N (shot 1686-línea MF22)‏